AzTrials
AzTrials

Healthy CohortNCT01978522

The NICOLA Questionnaire Trial (NICOLA-QT)

A study testing Randomisation of questionnaire receipt. in people with Healthy Cohort, run by Queen's University, Belfast at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Recruiting, retaining and gathering complete data on participants in research projects, be they patients or health professionals, can be extremely difficult. These problems increase the risk that research will be abandoned before its true value is appreciated, or lead to delays in resolving uncertainty for decision… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy Cohort
What is being tested?
Randomisation of questionnaire receipt.
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
8,500 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
1 Jan 2014to 20 Dec 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants must be aged 50 or over.
  • Participants must be living in an non-institutionalised environment.
  • Participants must be capable of providing informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Participants who are 49 or younger.
  • Participants who are institutionalised.
  • Participants who are not capable of providing informed consent.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Lisa Maguire

    Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT12 6BJ

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: The NICOLA Questionnaire Trial (NICOLA-QT): Effect of Timing and Mode of Delivery on Completion and Completeness of a Self-assessment Questionnaire in a Longitudinal Study in People Over Age of 50.

Recruiting, retaining and gathering complete data on participants in research projects, be they patients or health professionals, can be extremely difficult. These problems increase the risk that research will be abandoned before its true value is appreciated, or lead to delays in resolving uncertainty for decision makers, while further studies are done. Poor recruitment, retention and outcome collection frequently lead to many prospective studies being extended, increasing costs. Researchers need to use strategies that are themselves evidence-based. This study proposes to link with an existing longitudinal ageing study called NICOLA to provide evidence on what research participants prefer in relation to providing personal information through a self-completed questionnaire. NICOLA is a large study of people over the age of 50 that is being conducted in Northern Ireland. NICOLA is aiming to recruit 8500 people and will ask them questions about participation in social activities, including organised structured and informal activities; relationship quality; loneliness; stress; resilience; quality of life; alcohol intake; food poverty and assess their health and wellbeing. Participants in NICOLA agree to having an interviewer visit them at home to ask questions about their lives, complete questionnaires in their own time and attend a health assessment appointment. They also agree to being followed up over a course of at least 10 years. The research described here will examine the impact of differing times and formats of a self assessment questionnaire on completion rates, specifically:

  • To assess the effect of being given a questionnaire during a face to face interview with a researcher compared to receiving it by post
  • To explore the potential impact of interview fatigue on completion rates
Read the detailed description

The Northern Ireland Cohort for the Longitudinal Study of Ageing (NICOLA) is an opportunity to conduct methodology research relevant to many features of a large prospective study. NICOLA will begin in earnest in Northern Ireland in 2013 and is being conducted by a multidisciplinary team in the Centre for Public Health at Queen's University Belfast. It is an omnibus programme of research on ageing that will continue for at least 10 years and will recruit 8500 middle-aged people in Northern Ireland and follow them into old age, providing a comprehensive assessment of their physical and mental health, their lifestyles, and their social and economic decision making. NICOLA will look at how they perceive disability and health, and how this differs between well-off and disadvantaged groups. NICOLA will also study various genetic, biological and psychological factors, including how participants perceive risk and value their time, and the effect of this on their retirement behaviour (including how they manage their money and their health). People over the age of 50 will be invited to take part and asked to complete detailed interviews and questionnaires every 2 years and health assessments every 4 years. In this randomised trial, we will assess the effect of given them the self-assessment questionnaire at different time points, and on paper or online.

Cohort and other studies with longitudinal designs often struggle to maintain their recruited participants across all the study time points and to obtain complete data. The problems reduce the effective sample size quality of the evidence and robustness of the findings, and can undermine the often substantial investment in such studies. Researchers are devoting increasing amounts of time and resources to understand how participants decide to take part in research and what researchers can do to make their work appeal to potential participants. We will explore some of these issues within NICOLA and, to our knowledge, no similar work has been conducted solely within an over 50 population.

Establishing rapport with the participants has been mentioned as another method to increase response rate and we will explore this by examining whether receiving a questionnaire in a face-to-face exchange increases the likelihood of completion - a topic that was not addressed in the aforementioned systematic review.

Our randomised comparison of online versus paper questionnaires will gauge the interest in online methods among the over 50s, and the effects of the different modes on completion and completeness. Embedding this research at the beginning of a large cohort study allows the opportunity to test different methodologies to discover what works best at with regards to the delivery of questionnaires

The overall aim of this research is to examine the impact of differing times and formats of a self assessment questionnaire on completion rates. Specific objectives include:

  • Assessing the effect of being given a questionnaire during a face to face interview with a researcher compared to receiving it by post
  • Exploring the potential impact of interview fatigue on completion rates

The proposed study is a randomised trial of different timings and methods of offering a self-completion questionnaire. It will be embedded in an ongoing cohort study. All participants who complete the CAPI (Computer Assisted Personal Interview) will be invited to fill in a self-completion (paper) questionnaire whose contents will include measures of: participation in social activities, including organised structured and informal activities; relationship quality (partners/relatives/friends); loneliness; perceived stress; resilience; quality of life; alcohol intake and a measure of food poverty.

After participants have agreed to take part in the study, they will be randomised into one of two different trial arms:

  1. Receive a paper based questionnaire immediately after their CAPI, handed to them by their Interviewer
  2. Receive a paper based questionnaire in the post approximately one week after their CAPI interview
Conditions
Healthy Cohort
Being tested
Randomisation of questionnaire receipt.
Keywords
Randomised trial, postal questionnaires, return rates

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Randomisation of questionnaire receipt.Other

    1. The self-completion questionnaire will be delivered to the participants via post a week after completing the CAPI.
    2. Self-completion questionnaire handed to participants immediately after completing the CAPI.
Study groups in NCT01978522
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
NICOLA ParticipantsExperimentalAll participants enrolled in the NICOLA cohort
Receives: Other: Randomisation of questionnaire receipt.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Influence of group on questionnaire return rates

    Measured: Within two months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Influence of group on questionnaire completeness

    Measured: Within two months

  2. Influence of group on time taken to return questionnaire

    Measured: Within two months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Nov 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Jan 2014
  3. Primary completion20 Dec 2015
  4. Study completion20 Dec 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
8,500 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01978522
Sponsor's protocol ID
QUB-1112-QT
Status last verified
Apr 2018
First submitted
31 Oct 2013
Last updated
11 Apr 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Randomisation of questionnaire receipt. in people with Healthy Cohort, run by Queen's University, Belfast at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Influence of group on questionnaire return rates (time frame: Within two months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Apr 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in