HIVM-DARTNCT01985269
Modified Directly Observed Antiretroviral Therapy
A study testing Home visits in people with HIV, run by Moi University at 1 site in Kenya.
Trial summary
M-DART Study is a randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of a home-based modified directly observed antiretroviral (ART) treatment strategy to clinic-based standard of care in patients with HIV/AIDS in Port Victoria, Busia, Kitale, Chulaimbo and Khunyangu, Kenya. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 14 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV
- What is being tested?
- Home visits
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 511 participants
- Where
- 1 siteKenya
- Study dates
- Aug 2011to Dec 2013
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 14 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients who require initiation of ART and fulfill the following AMPATH High-Risk Express Care criteria will be eligible for enrollment into the study.
- Newly diagnosed HIV-infected patients
- Age >14 years
- CD4 count <100 cells/ml
- ART naïve
Who cannot join
- Patients declining home visits
- Refusal to consent to the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Modified Directly Observed Antiretroviral Therapy (M-DART): An Intensive, Nurse-directed, Home-centered, Treatment Strategy to Reduce Mortality and Loss to Follow-up in High-risk HIV-infected Patients Initiating Antiretroviral Therapy
M-DART Study is a randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of a home-based modified directly observed antiretroviral (ART) treatment strategy to clinic-based standard of care in patients with HIV/AIDS in Port Victoria, Busia, Kitale, Chulaimbo and Khunyangu, Kenya.
Hypothesis 1a: It is feasible to implement M-DART in remote, poverty stricken, high-HIV prevalence rural communities in western Kenya.
Read more
Hypothesis 1b: M-DART will be a more effective strategy than standard of care (High-Risk Express Care) in reducing mortality and LTFU in patients at the highest risk of dying following ART initiation.
Hypothesis 2: M-DART will be cost effective over the 48-week study period
Hypothesis 3a: Patients enrolled in M-DART will have higher quality of life scores at 24 and 48 weeks as compared to the control patients.
Hypothesis 3b: Patients enrolled in M-DART will have lower HIV related stigma scores at 24 and 48-weeks as compared to the control patients.
Read the detailed description
Mortality and lost to follow-up (LTFU) rates amongst adult African HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) are high, especially so in the first 12 months of treatment. Although the risk factors for death and LTFU in these patients have been elucidated, specific care interventions to reduce both death and LTFU have not been reported. Therefore, there is an urgent need for evidence-based knowledge of care interventions that reduce early mortality and LTFU in HIV-infected patients on ART in sub-Saharan Africa. By informing decision-making processes on resource allocation, treatment and care emphasis-areas and planned strategies, such knowledge would provide treatment programs a great opportunity to lower HIV-related mortality while increasing the benefits of ART.
The USAID-AMPATH Partnership (AMPATH) has enrolled >118,000 HIV-infected patients across 60 urban and rural care sites in western Kenya, >65,000 of whom have initiated ART. To date, >9,000 patients have been confirmed dead, half of whom were on ART. Many more are LTFU, unknown whether they are still alive or not. AMPATH is uniquely placed to perform care intervention trials targeting reduction in mortality and LTFU because:
- There are sufficient study subjects;
- It has a protocol-driven care program that will enable the establishment of a control group that is cared for in a standard fashion;
- The AMPATH Medical Record System (AMRS), a fully computerized system containing >80 million observations collected prospectively for >3.0 million visits will provide easy data storage and retrieval;
- Experienced investigators from the Moi and Indiana University Schools of Medicine and the World Bank will ensure that the study is executed within acceptable clinical trial standards and in a timely fashion; and
- It has effective community outreach programs which will increase the chances of the study's acceptability in the community, hence its success.
We propose to perform a randomized clinical trial that will compare the effectiveness of a home-based modified directly observed ART treatment strategy to clinic-based standard of care in reducing both mortality and LTFU soon after ART is initiated. A similar cadre of clinicians will be used for home-based as for clinic-based care in order to enhance comparability of outcomes. A cost effectiveness analysis of the intervention will be performed. The patients' quality of life and perceived HIV stigma will be assessed at study enrollment, 24 and 48 weeks. We will perform the study in two of the remotest AMPATH care sites that have very high HIV-prevalence in the hope that the study's results, if positive, will impact care in communities that need it the most.
- Specific Aims High mortality and LTFU rates soon after HIV-infected patients initiate ART are two major challenges facing HIV treatment and care programs in sub-Saharan Africa. In the first year of ART, mortality in African patients is as high as 26% despite appropriate treatment. The majority of these deaths occur in the first six months. This mortality rate is 5 - 8 times higher than for similar patients in the developed world. The risk factors for mortality in African patients initiating ART have been well elucidated. These risk factors include: late patient presentation with severe immune degradation and clinically advanced HIV disease; active or latent infections such as tuberculosis, invasive bacterial and fungal; anaemia; malnutrition; care in lower level and fee-for-service centers; male gender; and poor adherence to ART. Similarly, LTFU rates are high. Some care programs have reported LTFU rates as high as 40% in the first 12 months of ART. The risk factors for LTFU have also been reported and some mirror those for death. Recently published data indicate that unreported deaths might be the biggest reason for LTFU. With such abundant knowledge on risk factors for death and LTFU after ART initiation, what is now required is the development, implementation and evaluation of novel treatment and care strategies that target specific risk factors with the aim of mitigating these twin challenges.
The United States Agency for International Development - Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (USAID-AMPATH Partnership) is one of the largest public HIV treatment and care programs in sub-Saharan Africa. With care centers in Western, Nyanza and North Rift Valley provinces of Kenya, AMPATH has enrolled over 118,000 HIV-infected patients in 60 urban and rural care sites. Of these patients, >65,000 have initiated ART. To date, more than 9,000 of the >118,000 AMPATH-enrolled HIV-infected patients have been confirmed dead, including more than 5,000 on ART. Current AMPATH's annual LTFU rate is estimated at 8% for patients on ART and 13% for those not on ART. AMPATH's long-term objective is to improve ART outcomes for HIV-infected African patients through the development of replicable, sustainable, cost-effective treatment and care strategies that prevent mortality and prolong survival. Through this proposed research, we would like to study the usefulness of an intensive, nurse-directed, home-centered, modified (three times per week) treatment and follow-up strategy for newly enrolled, HIV-infected, ART-naïve patients at the highest risk of dying after initiating ART. The central hypothesis in this application is that the vast majority of deaths in HIV-infected African patients on ART can be prevented by early identification and aggressive management of HIV- and ART-related complications through close patient monitoring. The rationale behind this proposal is that interventions to interrupt early death in HIV-infected patients on ART are more likely to succeed if HIV and ART-related complications are identified early and appropriate interventions instituted promptly. Furthermore, solutions to HIV care and treatment challenges in sub-Saharan Africa are more likely to be attained if the research conducted addresses the region's specific healthcare needs and the results of such research can be translated into local practice. We plan to accomplish our objective by pursuing the following three specific aims:
- To develop and implement an intensive, nurse-directed, home-centered, modified directly observed antiretroviral therapy (M-DART) care strategy for high-risk HIV-infected patients initiating ART in remote locations in western Kenya and compare this to the current AMPATH standard of care (High-Risk Express Care).
- Hypothesis 1a: It is feasible to implement M-DART in remote, poverty stricken, high-HIV prevalence rural communities in western Kenya.
- Hypothesis 1b: M-DART will be a more effective strategy than standard of care (High-Risk Express Care) in reducing mortality and LTFU in patients at the highest risk of dying following ART initiation.
- To determine the costs effectiveness of M-DART
- Hypothesis 2: M-DART will be cost effective over the 48-week study period
- To determine patients' perception of quality of life and stigma following implementation of M-DART.
- Hypothesis 3a: Patients enrolled in M-DART will have higher quality of life scores at 24 and 48 weeks as compared to the control patients.
- Hypothesis 3b: Patients enrolled in M-DART will have lower HIV related stigma scores at 24 and 48-weeks as compared to the control patients.
- Conditions
- HIV
- Being tested
- Home visits
- Keywords
- High risk, ART naive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Home visitsOther
Also called Treatment arm, Intervention arm
The participants' vital signs (blood pressure, temperature, pulse rate, respiratory rate, and arterial oxygen saturation) will be taken and a limited physical examination (e.g. oral cavity for thrush, Kaposi's lesions, ulcers and dehydration; skin for rash, herpes zoster and dehydration; eyes for jaundice and pallor, gross neurological function such as ability to walk without difficulty, presence of facial droop, one-sided body weakness etc.) conducted. The nurse will then review medications adherence before observing the study participant swallow their pills (antiretrovirals, anti-TB, antibiotics, and analgesics).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Home visits | Active comparator | Minimal physical examination at home Drug adherence/pill counts Receives: Other: Home visits |
| Control | No intervention | Normal standard of care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Death
Death data will be collected at 48 weeks of the study
Measured: 48 weeks
Lost to follow up
Lost to follow up data will be collected at 48 weeks of the study
Measured: 48 weeks
Secondary outcomes (3)
plasma viral load (pVL)
Plasma viral load (pVL) changes at 48 weeks will be measured
Measured: 48 weeks
CD4 Count (cells/ml)
CD4 count changes at 48 weeks will be measured
Measured: 48 weeks
Weight (Kg)
Weight changes at 48 weeks will be measured
Measured: 48 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Nov 2013 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2011
- Primary completionDec 2013 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2013 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HIVStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 511 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Moi University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, ABRAHAM M. SIIKA, MBChB, MMed, MS, Moi University
- Investigators
- Abraham M Siika, MBCHB,MMED,MS, Principal investigator, Moi University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01985269
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AID-623-A-00-08-00003
- Acronym
- M-DART
- Status last verified
- Nov 2013
- First submitted
- 24 Oct 2013
- Last updated
- 15 Nov 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Nov 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Modified Directly Observed Antiretroviral Therapy (M-DART): An Intensive, Nurse-directed, Home-centered, Treatment Strategy to Reduce Mortality and Loss to Follow-up in High-risk HIV-infected Patients Initiating Antiretroviral Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01985269
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- M-DART / AID-623-A-00-08-00003
- Conditions
- HIV
- Keywords
- High risk, ART naive
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 511 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Moi UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
- Study start
- Aug 2011
- Primary completion
- Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2013 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Nov 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
M-DART Study is a randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of a home-based modified directly observed antiretroviral (ART) treatment strategy to clinic-based standard of care in patients with HIV/AIDS in Port Victoria, Busia, Kitale, Chulaimbo and Khunyangu, Kenya.
Hypothesis 1a: It is feasible to implement M-DART in remote, poverty stricken, high-HIV prevalence rural communities in western Kenya.
Hypothesis 1b: M-DART will be a more effective strategy than standard of care (High-Risk Express Care) in reducing mortality and LTFU in patients at the highest risk of dying following ART initiation.
Hypothesis 2: M-DART will be cost effective over the 48-week study period
Hypothesis 3a: Patients enrolled in M-DART will have higher quality of life scores at 24 and 48 weeks as compared to the control patients.
Hypothesis 3b: Patients enrolled in M-DART will have lower HIV related stigma scores at 24 and 48-weeks as compared to the control patients.
Detailed description
Mortality and lost to follow-up (LTFU) rates amongst adult African HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) are high, especially so in the first 12 months of treatment. Although the risk factors for death and LTFU in these patients have been elucidated, specific care interventions to reduce both death and LTFU have not been reported. Therefore, there is an urgent need for evidence-based knowledge of care interventions that reduce early mortality and LTFU in HIV-infected patients on ART in sub-Saharan Africa. By informing decision-making processes on resource allocation, treatment and care emphasis-areas and planned strategies, such knowledge would provide treatment programs a great opportunity to lower HIV-related mortality while increasing the benefits of ART.
The USAID-AMPATH Partnership (AMPATH) has enrolled >118,000 HIV-infected patients across 60 urban and rural care sites in western Kenya, >65,000 of whom have initiated ART. To date, >9,000 patients have been confirmed dead, half of whom were on ART. Many more are LTFU, unknown whether they are still alive or not. AMPATH is uniquely placed to perform care intervention trials targeting reduction in mortality and LTFU because:
- There are sufficient study subjects;
- It has a protocol-driven care program that will enable the establishment of a control group that is cared for in a standard fashion;
- The AMPATH Medical Record System (AMRS), a fully computerized system containing >80 million observations collected prospectively for >3.0 million visits will provide easy data storage and retrieval;
- Experienced investigators from the Moi and Indiana University Schools of Medicine and the World Bank will ensure that the study is executed within acceptable clinical trial standards and in a timely fashion; and
- It has effective community outreach programs which will increase the chances of the study's acceptability in the community, hence its success.
We propose to perform a randomized clinical trial that will compare the effectiveness of a home-based modified directly observed ART treatment strategy to clinic-based standard of care in reducing both mortality and LTFU soon after ART is initiated. A similar cadre of clinicians will be used for home-based as for clinic-based care in order to enhance comparability of outcomes. A cost effectiveness analysis of the intervention will be performed. The patients' quality of life and perceived HIV stigma will be assessed at study enrollment, 24 and 48 weeks. We will perform the study in two of the remotest AMPATH care sites that have very high HIV-prevalence in the hope that the study's results, if positive, will impact care in communities that need it the most.
- Specific Aims High mortality and LTFU rates soon after HIV-infected patients initiate ART are two major challenges facing HIV treatment and care programs in sub-Saharan Africa. In the first year of ART, mortality in African patients is as high as 26% despite appropriate treatment. The majority of these deaths occur in the first six months. This mortality rate is 5 - 8 times higher than for similar patients in the developed world. The risk factors for mortality in African patients initiating ART have been well elucidated. These risk factors include: late patient presentation with severe immune degradation and clinically advanced HIV disease; active or latent infections such as tuberculosis, invasive bacterial and fungal; anaemia; malnutrition; care in lower level and fee-for-service centers; male gender; and poor adherence to ART. Similarly, LTFU rates are high. Some care programs have reported LTFU rates as high as 40% in the first 12 months of ART. The risk factors for LTFU have also been reported and some mirror those for death. Recently published data indicate that unreported deaths might be the biggest reason for LTFU. With such abundant knowledge on risk factors for death and LTFU after ART initiation, what is now required is the development, implementation and evaluation of novel treatment and care strategies that target specific risk factors with the aim of mitigating these twin challenges.
The United States Agency for International Development - Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (USAID-AMPATH Partnership) is one of the largest public HIV treatment and care programs in sub-Saharan Africa. With care centers in Western, Nyanza and North Rift Valley provinces of Kenya, AMPATH has enrolled over 118,000 HIV-infected patients in 60 urban and rural care sites. Of these patients, >65,000 have initiated ART. To date, more than 9,000 of the >118,000 AMPATH-enrolled HIV-infected patients have been confirmed dead, including more than 5,000 on ART. Current AMPATH's annual LTFU rate is estimated at 8% for patients on ART and 13% for those not on ART. AMPATH's long-term objective is to improve ART outcomes for HIV-infected African patients through the development of replicable, sustainable, cost-effective treatment and care strategies that prevent mortality and prolong survival. Through this proposed research, we would like to study the usefulness of an intensive, nurse-directed, home-centered, modified (three times per week) treatment and follow-up strategy for newly enrolled, HIV-infected, ART-naïve patients at the highest risk of dying after initiating ART. The central hypothesis in this application is that the vast majority of deaths in HIV-infected African patients on ART can be prevented by early identification and aggressive management of HIV- and ART-related complications through close patient monitoring. The rationale behind this proposal is that interventions to interrupt early death in HIV-infected patients on ART are more likely to succeed if HIV and ART-related complications are identified early and appropriate interventions instituted promptly. Furthermore, solutions to HIV care and treatment challenges in sub-Saharan Africa are more likely to be attained if the research conducted addresses the region's specific healthcare needs and the results of such research can be translated into local practice. We plan to accomplish our objective by pursuing the following three specific aims:
- To develop and implement an intensive, nurse-directed, home-centered, modified directly observed antiretroviral therapy (M-DART) care strategy for high-risk HIV-infected patients initiating ART in remote locations in western Kenya and compare this to the current AMPATH standard of care (High-Risk Express Care).
- Hypothesis 1a: It is feasible to implement M-DART in remote, poverty stricken, high-HIV prevalence rural communities in western Kenya.
- Hypothesis 1b: M-DART will be a more effective strategy than standard of care (High-Risk Express Care) in reducing mortality and LTFU in patients at the highest risk of dying following ART initiation.
- To determine the costs effectiveness of M-DART
- Hypothesis 2: M-DART will be cost effective over the 48-week study period
- To determine patients' perception of quality of life and stigma following implementation of M-DART.
- Hypothesis 3a: Patients enrolled in M-DART will have higher quality of life scores at 24 and 48 weeks as compared to the control patients.
- Hypothesis 3b: Patients enrolled in M-DART will have lower HIV related stigma scores at 24 and 48-weeks as compared to the control patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Home visits | Active comparator | Other: Home visitsMinimal physical examination at home Drug adherence/pill counts |
| Control | No intervention | –Normal standard of care |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 14 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients who require initiation of ART and fulfill the following AMPATH High-Risk Express Care criteria will be eligible for enrollment into the study.
- Newly diagnosed HIV-infected patients
- Age >14 years
- CD4 count <100 cells/ml
- ART naïve
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients declining home visits
- Refusal to consent to the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Home visitsAlso: Treatment arm, Intervention armThe participants' vital signs (blood pressure, temperature, pulse rate, respiratory rate, and arterial oxygen saturation) will be taken and a limited physical examination (e.g. oral cavity for thrush, Kaposi's lesions, ulcers and dehydration; skin for rash, herpes zoster and dehydration; eyes for jaundice and pallor, gross neurological function such as ability to walk without difficulty, presence of facial droop, one-sided body weakness etc.) conducted. The nurse will then review medications adherence before observing the study participant swallow their pills (antiretrovirals, anti-TB, antibiotics, and analgesics). | Other | Home visits |
Primary outcome
Death
Time frame: 48 weeks
Death data will be collected at 48 weeks of the study
Lost to follow up
Time frame: 48 weeks
Lost to follow up data will be collected at 48 weeks of the study
3 secondary outcomes
plasma viral load (pVL)
Time frame: 48 weeks
CD4 Count (cells/ml)
Time frame: 48 weeks
Weight (Kg)
Time frame: 48 weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Nov 2013.
Related trials for HIV
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Adapting the ESTEEM Intervention to Improve Mental Health and PrEP Uptake Among Men at Risk of HIV
PrEP Use
RecruitingPhase 2
Evaluating the Safety and Immunogenicity of MTBVAC
HIV I Infection, Tuberculosis
Active, not recruiting
Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Mobile HIV Prevention App to Increase HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) Testing and PrEP Initiation Among Rural Men Who Have Sex With Men
HIV Infections, STI
Not yet recruiting
PNF RCT to Decrease Alcohol Use and Increase HIV Prevention
HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), Alcohol Misuse
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Abraham M Siika, MBCHB,MMED,MS principal investigator
Moi University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Home visits in people with HIV, run by Moi University at 1 site in Kenya.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Nov 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Kenya. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Death (time frame: 48 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Nov 2013.