AzTrials
AzTrials

Heart Valve Disease3D-INTENSITYNCT01996657

D-Dimer Determined Anticoagulation INTENSITY in Patients With Mechanical Valve Replacement

An observational study of Heart Valve Disease, run by Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital at 2 sites in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The optimal intensity of oral anticoagulation in China patients undergoing mechanical valve replacements is still controversial due to the different risk profiles of thrombophilia and bleeding in Chinese patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Heart Valve Disease
What is being tested?
Warfarin
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
How many people
772 participants
Where
2 sitesChina
Study dates
Jan 2013to Jun 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients suffered mechanical valves replacement because of valves dysfunction; and oral anticoagulation therapy with warfarin

Who may be able to join

  • age>18years,male or female without pregnancy;
  • Suffered the mechanical valves replacement in Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital;
  • The operation type was Mitral valve replacement or Double valves replacement(aortic and mitral valve replacement).
  • Exclusion Criteria: Patients with following diseases within 3 months.
  • deep venous thromboembolism
  • Pulmonary embolism
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Aortic dissection
  • stroke
  • Cerebral hemorrhage
  • Myocardial infarction

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

China2 sites
  • WAHH

    Wuhan, Hubei, 430000

  • Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital

    Wuhan, Hubei, 430022

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: D-dimer Levels Determined the Intensity of Anticoagulation Therapy to Improve Outcomes in Patients With Mechanical Valve Replacement

The optimal intensity of oral anticoagulation in China patients undergoing mechanical valve replacements is still controversial due to the different risk profiles of thrombophilia and bleeding in Chinese patients. Elevated D-dimer could reflect a pro-thrombogenic or prothrombotic state, and thus might be used to decide the intensity of oral anticoagulation.

This study was to evaluate whether elevated D-dimer levels could help to determine the intensity of oral anticoagulation in patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses.

Read the detailed description

Background: The optimal intensity of oral anticoagulation in China patients undergoing mechanical valve replacements is still controversial due to the different risk profiles of thrombophilia and bleeding in Chinese patients. Elevated D-dimer could reflect a pro-thrombogenic or prothrombotic state, and thus might be used to decide the intensity of oral anticoagulation.

Objective: This study was to evaluate whether elevated D-dimer levels could help to determine the intensity of oral anticoagulation in patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses.

Methods: A single-center, prospective study was performed. 748 Patients with mechanical valve replacement who had received oral anticoagulation. The patients were randomly assigned to three groups The intensity of anticoagulation for group one was standard intensity (INR:2.5-3.5). The intensity of anticoagulation for group two was kept at low intensity without adjustment (INR:1.8-2.6), and for group three , The intensity of anticoagulation maintained at low level initiatively (INR:1.8-2.6), D-dimer testing were analyzed two times at 3 month later. In case of D-dimer level elevated, adjusted the intensity of anticoagulation to standard level. The endpoint of the study was the subsequent thromboembolic and major bleeding during an average follow-up of 2 years.

Being tested
Warfarin
Keywords
mechanical valves replacement, INR, D-dimer, thromboembolic events
Medical subject headings
Heart Valve Diseases, Thromboembolism

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • WarfarinDrug

    Also called Warfarin Sodium Tablets

Study groups in NCT01996657
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard intensity of anticoagulationAfter mechanical valve replacement,patients should be gave oral anticoagulants,such as warfarin.and The intensity of anticoagulation for this group was standard intensity (INR:2.5-3.5).
Receives: Drug: Warfarin
Low intensity and adjusted by elevated D-dimerThe intensity of anticoagulation maintained at low level initiatively, D-dimer testing were analyzed at 3 month later. In case of D-dimer level elevated, adjusted the intensity to standard level.
Receives: Drug: Warfarin
Low intensity without adjustmentThe intensity of anticoagulation for this group was kept at low intensity without adjustment (INR:1.8-2.6),
Receives: Drug: Warfarin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Bleeding Events;

    The bleeding events included cerebral hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding and other major internal or external bleeding that causes death, hospitalization, or permanent injury (e.g. vision loss) or necessitates transfusion.

    Measured: Up to 24 months

  2. Thrombotic Events

    The thrombotic events included valve thrombosis, transient ischemic attack, ischemic stroke, peripheral embolism, and myocardial infarction.

    Measured: 24 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. All Cause Deaths

    The deaths from all causes

    Measured: Up to 24 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Nov 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2013
  3. Primary completionMay 2016
  4. Study completionJun 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
772 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01996657
Sponsor's protocol ID
2013-P-002
Acronym
3D-INTENSITY
Status last verified
Jun 2016
First submitted
4 Nov 2013
Last updated
26 Jun 2017
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Zhang L, Long Y, Xiao H, Yang J, Liu X, Zhang Z. D-Dimer to Predict the Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Mechanical Heart Valve Replacement During Oral Anticoagulation Therapy. Int Heart J. 2019 May 30;60(3):631-636. doi: 10.1536/ihj.18-237. Epub 2019 Apr 25.

    PubMed 31019170
  • Zhang L, Zheng X, Long Y, Wu M, Chen Y, Yang J, Liu Z, Zhang Z. D-dimer to guide the intensity of anticoagulation in Chinese patients after mechanical heart valve replacement: a randomized controlled trial. J Thromb Haemost. 2017 Oct;15(10):1934-1941. doi: 10.1111/jth.13782. Epub 2017 Sep 20.

    PubMed 28762606

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Heart Valve Disease, run by Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital at 2 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Jun 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Bleeding Events; (time frame: Up to 24 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01996657, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jun 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in