Alcohol DrinkingCTMINCT01996280
A Randomized Clinical Trial of Culturally Tailored MI
A study testing Motivational Interviewing and Culturally Tailored MI in people with Alcohol Drinking, run by Northeastern University at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Culturally-tailored empirically-based interventions are needed because Latinos suffer a greater burden of alcohol-related health disparities and negative social consequences compared to other racial/ethnic groups, are less likely to initiate and to remain in treatment, and are more likely to live in communities with a… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Alcohol Drinking
- What is being tested?
- Motivational Interviewing and Culturally Tailored MI
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 301 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 26 Aug 2014to 30 Nov 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Meet criteria for hazardous drinking (greater than or equal to 5/4 per occasion for males/females), two or more times in the past 30 days.
- Latino
- Are not currently in any substance use treatment program for alcohol use disorder, nor have been in the past year.
- 18-65 years old
- Able to speak English or Spanish
Who cannot join
- Psychotic symptoms, as evidenced by hallucinations or delusions.
- Cognitive impairment, as evidenced by inability to understand informed consent. a. To determine comprehension, a research assistant will read informed consent aloud and will ask 3 questions
- Is the study voluntary
- Can he/she drop out at any time
- Will there be study follow-up.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
Northeastern University
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
South End Community Health Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Clinical Trial of Culturally Tailored Motivational Interviewing
Culturally-tailored empirically-based interventions are needed because Latinos suffer a greater burden of alcohol-related health disparities and negative social consequences compared to other racial/ethnic groups, are less likely to initiate and to remain in treatment, and are more likely to live in communities with a high density of alcohol outlets. Pilot data from the PI's (New Investigator) K award (AA014905), which will serve as the basis for the current proposed larger-scale study, demonstrated that culturally tailored motivational interviewing (CTMI) outperformed motivational interviewing (MI) that was not tailored to the needs of Latino heavy drinkers. The public health impact of this study will be to develop a program of early screening and brief intervention to reduce hazardous drinking among Latinos, to minimize the burden of illness and social consequences that disproportionately affect Latino communities.
Read the detailed description
The proposed R01 research, in response to PA 10-100, "Alcohol Use Disorders: Treatment, Services Research, and Recovery", addresses the PA priority: Treatment for Health Disparities/Special Populations. Latinos, the largest and fastest growing ethnic group in the United States (U.S.), representing 14% of the population (1), are expected to grow to nearly 29% of the population by 2050 (2-3). Like many immigrant groups adapting to U.S. culture, Latinos adopt the health behaviors of the mainstream population, such as hazardous drinking (4-6). Hazardous drinking is a pattern of drinking associated with increased alcohol related problems: injuries, violence, sexually transmitted diseases (7-15), and increased risk for developing an alcohol use disorder (abuse or dependence) (7, 10, 16). Latinos report a disproportionately greater burden of illness, injuries, workplace and legal problems (17-21) as a result of their alcohol consumption than other racial ethnic groups, including an elevated risk for alcohol-involved motor vehicle crashes and fatalities (20, 22).
Early intervention prevents the need for more costly and complex alcohol treatment (23). According to the National Academy of Sciences, dissemination of empirically-based interventions that are culturally tailored is particularly needed among Latinos (23-24) because they suffer alcohol-related health disparities (18-20, 25-26) and because alcohol treatment utilization rates are lower among Latinos than among other minority racial/ethnic groups or Whites (27-29). Although evidence suggests that culturally tailored addiction treatment improves retention and treatment outcomes (30-31), progress in the field has been limited by the lack of prospective clinical trials comparing tailored to non-tailored treatment (23). The PI's (New Investigator) funded K award (AA014905) provided important pilot data demonstrating that culturally tailored motivational interviewing (CTMI) outperformed un-tailored motivational interviewing (MI). This study will be the basis for the current proposed study, which is a larger scale version of the pilot. The culturally tailored MI maintained MI components. The key modification in our Social Contextual Model of Cultural Tailoring was to tailor the MI to incorporate important acculturation stressors (32-33): limited financial resources and opportunities, loss of social networks, discrimination (34-38), and changing cultural values. The proposed study will investigate acculturation stress (39) as an influence on the relationship between acculturation and alcohol consumption behavior and treatment outcomes. Efforts will help build a comprehensive model of how acculturation stressors influence drinking behavior among Latinos (40). The CTMI is also a needed effort to tailor treatment to drinkers who experience the burden of multiple social contextual sources of disadvantage, including poverty, discrimination, and acculturation stress (40).
Because the original pilot study goal was to isolate and test the effects of tailoring treatment, it was delivered in English. The current proposal extends the tailored treatment to Spanish-speaking Latinos. Providing the tailored treatment in Spanish addresses a major clinical need and increases external generalizability. The study's public health impact will be to provide early screening and brief intervention to reduce hazardous drinking among Latinos in communities that lack such services. By providing early screening and intervention, we hope to minimize the burden of illness and social consequences that disproportionately affect Latino communities. Impact on field: will be to contribute to an understanding of whether culturally tailored motivational intervention enhances treatment efficacy for Latinos compared to un-tailored treatment. Another contribution will be to explore the effects of translating and of tailoring MI. Short term goals are to compare the efficacy of an evidenced-based treatment, MI, against a culturally adapted version of MI among Latinos. Long term goals are to disseminate an easily trainable, conceptual model of culturally tailored empirically-based substance abuse treatment, understand how acculturation processes confer risk for increased hazardous drinking among Latinos, and to inform further tailoring of treatments for multiple stressors, including acculturation stress.
Research Hypotheses:
Primary Aim 1: Treatment Main Effect. Determine the efficacy of standard motivational interviewing (MI) compared to culturally tailored MI (CTMI) at two, six, and twelve month follow-up. We hypothesize that CTMI participants will report fewer alcohol-related negative consequences and fewer heavy drinking days at follow-up vs. MI participants.
Primary Aim 2: Explore acculturation stress as a moderator of alcohol treatment outcomes for Latinos. We hypothesize that among participants with high acculturation stress, those in CTMI will improve more over time than those in MI (at 6 months). We also hypothesize that among those who receive CTMI, those with high acculturation stress may show greater improvement over time (at six months) than those with low acculturation stress.
- Conditions
- Alcohol Drinking
- Being tested
- Motivational Interviewing, Culturally Tailored MI
- Medical subject headings
- Alcohol Drinking
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Motivational InterviewingBehavioural
The MI is a single brief motivational intervention lasting 1.5 hrs. The MI includes MI structured strategies tailored to the patient's readiness to change such as: the Typical Day exercise, the use of personal feedback reports (e.g., normative feedback about their drinking), discussions about the pros and cons of use, and completion of a change plan; It is designed to follow MI principles of invoking autonomy and emphasizing collaboration with the interventionist.
Culturally Tailored MIBehavioural
CTMI is a single brief motivational intervention lasting 1.5hrs. The CTMI follows the same sequence of structured strategies as the MI arm, and while the components in CTMI and MI are parallel, the focus within them is different. CTMI components culturally relevant material, such as acculturation stress. The CTMI components, which are MI structured strategies, are culturally tailored to address relevant concerns and issues. There are also culturally tailored feedback element, such as ethnic normative feedback related to drinking.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Motivational Interviewing | Placebo comparator | The MI is a single brief motivational intervention lasting 1.5 hours that includes MI structured strategies tailored to the patient's readiness to change such as: the Typical Day exercise, the use of personal feedback reports (e.g., normative feedback about their drinking), discussions about the pros and cons of use, and completion of a change plan. The MI is designed to follow MI principles of invoking autonomy and emphasizing collaboration with the interventionist. Receives: Behavioral: Motivational Interviewing |
| Culturally Tailored MI | Experimental | The CTMI is a single brief motivational interview lasting 1.5 hours. It follows the same sequence of structured strategies as the MI, but the focus of the components is different. CTMI has augmented some of the components with culturally relevant material, including discussion about acculturation stress. The CTMI components are culturally tailored to address relevant concerns and issues. There are also culturally tailored feedback elements in the CTMI, such as ethnic normative feedback about drinking. To control for time across conditions, interventionists are instructed to select CTMI components based on participant interests, not the entire array of components. Receives: Behavioral: Culturally Tailored MI |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Frequency of Heavy Drinking Days
The frequency of heavy drinking days will be assessed using a 90 day Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) collected at baseline prior to study intervention. TLFB will be administered again at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow up periods. Changes in frequency of heavy drinking days will be assessed across all study time points.
Measured: Baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up
Secondary outcomes (1)
Change in Frequency of Alcohol-Related Negative Consequences
Frequency of alcohol-related consequences will be assessed using the Drinker Inventory of Consequences (DrInC) and its' five subscales, as well as the Drinking and Driving Scale. The DrInC will be administered at baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow up whereas the Drinking and Driving scale will be administered at baseline and again at the 12-month follow up session. Changes in the frequency of reported negative alcohol-related consequences will be examined across these time points.
Measured: Baseline, 3-, 6-. 12-month follow up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Nov 2013 (estimated)
- Study start26 Aug 2014
- Primary completion30 Oct 2017
- Study completion30 Nov 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Alcohol DrinkingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 301 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Northeastern University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Christina S Lee, Ph.D, Principal investigator, Northeastern University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01996280
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PA-10-100
- Acronym
- CTMI
- Status last verified
- Mar 2019
- First submitted
- 17 Jun 2013
- Last updated
- 1 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Rosales R, Lee CS, Cortes D, Caetano R, Rohsenow DJ, Lopez SR, Colby SM. Development and Evaluation of a Measure of Drinking Behavior in Response to Acculturation Stressors for Latinx Adults Entering Alcohol Treatment. J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2023 Dec;155:208936. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2022.208936. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
PubMed 38434594Hai AH, Lee CS, Zhou C, Delva J. Culturally adapted motivational interviewing's effects on drinking in response to immigration and acculturation stressors among Latinx adults with heavy drinking problems. J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2023 Jul;150:209061. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209061. Epub 2023 May 6.
PubMed 37156426Lee CS, Colby SM, Rohsenow DJ, Martin R, Rosales R, McCallum TT, Falcon L, Almeida J, Cortes DE. A randomized controlled trial of motivational interviewing tailored for heavy drinking latinxs. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2019 Sep;87(9):815-830. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000428.
PubMed 31403817Lee CS, Almeida J, Colby SM, Tavares T, Rohsenow DJ. Acculturation, hazardous drinking and depressive symptomatology among Hispanics enrolled in a clinical trial. Addict Res Theory. 2016 Jan 1;24(1):69-79. doi: 10.3109/16066359.2015.1072517. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
PubMed 26819573
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Clinical Trial of Culturally Tailored Motivational Interviewing
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01996280
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CTMI / PA-10-100
- Conditions
- Alcohol Drinking
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 301 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Northeastern UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 26 Aug 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Nov 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Culturally-tailored empirically-based interventions are needed because Latinos suffer a greater burden of alcohol-related health disparities and negative social consequences compared to other racial/ethnic groups, are less likely to initiate and to remain in treatment, and are more likely to live in communities with a high density of alcohol outlets. Pilot data from the PI's (New Investigator) K award (AA014905), which will serve as the basis for the current proposed larger-scale study, demonstrated that culturally tailored motivational interviewing (CTMI) outperformed motivational interviewing (MI) that was not tailored to the needs of Latino heavy drinkers. The public health impact of this study will be to develop a program of early screening and brief intervention to reduce hazardous drinking among Latinos, to minimize the burden of illness and social consequences that disproportionately affect Latino communities.
Detailed description
The proposed R01 research, in response to PA 10-100, "Alcohol Use Disorders: Treatment, Services Research, and Recovery", addresses the PA priority: Treatment for Health Disparities/Special Populations. Latinos, the largest and fastest growing ethnic group in the United States (U.S.), representing 14% of the population (1), are expected to grow to nearly 29% of the population by 2050 (2-3). Like many immigrant groups adapting to U.S. culture, Latinos adopt the health behaviors of the mainstream population, such as hazardous drinking (4-6). Hazardous drinking is a pattern of drinking associated with increased alcohol related problems: injuries, violence, sexually transmitted diseases (7-15), and increased risk for developing an alcohol use disorder (abuse or dependence) (7, 10, 16). Latinos report a disproportionately greater burden of illness, injuries, workplace and legal problems (17-21) as a result of their alcohol consumption than other racial ethnic groups, including an elevated risk for alcohol-involved motor vehicle crashes and fatalities (20, 22).
Early intervention prevents the need for more costly and complex alcohol treatment (23). According to the National Academy of Sciences, dissemination of empirically-based interventions that are culturally tailored is particularly needed among Latinos (23-24) because they suffer alcohol-related health disparities (18-20, 25-26) and because alcohol treatment utilization rates are lower among Latinos than among other minority racial/ethnic groups or Whites (27-29). Although evidence suggests that culturally tailored addiction treatment improves retention and treatment outcomes (30-31), progress in the field has been limited by the lack of prospective clinical trials comparing tailored to non-tailored treatment (23). The PI's (New Investigator) funded K award (AA014905) provided important pilot data demonstrating that culturally tailored motivational interviewing (CTMI) outperformed un-tailored motivational interviewing (MI). This study will be the basis for the current proposed study, which is a larger scale version of the pilot. The culturally tailored MI maintained MI components. The key modification in our Social Contextual Model of Cultural Tailoring was to tailor the MI to incorporate important acculturation stressors (32-33): limited financial resources and opportunities, loss of social networks, discrimination (34-38), and changing cultural values. The proposed study will investigate acculturation stress (39) as an influence on the relationship between acculturation and alcohol consumption behavior and treatment outcomes. Efforts will help build a comprehensive model of how acculturation stressors influence drinking behavior among Latinos (40). The CTMI is also a needed effort to tailor treatment to drinkers who experience the burden of multiple social contextual sources of disadvantage, including poverty, discrimination, and acculturation stress (40).
Because the original pilot study goal was to isolate and test the effects of tailoring treatment, it was delivered in English. The current proposal extends the tailored treatment to Spanish-speaking Latinos. Providing the tailored treatment in Spanish addresses a major clinical need and increases external generalizability. The study's public health impact will be to provide early screening and brief intervention to reduce hazardous drinking among Latinos in communities that lack such services. By providing early screening and intervention, we hope to minimize the burden of illness and social consequences that disproportionately affect Latino communities. Impact on field: will be to contribute to an understanding of whether culturally tailored motivational intervention enhances treatment efficacy for Latinos compared to un-tailored treatment. Another contribution will be to explore the effects of translating and of tailoring MI. Short term goals are to compare the efficacy of an evidenced-based treatment, MI, against a culturally adapted version of MI among Latinos. Long term goals are to disseminate an easily trainable, conceptual model of culturally tailored empirically-based substance abuse treatment, understand how acculturation processes confer risk for increased hazardous drinking among Latinos, and to inform further tailoring of treatments for multiple stressors, including acculturation stress.
Research Hypotheses:
Primary Aim 1: Treatment Main Effect. Determine the efficacy of standard motivational interviewing (MI) compared to culturally tailored MI (CTMI) at two, six, and twelve month follow-up. We hypothesize that CTMI participants will report fewer alcohol-related negative consequences and fewer heavy drinking days at follow-up vs. MI participants.
Primary Aim 2: Explore acculturation stress as a moderator of alcohol treatment outcomes for Latinos. We hypothesize that among participants with high acculturation stress, those in CTMI will improve more over time than those in MI (at 6 months). We also hypothesize that among those who receive CTMI, those with high acculturation stress may show greater improvement over time (at six months) than those with low acculturation stress.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Motivational Interviewing | Placebo comparator | Behavioral: Motivational InterviewingThe MI is a single brief motivational intervention lasting 1.5 hours that includes MI structured strategies tailored to the patient's readiness to change such as: the Typical Day exercise, the use of personal feedback reports (e.g., normative feedback about their drinking), discussions about the pros and cons of use, and completion of a change plan. The MI is designed to follow MI principles of invoking autonomy and emphasizing collaboration with the interventionist. |
| Culturally Tailored MI | Experimental | Behavioral: Culturally Tailored MIThe CTMI is a single brief motivational interview lasting 1.5 hours. It follows the same sequence of structured strategies as the MI, but the focus of the components is different. CTMI has augmented some of the components with culturally relevant material, including discussion about acculturation stress. The CTMI components are culturally tailored to address relevant concerns and issues. There are also culturally tailored feedback elements in the CTMI, such as ethnic normative feedback about drinking. To control for time across conditions, interventionists are instructed to select CTMI components based on participant interests, not the entire array of components. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Meet criteria for hazardous drinking (greater than or equal to 5/4 per occasion for males/females), two or more times in the past 30 days.
- Latino
- Are not currently in any substance use treatment program for alcohol use disorder, nor have been in the past year.
- 18-65 years old
- Able to speak English or Spanish
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Psychotic symptoms, as evidenced by hallucinations or delusions.
- Cognitive impairment, as evidenced by inability to understand informed consent. a. To determine comprehension, a research assistant will read informed consent aloud and will ask 3 questions
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Motivational InterviewingThe MI is a single brief motivational intervention lasting 1.5 hrs. The MI includes MI structured strategies tailored to the patient's readiness to change such as: the Typical Day exercise, the use of personal feedback reports (e.g., normative feedback about their drinking), discussions about the pros and cons of use, and completion of a change plan; It is designed to follow MI principles of invoking autonomy and emphasizing collaboration with the interventionist. | Behavioural | Motivational Interviewing |
| Culturally Tailored MICTMI is a single brief motivational intervention lasting 1.5hrs. The CTMI follows the same sequence of structured strategies as the MI arm, and while the components in CTMI and MI are parallel, the focus within them is different. CTMI components culturally relevant material, such as acculturation stress. The CTMI components, which are MI structured strategies, are culturally tailored to address relevant concerns and issues. There are also culturally tailored feedback element, such as ethnic normative feedback related to drinking. | Behavioural | Culturally Tailored MI |
Primary outcome
Change in Frequency of Heavy Drinking Days
Time frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up
The frequency of heavy drinking days will be assessed using a 90 day Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) collected at baseline prior to study intervention. TLFB will be administered again at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow up periods. Changes in frequency of heavy drinking days will be assessed across all study time points.
1 secondary outcome
Change in Frequency of Alcohol-Related Negative Consequences
Time frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-. 12-month follow up
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Apr 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38434594Rosales R, Lee CS, Cortes D, Caetano R, Rohsenow DJ, Lopez SR, Colby SM. Development and Evaluation of a Measure of Drinking Behavior in Response to Acculturation Stressors for Latinx Adults Entering Alcohol Treatment. J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2023 Dec;155:208936. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2022.208936. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37156426Hai AH, Lee CS, Zhou C, Delva J. Culturally adapted motivational interviewing's effects on drinking in response to immigration and acculturation stressors among Latinx adults with heavy drinking problems. J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2023 Jul;150:209061. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209061. Epub 2023 May 6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31403817Lee CS, Colby SM, Rohsenow DJ, Martin R, Rosales R, McCallum TT, Falcon L, Almeida J, Cortes DE. A randomized controlled trial of motivational interviewing tailored for heavy drinking latinxs. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2019 Sep;87(9):815-830. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000428.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26819573Lee CS, Almeida J, Colby SM, Tavares T, Rohsenow DJ. Acculturation, hazardous drinking and depressive symptomatology among Hispanics enrolled in a clinical trial. Addict Res Theory. 2016 Jan 1;24(1):69-79. doi: 10.3109/16066359.2015.1072517. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
Related trials for Alcohol Drinking
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingPhase 1
Environment and Alcohol: A Pilot Study
Alcohol Use Disorder
Not yet recruiting
A MRT to Optimize a JITAI for Alcohol Craving and Suicide Ideation
Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD), Suicide Ideation
RecruitingPhase 2
Study on Thiamine Supplementation to REduce braiN Injury Associated With Chronic Alcohol Use in Outpatients With Alcohol Use Disorder
Alcohol Use Disorder
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Longitudinal Cohort Study to Evaluate Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Disease in Haiti
Hypertension, Diabetes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Christina S Lee, Ph.D principal investigator
Northeastern University
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Motivational Interviewing and Culturally Tailored MI in people with Alcohol Drinking, run by Northeastern University at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Frequency of Heavy Drinking Days (time frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01996280, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Apr 2019.