Primary Open Angle GlaucomaPhase 4NCT02006693
Evaluation of the XEN Implant in Moderate Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG) Participants
A Phase 4 study testing XEN® Gel Stent and Cataract Surgery in people with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma, run by AqueSys, Inc. at 21 sites in 9 countries.
Trial summary
The objective of this study was to evaluate the AqueSys XEN Implant [XEN® Gel Stent (XEN45 Implant)] for the treatment of moderate primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) participants when medications have failed to control intraocular pressure (IOP). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
- What is being tested?
- XEN® Gel Stent and Cataract Surgery
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 199 participants
- Where
- 21 sitesin 9 countries
- Study dates
- 5 Dec 2013to 26 Jan 2017
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of primary open angle glaucoma
- Participants are taking at least one and no more than four topical IOP-lowering medications.
Who cannot join
- Angle Closure Glaucoma
- Participant has neovascular, uveitic or angle recession glaucoma or any glaucoma associated with vascular disorders
- Clinically significant inflammation or infection in the study eye within 30 days prior to the preoperative visit (e.g., blepharitis, conjunctivitis, keratitis, uveitis, herpes simplex infection)
- Presence of conjunctival scarring or prior conjunctival surgery or other conjunctival pathologies (e.g., pterygium) in the target quadrant
Trial locations and contacts
21 sites in 9 countries.
21 sites in 9 countries
United Kingdom5 sites
Birmingham Midland Eye Theaters
Birmingham, West Midlands, B18 7QH
Moorfields Eye Hospital
London, EC1V2PD
St. Thomas Hospital
London, SE17EH
Maidstone Hospital Eye, Ear and Mouth Unit
Maidstone, Kent, ME16 9QQ
Pinderfields Hospital
Wakefield, WF14DG
Austria3 sites
University of Graz
Graz, 8036
University Augenklinik Salzburg
Salzburg, 5020
Vienna University
Vienna, 1090
Germany3 sites
University Eye Clinic Bochum-Langendreer
Bochum, 44892
Klinik für Augenheilkunde
Frankfurt, D-60590
Klinik fur Augenheilkunde
Neubrandenburg, 17036
Italy3 sites
University of Pisa
Pisa, 56124
Clinica Oculistica, Universita' di Torino
Torino, 10100
Integrated University Hospital of Verona
Verona, 37126
Spain3 sites
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid, 28046
Hospital Principe de Asturias
Madrid
Hospital Meixeiro Servicio de Ofthalmologia
Vigo, Pontevedra
Poland1 site
Ophthalmology Department of the Military Health Service Institute
Warsaw, 04-141
About this study
Official title: Post Market Multicentric Evaluation of the AqueSys XEN Implant in Moderate Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Subjects
The objective of this study was to evaluate the AqueSys XEN Implant [XEN® Gel Stent (XEN45 Implant)] for the treatment of moderate primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) participants when medications have failed to control intraocular pressure (IOP). Effectiveness was evaluated by comparing medicated preoperative IOP to postoperative values. Additionally, the number of topical IOP-lowering medications at screening were compared to the number of IOP-lowering medications at 1 year.
- Conditions
- Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
- Being tested
- XEN® Gel Stent, Cataract Surgery
- Keywords
- XEN, Primary Open Angle Glaucoma, Filtration Device, Ab interno
- Medical subject headings
- Glaucoma, Open-Angle
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
XEN® Gel StentDevice
Also called XEN Glaucoma Implant, XEN Gel Stent, XEN45 Implant
The XEN® Gel Stent (XEN45 implant) was placed in the study eye.
Cataract SurgeryProcedure or surgery
Participants diagnosed with a cataract elected to have cataract surgery.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| XEN® Gel Stent | Other | The XEN®45 Gel Stent (XEN45 implant) was placed in the study eye as a standalone procedure. Receives: Device: XEN® Gel Stent |
| XEN® Gel Stent with Cataract Surgery | Other | The XEN® Gel Stent (XEN45 implant) with cataract surgery, occurred if the participant was diagnosed with a cataract. Receives: Procedure: Cataract Surgery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye to Month 12
IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Two IOP measurements were taken, followed by a third if the first 2 differed by 3 mmHg or more. The measurements were averaged. The study eye(s) is defined as an eye(s) that met IOP and IOP-lowering medication study inclusion criteria. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline (≤ 90 days Preoperative) to Month 12 (Postoperative)
Change From Baseline in the Number of Topical IOP-Lowering Medications in the Study Eyes to Month 12
The use of topical IOP-lowering medications was recorded at the preoperative screening visit and at the 12 Month postoperative visit. The study eye(s) is defined as an eye(s) that met IOP and IOP-lowering medication study inclusion criteria. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline (≤ 90 days Preoperative) to Month 12 (Postoperative)
Mean Change From Baseline in IOP in the Study Eyes to Month 24
IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Two IOP measurements were taken, followed by a third if the first 2 differed by 3 mmHg or more. The measurements were averaged. The study eye(s) is defined as an eye(s) that met IOP and IOP-lowering medication study inclusion criteria. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline (≤ 90 days Preoperative) to Month 24 (Postoperative)
Change From Baseline in the Number of Topical IOP-Lowering Medications in the Study Eyes to Month 24
The use of topical IOP-lowering medications was recorded at the preoperative screening visit and at the 24 Month postoperative visit. The study eye(s) is defined as an eye(s) that met IOP and IOP-lowering medication study inclusion criteria. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline (≤ 90 days Preoperative) to Month 24 (Postoperative)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Study start5 Dec 2013
- Primary completion9 Feb 2016
- Study completion26 Jan 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Primary Open Angle GlaucomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 199 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AqueSys, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Vanessa Vera, MD, Study director, Allergan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02006693
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MS-001
- Status last verified
- Jan 2019
- First submitted
- 2 Dec 2013
- Last updated
- 22 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Reitsamer H, Sng C, Vera V, Lenzhofer M, Barton K, Stalmans I; Apex Study Group. Two-year results of a multicenter study of the ab interno gelatin implant in medically uncontrolled primary open-angle glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 May;257(5):983-996. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04251-z. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
PubMed 30758653Ozal SA, Kaplaner O, Basar BB, Guclu H, Ozal E. An innovation in glaucoma surgery: XEN45 gel stent implantation. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2017 Nov-Dec;80(6):382-385. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20170093.
PubMed 29267575
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Post Market Multicentric Evaluation of the AqueSys XEN Implant in Moderate Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Subjects
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02006693
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MS-001
- Conditions
- Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
- Keywords
- XEN, Primary Open Angle Glaucoma, Filtration Device, Ab interno
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 199 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AqueSys, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 5 Dec 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 9 Feb 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Jan 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 22 Apr 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the AqueSys XEN Implant [XEN® Gel Stent (XEN45 Implant)] for the treatment of moderate primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) participants when medications have failed to control intraocular pressure (IOP). Effectiveness was evaluated by comparing medicated preoperative IOP to postoperative values. Additionally, the number of topical IOP-lowering medications at screening were compared to the number of IOP-lowering medications at 1 year.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| XEN® Gel Stent | Other | Device: XEN® Gel StentThe XEN®45 Gel Stent (XEN45 implant) was placed in the study eye as a standalone procedure. |
| XEN® Gel Stent with Cataract Surgery | Other | Procedure: Cataract SurgeryThe XEN® Gel Stent (XEN45 implant) with cataract surgery, occurred if the participant was diagnosed with a cataract. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Diagnosis of primary open angle glaucoma
- Participants are taking at least one and no more than four topical IOP-lowering medications.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Angle Closure Glaucoma
- Participant has neovascular, uveitic or angle recession glaucoma or any glaucoma associated with vascular disorders
- Clinically significant inflammation or infection in the study eye within 30 days prior to the preoperative visit (e.g., blepharitis, conjunctivitis, keratitis, uveitis, herpes simplex infection)
- Presence of conjunctival scarring or prior conjunctival surgery or other conjunctival pathologies (e.g., pterygium) in the target quadrant
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| XEN® Gel StentAlso: XEN Glaucoma Implant, XEN Gel Stent, XEN45 ImplantThe XEN® Gel Stent (XEN45 implant) was placed in the study eye. | Device | XEN® Gel Stent |
| Cataract SurgeryParticipants diagnosed with a cataract elected to have cataract surgery. | Procedure or surgery | XEN® Gel Stent with Cataract Surgery |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye to Month 12
Time frame: Baseline (≤ 90 days Preoperative) to Month 12 (Postoperative)
IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Two IOP measurements were taken, followed by a third if the first 2 differed by 3 mmHg or more. The measurements were averaged. The study eye(s) is defined as an eye(s) that met IOP and IOP-lowering medication study inclusion criteria. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in the Number of Topical IOP-Lowering Medications in the Study Eyes to Month 12
Time frame: Baseline (≤ 90 days Preoperative) to Month 12 (Postoperative)
The use of topical IOP-lowering medications was recorded at the preoperative screening visit and at the 12 Month postoperative visit. The study eye(s) is defined as an eye(s) that met IOP and IOP-lowering medication study inclusion criteria. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Mean Change From Baseline in IOP in the Study Eyes to Month 24
Time frame: Baseline (≤ 90 days Preoperative) to Month 24 (Postoperative)
IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Two IOP measurements were taken, followed by a third if the first 2 differed by 3 mmHg or more. The measurements were averaged. The study eye(s) is defined as an eye(s) that met IOP and IOP-lowering medication study inclusion criteria. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in the Number of Topical IOP-Lowering Medications in the Study Eyes to Month 24
Time frame: Baseline (≤ 90 days Preoperative) to Month 24 (Postoperative)
The use of topical IOP-lowering medications was recorded at the preoperative screening visit and at the 24 Month postoperative visit. The study eye(s) is defined as an eye(s) that met IOP and IOP-lowering medication study inclusion criteria. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Apr 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30758653Reitsamer H, Sng C, Vera V, Lenzhofer M, Barton K, Stalmans I; Apex Study Group. Two-year results of a multicenter study of the ab interno gelatin implant in medically uncontrolled primary open-angle glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 May;257(5):983-996. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04251-z. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29267575Ozal SA, Kaplaner O, Basar BB, Guclu H, Ozal E. An innovation in glaucoma surgery: XEN45 gel stent implantation. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2017 Nov-Dec;80(6):382-385. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20170093.
Related trials for Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
RecruitingPhase 2
A Phase 2a Study Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Pregabalin Eye Drops Comparing With Timolol Eye Drops in Adults With Glaucoma or High Eye Pressure.
Primary Open - Angle Glaucoma (POAG), Ocular Hypertension (OHT)
Recruiting
The Acute Effect of Exercise Type And Timing on Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Intra-Ocular Pressure in Individuals With Glaucoma (The ACHIEVE-project).
Glaucoma Open-Angle Primary, Hypertension
RecruitingObservational study
PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt XI Observational PMCF Study With no Control Group
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Glaucoma, Visual Field Loss, and Their Association With Life Space in Older Adults
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Impact of Glaucoma and Visual Field Loss on Life Space
Primary Open-angle Glaucoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Vanessa Vera, MD study director
Allergan
21 sites in 9 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing XEN® Gel Stent and Cataract Surgery in people with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma, run by AqueSys, Inc. at 21 sites in 9 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 21 sites in United Kingdom, Austria, Germany, Italy, Spain and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Apr 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye to Month 12 (time frame: Baseline (≤ 90 days Preoperative) to Month 12 (Postoperative)). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02006693, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Apr 2019.