AzTrials
AzTrials

Neurogenic DysphagiaNCT01995929

Functional Endoscopy in Neurogenic Dysphagia

An observational study of Neurogenic Dysphagia, run by University Hospital Muenster at 2 sites in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy is an endoscopic examination technique of the upper GI-tract which was founded by the German surgeon Johann Freiherr von Mikuliicz-Radecki at the end of 19th century. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Neurogenic Dysphagia
What is being tested?
transnasal functional endoscopy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
62 participants
Where
2 sitesGermany
Study dates
Dec 2013to 31 Oct 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The focus of our observational study are patients with suspected neurogenic dysphagia.

Who may be able to join

  • patients with suspected neurogenic dysphagia, not fulfilling the exclusion criteria

Who cannot join

  • Age under 18 years
  • Inability to understand information for participation
  • Refusal of participation

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Germany2 sites
  • University Hospital of Muenster

    Münster

  • Josephs Hospital Warendorf

    Warendorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48231

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Transnasal Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: Functional Esophagoscopy Using an Ultrathin Video Endoscope in Neurogenic Dysphagia

The esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy is an endoscopic examination technique of the upper GI-tract which was founded by the German surgeon Johann Freiherr von Mikuliicz-Radecki at the end of 19th century. By this means, the luminal site of the esophagus, stomach and duodenum may be visualized after inserting a flexible endoscope through the mouth (transoral access). By the rapid technical development in the last years smaller flexible video endoscopes have been developed allowing also an alternative access to the upper GI-tract via the nose (transnasal access).

Patients with dysphagia are referred to physicians of different disciplines (gastroenterology, surgery, ear, nose, and throat (ENT) medicine, radiology, neurology) performing a variety of endoscopic and non-endoscopic techniques. Mostly, the endoscopic examination of the esophagus is done in sedated patients in left lateral examination. Typical findings during esophagoscopy might be tumors, strictures, achalasia or diverticula.

Read more

Patients suffering from neurogenic dysphagia often get caught in the trap: they find themselves somewhere in the space between gastroenterologist, neurologist, ENT-specialist and radiologist. This dilemma might be due to a lack of pathophysiological knowledge among many physicians and an inability to directly visualize the esophageal phase of deglutition. In sedated patients lying in left lateral position, endoscopists may receive a very limited impression of the function of the different phases of swallowing since this endoscopic access is a rather static one.

The focus of our observational study are patients with suspected neurogenic dysphagia. These patients shall be examined by transnasal endoscopy applying an ultrathin video endoscope with an outer diameter of 3.8 mm (BF-3C160, Olympus Europe). Patients are examined in sitting position while ingesting water and food of different consistencies (functional endoscopy). Diagnostic shall be completed and correlated by videofluoroscopy, high-resolution manometry and assessment of the clinical signs. Beside feasibility and safety as primary endpoints, secondary endpoints shall be the assessment of pathologic endoscopic findings in patients suffering from neurogenic dysphagia. The study is approved by the local Ethics Committee (AZ 2010-214-f-S).

Read the detailed description

The esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy is an endoscopic examination technique of the upper GI-tract which was founded by the German surgeon Johann Freiherr von Mikuliicz-Radecki at the end of 19th century. By this means, the luminal site of the esophagus, stomach and duodenum may be visualized after inserting a flexible endoscope through the mouth (transoral access). By the rapid technical development in the last years smaller flexible video endoscopes have been developed allowing also an alternative access to the upper GI-tract via the nose (transnasal access).

Patients with dysphagia are referred to physicians of different disciplines (gastroenterology, surgery, ear, nose, and throat (ENT) medicine, radiology, neurology) performing a variety of endoscopic and non-endoscopic techniques. Mostly, the endoscopic examination of the esophagus is done in sedated patients in left lateral examination. Typical findings during esophagoscopy might be tumors, strictures, achalasia or diverticula. In sedated patients lying in left lateral position, endoscopists may, therefore, receive a very limited impression of the actual function of the different phases of swallowing since this endoscopic approach is a rather static one.

Patients suffering from neurogenic dysphagia often get caught in the trap: they find themselves somewhere in the space between gastroenterologist, neurologist, ENT-specialist and radiologist. This dilemma might be due to a lack of pathophysiological knowledge among many physicians and an inability to directly visualize the esophageal phase of deglutition.

The focus of our observational study are patients with suspected neurogenic dysphagia. These patients shall be examined by transnasal endoscopy applying an ultrathin video endoscope with an outer diameter of 3.8 mm (BF-3C160, Olympus Europe). Patients are examined in sitting position while ingesting water and food of different consistencies (functional endoscopy). Diagnostic shall be completed and correlated by videofluoroscopy, high-resolution manometry and assessment of the clinical signs. Beside feasibility and safety as primary endpoints, secondary endpoints shall be the assessment of pathologic endoscopic findings in patients suffering from neurogenic dysphagia. The study is approved by the local Ethics Committee (AZ 2010-214-f-S).

Being tested
transnasal functional endoscopy
Keywords
neurogenic dysphagia, transnasal endoscopy, functional endoscopy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • transnasal functional endoscopyProcedure or surgery

    Also called ultrathin video endoscope with an outer diameter of 3.8 mm (BF-3C160, Olympus Europe)

Study groups in NCT01995929
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
neurogenic dysphagiaPatients suffering from neurogenic dysphagia due to several reasons (e.g. Parkinson´s disease).
Receives: Procedure: transnasal functional endoscopy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of patients in which the procedure may be successfully performed (feasibility)

    Feasibility, safety, and tolerability of the procedure

    Measured: 30 minutes

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Pathologic endoscopic findings in patients suffering from neurogenic dysphagia

    Acquisition of pathologenic mechanism during swallowing

    Measured: 30 minutes

  2. Number of patients with adverse events as a measure of safety and tolerability

    safety of transnasal functional endoscopy in diagnostics of neurogenic dysphagia

    Measured: 1 week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Nov 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2013
  3. Primary completion31 Oct 2017
  4. Study completion31 Oct 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
62 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01995929
Sponsor's protocol ID
2012_2013_003
Other IDs
TNE_2010
Status last verified
Dec 2020
First submitted
18 Nov 2013
Last updated
9 Nov 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Cheung J, Bailey R, Veldhuyzen van Zanten S, McLean R, Fedorak RN, Morse J, Millan M, Guzowski T, Goodman KJ; CANHelp working group. Early experience with unsedated ultrathin 4.9 mm transnasal gastroscopy: a pilot study. Can J Gastroenterol. 2008 Nov;22(11):917-22. doi: 10.1155/2008/323027.

    PubMed 19018337
  • Wiegand N, Bauerfeind P, Delco F, Fried M, Wildi SM. Endoscopic position control of nasoenteral feeding tubes by transnasal re-endoscopy: a prospective study in intensive care patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 May;104(5):1271-6. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.26. Epub 2009 Mar 24.

    PubMed 19319127
  • Zhihui T, Wenkui Y, Weiqin L, Zhiming W, Xianghong Y, Ning L, Jieshou L. A randomised clinical trial of transnasal endoscopy versus fluoroscopy for the placement of nasojejunal feeding tubes in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Postgrad Med J. 2009 Feb;85(1000):59-63. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2008.070326.

    PubMed 19329697
  • Warnecke T, Teismann I, Oelenberg S, Hamacher C, Ringelstein EB, Schabitz WR, Dziewas R. Towards a basic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in acute stroke - identification of salient findings by the inexperienced examiner. BMC Med Educ. 2009 Mar 10;9:13. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-9-13.

    PubMed 19284543
  • Warnecke T, Teismann I, Oelenberg S, Hamacher C, Ringelstein EB, Schabitz WR, Dziewas R. The safety of fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in acute stroke patients. Stroke. 2009 Feb;40(2):482-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.520775. Epub 2008 Dec 12.

    PubMed 19074481
  • Warnecke T, Teismann I, Zimmermann J, Oelenberg S, Ringelstein EB, Dziewas R. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with simultaneous Tensilon application in diagnosis and therapy of myasthenia gravis. J Neurol. 2008 Feb;255(2):224-30. doi: 10.1007/s00415-008-0664-6. Epub 2008 Jan 28.

    PubMed 18217186
  • Herrmann IF, Scarpignato C. [Functional endoscopy : the physiological and pathophysiological basis of reflux disease, diagnosis and therapy]. HNO. 2009 Dec;57(12):1221-36. doi: 10.1007/s00106-009-1934-z. German.

    PubMed 19924362
  • Ruckert J, Lenz P, Heinzow H, Wessling J, Warnecke T, Herrmann IF, Strahl M, Lenze F, Nowacki T, Domagk D. Functional endoscopy in neurogenic dysphagia: a feasibility study focusing on the esophageal phase of swallowing. Endosc Int Open. 2021 Apr;9(4):E646-E652. doi: 10.1055/a-1380-3224. Epub 2021 Apr 15.

    PubMed 33880400

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Neurogenic Dysphagia, run by University Hospital Muenster at 2 sites in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of patients in which the procedure may be successfully performed (feasibility) (time frame: 30 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01995929, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Nov 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in