Renal Cell CarcinomaNCT02001493
Metabolomic Profiling in Renal Cell Carcinoma
An observational study of Renal Cell Carcinoma, run by Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Antiangiogenics are the mainstay of treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Conventional clinical end-points, used to measure efficacy with chemotherapeutic agents, have not been helpful in monitoring the efficacy of antiangiogenic therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Renal Cell Carcinoma
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Jan 2014to Dec 2015
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: volunteer patients with renal cell carcinoma
Who may be able to join
- Patients must be older than 18 years in age.
- Written Informed Consent obtained.
- Cohort 1. Patients with histologically confirmed renal clear cell carcinoma.
- Cohort 2. Patients before surgery with confirmed renal cell carcinoma or suspected. RCC must be confirmed after surgery.
Who cannot join
- Presence of a separate malignant diagnosis, in the last two years, except non-melanoma skin cancer or cervical carcinoma in situ.
- Prior anti-cancer treatment for RCC other than nephrectomy
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Guillermo de Velasco, MD contact
United Kingdom2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Addenbrooke's Hospital
Cambridge, CB2 0QQ
Guillermo de Velasco, MD, guillermo.develasco@addenbrookes.nhs.uk
- Recruiting
Addenbrookes' Hospital
Cambridge, CB220QQ
Guillermo de Velasco, MD, Guillermo.develasco@addenbrookes.nhs.uk
About this study
Official title: Observational Prospective Study to Analyze a Metabolomic Profile and to Explore it as Prognostic Factor in Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC)
Antiangiogenics are the mainstay of treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Conventional clinical end-points, used to measure efficacy with chemotherapeutic agents, have not been helpful in monitoring the efficacy of antiangiogenic therapy. Increasing numbers of predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarkers are being investigated that are useful surrogates for clinical response and also to identify patients early on who will benefit from this class of agents. This is valuable in avoiding unnecessary toxicity in patients and also in reducing cost implications of this expensive group of drugs.
The investigators wish to explore the variability of baseline metabolomic profile in the blood and urine of patients with mRCC and characterise the inter-subject and intra-subject variability. The study of the baseline levels has not been performed in this cohort previously. This is extremely important in interpreting the emerging data of changes in the levels of the various biomarkers from various trials. This will in turn help in the development of future targeted therapies, especially Phase I/II studies where an early demonstration of target modulation is vital. This study will also help to identify the number of patients required for appropriate statistical evaluation in pharmacodynamic studies to assess biological activity, optimisation of dosing, and investigation of potential mechanisms of resistance. Study of the urinary and blood metabolomic profile in conjunction will give us an insight into the potential use of urine as a diagnostic and prognostic tool.
OBJECTIVES GOAL The main objective of the study is to determine the change from baseline in metabolomic profiling in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma 1 month after nephrectomy or antiangiogenic treatment during 2 months
Read the detailed description
METHODOLOGY STUDY DESIGN. Observational, Prospective, Exploratory, Single centre.
STUDY POPULATION Common Inclusion criteria Patients must be older than 18 years in age. Written Informed Consent obtained. Patients previously informed about the objectives.
Patients with histologically confirmed renal clear cell carcinoma. Patients before surgery with confirmed renal cell carcinoma or suspected. RCC must be confirmed after surgery.
Exclusion criteria Presence of a separate malignant diagnosis, in the last two years, except non-melanoma skin cancer or cervical carcinoma in situ.
Prior anti-cancer treatment for RCC other than nephrectomy
ENDPOINTS Primary endpoint Determination the changes from baseline in metabolomic profiling Secondary outcomes Time to progression Progression free survival (PFS) /Overall survival (OS) Determination of metabolomic levels during the monitoring period Radiologically measured tumour response (according to investigator assessment) Toxicities
Outcome Measures Primary The primary outcome measures are the changes from baseline in metabolomic profiling 1 month after nephrectomy or after antiangiogenic treatment during 2 months Cohort 1. The primary clinical outcome measure is progression-free survival (PFS), the interval from first line therapy to first evidence of progression disease or death from RCC.
Cohort 2. The primary clinical outcome measure is to find differences in metabolomic profiles between samples before and after nephrectomy.
Secondary The main objective of the study is to determine the metabolomic basal levels in patients with renal cell carcinoma clear cell and try to find out a prognostic profile Metabolomic profile changes during the follow up. Tumour progression and PFS, i.e. the time from surgery/first line treatment to progression RCC specific survival time, i.e. the time from first line treatment to death from RCC Overall survival, i.e. the time from first line treatment to death from any cause, including RCC Best response Toxicity and association with metabolomic profile evaluation. Metabolomic characteristics of resected primary RCC. Tumour samples will be examined for a relevant metabolomic profile, and their association with outcome will be studied.
Definitions PFS is defined as the time between the first day of treatment with any drug (sunitinib, pazopanib, etc.) and the date of radiological progressive disease (PD), clear clinical evidence of PD, or death. Patients who had not progressed at database closure will be censored at final follow-up. If the date of PD is unknown, the investigators will censor PFS at the last tumour assessment.
Overall survival is defined as the time between the first day of "drug" treatment and the date of death or last date of follow-up.
Objective response will be assessed by treating doctors, according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria version 1.1, and classified as complete response, partial response, stable disease, or PD. Timing for assessments will be dictated by individual institution policy.
All adverse effects will be graded by the attending doctors according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4•0. The investigators have initially selected mucositis, hypothyroidism, hand-foot syndrome, hypertension, anaemia, and thrombocytopenia for analysis on the basis of clinical relevance and grading objectiveness, together with grade 3-4 adverse events. The investigators will also record adverse toxic events leading to dose reductions and the date on which they occurred.
The investigators will test metabolomic profile against PFS and overall survival with Cox-regression analysis and against RECIST response with logistic regression analysis. The investigators shall perform a multivariable analysis by including clinical factors associated with PFS, overall survival, or response as covariates (clinical factors that will be associated with p<0•1 with a specific variable will be used as covariates for that specific variable).
The investigators will allocate patients to favourable, intermediate, and poor prognosis groups according to the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) prognostic classification, and included this variable in the multivariable analysis. The investigators will further analyse metabolomic profile associated with PFS and overall survival in the multivariable analysis by the Kaplan-Meier method.
The investigators will assess metabolomic levels/profile associated with an increased risk of drug dose reduction caused by toxicity with Cox-regression modelling of the number of days of drug treatment until the reduction of dose. Patients with no dose reductions will be censored at final follow-up. For multivariable analysis, the investigators will use clinical factors associated with p<0•1 with dose reductions as covariates, and the investigators will analyse the metabolomic levels associated to drug dose reduction in the multivariable analysis with the Kaplan-Meier method. The investigators will study associations between specific drug toxicities and metabolomic profiles with logistic regression analysis, with toxicity development as a dichotomous endpoint. The multivariable logistic regression analyses will include clinical factors associated with the corresponding outcome as covariates (factors with p<0•1). The investigators will test all genotypes with an additive genetic model. The investigators will retain missing data as missing apart from MSKCC prognostic factors. The most likely value, based on the data from the rest of the series, will be assigned to these patients.
There will be a general descriptive variables included in the study. Distributions will be presented absolute and relative frequencies of qualitative variables, and measures of central tendency and dispersion (mean standard deviation, median, minimum and maximum) for quantitative variables. They will be presented with the confidence intervals at 95% for the major outcome. No missing data imputed and left as missing.
The hypothesis test to be performed will be bilateral with a significance level of 0.05. For variables that do not conform to the normal distribution (or parametric) will be used for non-parametric tests in the analysis of contingency tables and for comparison of proportions and / or frequency distributions, will be used the chi -square (or Fisher's exact where appropriate).
Statistical analysis of the data from the study will be conducted by Hutchison/MRC (Medical Research Council) Research Center. Specific aspects of the statistical analysis
Analysis goal:
Cohort 1: "To determine the baseline metabolomic profiles in urine/blood in patients with renal cell carcinoma clear in order to find a prognostic/predictive model" Appropriate regression models as well as univariate and multivariate statistical tests will be used.
Cohort 2: "To determine the changes of metabolomic profiles before and 1 month after nephrectomy" Univariate and multivariate statistical tests for paired setting will be applied to reveal the changes.
- Conditions
- Renal Cell Carcinoma
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from Baseline Metabolomic profiling 1 month after nephrectomy or after antiangiogenic treatment during 2 months
Measured: Baseline, month 1, month 2
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2014
- Primary completionOct 2015 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2015 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Renal Cell CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Guillermo de Velasco, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
- Investigators
- TIm Eisen, Professor, Study chair, University of Cambridge
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02001493
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KIME-01
- Status last verified
- Jun 2015
- First submitted
- 19 Nov 2013
- Last updated
- 23 Jun 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jun 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Observational Prospective Study to Analyze a Metabolomic Profile and to Explore it as Prognostic Factor in Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02001493
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KIME-01
- Conditions
- Renal Cell Carcinoma
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2014
- Primary completion
- Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2015 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Antiangiogenics are the mainstay of treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Conventional clinical end-points, used to measure efficacy with chemotherapeutic agents, have not been helpful in monitoring the efficacy of antiangiogenic therapy. Increasing numbers of predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarkers are being investigated that are useful surrogates for clinical response and also to identify patients early on who will benefit from this class of agents. This is valuable in avoiding unnecessary toxicity in patients and also in reducing cost implications of this expensive group of drugs.
The investigators wish to explore the variability of baseline metabolomic profile in the blood and urine of patients with mRCC and characterise the inter-subject and intra-subject variability. The study of the baseline levels has not been performed in this cohort previously. This is extremely important in interpreting the emerging data of changes in the levels of the various biomarkers from various trials. This will in turn help in the development of future targeted therapies, especially Phase I/II studies where an early demonstration of target modulation is vital. This study will also help to identify the number of patients required for appropriate statistical evaluation in pharmacodynamic studies to assess biological activity, optimisation of dosing, and investigation of potential mechanisms of resistance. Study of the urinary and blood metabolomic profile in conjunction will give us an insight into the potential use of urine as a diagnostic and prognostic tool.
OBJECTIVES GOAL The main objective of the study is to determine the change from baseline in metabolomic profiling in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma 1 month after nephrectomy or antiangiogenic treatment during 2 months
Detailed description
METHODOLOGY STUDY DESIGN. Observational, Prospective, Exploratory, Single centre.
STUDY POPULATION Common Inclusion criteria Patients must be older than 18 years in age. Written Informed Consent obtained. Patients previously informed about the objectives.
Patients with histologically confirmed renal clear cell carcinoma. Patients before surgery with confirmed renal cell carcinoma or suspected. RCC must be confirmed after surgery.
Exclusion criteria Presence of a separate malignant diagnosis, in the last two years, except non-melanoma skin cancer or cervical carcinoma in situ.
Prior anti-cancer treatment for RCC other than nephrectomy
ENDPOINTS Primary endpoint Determination the changes from baseline in metabolomic profiling Secondary outcomes Time to progression Progression free survival (PFS) /Overall survival (OS) Determination of metabolomic levels during the monitoring period Radiologically measured tumour response (according to investigator assessment) Toxicities
Outcome Measures Primary The primary outcome measures are the changes from baseline in metabolomic profiling 1 month after nephrectomy or after antiangiogenic treatment during 2 months Cohort 1. The primary clinical outcome measure is progression-free survival (PFS), the interval from first line therapy to first evidence of progression disease or death from RCC.
Cohort 2. The primary clinical outcome measure is to find differences in metabolomic profiles between samples before and after nephrectomy.
Secondary The main objective of the study is to determine the metabolomic basal levels in patients with renal cell carcinoma clear cell and try to find out a prognostic profile Metabolomic profile changes during the follow up. Tumour progression and PFS, i.e. the time from surgery/first line treatment to progression RCC specific survival time, i.e. the time from first line treatment to death from RCC Overall survival, i.e. the time from first line treatment to death from any cause, including RCC Best response Toxicity and association with metabolomic profile evaluation. Metabolomic characteristics of resected primary RCC. Tumour samples will be examined for a relevant metabolomic profile, and their association with outcome will be studied.
Definitions PFS is defined as the time between the first day of treatment with any drug (sunitinib, pazopanib, etc.) and the date of radiological progressive disease (PD), clear clinical evidence of PD, or death. Patients who had not progressed at database closure will be censored at final follow-up. If the date of PD is unknown, the investigators will censor PFS at the last tumour assessment.
Overall survival is defined as the time between the first day of "drug" treatment and the date of death or last date of follow-up.
Objective response will be assessed by treating doctors, according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria version 1.1, and classified as complete response, partial response, stable disease, or PD. Timing for assessments will be dictated by individual institution policy.
All adverse effects will be graded by the attending doctors according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4•0. The investigators have initially selected mucositis, hypothyroidism, hand-foot syndrome, hypertension, anaemia, and thrombocytopenia for analysis on the basis of clinical relevance and grading objectiveness, together with grade 3-4 adverse events. The investigators will also record adverse toxic events leading to dose reductions and the date on which they occurred.
The investigators will test metabolomic profile against PFS and overall survival with Cox-regression analysis and against RECIST response with logistic regression analysis. The investigators shall perform a multivariable analysis by including clinical factors associated with PFS, overall survival, or response as covariates (clinical factors that will be associated with p<0•1 with a specific variable will be used as covariates for that specific variable).
The investigators will allocate patients to favourable, intermediate, and poor prognosis groups according to the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) prognostic classification, and included this variable in the multivariable analysis. The investigators will further analyse metabolomic profile associated with PFS and overall survival in the multivariable analysis by the Kaplan-Meier method.
The investigators will assess metabolomic levels/profile associated with an increased risk of drug dose reduction caused by toxicity with Cox-regression modelling of the number of days of drug treatment until the reduction of dose. Patients with no dose reductions will be censored at final follow-up. For multivariable analysis, the investigators will use clinical factors associated with p<0•1 with dose reductions as covariates, and the investigators will analyse the metabolomic levels associated to drug dose reduction in the multivariable analysis with the Kaplan-Meier method. The investigators will study associations between specific drug toxicities and metabolomic profiles with logistic regression analysis, with toxicity development as a dichotomous endpoint. The multivariable logistic regression analyses will include clinical factors associated with the corresponding outcome as covariates (factors with p<0•1). The investigators will test all genotypes with an additive genetic model. The investigators will retain missing data as missing apart from MSKCC prognostic factors. The most likely value, based on the data from the rest of the series, will be assigned to these patients.
There will be a general descriptive variables included in the study. Distributions will be presented absolute and relative frequencies of qualitative variables, and measures of central tendency and dispersion (mean standard deviation, median, minimum and maximum) for quantitative variables. They will be presented with the confidence intervals at 95% for the major outcome. No missing data imputed and left as missing.
The hypothesis test to be performed will be bilateral with a significance level of 0.05. For variables that do not conform to the normal distribution (or parametric) will be used for non-parametric tests in the analysis of contingency tables and for comparison of proportions and / or frequency distributions, will be used the chi -square (or Fisher's exact where appropriate).
Statistical analysis of the data from the study will be conducted by Hutchison/MRC (Medical Research Council) Research Center. Specific aspects of the statistical analysis
Analysis goal:
Cohort 1: "To determine the baseline metabolomic profiles in urine/blood in patients with renal cell carcinoma clear in order to find a prognostic/predictive model" Appropriate regression models as well as univariate and multivariate statistical tests will be used.
Cohort 2: "To determine the changes of metabolomic profiles before and 1 month after nephrectomy" Univariate and multivariate statistical tests for paired setting will be applied to reveal the changes.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- volunteer patients with renal cell carcinoma
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients must be older than 18 years in age.
- Written Informed Consent obtained.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Presence of a separate malignant diagnosis, in the last two years, except non-melanoma skin cancer or cervical carcinoma in situ.
- Prior anti-cancer treatment for RCC other than nephrectomy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Change from Baseline Metabolomic profiling 1 month after nephrectomy or after antiangiogenic treatment during 2 months
Time frame: Baseline, month 1, month 2
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jun 2015.
Related trials for Renal Cell Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Assessment of Intelligent Algorithms for Detection, Diagnosis and Risk Stratification of Tumors of the Kidney and Prostate
Kidney Cancers, Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Pazopanib Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With Metastatic Kidney Cancer Who Have No Evidence of Disease After Surgery
Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma, Stage IV Renal Cell Cancer AJCC v7
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
AB-2100, an Integrated Circuit T Cell Therapy in Patients With Recurrent Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRCC)
Advanced/Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma, Recurrence
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Role of DNA Released From Tumor Cells Into the Blood in Guiding the Use of Immunotherapy After Surgical Removal of the Bladder, Kidney, Ureter, and Urethra for Urothelial Cancer Treatment, MODERN Study
Muscle Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Muscle Invasive Renal Pelvis Urothelial Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Prospective Study of Cadonilimab With Lenvatinib in Renal Cell Carcinoma
Renal Cell Carcinoma (Kidney Cancer), Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Guillermo de Velasco, MD contact
TIm Eisen, Professor study chair
University of Cambridge
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Renal Cell Carcinoma, run by Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jun 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Guillermo de Velasco, MD (guillermo.develasco@addenbrookes.nhs.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from Baseline Metabolomic profiling 1 month after nephrectomy or after antiangiogenic treatment during 2 months (time frame: Baseline, month 1, month 2). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jun 2015.