Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructivePhase 3NCT02006732
Tiotropium+Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (OTEMTO 2)
A Phase 3 study testing olodaterol and tiotropium in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 78 sites in 11 countries.
Trial summary
The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of 12 weeks once daily treatment with orally inhaled tiotropium + olodaterol FDC (delivered by the Respimat inhaler) compared with tiotropium and placebo in patients with COPD. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- What is being tested?
- olodaterol and tiotropium
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 809 participants
- Where
- 78 sitesin 11 countries
- Study dates
- Nov 2013to Nov 2014
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- Relatively stable airway obstruction with post FEV1 >=30 and < 80% predicted normal and post FEV1/ FVC < 70%
- Male or female patients, 40 years of age or more
- Smoking history more than 10 pack years
Who cannot join
- Significant diseases other than COPD
- History of asthma
- COPD exacerbation in previous 3 months
- Completion of pulmonary rehabilitation program within previous 6 weeks or current participation in pulmonary rehabilitation program.
- Pregnant or nursing women
- Patients unable to comply with pulmonary medication restrictions
Trial locations and contacts
78 sites in 11 countries.
78 sites in 11 countries
United States20 sites
1237.26.10609 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Boerne, Texas
1237.26.10619 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Clearwater, Florida
1237.26.10603 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Columbus, Ohio
1237.26.10621 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Dayton, Ohio
1237.26.10616 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Duluth, Georgia
1237.26.10610 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
East Providence, Rhode Island
1237.26.10607 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Gaffney, South Carolina
1237.26.10615 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Greensboro, North Carolina
1237.26.10617 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Greenville, South Carolina
1237.26.10620 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Jasper, Alabama
1237.26.10606 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Medford, Oregon
1237.26.10601 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Morgantown, West Virginia
1237.26.10605 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
1237.26.10602 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas
1237.26.10608 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Spartanburg, South Carolina
1237.26.10613 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri
1237.26.10618 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Stamford, Connecticut
1237.26.10614 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Tampa, Florida
1237.26.10612 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Toledo, Ohio
1237.26.10604 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Union, South Carolina
Germany16 sites
1237.26.49610 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bamberg
1237.26.49611 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Berlin
1237.26.49616 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Berlin
1237.26.49609 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bochum
1237.26.49607 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Dresden
1237.26.49612 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Frankfurt
1237.26.49615 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Halberstadt
1237.26.49606 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hamburg
1237.26.49608 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hanover
1237.26.49603 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hettstedt
1237.26.49604 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Leipzig
1237.26.49605 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Leipzig
1237.26.49601 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Lübeck
1237.26.49602 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Rüdersdorf
1237.26.49614 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Schwerin
1237.26.49613 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Wiesloch
Canada9 sites
1237.26.11609 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Courtice, Ontario
1237.26.11611 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Mirabel, Quebec
1237.26.11605 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Moncton, New Brunswick
1237.26.11602 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Point Claire, Quebec
1237.26.11608 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Sarnia, Ontario
1237.26.11603 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Sherbrooke, Quebec
1237.26.11606 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario
1237.26.11607 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario
1237.26.11601 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Windsor, Ontario
Australia6 sites
1237.26.61004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Concord, New South Wales
1237.26.61002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Daw Park, South Australia
1237.26.61005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Murdoch, Western Australia
1237.26.61001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Nedlands, Western Australia
1237.26.61003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Toorak Gardens, South Australia
1237.26.61007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Woodville, South Australia
Austria5 sites
1237.26.43004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Feldbach
1237.26.43002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Grieskirchen
1237.26.43003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Linz
1237.26.43006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Linz
1237.26.43001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Thalheim bei Wels
Greece5 sites
1237.26.30005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Athens
1237.26.30002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Heraklion
1237.26.30001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Nafplion
1237.26.30004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Serres
1237.26.30003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Thessaloniki
Norway4 sites
1237.26.47003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hamar
1237.26.47001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hønefoss
1237.26.47002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kløfta
1237.26.47004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Lierskogen
Slovakia4 sites
1237.26.42103 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bardejov
1237.26.42104 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Humenné
1237.26.42102 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Spišská Nová Ves
1237.26.42101 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Vyšné Hágy
South Africa4 sites
1237.26.27601 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Cape Town
1237.26.27602 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Cape Town
1237.26.27604 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Cape Town
1237.26.27605 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Durban
Sweden4 sites
1237.26.46004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Höllviken
1237.26.46001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Lund
1237.26.46002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Stockholm
1237.26.46003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Uddevalla
New Zealand1 site
1237.26.64001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Greenlane East Auckland NZ
About this study
Official title: A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo- and Active-controlled Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy of 12 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Two Doses of Orally Inhaled Tiotropium+ Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination (Delivered by the Respimat Inhaler) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of 12 weeks once daily treatment with orally inhaled tiotropium + olodaterol FDC (delivered by the Respimat inhaler) compared with tiotropium and placebo in patients with COPD.
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- Being tested
- olodaterol, tiotropium, placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
olodaterolDrug
fixed dose combination
tiotropiumDrug
fixed dose combination
placeboDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| tiotropium + olodaterol low dose | Experimental | Once daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat Receives: Drug: olodaterol; Drug: tiotropium |
| tiotropium + olodaterol high dose | Experimental | Once daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat Receives: Drug: olodaterol; Drug: tiotropium |
| tiotropium | Active comparator | Once daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat Receives: Drug: tiotropium |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | Once daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat Receives: Drug: placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
FEV1 AUC0-3h Response
Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) Area under the curve (AUC) 0-3h was calculated as the area under the FEV1-time curve from 0 to 3h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3h) to report in litres. FEV1 AUC0-3h response was defined as FEV1 AUC0-3h minus baseline FEV1. The adjusted mean and standard error (SE) are obtained from fitting a mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment by test day interaction, baseline, and baseline by test day interaction; patient as a random effect; spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation of denominator degrees of freedom.
Measured: baseline and 12 weeks
Trough FEV1 Response (Change From Baseline)
Trough FEV1 was defined as the FEV1 value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours). It was calculated as the mean of the 2 FEV1 measurements performed 23 h and at 23 h 50 min after inhalation of study medication at day 85. Trough FEV1 response was defines as trough FEV1 minus baseline FEV1. The adjusted mean (SE) are obtained from fitting a mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment by test day interaction, baseline, and baseline by test day interaction; patient as a random effect; spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation of denominator degrees of freedom.
Measured: baseline and 12 weeks
St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score Based on Data From This Individual Study
The SGRQ ranges from 0 (no impairment of quality of life) to 100 (highest impairment of quality of life).
The adjusted mean (SE) are obtained from fitting a mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment by test day interaction, baseline, and baseline by test day interaction; patient as a random effect; spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation of denominator degrees of freedom.
Measured: 12 weeks treatment
St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score Based on Combined Dataset From This Study and the Replicate Study NCT01964352
This endpoint was evaluated after combining the data from this and the replicate study NCT01964352 as specified in the analysis plan. The SGRQ ranges from 0 (no impairment of quality of life) to 100 (highest impairment of quality of life).
The adjusted mean (SE) are obtained from fitting a mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment by test day interaction, baseline, and baseline by test day interaction; patient as a random effect; spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation of denominator degrees of freedom.
Measured: 12 weeks treatment
Secondary outcomes (4)
Trough Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Response (Change From Baseline)
Trough FVC was defined as the FVC value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours). It was calculated as the mean of the 2 FVC measurements performed 23 h and at 23 h 50 min after inhalation of study medication at day 85. Trough FVC response was defined as trough FVC minus baseline FVC. The adjusted mean (SE) are obtained from fitting a mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment by test day interaction, baseline, and baseline by test day interaction; patient as a random effect; spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation of denominator degrees of freedom.
Measured: baseline and 12 weeks
TDI Focal Score Based on Data From This Individual Study
Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) focal score was performed to measure the effect of the treatment on patients' dyspnoea.(Rating scale of 3 components - change in functional impairment, change in magnitude of tasks, change in magnitude of efforts. Worst score = -9, best score = +9).
The adjusted mean (SE) are obtained from fitting an MMRM model including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment by test day interaction, baseline, and baseline by test day interaction; patient as a random effect; spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation of denominator degrees of freedom.
Measured: 12 weeks
TDI Focal Score Based on Combined Dataset From This Study and the Replicate Study NCT01964352
This endpoint was evaluated after combining the data from this and the replicate study NCT01964352 as specified in the analysis plan. Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) focal score was performed to measure the effect of the treatment on patients' dyspnoea.(Rating scale of 3 components - change in functional impairment, change in magnitude of tasks, change in magnitude of efforts. Worst score = -9, best score = +9).
The adjusted mean (SE) are obtained from fitting an MMRM model including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment by test day interaction, baseline, and baseline by test day interaction; patient as a random effect; spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation of denominator degrees of freedom.
Measured: 12 weeks
FVC AUC0-3h Response (Change From Baseline)
The adjusted mean (SE) are obtained from fitting a mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment by test day interaction, baseline, and baseline by test day interaction; patient as a random effect; spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation of denominator degrees of freedom.
Measured: baseline and 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2013
- Primary completionOct 2014
- Study completionNov 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Boehringer IngelheimThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Enrolment
- 809 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Boehringer Ingelheim, Study chair, Boehringer Ingelheim
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02006732
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1237.26
- Other IDs
- 2013-002264-24
- Status last verified
- Dec 2015
- First submitted
- 14 Oct 2013
- Last updated
- 20 Jan 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Buhl R, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Singh D, Ferguson GT. Efficacy of Tiotropium/Olodaterol Compared with Tiotropium as a First-Line Maintenance Treatment in Patients with COPD Who Are Naive to LAMA, LABA and ICS: Pooled Analysis of Four Clinical Trials. Adv Ther. 2020 Oct;37(10):4175-4189. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01411-0. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
PubMed 32671684Buhl R, Singh D, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Ferguson GT. Benefits of Tiotropium/Olodaterol Compared with Tiotropium in Patients with COPD Receiving only LAMA at Baseline: Pooled Analysis of the TONADO(R) and OTEMTO(R) Studies. Adv Ther. 2020 Aug;37(8):3485-3499. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01373-3. Epub 2020 May 27.
PubMed 32462607Singh D, Gaga M, Schmidt O, Bjermer L, Gronke L, Voss F, Ferguson GT. Effects of tiotropium + olodaterol versus tiotropium or placebo by COPD disease severity and previous treatment history in the OTEMTO(R) studies. Respir Res. 2016 Jun 18;17(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12931-016-0387-7.
PubMed 27316465Singh D, Ferguson GT, Bolitschek J, Gronke L, Hallmann C, Bennett N, Abrahams R, Schmidt O, Bjermer L. Tiotropium + olodaterol shows clinically meaningful improvements in quality of life. Respir Med. 2015 Oct;109(10):1312-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
PubMed 26320402
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Jan 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo- and Active-controlled Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy of 12 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Two Doses of Orally Inhaled Tiotropium+ Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination (Delivered by the Respimat Inhaler) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02006732
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1237.26
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 809 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer IngelheimIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Nov 2013
- Primary completion
- Oct 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 20 Jan 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of 12 weeks once daily treatment with orally inhaled tiotropium + olodaterol FDC (delivered by the Respimat inhaler) compared with tiotropium and placebo in patients with COPD.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| tiotropium + olodaterol low dose | Experimental | Drug: olodaterol, Drug: tiotropiumOnce daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat |
| tiotropium + olodaterol high dose | Experimental | Drug: olodaterol, Drug: tiotropiumOnce daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat |
| tiotropium | Active comparator | Drug: tiotropiumOnce daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: placeboOnce daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Diagnosis chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- Relatively stable airway obstruction with post FEV1 >=30 and < 80% predicted normal and post FEV1/ FVC < 70%
- Male or female patients, 40 years of age or more
- Smoking history more than 10 pack years
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Significant diseases other than COPD
- History of asthma
- COPD exacerbation in previous 3 months
- Completion of pulmonary rehabilitation program within previous 6 weeks or current participation in pulmonary rehabilitation program.
- Pregnant or nursing women
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| olodaterolfixed dose combination | Drug | tiotropium + olodaterol high dose, tiotropium + olodaterol low dose |
| tiotropiumfixed dose combination | Drug | tiotropium, tiotropium + olodaterol high dose, tiotropium + olodaterol low dose |
| placebo | Drug | placebo |
Primary outcome
FEV1 AUC0-3h Response
Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks
Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) Area under the curve (AUC) 0-3h was calculated as the area under the FEV1-time curve from 0 to 3h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3h) to report in litres. FEV1 AUC0-3h response was defined as FEV1 AUC0-3h minus baseline FEV1. The adjusted mean and standard error (SE) are obtained from fitting a mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment by test day interaction, baseline, and baseline by test day interaction; patient as a random effect; spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation of denominator degrees of freedom.
Trough FEV1 Response (Change From Baseline)
Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks
Trough FEV1 was defined as the FEV1 value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours). It was calculated as the mean of the 2 FEV1 measurements performed 23 h and at 23 h 50 min after inhalation of study medication at day 85. Trough FEV1 response was defines as trough FEV1 minus baseline FEV1. The adjusted mean (SE) are obtained from fitting a mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment by test day interaction, baseline, and baseline by test day interaction; patient as a random effect; spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation of denominator degrees of freedom.
St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score Based on Data From This Individual Study
Time frame: 12 weeks treatment
The SGRQ ranges from 0 (no impairment of quality of life) to 100 (highest impairment of quality of life). The adjusted mean (SE) are obtained from fitting a mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment by test day interaction, baseline, and baseline by test day interaction; patient as a random effect; spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation of denominator degrees of freedom.
St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score Based on Combined Dataset From This Study and the Replicate Study NCT01964352
Time frame: 12 weeks treatment
This endpoint was evaluated after combining the data from this and the replicate study NCT01964352 as specified in the analysis plan. The SGRQ ranges from 0 (no impairment of quality of life) to 100 (highest impairment of quality of life). The adjusted mean (SE) are obtained from fitting a mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment by test day interaction, baseline, and baseline by test day interaction; patient as a random effect; spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation of denominator degrees of freedom.
4 secondary outcomes
Trough Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Response (Change From Baseline)
Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks
TDI Focal Score Based on Data From This Individual Study
Time frame: 12 weeks
TDI Focal Score Based on Combined Dataset From This Study and the Replicate Study NCT01964352
Time frame: 12 weeks
FVC AUC0-3h Response (Change From Baseline)
Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Jan 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32671684Buhl R, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Singh D, Ferguson GT. Efficacy of Tiotropium/Olodaterol Compared with Tiotropium as a First-Line Maintenance Treatment in Patients with COPD Who Are Naive to LAMA, LABA and ICS: Pooled Analysis of Four Clinical Trials. Adv Ther. 2020 Oct;37(10):4175-4189. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01411-0. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32462607Buhl R, Singh D, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Ferguson GT. Benefits of Tiotropium/Olodaterol Compared with Tiotropium in Patients with COPD Receiving only LAMA at Baseline: Pooled Analysis of the TONADO(R) and OTEMTO(R) Studies. Adv Ther. 2020 Aug;37(8):3485-3499. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01373-3. Epub 2020 May 27.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27316465Singh D, Gaga M, Schmidt O, Bjermer L, Gronke L, Voss F, Ferguson GT. Effects of tiotropium + olodaterol versus tiotropium or placebo by COPD disease severity and previous treatment history in the OTEMTO(R) studies. Respir Res. 2016 Jun 18;17(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12931-016-0387-7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26320402Singh D, Ferguson GT, Bolitschek J, Gronke L, Hallmann C, Bennett N, Abrahams R, Schmidt O, Bjermer L. Tiotropium + olodaterol shows clinically meaningful improvements in quality of life. Respir Med. 2015 Oct;109(10):1312-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
Related trials for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Firefighter's Longitudinal Airway and Respiratory Exposome/Multiome Study (FLARES)
Anosmia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate Axatilimab and Corticosteroids as Initial Treatment for Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease
Chronic Graft-versus-host-disease
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Multidisciplinary Care, Structured and Targeted on the COPD Patient's Clinical Pathway.
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Lung Diseases, Obstructive
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
The AIRWARD Study: A Study to Test Whether Verducatib Helps People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating and Promoting Resilience in Adolescents With Tourette Syndrome
Tourette Syndrome, Tic Disorders
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Boehringer Ingelheim study chair
Boehringer Ingelheim
78 sites in 11 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing olodaterol and tiotropium in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 78 sites in 11 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jan 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 78 sites in United States, Germany, Canada, Australia, Austria and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Jan 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
FEV1 AUC0-3h Response (time frame: baseline and 12 weeks). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02006732, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jan 2016.