Posterior Cervical SurgeryNCT01977690
Clavicle Splint for Pain Reduction After Posterior Cervicothoracic Surgery
A study testing Clavicle Brace in people with Posterior Cervical Surgery and Posterior Cervical Fusion, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to see whether a clavicle splint can decrease the pain after posterior cervicothoracic surgery. The term "cervicle splint" conveys that the investigators do not deal with clavicle fractures here but use the splint he stabilize the posterior cervical area. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 95 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Posterior Cervical Surgery, Posterior Cervical Fusion, Posterior Cervical Laminectomy
- What is being tested?
- Clavicle Brace
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2013to Aug 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 95 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient underwent cervicothoracic surgery from posterior -
Who cannot join
- Patients that are potentially vulnerable
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Stanford University Hospital
Stanford, California, 94043
About this study
The purpose of the study is to see whether a clavicle splint can decrease the pain after posterior cervicothoracic surgery. The term "cervicle splint" conveys that the investigators do not deal with clavicle fractures here but use the splint he stabilize the posterior cervical area. The investigators want to demonstrate this in a prospective randomized manner.
Read the detailed description
In this prospectively controlled randomized study 30 patients who had undergone posterior cervical spine surgery were randomized into two groups who either wore or did not wear a clavicle brace to retract the shoulders. Patients in the brace group began wearing the brace on postoperative day 4, and continuously wore it throughout the 30-day study period. Outcome was measured as daily levels of self-reported pain and number of pain pills taken during the 30-day postoperative period. .
After hypothesizing a mean pain reduction through the brace on the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain from 5 to 3 with a standard deviation of 1, we calculated that at a power level of 99% and an alpha error of 5%, and given that the VAS numbers were normally distributed, we needed 22 patients to enroll into the study. We increased this number to 30 to account for early and late dropouts.
The study was performed at a single institution with patients from 2 different spine surgeons.
Patients were randomized prior to or the day after the procedure to either wear or not wear the clavicle brace. Randomization was done through closed envelopes that the patients drew. Dissection was performed by the two fellows at our institution and depended solely on the number of fused levels and whether or not a tumor had to be removed. Closure was also performed by the two spine fellows after instruction by the senior author. Cervical alignment was reviewed using the C2-C7 angle according to Cobb's method on lateral images. The cervico-thoracic angles were calculated by the addition of the cervical spine angle and the remaining angles of thoracic spine until T3 according to Cobb's method.
The brace was provided by the hospital. Patients were instructed how to properly wear the brace by the first author, the senior author, or the hospital Rehabilitation Orthotics specialist. To complete the study, patients wore the brace for at least 30 days. (Patients of J.P. continued to wear the brace for 3 months outside of the study period.). All patients wore hard cervical collars until the end of the study period.
Patients self-recorded their average level of pain on a scale from 1 to 10 for each post-surgery day beginning on postoperative day 2. They also recorded the number of pain pills they took each day. On the same sheet used to record medication usage, patients were instructed to record each day whether they were able to wear the brace or if they experienced problems. At their 1 month postoperative visit the incision was inspected and palpated by the first or senior author for the presence of fascial dehiscence and its occurrence was recorded.
Every patient routinely received narcotic and non-narcotic pain medication on an as-needed basis in the hospital. No nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, such as ibuprofen or ketorolac, were given. If, on a particular postoperative day, patients were still on an intravenous narcotic patient-controlled anesthesia (PCA), that day's data were not recorded for the study.
- Conditions
- Posterior Cervical Surgery, Posterior Cervical Fusion, Posterior Cervical Laminectomy, Posterior Cervical Laminoplasty
- Being tested
- Clavicle Brace
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Clavicle BraceDevice
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Management | No intervention | Patients wore no brace. |
| Clavicle Brace Wearing | Experimental | Patient has to wear clavicle brace for one month. Receives: Device: Clavicle Brace |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Average Neck Pain Level
Patients self-recorded their average level of pain on a scale from 1 to 10 for each post-surgery day beginning on postoperative day 2. 1 Meaning least pain, 10 meaning worst level of pain
Measured: 1 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Nov 2013 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2013
- Primary completionAug 2014
- Study completionAug 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Posterior Cervical SurgeryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Stanford UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Stephan Duetzmann, Stanford University
- Investigators
- Stephan Duetzmann, Principal investigator, Stanford University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01977690
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CLABRA
- Status last verified
- Jul 2017
- First submitted
- 31 Oct 2013
- Last updated
- 21 Aug 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Duetzmann S, Cole T, Senft C, Seifert V, Ratliff JK, Park J. Clavicle pain and reduction of incisional and fascial pain after posterior cervical surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Dec;23(6):684-9. doi: 10.3171/2015.2.SPINE141118. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
PubMed 26296190
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Aug 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clavicle Splint for Pain Reduction After Posterior Cervicothoracic Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01977690
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CLABRA
- Conditions
- Posterior Cervical Surgery, Posterior Cervical Fusion, Posterior Cervical Laminectomy, Posterior Cervical Laminoplasty
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2013
- Primary completion
- Aug 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Nov 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 21 Aug 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to see whether a clavicle splint can decrease the pain after posterior cervicothoracic surgery. The term "cervicle splint" conveys that the investigators do not deal with clavicle fractures here but use the splint he stabilize the posterior cervical area. The investigators want to demonstrate this in a prospective randomized manner.
Detailed description
In this prospectively controlled randomized study 30 patients who had undergone posterior cervical spine surgery were randomized into two groups who either wore or did not wear a clavicle brace to retract the shoulders. Patients in the brace group began wearing the brace on postoperative day 4, and continuously wore it throughout the 30-day study period. Outcome was measured as daily levels of self-reported pain and number of pain pills taken during the 30-day postoperative period. .
After hypothesizing a mean pain reduction through the brace on the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain from 5 to 3 with a standard deviation of 1, we calculated that at a power level of 99% and an alpha error of 5%, and given that the VAS numbers were normally distributed, we needed 22 patients to enroll into the study. We increased this number to 30 to account for early and late dropouts.
The study was performed at a single institution with patients from 2 different spine surgeons.
Patients were randomized prior to or the day after the procedure to either wear or not wear the clavicle brace. Randomization was done through closed envelopes that the patients drew. Dissection was performed by the two fellows at our institution and depended solely on the number of fused levels and whether or not a tumor had to be removed. Closure was also performed by the two spine fellows after instruction by the senior author. Cervical alignment was reviewed using the C2-C7 angle according to Cobb's method on lateral images. The cervico-thoracic angles were calculated by the addition of the cervical spine angle and the remaining angles of thoracic spine until T3 according to Cobb's method.
The brace was provided by the hospital. Patients were instructed how to properly wear the brace by the first author, the senior author, or the hospital Rehabilitation Orthotics specialist. To complete the study, patients wore the brace for at least 30 days. (Patients of J.P. continued to wear the brace for 3 months outside of the study period.). All patients wore hard cervical collars until the end of the study period.
Patients self-recorded their average level of pain on a scale from 1 to 10 for each post-surgery day beginning on postoperative day 2. They also recorded the number of pain pills they took each day. On the same sheet used to record medication usage, patients were instructed to record each day whether they were able to wear the brace or if they experienced problems. At their 1 month postoperative visit the incision was inspected and palpated by the first or senior author for the presence of fascial dehiscence and its occurrence was recorded.
Every patient routinely received narcotic and non-narcotic pain medication on an as-needed basis in the hospital. No nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, such as ibuprofen or ketorolac, were given. If, on a particular postoperative day, patients were still on an intravenous narcotic patient-controlled anesthesia (PCA), that day's data were not recorded for the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Management | No intervention | –Patients wore no brace. |
| Clavicle Brace Wearing | Experimental | Device: Clavicle BracePatient has to wear clavicle brace for one month. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 95 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patient underwent cervicothoracic surgery from posterior -
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients that are potentially vulnerable
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Clavicle Brace | Device | Clavicle Brace Wearing |
Primary outcome
Average Neck Pain Level
Time frame: 1 month
Patients self-recorded their average level of pain on a scale from 1 to 10 for each post-surgery day beginning on postoperative day 2. 1 Meaning least pain, 10 meaning worst level of pain
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Aug 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26296190Duetzmann S, Cole T, Senft C, Seifert V, Ratliff JK, Park J. Clavicle pain and reduction of incisional and fascial pain after posterior cervical surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Dec;23(6):684-9. doi: 10.3171/2015.2.SPINE141118. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Posterior Cervical Surgery
Recruiting
Researching the Useful of Barb Suture in Obese Patients Undergoing Posterior Cervical Surgery
Cervical Spinal Stenosis, Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery
Active, not recruiting
Minimally Invasive Posterior Decompression of the Cervical Spine
Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease, Cervical Stenosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Stephan Duetzmann principal investigator
Stanford University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Clavicle Brace in people with Posterior Cervical Surgery and Posterior Cervical Fusion, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Aug 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Average Neck Pain Level (time frame: 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01977690, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Aug 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.