Treatment ErrorREPHVIMNCT02006797
Communication Between Hospital and Community Pharmacists: Impact on Drug Management at Discharge
A study testing reconciliation in people with Treatment Error, run by University Hospital, Tours at 21 sites in France.
Trial summary
This study will evaluate the impact of a communication between hospital pharmacist and community pharmacists in addition to drugs reconciliation procedure at discharge. It will be conducted in 21 french public hospitals. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Treatment Error
- What is being tested?
- reconciliation
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,176 participants
- Where
- 21 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- Jan 2014to Dec 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patients over 18
- patients attending to the same CP for at least 3 months
- patients speaking french
Who cannot join
- patients with a length stay over 21 days (too many therapeutic modifications),
- patients who do not return to home,
- palliative patients and/or expected end of life
- patients that will not give their informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
21 sites in 1 country.
21 sites in 1 country
France21 sites, 21 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Centre Hospitalier Alès-Cévennes
Alès, 30100
Vincent BOUIX, +33(0)466783147, vbouix@ch-ales.fr
Vincent BOUIX
- Not yet recruiting
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire
Angers, 49000
Frédéric MOAL, +33(0)241354956, frmoal@chu-angers.fr
Frédéric MOAL
- Not yet recruiting
Centre Hospitalier
Béthune, 62408
Catherine FLORET, +33(0)321644133, cfloret@ch-bethune.fr
Catherine FLORET
- Not yet recruiting
Centre Hospitalier
Blois, 41000
Mathilde EMONET, +33(0)254556633, emonetm@ch-blois.fr
Mathilde EMONET
- Not yet recruiting
Hopital de la Cavale Blanche
Brest, 29200
Maud PERENNES, +33(0)298347600, maud.perennes@chu-brest.fr
Maud PERENNES
- Not yet recruiting
Hopital ESTAING
Clermont-Ferrand, 63000
Anne BOYER, +33(0)473357911, aboyer@chu-clermontferrand.fr
Anne BOYER
- Not yet recruiting
Hopitaux civils de Colmar
Colmar, 68000
Christelle LEMARIGNIER, +33(0)389124240, christelle.lemarignier@ch-colmar.fr
Christelle LEMARIGNIER
- Not yet recruiting
Centre Hospitalier Compiègne-Noyon
Compiègne, 60200
Anne-Marie LIEBBE, +33(0)344236465, am.liebbe@ch-compiegnenoyon.fr
Anne-Marie LIEBBE
- Not yet recruiting
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire
Grenoble, 38000
Pierrick BEDOUCH, +33(0)476765496, pbedouch@chu-grenoble.fr
Pierrick BEDOUCH
- Not yet recruiting
Hopital Jacques Monod
Le Havre, 76290
Dorothée LAURE-OLIVIER, +33(0)2 32 73 33 90, dorothee.olivier@ch-havre.fr
Dorothée LAURE-OLIVIER
- Not yet recruiting
Centre Hospitalier
Le Mans, 72000
Anne-marie CAMINONDO, +33(0)243432846, amcaminondo@ch-lemans.fr
Anne-Marie CAMINONDO
- Not yet recruiting
CHU Conception
Marseille, 13000
Philippe MONGES, +33(0)491383935, Philippe.MONGES@ap-hm.fr
Philippe MONGES
- Not yet recruiting
Hopital de Mercy Metz-Thionville
Metz, 57085
Grégory RONDELOT, +33(0)387553484, g.rondelot@chr-metz-thionville.fr
Grégory RONDELOT
- Not yet recruiting
Centre Hospitalier Pierre Bérégovoy
Nevers, 58000
Marie-Odette TISSERON-GUYOT, +33(0)386937086, marieodette.tisseron@ch-nevers.fr
Marie-Odette TISSERON-GUYOT
- Not yet recruiting
Hopital Archet
Nice, 06000
Rémy COLLOMP, +33(0)492039281, COLLOMP.R@chu-nice.fr
Rémy COLLOMP
- Not yet recruiting
Centre Hospitalier
Nîmes, 30000
Clarisse ROUX, +33(0)466683739, clarisse.roux@chu-nimes.fr
Clarisse ROUX
- Not yet recruiting
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire
Poitiers, 86000
Sophie SURY-LESTAGE, +33(0)549443801, sophie.SURY-LESTAGE@chu-poitiers.fr
Sophie SURY-LESTAGE
- Not yet recruiting
Hopital Inter Armées
Saint-Mandé, 94160
Virginie LAMAND, +33(0)143985038, lamand.virginie@gmail.com
Virginie LAMAND
- Not yet recruiting
Hopital de Hautepierre
Strasbourg, 67000
Bénédicte GOURIEUX, +33(0)388127803, benedicte.gourieux@chru-strasbourg.fr
Bénédicte GOURIEUX
- Not yet recruiting
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire
Toulouse, 31000
Cécile LEBAUDY, +33(0)561776418, lebaudy.c@chu-toulouse.fr
Cécile LEBAUDY
- Recruiting
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire
Tours, 37000
Xavier POURRAT, +33(0)234389539, x.pourrat@chu-tours.fr
Xavier POURRAT
About this study
Official title: Impact of Drug Reconciliation at Discharge and Pharmaceutical Communication Between Hospital and Community Pharmacists on Drug Related Problems: Study Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Cross-over Trial
This study will evaluate the impact of a communication between hospital pharmacist and community pharmacists in addition to drugs reconciliation procedure at discharge. It will be conducted in 21 french public hospitals.
Read the detailed description
Transition points during hospitalization are at risk of drug related problems (DRP) especially admission and discharge. Reconciliation procedure at admission lead by a clinical pharmacist had been proved to decrease DRP. The community pharmacist (CP) is often the first health professional that patients meet at discharge. He/she is in charge of dispensing their medication to patients and give treatment information. However because of lack of information community pharmacist is not always able to identify problems and this may lead to dispense wrong drugs and/or wrong dosage and/or give wrong information. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of drug reconciliation performed at discharge completed by a communication between the Hospital Pharmacist (HP) and community pharmacist on drug related problem during the 7 days following discharge at home.
The study is a cluster randomized cross-over trial. It involves 21 French universitarian and non-universitarian hospitals with 42 care units: 22 medical units and 20 surgical units. Each unit (a unit corresponds to a cluster) is involved during two consecutive 14-day periods which are randomly assigned as "experimental" or "control" where control corresponds to usual care. During the experimental period, for each eligible patient discharged during the period, a reconciliation procedure will be performed by the HP, with communication to the patient. The HP will further inform the patient's community pharmacist about patient's drug therapy [modification in home medication, acute drugs prescribed, shelved treatments and/or labs results to survey patient]. Eligible patients will be over 18, attending to the same community pharmacist for at least 3 months. We will exclude patients with a length stay over 21 days (too many therapeutic modifications), those who do not return to home, and also palliative patient. The primary outcome is a composite outcome associating any kind of drug misuse during the 7 days following discharge. It will be assessed by phone at day 7 (+/-2) by a pharmacist in charge of the study (PCS) will phone both patients and community pharmacists . The secondary outcome will be the unplanned hospitalizations observed in each group assessed by phone at day 35 (+/-5). We plan to recruit 1,176 patients, i.e. 14 per period per unit.
This study will assess the impact of a reconciliation procedure at discharge followed by a communication between HP and community pharmacists . Also it will identify the type of patients for which the intervention is the most relevant in France and may be generalized to other countries that have the same care organisation.
- Conditions
- Treatment Error
- Being tested
- reconciliation
- Keywords
- reconciliation, discharge, pharmacist, drug related problems
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
reconciliationOther
medication reconciliation at discharge and communication of this intervention to patient's community pharmacist
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| intervention | Experimental | patients with reconciliation procedure at discharge and included in the exchange process Receives: Other: reconciliation |
| control | No intervention | usual care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
drug related problems (DRP)
The primary outcome is a composite endpoint associated all the problems/dysfunctions that can be observed from the hospital to home during 7 days after discharge. We will be taking in account the occurence of a dysfunction every time that one of the following problems will happen: - first drug problem; the drug taken by the patient has a problem: it is not the right medicine (Name, form, route, dose). The fault may be 1) an error between the processing of transcription at the admission and the discharge, 2) a therapeutic modification related to therapeutic formulary restriction, the home medication is replaced by an another one that may be less adaptated to patient, 3) an error linked to the writing. Second : patient due to patient; the patient doesn't take what was prescribed and / or treatments that he takes are stopped. Third- :presence of a gap in the continuity and duration of therapy: the patient could not have his medication when he's coming at the pharmacy
Measured: 7 days after patient discharge
Secondary outcomes (7)
all compounds of the composite primary outcome measure (patient errors, medical error and DRP)
Measured: day 7 after discharge
clinical impact of problems
all problems will be scored of the potential iatrogenic impact (from 0: none to 3: fatal) by a team associated a nephrologist, a cardiologist, a gastroenterologist and a clinical pharmacist.
Measured: days 7 after discharge
number of non-planned hospitalization
number of non-planned hospitalizations in each group
Measured: days 35 after discharge
patient satisfaction
the patient will have to tell his satisfaction about his drugs management by health professionals at discharge. It will be evaluated by a Likert scale with 4 items.
Measured: day 7 after patient discharge
community pharmacist satisfaction about exchanges with hospital pharmacists
the community pharmacist will have to tell his satisfaction about his drugs management by health professionals at discharge. It will be evaluated by a Likert scale with 4 items.
Measured: 7 days after patient discharge
time spend by hospital pharmacist on reconciliation and communication to community pharmacist
the hospital pharmacist will notice the time spent to patient reconciliation and communicate informations to community pharmacist. Time will be those declared by the hospital pharmacist
Measured: at day 2/3 after discharge
percentage of drugs prescription modified by the hospital pharmacist at discharge
Measured: at discharge
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2014
- Primary completionApr 2015 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2015 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Treatment ErrorStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, ToursThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,176 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Tours
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Xavier POURRAT, Pr, Study director, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02006797
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PREPS12-XP/REPHVIM
- Acronym
- REPHVIM
- Status last verified
- Jan 2014
- First submitted
- 5 Dec 2013
- Last updated
- 24 Jan 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Pourrat X, Roux C, Bouzige B, Garnier V, Develay A, Allenet B, Fraysse M, Halimi JM, Grassin J, Giraudeau B. Impact of drug reconciliation at discharge and communication between hospital and community pharmacists on drug-related problems: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Jun 30;15:260. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-260.
PubMed 24981605
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jan 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of Drug Reconciliation at Discharge and Pharmaceutical Communication Between Hospital and Community Pharmacists on Drug Related Problems: Study Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Cross-over Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02006797
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REPHVIM / PREPS12-XP/REPHVIM
- Conditions
- Treatment Error
- Keywords
- reconciliation, discharge, pharmacist, drug related problems
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 1,176 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, ToursUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2014
- Primary completion
- Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2015 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will evaluate the impact of a communication between hospital pharmacist and community pharmacists in addition to drugs reconciliation procedure at discharge. It will be conducted in 21 french public hospitals.
Detailed description
Transition points during hospitalization are at risk of drug related problems (DRP) especially admission and discharge. Reconciliation procedure at admission lead by a clinical pharmacist had been proved to decrease DRP. The community pharmacist (CP) is often the first health professional that patients meet at discharge. He/she is in charge of dispensing their medication to patients and give treatment information. However because of lack of information community pharmacist is not always able to identify problems and this may lead to dispense wrong drugs and/or wrong dosage and/or give wrong information. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of drug reconciliation performed at discharge completed by a communication between the Hospital Pharmacist (HP) and community pharmacist on drug related problem during the 7 days following discharge at home.
The study is a cluster randomized cross-over trial. It involves 21 French universitarian and non-universitarian hospitals with 42 care units: 22 medical units and 20 surgical units. Each unit (a unit corresponds to a cluster) is involved during two consecutive 14-day periods which are randomly assigned as "experimental" or "control" where control corresponds to usual care. During the experimental period, for each eligible patient discharged during the period, a reconciliation procedure will be performed by the HP, with communication to the patient. The HP will further inform the patient's community pharmacist about patient's drug therapy [modification in home medication, acute drugs prescribed, shelved treatments and/or labs results to survey patient]. Eligible patients will be over 18, attending to the same community pharmacist for at least 3 months. We will exclude patients with a length stay over 21 days (too many therapeutic modifications), those who do not return to home, and also palliative patient. The primary outcome is a composite outcome associating any kind of drug misuse during the 7 days following discharge. It will be assessed by phone at day 7 (+/-2) by a pharmacist in charge of the study (PCS) will phone both patients and community pharmacists . The secondary outcome will be the unplanned hospitalizations observed in each group assessed by phone at day 35 (+/-5). We plan to recruit 1,176 patients, i.e. 14 per period per unit.
This study will assess the impact of a reconciliation procedure at discharge followed by a communication between HP and community pharmacists . Also it will identify the type of patients for which the intervention is the most relevant in France and may be generalized to other countries that have the same care organisation.
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| intervention | Experimental | Other: reconciliationpatients with reconciliation procedure at discharge and included in the exchange process |
| control | No intervention | –usual care |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- patients over 18
- patients attending to the same CP for at least 3 months
- patients speaking french
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- patients with a length stay over 21 days (too many therapeutic modifications),
- patients who do not return to home,
- palliative patients and/or expected end of life
- patients that will not give their informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| reconciliationmedication reconciliation at discharge and communication of this intervention to patient's community pharmacist | Other | intervention |
Primary outcome
drug related problems (DRP)
Time frame: 7 days after patient discharge
The primary outcome is a composite endpoint associated all the problems/dysfunctions that can be observed from the hospital to home during 7 days after discharge. We will be taking in account the occurence of a dysfunction every time that one of the following problems will happen: - first drug problem; the drug taken by the patient has a problem: it is not the right medicine (Name, form, route, dose). The fault may be 1) an error between the processing of transcription at the admission and the discharge, 2) a therapeutic modification related to therapeutic formulary restriction, the home medication is replaced by an another one that may be less adaptated to patient, 3) an error linked to the writing. Second : patient due to patient; the patient doesn't take what was prescribed and / or treatments that he takes are stopped. Third- :presence of a gap in the continuity and duration of therapy: the patient could not have his medication when he's coming at the pharmacy
7 secondary outcomes
all compounds of the composite primary outcome measure (patient errors, medical error and DRP)
Time frame: day 7 after discharge
clinical impact of problems
Time frame: days 7 after discharge
number of non-planned hospitalization
Time frame: days 35 after discharge
patient satisfaction
Time frame: day 7 after patient discharge
community pharmacist satisfaction about exchanges with hospital pharmacists
Time frame: 7 days after patient discharge
time spend by hospital pharmacist on reconciliation and communication to community pharmacist
Time frame: at day 2/3 after discharge
percentage of drugs prescription modified by the hospital pharmacist at discharge
Time frame: at discharge
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jan 2014.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24981605Pourrat X, Roux C, Bouzige B, Garnier V, Develay A, Allenet B, Fraysse M, Halimi JM, Grassin J, Giraudeau B. Impact of drug reconciliation at discharge and communication between hospital and community pharmacists on drug-related problems: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Jun 30;15:260. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-260.
Related trials for Treatment Error
Not yet recruiting
BRIGHT-LIGHT: Studying Red Light Therapy for Severe Short-Sightedness or Short-Sightedness That Worsens Despite Standard Treatment
Myopia, Myopia Progressing
RecruitingPhase 4
Treat-to-Target Serum Urate Versus Treat-to-Avoid Symptoms in Gout
Gout
RecruitingPhase 2/3
A Study in Pediatric Participants With Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (Balance-CAH)
Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia, Classic Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia
Recruiting
Evaluation of a New Laser Refractive Vision Correction Using the TENEO™ 317 Model 2
Hyperopia and Myopia
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Treatment of Hemochromatosis
Hemochromatosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Xavier POURRAT, Pr study director
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours
21 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing reconciliation in people with Treatment Error, run by University Hospital, Tours at 21 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jan 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 21 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Xavier POURRAT, Pr (+33(2)34389539, X.POURRAT@chu-tours.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
drug related problems (DRP) (time frame: 7 days after patient discharge). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02006797, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jan 2014.