AzTrials
AzTrials

Stem Cell TransplantNCT01984671

mPCST for BMT Patients

A study testing Mobile Pain Coping Skills Training in people with Stem Cell Transplant, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

We used a small randomized controlled trial (n=36) to compare a Mobile Health Pain Coping Skills (mPCST) to Usual Treatment for patients having received hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Stem Cell Transplant
What is being tested?
Mobile Pain Coping Skills Training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
36 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
2 Oct 2013to 1 Dec 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • receipt of an stem cell transplant due to an oncological disease,
  • no prior stem cell transplant,
  • report a clinical pain score of at least 3/10, and
  • an age of > 21.

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Duke University Medical Center

    Durham, North Carolina, 27708

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Home-Based Tablet Computer Pain Coping Skills Following Stem Cell Transplant

We used a small randomized controlled trial (n=36) to compare a Mobile Health Pain Coping Skills (mPCST) to Usual Treatment for patients having received hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

Read the detailed description

The investigator proposes to develop and test a Mobile Health Pain Coping Skills (mPCST) protocol for HSCT patients with persistent pain to meet the challenges of HSCT patients with pain as they transition from hospital based care to their home environment. We used a small randomized controlled trial to examine the feasibility and acceptability, and engagement in the developed mPCST protocol. We compared the effects of usual care to the developed mPCST protocol on pain disability, pain self-efficacy, fatigue, and physical disability.

Being tested
Mobile Pain Coping Skills Training

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Mobile Pain Coping Skills TrainingBehavioural

Study groups in NCT01984671
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Mobile pain coping skills training (mPCST)ExperimentalParticipants in this condition completed the first session following their baseline survey assessment. The developed mPCST protocol included 1 in-person session at the medical center between the patient and study therapist, which led to the development of a successful working relationship and the integration of mPCST with the patient's medical care. Then, once the patient returned home following intensive outpatient care, 5 more sessions were conducted using videoconferencing. Last, participants completed the post-assessment.
Receives: Behavioral: Mobile Pain Coping Skills Training
Usual care controlNo interventionPatients in this condition will have access to activity tracker syncing and daily symptoms assessment following their baseline survey assessment. HCT education participants will be encouraged to download the Transplant (HCT) Guidelines mobile app that is free of charge. Last, participants completed the post-assessment.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Feasibility as Measured by the Overall Percentage of Completed Sessions

    Presented as the (total number of completed sessions for all participants) divided by the (total number of planned sessions for all participants) multiplied by 100. The goal of this study was to develop a PCST intervention that could be used to enhance the ability of HCT patients to manage their pain following transplant, that is feasible and acceptable.

    Measured: 10 weeks

  2. Acceptability as Measured by the Percentage of Participants Who Responded in the Affirmative for Each Item on the Assessment

    The goal of this study was to develop a PCST intervention that could be used to enhance the ability of HCT patients to manage their pain following transplant, that is feasible and acceptable.

    Measured: 10 weeks

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Cohen's D Effect Size of the Change in Pain Disability From Baseline to 10 Weeks

    A positive value indicates improvement in pain disability and a negative value indicates a decline.

    Measured: Baseline to 10 weeks

  2. Cohen's D Effect Size of the Change in Pain Self-efficacy From Baseline to 10 Weeks

    A positive value indicates improvement in pain self-efficacy and a negative value indicates a decline.

    Measured: Baseline to 10 weeks

  3. Cohen's D Effect Size of the Change in Fatigue From Baseline to 10 Weeks

    A positive value indicates improvement in pain self-efficacy and a negative value indicates a decline.

    Measured: Baseline to 10 weeks

  4. Cohen's D Effect Size of the Change in 2-minute Walk Test From Baseline to 10 Weeks

    A positive value indicates improvement in the 2-minute walk test and a negative value indicates a decline.

    Measured: Baseline to 10 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Nov 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study start2 Oct 2013
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2015
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
36 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01984671
Sponsor's protocol ID
Pro00047952
Status last verified
Oct 2025
First submitted
31 Oct 2013
Last updated
28 Oct 2025
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Somers TJ, Kelleher SA, Dorfman CS, Shelby RA, Fisher HM, Rowe Nichols K, Sullivan KM, Chao NJ, Samsa GP, Abernethy AP, Keefe FJ. An mHealth Pain Coping Skills Training Intervention for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Patients: Development and Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Mar 19;6(3):e66. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.8565.

    PubMed 29555620

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Mobile Pain Coping Skills Training in people with Stem Cell Transplant, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Oct 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Feasibility as Measured by the Overall Percentage of Completed Sessions (time frame: 10 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01984671, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Oct 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in