AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Artery DiseaseINERTNCT01981304

Effects of a rapamycIn-eluting carboNized Stent With a Completely biodEgradable polymeR Coating

An observational study of Coronary Artery Disease, run by University of Roma La Sapienza.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting may induce endothelial damage/dysfunction and inflammatory reactions, which in turn delay healing and endothelialization and may lead to the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), such as restenosis, atherosclerosis, and stent thrombosis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Coronary Artery Disease
How many people
50 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2014to Dec 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Coronary artery disease

Who may be able to join

  • A de novo native coronary artery lesions (reference vessel diameter:2.5-3.75 mm) Class I indication to elective percutaneous coronary intervention Stable conditions and no recent acute coronary syndromes Normal baseline values of markers of myocardial damage (creatine kinase, creatine kinase-MB, myoglobin, and troponin I) Able to understand and willing to sign the informed CF

Who cannot join

  • Women of child bearing potential patients must demonstrate a negative pregnancy test performed within 24 hours before CT

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

FRANCESCO PELLICCIA contact

f.pelliccia@mclink.it

About this study

Official title: Effects of a rapamycIn-eluting carboNized Stent With a Completely biodEgradable polymeR Coating on inflammaTory Biomarkers and Endothelial Damage

Percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting may induce endothelial damage/dysfunction and inflammatory reactions, which in turn delay healing and endothelialization and may lead to the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), such as restenosis, atherosclerosis, and stent thrombosis.

Drugs, platforms and polymers are considered the protagonists of these pathophysiologic processes.

Read more

The objectives of the INERT study is to assess the extent of inflammation and endothelial damage induced by the first carbonized bio-absorbable coated rapamycin-eluting coronary stent at time of percutaneous coronary intervention and correlate the extent of these abnormalities with short and long-term clinical outcome and post-procedural evaluation of success.

As part of the study, a randomized sub-study will be carried out at the Coordinating Center in order to compare the biohumoral, clinical and procedural findings between patients with the carbonized bio-absorbable coated rapamycin-eluting coronary stent and those randomly assigned to receive stents with different platforms and polymers.

Read the detailed description

Percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting may induce endothelial damage/dysfunction and inflammatory reactions, which in turn delay healing and endothelialization and may lead to the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), such as restenosis, atherosclerosis, and stent thrombosis.

Drugs, platforms and polymers are considered the protagonists of these pathophysiologic processes.

Platforms Due to advances in stent technology, several stent platforms are now available, including the stainless steel, the cobalt-chromium, and the platinum-chromium stent series. Pre-clinical animal studies suggest that some platforms might have important advantages in terms of vascular compatibility and early and late healing. In a rabbit denudation model, it was shown that at 14 days the luminal surface area is incompletely endothelialised with the CrCo stents but nearly complete for other metals. Additionally, it has been shown that a thinner-strut stent is associated with reduced fibrin deposition and more rapid fibrin clearance in porcine coronary arteries compared with thicker stents, thus suggesting that the thin stent platforms may induce less injury. As a matter of fact, The second-generation DESs, with thinner struts, are obviously associated with a suppression of the neointimal response and a more rapid re-endothelialization but stainless steel based stent design might have a better conformability to the vessel wall which results to less malposition.

Polymers The polymer coating that elutes the antiproliferative drug has been linked to complications including delayed vessel healing, hypersensitivity reactions, atheroma, and restenosis, with the potential for repeat intervention, stent thrombosis, acute myocardial infarction, and sudden death.

The link between the permanent polymer and late adverse events has prompted the development of a variety of biodegradable polymer coatings. Absorption of the polymer may lower the rates of stent thrombosis, particularly beyond 1 year after stent implantation. In addition, stents with absorbable polymers may allow a shorter duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) than currently recommended The incidence of late adverse events is likely to be lower after the absorption of the polymer than after the implantation of drug-eluting stents coated with a permanent polymer, as there is less ongoing inflammation than with permanent polymers. In a meta-analysis of randomized trials, metal stents that release an antiproliferative drug from an absorbable polymer coating had lower rates of MACE out to 4 years than metal stents that released a drug from a durable polymer. The randomized LEADERS (Limus Eluted from A Durable versus ERodable Stent) trial studies showed that a biolimus eluting stent coated with a biodegradable polymer had a lower risk of adverse cardiac events associated with very late ST through 5 years of follow-up, improving the long-term clinical outcomes compared with sirolimus-eluting stents coated with a durable polymer

Bio-absorbable coated Rapamycin-Eluting Coronary Carbonized Stent The new Rapamycin-Eluting Coronary Stent System is the first carbonized stent with a completely biodegradable polymer coating which contains rapamycin as drug for preventing early thrombotic and re-stenotic events. Absorption of carrier coating and drug takes place simultaneously within 6 weeks after implantation, leaving a carbonized stent platform behind. Because of the biodegradable polymer based technology, duration of the dual antiplatelet therapy after DES implantation might be shortened up to a few months.

The stent platform is a stainless stent that received CE-mark in 2001. It is a laser cut slotted tube, with multi-cellular design. The stent is characterized by a carbon-ion implanted layer (Inert Carbon Technology) that becomes incorporated within the metal lattice down to 0.05 mcm and avoids the leakage of heavy-metal ions as nickel and molybdenum. Usually, heavy metal ions released from stainless steel stent can cause allergic and inflammatory reactions which might be associated with in-stent restenosis. Conversely, the INERT-Technology alters common 316 stainless steel into a highly biocompatible alloy biodegradable polymer based sirolimus-eluting stent which is associated with earlier neointimal healing as compared to permanent polymer based eluting stent.

After carbonizing, the stent is coated with a thin layer of biodegradable polymer (PLGA). The coating is cleared from the stent in 45 to 60 days and and its degradation products (lactic and glycolic acid) are completely absorbed into the tissue within 90 days, leaving an inert bare metal stent, as confirmed during preclinical animal testing . This approach of drug delivery to the artery is aimed at achieving tissue coverage of the stent struts without excessive neointimal proliferation. Pre-clinical 'in vivo' studies have shown that the new Rapamycin-Eluting Coronary Stent System inhibit struts-associated inflammation and neointimal formation in the porcine coronary model.

Purpose

The objectives of the INERT study is to assess the extent of inflammation and endothelial damage induced by the first carbonized bio-absorbable coated rapamycin-eluting coronary stent at time of percutaneous coronary intervention and correlate the extent of these abnormalities with short and long-term clinical outcome and post-procedural evaluation of success.

As part of the study, a randomized sub-study will be carried out at the Coordinating Center in order to compare the biohumoral, clinical and procedural findings between patients with the carbonized bio-absorbable coated rapamycin-eluting coronary stent and those randomly assigned to receive stents with different platforms and polymers.

Keywords
Coronary artery disease, Percutaneous coronary intervention
Medical subject headings
Coronary Artery Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01981304
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
DES with a biodegradable polymer coatingPatients receiving the first carbonized bio-absorbable coated rapamycin-eluting coronary stent at time of percutaneous coronary intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Post-PCI changes in markers of inflammation and endothelial damage

    Changes 4 months after PCI in indexes of endothelial damage (von Willebrand Factor, sE-selectin, Vascular cell adhesion molecule, Intercellular adhesion molecule) and inflammation (C-reactive protein, Fibrinogen, Plasminogen activator inhibitor, Interleukin-6)

    Measured: Baseline and 4 months after PCI

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. 12-month rate of MACE

    12-months incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE-death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization)

    Measured: Up to 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Nov 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2014
  3. Primary completionDec 2015 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2016 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01981304
Sponsor's protocol ID
807/2013/D
Acronym
INERT
Status last verified
Nov 2013
First submitted
4 Nov 2013
Last updated
13 Nov 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Coronary Artery Disease, run by University of Roma La Sapienza.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Nov 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact FRANCESCO PELLICCIA (f.pelliccia@mclink.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Post-PCI changes in markers of inflammation and endothelial damage (time frame: Baseline and 4 months after PCI). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Nov 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in