AzTrials
AzTrials

CataractNCT01991717

Victus Versus Conventional

A study testing Victus and Conventional Phaco in people with Cataract, run by Matthias Bolz at 1 site in Austria.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Cataract surgery is among the world's most frequently performed operations. It involves removal of an opaque lens from the human eye and implantation of an artificial lens. The operation is performed under local anaesthesia using ultrasound technology, by which the lens is emulsified and removed by suction. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cataract
What is being tested?
Victus and Conventional Phaco
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteAustria
Study dates
Dec 2013to Jan 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 years
  • related cataract
  • Ability to follow instructions from the treatment team
  • Both eyes to receive surgery

Who cannot join

  • Narrow pupils (in ther. mydriasis <6mm)
  • Narrow orbits
  • Sunken eyes
  • manifest glaucoma treated with anti-glaucomatous therapy or prior surgery
  • Conditions that pose a high risk of complications during surgery
  • Known sensitivity to planned concomitant medications
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Patients with disorders of the ocular muscle, such as nystagmus or strabismus
  • Patients who are blind on one eye
  • Acute or chronic systemic and/or ocular illnesses that are clinically significant and will increase the risk to the subject or confound the outcomes of this study, such as but not restricted to diabetes mellitus, autoimmune/rheumatic or connective tissue diseases, dementia or epilepsy.
  • Patients who are pregnant or nursing
  • Patients who do not give informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Austria1 site, 1 recruiting
  • AKh Linz

    Linz, Upper Austria, 4021

    Recruiting

Other trials in Austria

About this study

Official title: An Open-label Investigator-masked Study Comparing Femtosecond Laser Assisted With Conventional Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery

Cataract surgery is among the world's most frequently performed operations. It involves removal of an opaque lens from the human eye and implantation of an artificial lens. The operation is performed under local anaesthesia using ultrasound technology, by which the lens is emulsified and removed by suction.

Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery is a new innovative surgical procedure that can improve the quality of cataract surgery and provide a new best possible standard of quality. In contrast to the conventional method the capsulotomy and the fragemntation are fully automatically performed with a femtosecond laser. In addition, the lens is fragmented by the laser, which substantially facilitates its removal and reduces the operation time.

Read more

Study to investigate whether the femtosecond laser cataract surgery causes any significant differences in clinical outcomes as compared to the conventional, manual continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC).

Effective phako time (EPT) is defined as duration of phakoemulsifikation of the crystalline lens.

EPT of conventional surgery at intraoperative visit > EPT oflaser-assisted surgery at intraoperative visit

Conditions
Cataract
Being tested
Victus, Conventional Phaco
Keywords
Victus, lensfragmentation, femtosecond laser assisted, capsulotomy,, manual, continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC), effective phaco time, phaco
Medical subject headings
Cataract

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • VictusDevice

    The anterior capsulotomy and lens fragmentation will be performed by means of femtosecond laser surgery

  • Conventional PhacoDevice

    The capsulotomy as well as the lens fragmentation is performed manually.

Study groups in NCT01991717
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Victus GroupExperimentalThe anterior capsulotomy and lens fragmentation will be performed by means of femtosecond laser surgery
Receives: Device: Victus
Conventional GroupOtherThe Conventional Group acts as a control group where the capsulotomy as well as the lens fragmentation is performed manually
Receives: Device: Conventional Phaco

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Effective Phaco Time

    EPT of the conventional cataract surgery (mesured intraoperativ = Visit 2) is smaller or equal to the EPT of the Laser-assisted cataract surgery (meausred intraoperativ = Visit 2)

    Measured: surgery day

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. IOL overlap

    The difference in the IOL overlap between group A and B. The IOL overlap, ΔROverlap, is the euclidian distance between the center of mass of the capsulotomy and the center of mass of the IOL, representing the symmetry of the IOL-Capsulotomy aperture- overlap

    Measured: 1 month, 3 and 6 months

  2. IOL Centration

    The difference in the IOL centration between group A and B. The IOL centration is the euclidian distance between the center of mass of the IOL and the center of mass of the dilated pupil

    Measured: 1 month, 3 and 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Nov 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2013
  3. Primary completionJan 2015 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJan 2015 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01991717
Sponsor's protocol ID
13A06
Status last verified
Jan 2014
First submitted
18 Nov 2013
Last updated
22 Jan 2014
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Victus and Conventional Phaco in people with Cataract, run by Matthias Bolz at 1 site in Austria.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jan 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Austria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Matthias Bolz, MD (+43 (0)732 7806 ext. 1310, Matthias.Bolz@akh.linz.at), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Effective Phaco Time (time frame: surgery day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jan 2014.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in