AzTrials
AzTrials

Intensive CareNCT01997931

The Impact of Bispectral Index Monitoring on Sedation Administration in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

A study testing Bispectral Index Sedation monitor in people with Intensive Care and Mechanically Ventilated Patients, run by Bayside Health at 1 site in Australia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This prospective randomised controlled trial was designed to assess the effectiveness of the Bispectral Index Sedation (BIS) monitor in supporting clinical, sedation management decisions in mechanically ventilated ICU patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Bispectral Index Sedation monitor
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteAustralia
Study dates
Sep 2004to Jul 2005
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Intubated and ventilated for at least 24 hours
  • Sedated on morphine and midazelam infusions

Who cannot join

  • Intracranial injury
  • Status epilepticus
  • Facial Burns

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Australia1 site
  • The Alfred Hospital

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3004

Other trials in Australia

About this study

This prospective randomised controlled trial was designed to assess the effectiveness of the Bispectral Index Sedation (BIS) monitor in supporting clinical, sedation management decisions in mechanically ventilated ICU patients.

The primary hypothesis for the study is that patients with Bispectral Index Sedation (BIS) monitoring will receive less sedation then those receiving standard sedation management.

The secondary hypotheses are:

  1. Patients with BIS have fewer ventilation days than those receiving standard sedation management.
  2. Level of sedation administered will differ according to the critical care experience and qualification of the nurse.
Read the detailed description

Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) frequently require sedatives and analgesics as part of therapy. Assessing the appropriate dose of sedative and analgesic drugs can be difficult due to the severity of the patient's illness, inability of the patient to communicate, multiple procedures and transports for investigations and the subjectivity of clinical sedation assessment tools. Poorly assessed and managed levels of sedation can result in over sedation, extended ventilation time and a potentially extended ICU stay.

The BIS monitor is derived from the electroencephalogram and provides a numeric value that represents a measure of cerebral activity. Such an objective measure of the patient's level of sedation may provide a useful tool that will enable nurses to titrate sedation more accurately in an attempt to provide the optimal level of sedation for all ICU patients.

The study will be conducted in the Intensive Care Unit at the Alfred Hospital. This study is designed as a prospective randomised control trial with parallel design. This means that participants' will be randomly allocated into either one of two groups - an intervention or control group. Participant's randomised to the intervention group will receive BIS monitoring. The control group will receive standard ICU sedation assessment and management.

To determine if BIS monitoring is useful in ICU, information will be collected by auditing patient charts and determining the average amounts of sedation medication for each nursing shift. In addition, the years of critical care experience and critical care qualification will be recorded for each nurse managing patients recruited to the study.

Being tested
Bispectral Index Sedation monitor
Keywords
bispectral index, sedation, intensive care, mechanical ventilation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Bispectral Index Sedation monitorDevice

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Optimised sedation management for patients through the use of BIS monitoring.

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Reduction in mechanical ventilation time.

  2. Reduced length of stay in the intensive care unit.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Nov 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2004
  3. Primary completionJun 2005
  4. Study completionJul 2005

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01997931
Sponsor's protocol ID
111/04
Status last verified
Nov 2013
First submitted
9 Sep 2005
Last updated
28 Nov 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Bispectral Index Sedation monitor in people with Intensive Care and Mechanically Ventilated Patients, run by Bayside Health at 1 site in Australia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Nov 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Optimised sedation management for patients through the use of BIS monitoring.. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Nov 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in