AzTrials
AzTrials

ADHFNCT02003040

Role of the Mespere Venus 1000 in Predicting Heart Failure Hospital Readmissions

An observational study of ADHF, run by Mespere Lifesciences Inc. at 1 site in Canada.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the utility of Venus 1000 in predicting 30-day hospital readmissions for acute decompensated heart failure. Secondary outcomes will include correlation with NT-proBNP and weight both at admission and discharge from hospital Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
ADHF
What is being tested?
Mespere Venus 1000 CVP System
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Sep 2014to May 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients admitted to the Cardiology ward at St Michael's Hospital with a main diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure.

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 and older
  • Patient admitted to St. Michael's Hospital with a main clinical diagnosis of decompensated heart failure.
  • Signed informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Lack of patient consent.
  • Presence of known AV dialysis fistula.
  • Allergy to adhesive tape from Mespere Venus 1000 system.
  • Known central vein stenosis.
  • Ongoing photodynamic therapy.
  • Assisted ventilation.
  • Associated acute coronary syndrome

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • St. Michael's Hospital

    Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8

Other trials in Canada

About this study

The purpose of this study is to investigate the utility of Venus 1000 in predicting 30-day hospital readmissions for acute decompensated heart failure. Secondary outcomes will include correlation with NT-proBNP and weight both at admission and discharge from hospital

Read the detailed description

Rehospitalizations for heart failure have been linked to poor clinical outcomes, rates remain high despite different attempts to decrease them . Clinical indicators of volume congestion at time of discharge are associated with increased rates of readmission . Clinical evaluation of volume status remains the gold standard in determination of readiness and timing of hospital discharge, however identification of persistent congestion might prove difficult .

Assessment of the right atrial pressure can be done non-invasively at the bedside; however, precision and accuracy of this method are variable . Echocardiography is a valuable tool in the estimation of elevated central pressure , this, however is time consuming and requires trained personnel. While invasive measurements provide accurate estimation of central venous pressure, it is an impractical approach in most patients, notwithstanding the risks associated with the insertion of a catheter into the central circulation .

Since a significant proportion of readmitted patients return to hospital with congestive symptoms, attempts have been made to improve our ability to assess volume status . Current clinical evidence suggests that BNP-guided management of patients with congestive heart failure can decrease all-cause mortality and heart failure rehospitalization. However, biological variation for natriuretic peptides is high , and optimal targets are difficult to determine in individual patients.

The Mespere Venus 1000 system is a non-invasive tool that has previously shown reliable correlation and accuracy with central venous pressure obtained invasively in the catheterization laboratory and good correlation with jugular venous pressure at the bedside.

Conditions
ADHF
Being tested
Mespere Venus 1000 CVP System

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Mespere Venus 1000 CVP SystemDevice

    An adhesive patch (connected to the Mespere Venus 1000 System) is placed on the neck of the subject. A CVP measurement is recorded at time of patient's hospital admission and discharge. CVP readings will remain concealed from the treating team.

Study groups in NCT02003040
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
St. Michael's Hospital PatientsPatients admitted to the Cardiology ward at St Michael's Hospital with a main diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure
Receives: Device: Mespere Venus 1000 CVP System

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from baseline in non-invasive central venous pressure (NICVP) at time of hospital discharge

    To determine if NICVP (taken at time of hospital admission and discharge) from the Mespere Venus 1000 CVP System can predict 30-day hospital readmissions for acute decompensated heart failure.

    Measured: time of hospital admission (baseline) and time of hospital discharge

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. NT-proBNP

    To investigate if there's a correlation between CVP measurements from the Mespere Venus 1000 CVP System and NT-proBNP at time of hospital admission and discharge

    Measured: 1 visit

  2. Patient's weight

    To investigate if there's a correlation between CVP measurements from the Mespere Venus 1000 CVP System and weight change at time of hospital admission and discharge

    Measured: 1 visit

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Dec 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2014
  3. Primary completionApr 2016 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2016 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02003040
Sponsor's protocol ID
STP-9000011
Status last verified
Sep 2015
First submitted
2 Dec 2013
Last updated
28 Sep 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of ADHF, run by Mespere Lifesciences Inc. at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Sep 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from baseline in non-invasive central venous pressure (NICVP) at time of hospital discharge (time frame: time of hospital admission (baseline) and time of hospital discharge). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Sep 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in