InfertilityPhase 2NCT02000349
Comparison of Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfers and Fresh Embryo Transfers With Whole Chromosome Analysis Using Next Generation Sequencing
A Phase 2 study testing PGD in people with Infertility, run by Reprogenetics at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The investigators propose to perform a clinical randomized trial to evaluate the effect of a frozen-thawed embryo transfer and a fresh embryo transfer on pregnancy and implantation rates; with the added benefit of a blastocyst biopsy and whole chromosome analysis by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 42 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Infertility
- What is being tested?
- PGD
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 186 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Sep 2013to Dec 2016
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 42 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age up to 42 years
Who cannot join
- MESA and TESE patients
- At least one partner carrier of a chromosomal abnormality
- Egg donor cycle (sperm donor is acceptable)
- Gender selection cycles
- Thaw cycles
- Any patient who cannot have a fresh embryo transfer
- FSH above 12 or AMH less than 1
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Reproductive Medicine Lab, LLC
Portland, Oregon, 97210
About this study
The investigators propose to perform a clinical randomized trial to evaluate the effect of a frozen-thawed embryo transfer and a fresh embryo transfer on pregnancy and implantation rates; with the added benefit of a blastocyst biopsy and whole chromosome analysis by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS).
Read the detailed description
- Fresh group: All embryos will be hatched on day 3. Patients will have hatching blastocysts (*) biopsied on day 5, analyzed by NGS, and will have one or two euploid embryo transferred on day 6, in the am. If more than two euploid blastocysts are available the one(s) to be transferred will be selected based on morphology (*). Any morulas developing to hatching blastocyst on day-6 will be also analyzed but vitrified for use in a future cycle.
- Frozen group: All embryos will be hatched on day 3. Patients will have hatching blastocysts (*) biopsied on day 5 or day 6, embryos will then be vitrified, analyzed by NGS, and will have one or two euploid embryo(s) thawed and transferred on a FET cycle, before noon. If more than two euploid blastocysts are available the one(s) to be transferred will be selected based on morphology (*). (*) Hatching blastocysts as described by Gardner and Schoolcraft (1999):
- Conditions
- Infertility
- Being tested
- PGD
- Keywords
- infertility, next generation sequencing
- Medical subject headings
- Infertility
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PGDOther
Also called PGD (Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis), NGS (Next Generation Sequencing)
PGD using Next generation sequencing
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Frozen Embryo Transfer with PGD | Experimental | All embryos will be hatched on day 3. Patients will have hatching blastocysts (*) biopsied on day 5 or day 6, embryos will then be vitrified, analyzed by NGS, and will have one or two euploid embryo(s) thawed and transferred on a FET cycle, before noon. If more than two euploid blastocysts are available the one(s) to be transferred will be selected based on morphology (*). Receives: Other: PGD |
| Fresh Embryo Transfer with PGD | Experimental | All embryos will be hatched on day 3. Patients will have hatching blastocysts (*) biopsied on day 5, analyzed by NGS, and will have one or two euploid embryo transferred on day 6, in the am. If more than two euploid blastocysts are available the one(s) to be transferred will be selected based on morphology (*). Any morulas developing to hatching blastocyst on day-6 will be also analyzed but vitrified for use in a future cycle. Receives: Other: PGD |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Implantation rate
determining whether a frozen or a fresh embryo transfer will improve implantation rate.
Measured: 8 weeks after replacement
Secondary outcomes (1)
Correlation of Mitochondrial DNA and implantation
The second aim of this study is to determine retrospectively if mt DNA content is linked to implantation potential and if that is measurable by NGS. NGS provides the additional advantage that it can measure mitochondrial DNA, which it's content, seems to be inversely correlated with implantation (Fragouli et al 2013, ASRM).
Measured: When a fetal heartbeat is detected (8 weeks after implantation)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2013
- Primary completionDec 2015 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2016 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for InfertilityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 186 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Reprogenetics
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Reproductive Medicine Lab, LLC
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Santiago Munne, PhD, Study director, Reprogenetics
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02000349
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Reprogenetics-3.117
- Status last verified
- Nov 2015
- First submitted
- 19 Sep 2013
- Last updated
- 17 Nov 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Ata B, Kaplan B, Danzer H, Glassner M, Opsahl M, Tan SL, Munne S. Array CGH analysis shows that aneuploidy is not related to the number of embryos generated. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 Jun;24(6):614-20. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.02.009. Epub 2012 Feb 25.
PubMed 22503277Cohen J, DeVane GW, Elsner CW, Kort HI, Massey JB, Norbury SE. Cryopreserved zygotes and embryos and endocrinologic factors in the replacement cycle. Fertil Steril. 1988 Jul;50(1):61-7. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60009-2.
PubMed 3384119Cohen J, Wells D, Munne S. Removal of 2 cells from cleavage stage embryos is likely to reduce the efficacy of chromosomal tests that are used to enhance implantation rates. Fertil Steril. 2007 Mar;87(3):496-503. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1516. Epub 2006 Dec 4.
PubMed 17141767De Vos A, Staessen C, De Rycke M, Verpoest W, Haentjens P, Devroey P, Liebaers I, Van de Velde H. Impact of cleavage-stage embryo biopsy in view of PGD on human blastocyst implantation: a prospective cohort of single embryo transfers. Hum Reprod. 2009 Dec;24(12):2988-96. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep251. Epub 2009 Sep 21.
PubMed 19773223Sagoskin AW, Levy MJ, Tucker MJ, Richter KS, Widra EA. Laser assisted hatching in good prognosis patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2007 Feb;87(2):283-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1498. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
PubMed 17094975Fragouli E, Spath K, Alfarawati S, Wells D (2013) Quantification of mitochondrial DNA predicts the implantation potential of chromosomally normal embryos. Fertil Steril, in press (ASRM abstract)
Gardner DK and Schoolcraft WB. In vitro culture of human blastocysts. In: Jansen R, Mortimer D. eds. Towards Reproductive Certainty: Fertility and Genetics Beyond 1999. Carnforth, Parthenon Publishin, 1999, 378-88
Gutierrez-Mateo C, Colls P, Sanchez-Garcia J, Escudero T, Prates R, Ketterson K, Wells D, Munne S. Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos. Fertil Steril. 2011 Mar 1;95(3):953-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.010. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
PubMed 20971462Hodes-Wertz B, Grifo J, Ghadir S, Kaplan B, Laskin CA, Glassner M, Munne S. Idiopathic recurrent miscarriage is caused mostly by aneuploid embryos. Fertil Steril. 2012 Sep;98(3):675-80. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.025. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
PubMed 22683012Munne S, Wells D, Cohen J. Technology requirements for preimplantation genetic diagnosis to improve assisted reproduction outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2010 Jul;94(2):408-30. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.091. Epub 2009 May 5.
PubMed 19409550SART (2011): https://www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?ClinicPKID=0
Zaat T, Zagers M, Mol F, Goddijn M, van Wely M, Mastenbroek S. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 4;2(2):CD011184. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011184.pub3.
PubMed 33539543Coates A, Kung A, Mounts E, Hesla J, Bankowski B, Barbieri E, Ata B, Cohen J, Munne S. Optimal euploid embryo transfer strategy, fresh versus frozen, after preimplantation genetic screening with next generation sequencing: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2017 Mar;107(3):723-730.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.12.022. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
PubMed 28139240
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Nov 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfers and Fresh Embryo Transfers With Whole Chromosome Analysis Using Next Generation Sequencing
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02000349
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Reprogenetics-3.117
- Conditions
- Infertility
- Keywords
- infertility, next generation sequencing
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 186 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- ReprogeneticsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Reproductive Medicine Lab, LLC
- Study start
- Sep 2013
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2016 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators propose to perform a clinical randomized trial to evaluate the effect of a frozen-thawed embryo transfer and a fresh embryo transfer on pregnancy and implantation rates; with the added benefit of a blastocyst biopsy and whole chromosome analysis by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS).
Detailed description
- Fresh group: All embryos will be hatched on day 3. Patients will have hatching blastocysts (*) biopsied on day 5, analyzed by NGS, and will have one or two euploid embryo transferred on day 6, in the am. If more than two euploid blastocysts are available the one(s) to be transferred will be selected based on morphology (*). Any morulas developing to hatching blastocyst on day-6 will be also analyzed but vitrified for use in a future cycle.
- Frozen group: All embryos will be hatched on day 3. Patients will have hatching blastocysts (*) biopsied on day 5 or day 6, embryos will then be vitrified, analyzed by NGS, and will have one or two euploid embryo(s) thawed and transferred on a FET cycle, before noon. If more than two euploid blastocysts are available the one(s) to be transferred will be selected based on morphology (*). (*) Hatching blastocysts as described by Gardner and Schoolcraft (1999):
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Frozen Embryo Transfer with PGD | Experimental | Other: PGDAll embryos will be hatched on day 3. Patients will have hatching blastocysts (*) biopsied on day 5 or day 6, embryos will then be vitrified, analyzed by NGS, and will have one or two euploid embryo(s) thawed and transferred on a FET cycle, before noon. If more than two euploid blastocysts are available the one(s) to be transferred will be selected based on morphology (*). |
| Fresh Embryo Transfer with PGD | Experimental | Other: PGDAll embryos will be hatched on day 3. Patients will have hatching blastocysts (*) biopsied on day 5, analyzed by NGS, and will have one or two euploid embryo transferred on day 6, in the am. If more than two euploid blastocysts are available the one(s) to be transferred will be selected based on morphology (*). Any morulas developing to hatching blastocyst on day-6 will be also analyzed but vitrified for use in a future cycle. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 42 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Age up to 42 years
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- MESA and TESE patients
- At least one partner carrier of a chromosomal abnormality
- Egg donor cycle (sperm donor is acceptable)
- Gender selection cycles
- Thaw cycles
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PGDAlso: PGD (Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis), NGS (Next Generation Sequencing)PGD using Next generation sequencing | Other | Fresh Embryo Transfer with PGD, Frozen Embryo Transfer with PGD |
Primary outcome
Implantation rate
Time frame: 8 weeks after replacement
determining whether a frozen or a fresh embryo transfer will improve implantation rate.
1 secondary outcome
Correlation of Mitochondrial DNA and implantation
Time frame: When a fetal heartbeat is detected (8 weeks after implantation)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Nov 2015.
- Background: PubMed 22503277Ata B, Kaplan B, Danzer H, Glassner M, Opsahl M, Tan SL, Munne S. Array CGH analysis shows that aneuploidy is not related to the number of embryos generated. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 Jun;24(6):614-20. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.02.009. Epub 2012 Feb 25.
- Background: PubMed 3384119Cohen J, DeVane GW, Elsner CW, Kort HI, Massey JB, Norbury SE. Cryopreserved zygotes and embryos and endocrinologic factors in the replacement cycle. Fertil Steril. 1988 Jul;50(1):61-7. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60009-2.
- Background: PubMed 17141767Cohen J, Wells D, Munne S. Removal of 2 cells from cleavage stage embryos is likely to reduce the efficacy of chromosomal tests that are used to enhance implantation rates. Fertil Steril. 2007 Mar;87(3):496-503. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1516. Epub 2006 Dec 4.
- Background: PubMed 19773223De Vos A, Staessen C, De Rycke M, Verpoest W, Haentjens P, Devroey P, Liebaers I, Van de Velde H. Impact of cleavage-stage embryo biopsy in view of PGD on human blastocyst implantation: a prospective cohort of single embryo transfers. Hum Reprod. 2009 Dec;24(12):2988-96. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep251. Epub 2009 Sep 21.
- Background: PubMed 17094975Sagoskin AW, Levy MJ, Tucker MJ, Richter KS, Widra EA. Laser assisted hatching in good prognosis patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2007 Feb;87(2):283-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1498. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
- BackgroundFragouli E, Spath K, Alfarawati S, Wells D (2013) Quantification of mitochondrial DNA predicts the implantation potential of chromosomally normal embryos. Fertil Steril, in press (ASRM abstract)
- BackgroundGardner DK and Schoolcraft WB. In vitro culture of human blastocysts. In: Jansen R, Mortimer D. eds. Towards Reproductive Certainty: Fertility and Genetics Beyond 1999. Carnforth, Parthenon Publishin, 1999, 378-88
- Background: PubMed 20971462Gutierrez-Mateo C, Colls P, Sanchez-Garcia J, Escudero T, Prates R, Ketterson K, Wells D, Munne S. Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos. Fertil Steril. 2011 Mar 1;95(3):953-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.010. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
- Background: PubMed 22683012Hodes-Wertz B, Grifo J, Ghadir S, Kaplan B, Laskin CA, Glassner M, Munne S. Idiopathic recurrent miscarriage is caused mostly by aneuploid embryos. Fertil Steril. 2012 Sep;98(3):675-80. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.025. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
- Background: PubMed 19409550Munne S, Wells D, Cohen J. Technology requirements for preimplantation genetic diagnosis to improve assisted reproduction outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2010 Jul;94(2):408-30. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.091. Epub 2009 May 5.
- BackgroundSART (2011): https://www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?ClinicPKID=0
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33539543Zaat T, Zagers M, Mol F, Goddijn M, van Wely M, Mastenbroek S. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 4;2(2):CD011184. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011184.pub3.
Related trials for Infertility
RecruitingObservational study
International Pilot Study for Dual Non-invasive Assesment of Embryo Development
Infertility
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Retrieval of Sperm From Men With Azoospermia Using Ultrasound-guided Rete Testis Aspiration
Azoospermia, Nonobstructive, Infertility, Male
Not yet recruiting
Spinery Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for Vertebrogenic Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
RecruitingObservational study
Impact of Infertility on the Sexual Sphere in Couples Undergoing Assisted Reproduction
Sexual Health Quality of Life, Infertile Patients
RecruitingObservational study
Pilot Study of Discarded Blastocysts
Infertility (IVF Patients)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Santiago Munne, PhD study director
Reprogenetics
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing PGD in people with Infertility, run by Reprogenetics at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Nov 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Implantation rate (time frame: 8 weeks after replacement). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02000349, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Nov 2015.