Systemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeNCT01998139
Endothelial Microparticles as a Biomarker for Diagnosis and Prognosis in Early Sepsis
An observational study of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 2 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Sepsis is a major global health problem, leading to substantial morbidity and mortality despite medical care. The initial diagnosis of sepsis is a clinical challenge, as it is based on nonspecific systemic criteria. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome
- How many people
- 137 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Jul 2013to Feb 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Subjects will be eligible for enrollment at the time of clinician decision to admit to the Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) for presumed sepsis.
Who may be able to join
- Adults age 18 and older
- Clinician-suspected diagnosis of sepsis
- Willingness of subject or Legally Authorized Representative (LAR) to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- Desire to forego life-sustaining therapy
- Trauma or surgical subjects
- Pregnancy
- Subjects who, in the opinion of the treating physician and/or investigator, would be at increased risk by the additional blood draw, for instance, subjects with severe anemia, or subjects with anemia who are unwilling or unable to receive blood transfusions
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 2 countries.
2 sites in 2 countries
United States1 site
Weill Cornell Medical College
New York, New York, 10021
About this study
Sepsis is a major global health problem, leading to substantial morbidity and mortality despite medical care. The initial diagnosis of sepsis is a clinical challenge, as it is based on nonspecific systemic criteria. Excessive endothelial activation is a cardinal feature of sepsis and contributes to microvascular leak, edema, circulatory shock and organ failure. Activated endothelial cells shed endothelial microparticles (EMPs) which can be measured in plasma and are found at low levels in healthy subjects. Elevated EMPs have been reported in sepsis, but whether their effect is beneficial or deleterious is unclear. In this context, we hypothesize that circulating EMP levels can be assessed as a biomarker differentiating sepsis from non-sepsis critical illness. This may also suggest that EMP levels correlate with 30-day mortality. We propose to measure circulating EMPs at ICU admission in subjects with suspected sepsis. Final diagnoses will be adjudicated using standard criteria and 30-day mortality ascertained. Subjects determined not to have sepsis will serve as the control group. EMP levels will be correlated with diagnosis to ascertain the utility of EMP levels as a diagnostic biomarker for sepsis. For those subjects with proven sepsis, EMP levels will be correlated to 30-day mortality to assess EMP level as a prognostic marker in sepsis.
Read the detailed description
In the presence of infection, normal immune and physiologic responses act in concert to eradicate pathogens. When these responses are inappropriately regulated, sepsis develops. Sepsis is characterized by systemic manifestations of infection. The diagnosis is made by identifying at least 2 of the components of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), based on four clinical and laboratory criteria: respiratory rate, tachycardia, temperature, and leukocyte level in the presence of a documented infection. The presence of acute organ dysfunction in this setting defines severe sepsis, and hypotension that is not reversed with fluid administration defines the entity of septic shock. Severe sepsis as well as its most severe form, septic shock, are significant global health concerns, afflicting millions of patients worldwide, increasing in incidence, and having an associated mortality rate of >25%. In the United States alone, an estimated 750,000 people develop sepsis or severe sepsis each year, and sepsis/septic shock is the 11th leading illness leading to mortality in the US. The annual cost burden of sepsis is estimated to be more than $17 billion. For these reasons, clinical investigators interested in sepsis have directed efforts toward identifying a biomarker that would be useful in making an early diagnosis of sepsis. In addition to early diagnosis, biomarkers for prognosis have been sought to guide severity assessment and to guide more personalized treatment of individual patients.
Endothelial Activation in Sepsis Endothelial activation occurs early in systemic infections and is an adaptive response, allowing leukocyte migration to sites of microbial invasion. In sepsis, however, endothelial activation is excessive and poses the following risks: harm via tissue damage due to excessive leukocyte recruitment, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) relating to loss of endothelial anticoagulant properties, apoptotic death of endothelial cells, and loss of microvascular barrier function. The dysfunctional endothelial barrier leads to vascular leak and tissue edema, hallmarks of sepsis. This loss of endothelial barrier function is linked to increased morbidity and mortality in animal models of sepsis.
Endothelial Microparticles Microparticles are intact vesicles of a size 0.2-2.0 μm which are released from plasma membranes of multiple cell types in the setting of cell injury, activation, and/or apoptosis. In healthy individuals, microparticles found in the plasma are derived from platelets, erythrocytes, leukocytes, and endothelial cells. EMPS generally circulate at a relatively low level and reflect normal endothelial cell turnover. Elevated circulating levels of EMPs can be identified in a number of illnesses including sickle cell disease, immune-mediated thrombotic syndromes such as antiphospholipid syndrome and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, diabetes, chronic renal failure, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, venous thromboembolic disease, metabolic syndrome, severe hypertension, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, and multiple sclerosis. The functional roles that may be played by endothelial microparticles are diverse and include neutrophil activation, chemotactic attraction of leukocytes, platelet aggregation, generation of thrombin (in vitro) and superoxide anions, stimulation of endothelial proliferation, induction of angiogenesis, MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression enabling vascular invasion of the basement membrane, and carrying of endothelial proteins and protein C.
Given the importance of the endothelium in the pathogenesis of sepsis, we propose to examine the role of endothelial-derived microparticles (EMPs) as a biomarker in sepsis.
- Conditions
- Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome
- Medical subject headings
- Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Test Cohort | EMP levels will be measured at ICU admission in subjects with physician-suspected sepsis. For each subject, the final diagnosis of sepsis or non-sepsis critical illness will be adjudicated using standard criteria. The subjects without sepsis will form the Test Cohort. | |
| Validation Cohort | EMP levels will be measured at ICU admission in subjects with physician-suspected sepsis. For each subject, the final diagnosis of sepsis or non-sepsis critical illness will be adjudicated using standard criteria.The subjects determined to have sepsis will serve as the Validation Cohort . |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
EMP level as predictive biomarker for diagnosis of sepsis.
To evaluate the hypothesis that EMP level is a predictive biomarker for the diagnosis of sepsis. For the primary objective, a prospective, cross-sectional, case control design will be utilized. EMP levels will be measured at ICU admission in subjects with physician-suspected sepsis. For each subject, the final diagnosis of sepsis or non-sepsis critical illness will be adjudicated using standard criteria, and the subjects determined to have sepsis will serve as the cases while those subjects without sepsis will form the control group.
Measured: 5 days
Secondary outcomes (1)
EMP level as a predictive biomarker for mortality in sepsis.
To evaluate the hypothesis that EMP level is a predictive biomarker for mortality in sepsis. For the secondary objective, EMP levels will be measured on admission and daily for the first 5 ICU days or until the subject dies or leaves the ICU. While data will be collected prospectively on all subjects, the cohort for analysis for this objective will include only those subjects with a validated diagnosis of sepsis. In these subjects, 30-day mortality will be ascertained, and EMP levels correlated with mortality to determine the utility of EMPs as a biomarker for mortality risk in sepsis.
Measured: 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Nov 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2013
- Primary completionFeb 2019
- Study completionFeb 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Systemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 137 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Weill Medical College of Cornell University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hamad Medical Corporation
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ronald G Crystal, MD, Principal investigator, Weill Medical College of Cornell University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01998139
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1305013944
- Other IDs
- NPRP 6-1348-3-321, 13-00309
- Status last verified
- Jul 2020
- First submitted
- 22 Nov 2013
- Last updated
- 28 Jul 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jul 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Endothelial Microparticles as a Biomarker for Diagnosis and Prognosis in Early Sepsis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01998139
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1305013944
- Conditions
- Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 137 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hamad Medical Corporation
- Study start
- Jul 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Nov 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Sepsis is a major global health problem, leading to substantial morbidity and mortality despite medical care. The initial diagnosis of sepsis is a clinical challenge, as it is based on nonspecific systemic criteria. Excessive endothelial activation is a cardinal feature of sepsis and contributes to microvascular leak, edema, circulatory shock and organ failure. Activated endothelial cells shed endothelial microparticles (EMPs) which can be measured in plasma and are found at low levels in healthy subjects. Elevated EMPs have been reported in sepsis, but whether their effect is beneficial or deleterious is unclear. In this context, we hypothesize that circulating EMP levels can be assessed as a biomarker differentiating sepsis from non-sepsis critical illness. This may also suggest that EMP levels correlate with 30-day mortality. We propose to measure circulating EMPs at ICU admission in subjects with suspected sepsis. Final diagnoses will be adjudicated using standard criteria and 30-day mortality ascertained. Subjects determined not to have sepsis will serve as the control group. EMP levels will be correlated with diagnosis to ascertain the utility of EMP levels as a diagnostic biomarker for sepsis. For those subjects with proven sepsis, EMP levels will be correlated to 30-day mortality to assess EMP level as a prognostic marker in sepsis.
Detailed description
In the presence of infection, normal immune and physiologic responses act in concert to eradicate pathogens. When these responses are inappropriately regulated, sepsis develops. Sepsis is characterized by systemic manifestations of infection. The diagnosis is made by identifying at least 2 of the components of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), based on four clinical and laboratory criteria: respiratory rate, tachycardia, temperature, and leukocyte level in the presence of a documented infection. The presence of acute organ dysfunction in this setting defines severe sepsis, and hypotension that is not reversed with fluid administration defines the entity of septic shock. Severe sepsis as well as its most severe form, septic shock, are significant global health concerns, afflicting millions of patients worldwide, increasing in incidence, and having an associated mortality rate of >25%. In the United States alone, an estimated 750,000 people develop sepsis or severe sepsis each year, and sepsis/septic shock is the 11th leading illness leading to mortality in the US. The annual cost burden of sepsis is estimated to be more than $17 billion. For these reasons, clinical investigators interested in sepsis have directed efforts toward identifying a biomarker that would be useful in making an early diagnosis of sepsis. In addition to early diagnosis, biomarkers for prognosis have been sought to guide severity assessment and to guide more personalized treatment of individual patients.
Endothelial Activation in Sepsis Endothelial activation occurs early in systemic infections and is an adaptive response, allowing leukocyte migration to sites of microbial invasion. In sepsis, however, endothelial activation is excessive and poses the following risks: harm via tissue damage due to excessive leukocyte recruitment, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) relating to loss of endothelial anticoagulant properties, apoptotic death of endothelial cells, and loss of microvascular barrier function. The dysfunctional endothelial barrier leads to vascular leak and tissue edema, hallmarks of sepsis. This loss of endothelial barrier function is linked to increased morbidity and mortality in animal models of sepsis.
Endothelial Microparticles Microparticles are intact vesicles of a size 0.2-2.0 μm which are released from plasma membranes of multiple cell types in the setting of cell injury, activation, and/or apoptosis. In healthy individuals, microparticles found in the plasma are derived from platelets, erythrocytes, leukocytes, and endothelial cells. EMPS generally circulate at a relatively low level and reflect normal endothelial cell turnover. Elevated circulating levels of EMPs can be identified in a number of illnesses including sickle cell disease, immune-mediated thrombotic syndromes such as antiphospholipid syndrome and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, diabetes, chronic renal failure, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, venous thromboembolic disease, metabolic syndrome, severe hypertension, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, and multiple sclerosis. The functional roles that may be played by endothelial microparticles are diverse and include neutrophil activation, chemotactic attraction of leukocytes, platelet aggregation, generation of thrombin (in vitro) and superoxide anions, stimulation of endothelial proliferation, induction of angiogenesis, MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression enabling vascular invasion of the basement membrane, and carrying of endothelial proteins and protein C.
Given the importance of the endothelium in the pathogenesis of sepsis, we propose to examine the role of endothelial-derived microparticles (EMPs) as a biomarker in sepsis.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Test Cohort | – | –EMP levels will be measured at ICU admission in subjects with physician-suspected sepsis. For each subject, the final diagnosis of sepsis or non-sepsis critical illness will be adjudicated using standard criteria. The subjects without sepsis will form the Test Cohort. |
| Validation Cohort | – | –EMP levels will be measured at ICU admission in subjects with physician-suspected sepsis. For each subject, the final diagnosis of sepsis or non-sepsis critical illness will be adjudicated using standard criteria.The subjects determined to have sepsis will serve as the Validation Cohort . |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Subjects will be eligible for enrollment at the time of clinician decision to admit to the Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) for presumed sepsis.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adults age 18 and older
- Clinician-suspected diagnosis of sepsis
- Willingness of subject or Legally Authorized Representative (LAR) to participate in the study
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Desire to forego life-sustaining therapy
- Trauma or surgical subjects
- Pregnancy
- Subjects who, in the opinion of the treating physician and/or investigator, would be at increased risk by the additional blood draw, for instance, subjects with severe anemia, or subjects with anemia who are unwilling or unable to receive blood transfusions
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
EMP level as predictive biomarker for diagnosis of sepsis.
Time frame: 5 days
To evaluate the hypothesis that EMP level is a predictive biomarker for the diagnosis of sepsis. For the primary objective, a prospective, cross-sectional, case control design will be utilized. EMP levels will be measured at ICU admission in subjects with physician-suspected sepsis. For each subject, the final diagnosis of sepsis or non-sepsis critical illness will be adjudicated using standard criteria, and the subjects determined to have sepsis will serve as the cases while those subjects without sepsis will form the control group.
1 secondary outcome
EMP level as a predictive biomarker for mortality in sepsis.
Time frame: 30 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jul 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Pivotal Safety and Immunogenicity GBS-NN/NN2 Vaccine Maternal Immunisation Trial
Streptococcus Agalactiae Infection, Neonatal Sepsis
Active, not recruiting
CT for Personalized Mechanical Ventilation
Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, Sepsis Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 4
A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Extended and Intermittent Infusion of Beta-lactams in Critically Ill Paediatric Patients
Infection, Sepsis
Not yet recruiting
Double Plasma Separation and Adsorption in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (DPMAS-ACLF Trial)
Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF)
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Thymosin Alpha 1 and IgM Levels in Sepsis
Sepsis, Septic Shock
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ronald G Crystal, MD principal investigator
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
2 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 2 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States, Qatar. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
EMP level as predictive biomarker for diagnosis of sepsis. (time frame: 5 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jul 2020.