AzTrials
AzTrials

Systemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeNCT01998139

Endothelial Microparticles as a Biomarker for Diagnosis and Prognosis in Early Sepsis

An observational study of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 2 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Sepsis is a major global health problem, leading to substantial morbidity and mortality despite medical care. The initial diagnosis of sepsis is a clinical challenge, as it is based on nonspecific systemic criteria. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome
How many people
137 participants
Where
2 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
Jul 2013to Feb 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Subjects will be eligible for enrollment at the time of clinician decision to admit to the Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) for presumed sepsis.

Who may be able to join

  • Adults age 18 and older
  • Clinician-suspected diagnosis of sepsis
  • Willingness of subject or Legally Authorized Representative (LAR) to participate in the study

Who cannot join

  • Desire to forego life-sustaining therapy
  • Trauma or surgical subjects
  • Pregnancy
  • Subjects who, in the opinion of the treating physician and/or investigator, would be at increased risk by the additional blood draw, for instance, subjects with severe anemia, or subjects with anemia who are unwilling or unable to receive blood transfusions

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 2 countries.

2 sites in 2 countries

United States1 site
  • Weill Cornell Medical College

    New York, New York, 10021

Other trials in United States

Qatar1 site
  • Hamad Medical Corporation

    Doha

Other trials in Qatar

About this study

Sepsis is a major global health problem, leading to substantial morbidity and mortality despite medical care. The initial diagnosis of sepsis is a clinical challenge, as it is based on nonspecific systemic criteria. Excessive endothelial activation is a cardinal feature of sepsis and contributes to microvascular leak, edema, circulatory shock and organ failure. Activated endothelial cells shed endothelial microparticles (EMPs) which can be measured in plasma and are found at low levels in healthy subjects. Elevated EMPs have been reported in sepsis, but whether their effect is beneficial or deleterious is unclear. In this context, we hypothesize that circulating EMP levels can be assessed as a biomarker differentiating sepsis from non-sepsis critical illness. This may also suggest that EMP levels correlate with 30-day mortality. We propose to measure circulating EMPs at ICU admission in subjects with suspected sepsis. Final diagnoses will be adjudicated using standard criteria and 30-day mortality ascertained. Subjects determined not to have sepsis will serve as the control group. EMP levels will be correlated with diagnosis to ascertain the utility of EMP levels as a diagnostic biomarker for sepsis. For those subjects with proven sepsis, EMP levels will be correlated to 30-day mortality to assess EMP level as a prognostic marker in sepsis.

Read the detailed description

In the presence of infection, normal immune and physiologic responses act in concert to eradicate pathogens. When these responses are inappropriately regulated, sepsis develops. Sepsis is characterized by systemic manifestations of infection. The diagnosis is made by identifying at least 2 of the components of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), based on four clinical and laboratory criteria: respiratory rate, tachycardia, temperature, and leukocyte level in the presence of a documented infection. The presence of acute organ dysfunction in this setting defines severe sepsis, and hypotension that is not reversed with fluid administration defines the entity of septic shock. Severe sepsis as well as its most severe form, septic shock, are significant global health concerns, afflicting millions of patients worldwide, increasing in incidence, and having an associated mortality rate of >25%. In the United States alone, an estimated 750,000 people develop sepsis or severe sepsis each year, and sepsis/septic shock is the 11th leading illness leading to mortality in the US. The annual cost burden of sepsis is estimated to be more than $17 billion. For these reasons, clinical investigators interested in sepsis have directed efforts toward identifying a biomarker that would be useful in making an early diagnosis of sepsis. In addition to early diagnosis, biomarkers for prognosis have been sought to guide severity assessment and to guide more personalized treatment of individual patients.

Endothelial Activation in Sepsis Endothelial activation occurs early in systemic infections and is an adaptive response, allowing leukocyte migration to sites of microbial invasion. In sepsis, however, endothelial activation is excessive and poses the following risks: harm via tissue damage due to excessive leukocyte recruitment, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) relating to loss of endothelial anticoagulant properties, apoptotic death of endothelial cells, and loss of microvascular barrier function. The dysfunctional endothelial barrier leads to vascular leak and tissue edema, hallmarks of sepsis. This loss of endothelial barrier function is linked to increased morbidity and mortality in animal models of sepsis.

Endothelial Microparticles Microparticles are intact vesicles of a size 0.2-2.0 μm which are released from plasma membranes of multiple cell types in the setting of cell injury, activation, and/or apoptosis. In healthy individuals, microparticles found in the plasma are derived from platelets, erythrocytes, leukocytes, and endothelial cells. EMPS generally circulate at a relatively low level and reflect normal endothelial cell turnover. Elevated circulating levels of EMPs can be identified in a number of illnesses including sickle cell disease, immune-mediated thrombotic syndromes such as antiphospholipid syndrome and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, diabetes, chronic renal failure, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, venous thromboembolic disease, metabolic syndrome, severe hypertension, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, and multiple sclerosis. The functional roles that may be played by endothelial microparticles are diverse and include neutrophil activation, chemotactic attraction of leukocytes, platelet aggregation, generation of thrombin (in vitro) and superoxide anions, stimulation of endothelial proliferation, induction of angiogenesis, MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression enabling vascular invasion of the basement membrane, and carrying of endothelial proteins and protein C.

Given the importance of the endothelium in the pathogenesis of sepsis, we propose to examine the role of endothelial-derived microparticles (EMPs) as a biomarker in sepsis.

Medical subject headings
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01998139
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Test CohortEMP levels will be measured at ICU admission in subjects with physician-suspected sepsis. For each subject, the final diagnosis of sepsis or non-sepsis critical illness will be adjudicated using standard criteria. The subjects without sepsis will form the Test Cohort.
Validation CohortEMP levels will be measured at ICU admission in subjects with physician-suspected sepsis. For each subject, the final diagnosis of sepsis or non-sepsis critical illness will be adjudicated using standard criteria.The subjects determined to have sepsis will serve as the Validation Cohort .

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. EMP level as predictive biomarker for diagnosis of sepsis.

    To evaluate the hypothesis that EMP level is a predictive biomarker for the diagnosis of sepsis. For the primary objective, a prospective, cross-sectional, case control design will be utilized. EMP levels will be measured at ICU admission in subjects with physician-suspected sepsis. For each subject, the final diagnosis of sepsis or non-sepsis critical illness will be adjudicated using standard criteria, and the subjects determined to have sepsis will serve as the cases while those subjects without sepsis will form the control group.

    Measured: 5 days

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. EMP level as a predictive biomarker for mortality in sepsis.

    To evaluate the hypothesis that EMP level is a predictive biomarker for mortality in sepsis. For the secondary objective, EMP levels will be measured on admission and daily for the first 5 ICU days or until the subject dies or leaves the ICU. While data will be collected prospectively on all subjects, the cohort for analysis for this objective will include only those subjects with a validated diagnosis of sepsis. In these subjects, 30-day mortality will be ascertained, and EMP levels correlated with mortality to determine the utility of EMPs as a biomarker for mortality risk in sepsis.

    Measured: 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Nov 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2013
  3. Primary completionFeb 2019
  4. Study completionFeb 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
137 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01998139
Sponsor's protocol ID
1305013944
Other IDs
NPRP 6-1348-3-321, 13-00309
Status last verified
Jul 2020
First submitted
22 Nov 2013
Last updated
28 Jul 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 2 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States, Qatar. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

EMP level as predictive biomarker for diagnosis of sepsis. (time frame: 5 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jul 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in