Colonic PolypsACER/AMNNCT02000141
The Australian Colonic Advanced Mucosal Neoplasia and Endoscopic Resection Study
An observational study of Colonic Polyps, run by Professor Michael Bourke at 1 site in Australia.
Trial summary
To enhance understanding of the risk factors for AMN, improve lesion assessment and prediction of submucosal invasive cancer, improve endoscopic resection efficacy, reduce complications of WF-EMR and improve the understanding of the progression of large lesions to cancer Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Colonic Polyps
- What is being tested?
- Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 1,281 participants
- Where
- 1 siteAustralia
- Study dates
- Jan 2014to Jan 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients referred to a study centre for colonic WF-EMR of a known sessile colonic polyp or laterally spreading tumour (LST) ≥20mm in size.
Who may be able to join
- Patients referred for endoscopic resection of a large sessile colonic polyp or laterally spreading tumour ≥20mm in size.
- Age > 18 years
- Able to give informed consent to involvement in the clinical study
Who cannot join
- Unable to provide informed consent for involvement
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Australian Colonic Advanced Mucosal Neoplasia and Endoscopic Resection Study - a Prospective Observational Cohort Study
To enhance understanding of the risk factors for AMN, improve lesion assessment and prediction of submucosal invasive cancer, improve endoscopic resection efficacy, reduce complications of WF-EMR and improve the understanding of the progression of large lesions to cancer
Read the detailed description
The Australian Colonic Endoscopic Mucosal Resection study (ACE), is a multicentre prospective observational study which examined WF-EMR of colonic AMN (Ethics approval No. HREC JH/TG 2008/9/6.1(2858)). This project now has an extensive dataset from 8 leading colonic endoscopic resection centres in Australia on more than 1500 lesions resected over 4 years since June 2008.
The ACE study has been successful in addressing several aspects of the resection of AMN, resulting in several high profile papers in internationally recognised journals. The collection of this data has produced robust information on the efficacy of the procedure4, recurrence rates7, bleeding complications8 and mortality when compared to surgery5. Single centre analysis of the ACE dataset at Westmead has also allowed insights into how to refine the procedure to improve outcomes. The target sign is now a recognised indication for the placement of clips to prevent perforation9, CO2 insufflation for WF-EMR has been shown to be superior to air insufflation10 and succinylated gelatin (Gelofusine®) has been shown to be superior to normal saline as a submucosal lifting agent11.
There remain a number of unanswered questions regarding the endoscopic resection of large sessile lesions and expanding the ACE dataset in a new cohort of patients will allow these to be addressed. Enhancing the prediction of submucosal invasive cancer, advanced lesion classification, refinement of the assessment of deep injury, submucosal injectate constituents, the optimum electrosurgical resection methods, prevention and prophylaxis of bleeding, and subtype analyses of the different histological groups comprising AMN will be examined.
- Conditions
- Colonic Polyps
- Being tested
- Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
- Medical subject headings
- Colonic Polyps
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionProcedure or surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Endoscopic Mucosal Resection | Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Colonic Advanced Mucosal Lesions Receives: Procedure: Endoscopic Mucosal Resection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Recurrence
Follow up colonoscopies as per standard of care for 6 - 60 months noting and treating any recurrence.
Measured: 6-60 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Cancer prediction
By properly assessing the lesion it is hoped that we will be able to provide the greater Gastroenterology community with a tool which can be used to properly identify benign and cancerous lesions to decrease the number of benign lesions being referred to surgery.
Measured: Initial procedure
Improved Endoscopic Resection
By assessing the lesion at resection and following up with standard of care colonoscopies it is anticipated that there will be an improved endoscopic resection efficacy therefore reducing the risk of recurrence.
Measured: 0-60 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2014
- Primary completionJan 2017
- Study completionJan 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colonic PolypsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1,281 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Professor Michael Bourke
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Professor Michael Bourke, Western Sydney Local Health District
- Investigators
- Michael Bourke, MBBS, Principal investigator, South West Sydney Area Health Service
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02000141
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HREC2013/8/4.5(3778)
- Other IDs
- AU RED HREC/13/WMEAD/233
- Acronym
- ACER/AMN
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 26 Nov 2013
- Last updated
- 27 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Gauci JL, Mandarino FV, Kerrison C, Whitfield AM, O'Sullivan T, Gupta S, Lam B, Perananthan V, Cronin O, Lee EY, Williams SJ, Burgess N, Bourke MJ. Margin thermal ablation eliminates size as a risk factor for recurrence after piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps. Gut. 2025 Apr 7;74(5):752-760. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-333563.
PubMed 40044497Gauci JL, Whitfield A, Medas R, Kerrison C, Mandarino FV, Gibson D, O'Sullivan T, Cronin O, Gupta S, Lam B, Perananthan V, Hourigan L, Zanati S, Singh R, Raftopoulos S, Moss A, Brown G, Klein A, Desomer L, Tate DJ, Williams SJ, Lee EY, Burgess N, Bourke MJ. Prevalence of Endoscopically Curable Low-Risk Cancer Among Large (>/=20 mm) Nonpedunculated Polyps in the Right Colon. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Mar;23(4):555-563.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.07.017. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
PubMed 39089517Tate DJ, Vosko S, Bar-Yishay I, Desomer L, Shahidi N, Sidhu M, McLeod D, Bourke MJ. Incomplete mucosal layer excision during EMR: a potential source of recurrent adenoma (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Sep;100(3):501-509. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.01.030. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
PubMed 38280532Tate DJ, Desomer L, Argenziano ME, Mahajan N, Sidhu M, Vosko S, Shahidi N, Lee E, Williams SJ, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. Treatment of adenoma recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection. Gut. 2023 Oct;72(10):1875-1886. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330300. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
PubMed 37414440O'Sullivan T, Tate D, Sidhu M, Gupta S, Elhindi J, Byth K, Cronin O, Whitfield A, Craciun A, Singh R, Brown G, Raftopoulos S, Hourigan L, Moss A, Klein A, Heitman S, Williams S, Lee E, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. The Surface Morphology of Large Nonpedunculated Colonic Polyps Predicts Synchronous Large Lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Aug;21(9):2270-2277.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.01.034. Epub 2023 Feb 12.
PubMed 36787836Cronin O, Sidhu M, Shahidi N, Gupta S, O'Sullivan T, Whitfield A, Wang H, Kumar P, Hourigan LF, Byth K, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. Comparison of the morphology and histopathology of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps in the rectum and colon: implications for endoscopic treatment. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Jul;96(1):118-124. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.02.022. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
PubMed 35219724Shaleve Y, Sabo E, Bourke MJ, Klein A. Computerized image analysis of blood vessels within mucosal defects for the prediction of delayed bleeding following colonic endoscopic mucosal resection: a pilot study. Endoscopy. 2021 Aug;53(8):837-841. doi: 10.1055/a-1258-8992. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
PubMed 32898919Bahin FF, Heitman SJ, Rasouli KN, Mahajan H, McLeod D, Lee EYT, Williams SJ, Bourke MJ. Wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for laterally spreading colorectal lesions: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Gut. 2018 Nov;67(11):1965-1973. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-313823. Epub 2017 Oct 7.
PubMed 28988198Burgess NG, Hourigan LF, Zanati SA, Brown GJ, Singh R, Williams SJ, Raftopoulos SC, Ormonde D, Moss A, Byth K, Mahajan H, McLeod D, Bourke MJ. Risk Stratification for Covert Invasive Cancer Among Patients Referred for Colonic Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: A Large Multicenter Cohort. Gastroenterology. 2017 Sep;153(3):732-742.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.047. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
PubMed 28583826Burgess NG, Bassan MS, McLeod D, Williams SJ, Byth K, Bourke MJ. Deep mural injury and perforation after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection: a new classification and analysis of risk factors. Gut. 2017 Oct;66(10):1779-1789. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309848. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
PubMed 27464708
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Australian Colonic Advanced Mucosal Neoplasia and Endoscopic Resection Study - a Prospective Observational Cohort Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02000141
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ACER/AMN / HREC2013/8/4.5(3778)
- Conditions
- Colonic Polyps
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1,281 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Professor Michael BourkeUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2014
- Primary completion
- Jan 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To enhance understanding of the risk factors for AMN, improve lesion assessment and prediction of submucosal invasive cancer, improve endoscopic resection efficacy, reduce complications of WF-EMR and improve the understanding of the progression of large lesions to cancer
Detailed description
The Australian Colonic Endoscopic Mucosal Resection study (ACE), is a multicentre prospective observational study which examined WF-EMR of colonic AMN (Ethics approval No. HREC JH/TG 2008/9/6.1(2858)). This project now has an extensive dataset from 8 leading colonic endoscopic resection centres in Australia on more than 1500 lesions resected over 4 years since June 2008.
The ACE study has been successful in addressing several aspects of the resection of AMN, resulting in several high profile papers in internationally recognised journals. The collection of this data has produced robust information on the efficacy of the procedure4, recurrence rates7, bleeding complications8 and mortality when compared to surgery5. Single centre analysis of the ACE dataset at Westmead has also allowed insights into how to refine the procedure to improve outcomes. The target sign is now a recognised indication for the placement of clips to prevent perforation9, CO2 insufflation for WF-EMR has been shown to be superior to air insufflation10 and succinylated gelatin (Gelofusine®) has been shown to be superior to normal saline as a submucosal lifting agent11.
There remain a number of unanswered questions regarding the endoscopic resection of large sessile lesions and expanding the ACE dataset in a new cohort of patients will allow these to be addressed. Enhancing the prediction of submucosal invasive cancer, advanced lesion classification, refinement of the assessment of deep injury, submucosal injectate constituents, the optimum electrosurgical resection methods, prevention and prophylaxis of bleeding, and subtype analyses of the different histological groups comprising AMN will be examined.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Endoscopic Mucosal Resection | – | Procedure: Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionEndoscopic Mucosal Resection of Colonic Advanced Mucosal Lesions |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients referred to a study centre for colonic WF-EMR of a known sessile colonic polyp or laterally spreading tumour (LST) ≥20mm in size.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients referred for endoscopic resection of a large sessile colonic polyp or laterally spreading tumour ≥20mm in size.
- Age > 18 years
- Able to give informed consent to involvement in the clinical study
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Unable to provide informed consent for involvement
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Endoscopic Mucosal Resection | Procedure or surgery | Endoscopic Mucosal Resection |
Primary outcome
Recurrence
Time frame: 6-60 months
Follow up colonoscopies as per standard of care for 6 - 60 months noting and treating any recurrence.
2 secondary outcomes
Cancer prediction
Time frame: Initial procedure
Improved Endoscopic Resection
Time frame: 0-60 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Mar 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40044497Gauci JL, Mandarino FV, Kerrison C, Whitfield AM, O'Sullivan T, Gupta S, Lam B, Perananthan V, Cronin O, Lee EY, Williams SJ, Burgess N, Bourke MJ. Margin thermal ablation eliminates size as a risk factor for recurrence after piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps. Gut. 2025 Apr 7;74(5):752-760. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-333563.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39089517Gauci JL, Whitfield A, Medas R, Kerrison C, Mandarino FV, Gibson D, O'Sullivan T, Cronin O, Gupta S, Lam B, Perananthan V, Hourigan L, Zanati S, Singh R, Raftopoulos S, Moss A, Brown G, Klein A, Desomer L, Tate DJ, Williams SJ, Lee EY, Burgess N, Bourke MJ. Prevalence of Endoscopically Curable Low-Risk Cancer Among Large (>/=20 mm) Nonpedunculated Polyps in the Right Colon. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Mar;23(4):555-563.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.07.017. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38280532Tate DJ, Vosko S, Bar-Yishay I, Desomer L, Shahidi N, Sidhu M, McLeod D, Bourke MJ. Incomplete mucosal layer excision during EMR: a potential source of recurrent adenoma (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Sep;100(3):501-509. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.01.030. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37414440Tate DJ, Desomer L, Argenziano ME, Mahajan N, Sidhu M, Vosko S, Shahidi N, Lee E, Williams SJ, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. Treatment of adenoma recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection. Gut. 2023 Oct;72(10):1875-1886. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330300. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36787836O'Sullivan T, Tate D, Sidhu M, Gupta S, Elhindi J, Byth K, Cronin O, Whitfield A, Craciun A, Singh R, Brown G, Raftopoulos S, Hourigan L, Moss A, Klein A, Heitman S, Williams S, Lee E, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. The Surface Morphology of Large Nonpedunculated Colonic Polyps Predicts Synchronous Large Lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Aug;21(9):2270-2277.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.01.034. Epub 2023 Feb 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35219724Cronin O, Sidhu M, Shahidi N, Gupta S, O'Sullivan T, Whitfield A, Wang H, Kumar P, Hourigan LF, Byth K, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. Comparison of the morphology and histopathology of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps in the rectum and colon: implications for endoscopic treatment. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Jul;96(1):118-124. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.02.022. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32898919Shaleve Y, Sabo E, Bourke MJ, Klein A. Computerized image analysis of blood vessels within mucosal defects for the prediction of delayed bleeding following colonic endoscopic mucosal resection: a pilot study. Endoscopy. 2021 Aug;53(8):837-841. doi: 10.1055/a-1258-8992. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28988198Bahin FF, Heitman SJ, Rasouli KN, Mahajan H, McLeod D, Lee EYT, Williams SJ, Bourke MJ. Wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for laterally spreading colorectal lesions: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Gut. 2018 Nov;67(11):1965-1973. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-313823. Epub 2017 Oct 7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28583826Burgess NG, Hourigan LF, Zanati SA, Brown GJ, Singh R, Williams SJ, Raftopoulos SC, Ormonde D, Moss A, Byth K, Mahajan H, McLeod D, Bourke MJ. Risk Stratification for Covert Invasive Cancer Among Patients Referred for Colonic Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: A Large Multicenter Cohort. Gastroenterology. 2017 Sep;153(3):732-742.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.047. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27464708Burgess NG, Bassan MS, McLeod D, Williams SJ, Byth K, Bourke MJ. Deep mural injury and perforation after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection: a new classification and analysis of risk factors. Gut. 2017 Oct;66(10):1779-1789. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309848. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
Related trials for Colonic Polyps
Recruiting
Five or Ten Year Colonoscopy for 1-2 Non-Advanced Adenomatous Polyps
Adenocarcinoma of the Colon, Adenocarcinoma of the Rectum
Recruiting
Artificial Intelligence to Implement Cost-saving Strategies for Colonoscopy Screening Based on in Vivo Prediction of Polyp Histology
Colonic Neoplasms
RecruitingObservational study
KLF4 Epigenetic Modulation
KLF4 Methylation, Epigenetic
RecruitingObservational study
Malignant Polyp Registry
Malignant Colorectal Polyp, Colorectal Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Virtual Incision Robotically Assisted Surgical Device Use in Minimally Invasive Colectomy
Colon Cancer, Colon Polyp
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael Bourke, MBBS principal investigator
South West Sydney Area Health Service
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Colonic Polyps, run by Professor Michael Bourke at 1 site in Australia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Recurrence (time frame: 6-60 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02000141, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Mar 2025.