AzTrials
AzTrials

Hepatocellular CarcinomaPhase 3NCT02004210

A Phase 3 Trial Comparing TACE and TARE in Unilobar Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

A Phase 3 study testing transarterial radioembolization (TARE) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of conventional transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) and transarterial radioembolization in patients with unilobar advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
What is being tested?
transarterial radioembolization (TARE) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
Apr 2013to Apr 2018
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with clinical or histological diagnosis of HCC based on the guidelines of the AJCC
  • Patients with advanced HCC with unilobar advanaced involvement: right lobe ± S4 segment or left lobe ± S4 segment)
  • Patients with single large HCC or multinodular HCC
  • Single \& 5cm < size < 15cm
  • 2-5 nodules \& maximal sized 4-15cm \& sum of diameters ≦ 25cm
  • Infiltrative type \& unilobular involvement on liver MRI
Show all 17Show fewer
  • Segmental or lobar portal vein invasion can be included.
  • Age : 20 years to 80 years
  • ECOG Performance Status of 0 to 2
  • Child-Pugh class A (Child-Pugh score 5-6), B (CP score 7)
  • Adequate bone marrow, liver function as assessed by the following laboratory requirements to be conducted within 7 days prior to screening:
  • WBC count ≧ 1,000/mm3
  • Absolute neutrophil count > 500/mm3
  • Hb ≧ 7.0 g/dL
  • Platelet count > 100,000 /mm3
  • Bilirubin ≦ 3 mg/dL
  • Adequate clotting function: INR ≦ 2.3 or ≦ 6sec

Who cannot join

  • Child-Pugh score ≧ 8
  • ECOG Performance Status ≧ 3
  • Patients with chronic kidney disease or serum creatinine ≥ 1.2 mg/dL
  • History of organ allograft
  • Patients with uncontrolled co-morbidity which needs treatment
  • Patients who have received prior systemic chemotherapy
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Patients who have received Capecitabine within 8 weeks
  • Patients with extrahepatic metastasis
  • Main portal vein invasion
  • Patients with lymph node metastasis
  • Bilobar involvement
  • Bulk disease(Tumor volume >70% of the target liver volume, or tumor nodules too numerous to count)
  • Pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Seoul National University Hospital

    Seoul

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Multi-center, Open Label, Phase 3 Trial Comparing Conventional TACE and Transarterial Radioembolization in Patients With Unilobar Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of conventional transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) and transarterial radioembolization in patients with unilobar advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Read the detailed description

Potentially curative treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) include surgical resection, liver transplantation, and local ablative therapy.

However, HCC patients are diagnosed at advanced stages in Korea. Unresectable advanced HCCs are not suitable for other curative therapies. For these patients, the optimal treatment remains largely controversial. As a palliative treatment, the benefit of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) had been shown in patients with unresectable HCC by several trials. Recently,transarterial radioembolization (TARE) has been introduced for the treatment of advanced HCC. However, the efficacy of TARE compared to TACE is uncertain.

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of conventional transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) and transarterial radioembolization in patients with unilobar advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Being tested
transarterial radioembolization (TARE), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)
Keywords
transarterial chemoembolization, transarterial radioembolization, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • transarterial radioembolization (TARE)Procedure or surgery

    transarterial radioembolization

  • transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)Procedure or surgery

    transarterial chemoembolization

Study groups in NCT02004210
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
The TARE groupExperimentaltransarterial radioembolization group
Receives: Procedure: transarterial radioembolization (TARE)
The TACE groupExperimentalTransarterial chemoembolization group
Receives: Procedure: transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall survival

    From date of randomization until the date of death

    Measured: every 12 weeks, up to the time of death, up to 12 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Progression-Free Survival in the Liver

    From date of randomization until the date of first documented intrahepatic tumor progression or death

    Measured: every 12 weeks, up to the time of death or first documented intrahepatic tumor progression, up to 12 months

  2. Progression-Free Survival Overall

    From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or death

    Measured: every 12 weeks, up to the time of death or first documented progression, up to 12 months

  3. Overall tumor response assessment

    (CR, PR, SD, PD)by modified RECIST criteria

    Measured: every 12 weeks, up to the time of death or 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Dec 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2013
  3. Primary completionApr 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionApr 2018 (estimated)

Why it stopped: No participants were enrolled.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02004210
Sponsor's protocol ID
TACE_TARE
Status last verified
Apr 2016
First submitted
1 Oct 2013
Last updated
27 Apr 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing transarterial radioembolization (TARE) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 17 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Apr 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall survival (time frame: every 12 weeks, up to the time of death, up to 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Apr 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in