LymphomaPhase 2NCT02012088
Clinical Trial to Evaluate R-COMP Versus R-CHOP in Newly Diagnosed Patients With Non-localised Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)/Follicular Lymphoma Grade IIIb
A Phase 2 study testing RCOMP and RCHOP in people with Lymphoma, run by Grupo Español de Linfomas y Transplante Autólogo de Médula Ósea at 14 sites in Spain.
Trial summary
The Phase II study proposed here assesses the hypothesis that replacing doxorubicin by Myocet® in the R-CHOP regimen would yield comparable antitumour efficacy with a lower cardiotoxicity for first-line treatment in elderly patients with non-localised DLBCL/Follicular lymphoma grade IIIb Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lymphoma
- What is being tested?
- RCOMP and RCHOP
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 91 participants
- Where
- 14 sitesSpain
- Study dates
- 11 Oct 2013to Aug 2021
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ≥60 years of age
- Histological confirmed DLBCL/follicular lymphoma grade IIIb by WHO classification, with any IPI (International Prognostic Index)
- Newly diagnosed, with no previous treatment
- Non-localised stage, i.e. lymphoma that does not fit into a single radiotherapy field (including clinical stage IA with large tumour mass until stage IV) with at least one measurable lesion
- ECOG performance status 0 to 2
- Present appropriate haematologic, liver (ALT or AST < 2.5 ULN ? upper limit of normal) and renal functions (creatinine < 2.5 ULN) , unless changes are secondary to lymphoma
- LVEF at rest ? 55%, with no documented history of congestive heart failure (CHF), serious arrhythmia or acute myocardial infarction
Who cannot join
- Clinical stage I without large tumour mass or clinical stage IIA with fewer than three affected areas (stage-IIB patients are considered suitable, regardless of the number of affected areas)
- CNS infiltration
- Transformed lymphoma, although with no previous treatment, as well as other histological subtypes such as mantle cell lymphoma, peripheral T-cell lymphoma and its variants and post-transplant lymphoproliferative syndrome
- Clinically significant secondary cardiovascular disease
- Signs of any severe, acute or chronic and active infection
- Concurrent malignancy or history of other neoplasia except basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and cervical or breast carcinoma in situ (CIN)
- Patients with positive results in the HBV, HIV or HCV RNA tests
- Any previous treatment for DLBCL/follicular lymphoma grade IIIb
Trial locations and contacts
14 sites in 1 country.
14 sites in 1 country
Spain14 sites
Hospital Fundación de Alcorcón
Alcorcón, Madrid, 28922
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol
Badalona, Barcelona, 08916
Hospital del Mar
Barcelona, 08003
Hospital de Cabueñes
Gijón, Asturas, 33203
ICO- Hospital Duran i Reynals
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08908
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón
Madrid, 28007
Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor
Madrid, 28031
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid, 28041
Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca
Murcia, 30120
Hospital Universitario de Salamanca
Salamanca, Castille and León, 37007
Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla
Santander, Cantabria, 39008
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid
Valladolid, Castille and León, 47005
Hospital Universitario de Alava
Vitoria-Gasteiz, Alava
Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa
Zaragoza, Aragon, 50009
About this study
Official title: Phase II, Randomised, Multicentre Study With Two Treatment Arms (R-COMP Versus R-CHOP) in Newly Diagnosed Elderly Patients (≥60 Years) With Non-localised Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)/Follicular Lymphoma Grade IIIb.
The Phase II study proposed here assesses the hypothesis that replacing doxorubicin by Myocet® in the R-CHOP regimen would yield comparable antitumour efficacy with a lower cardiotoxicity for first-line treatment in elderly patients with non-localised DLBCL/Follicular lymphoma grade IIIb
Read the detailed description
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common histological subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). This is an aggressive lymphoma, with an incidence in Western countries estimated at 5-6 cases/100,000 inhabitants/year that increases with age.
Treatment for patients with DLBCL is currently based on immunochemotherapy, of which the R-CHOP regimen, which includes cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) in combination with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab and is administered every 21 days for a total of 6-8 cycles, is the most commonly used.
Cardiotoxicity is one of the undesirable effects that limit the use of anthracyclines, such as doxorubicin, as part of the CHOP regimen, which is caused by the formation of complexes between ferric ions and the anthracycline within the myocyte. Because of their oxidative properties, these complexes are toxic and produce highly reactive free radicals that damage the lipid membrane and lead to the cell death of myocytes. Several studies have linked the onset of cardiotoxicity with old age, high cumulative doses of doxorubicin, cardiovascular risk factors and previous heart disease, among others. Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity is cumulative and irreversible. Moreover, left ventricular dysfunction is an important late effect in patients with aggressive NHL who survive long term and, according to some studies, have received doxorubicin at doses higher than 200 mg/m². Cardiotoxicity may be silent or subclinical, which is usually detected as a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), or clinical, with varying degrees of congestive heart failure (CHF). Depending on the symptoms, cardiotoxicity also differs between acute, subacute, late or chronic. The first is manifested at an early stage, usually as arrhythmia, transient ECG changes or pericarditis, among others, is usually reversible, is not detrimental to the continuation of treatment and is not associated with subacute and late toxicity.
Chronic cardiotoxicity could be early or late. Early-onset cardiotoxicity occurs within 1 year after anthracycline treatment and late-onset cardiotoxicity occurs more than 1 year after completion of anthracycline treatment. In the latter two, cardiotoxicity is associated with the lesion of cardiomyocytes and is therefore considered irreversible. The incidence of cardiotoxicity varies among different studies, depending on patient follow-up or the definition of cardiotoxicity used (acute, subacute or late).
In addition to clinical findings, the determination of LVEF or, more recently, the use of biomarkers, are the most commonly used methods to diagnose and assess cardiotoxicity. Regarding the identification of biomarkers, troponin I and N-terminal fragment of pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are the most commonly used and investigated in the context of clinical studies. The advantages of using biomarkers include their minimally invasive identification, which is less expensive than echocardiography, and, unlike radionuclide ventriculography, they avoid irradiation of the patient. Furthermore, the interpretation of their results does not depend on the observer's experience, thus avoiding interobserver variability. Several studies have shown the role of troponins as indicators of early anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity or other chemotherapeutic agents, which are able to predict impaired ventricular function and higher incidence of cardiac events in patients with elevated values of this marker compared with patients with normal troponin values. Regarding the use of brain natriuretic peptides such as NT-proBNP, several studies have shown a correlation between persistently high values of this biomarker and impaired heart function parameters, in particular LVEF.
Myocet® (non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin) is one of the several strategies developed to reduce cardiotoxicity and maintain the therapeutic efficacy of the R-CHOP regimen. Non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin has shown a similar efficacy and less cardiotoxicity than conventional doxorubicin in the treatment of women with metastatic breast cancer. In addition, several studies in patients with NHL have shown similar response rates with regimens containing non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin to those obtained in historical controls with conventional doxorubicin, with a low incidence of clinical and subclinical cardiovascular events. The treatment is relatively well tolerated, while myelosuppression is its most important toxicity.
Most of these phase I and II studies (with or without rituximab), which assessed Myocet® in combination with cyclophosphamide; vincristine and prednisone, showed that it is an active treatment in newly diagnosed patients with aggressive NHL.
100% of the data registered on CRFs will be source data verified. eCRDs will be used in order to register the data. Nine monitoring visits per site will be performed.
First monitoring vistit will be performed when the first patient is included Second monitoring visit willb be performed when the third patient is included Third monitoring visit will be perforemd when the fifth patient is included Fourth monitoring visit will be performed then the last patient finish study treatment One monitoring visit per year will be performed during follow-up phase.
CRO (Dynamic) Standard Operating Procedures will be used to manage the clinical trial.
Sample size of the study is based on the hypothesis of a LEVF decrease <55% in the 15% of patients assigned to R-CHOP treatment group and 5% of patients assigned to R-COMP treatment group.
Categorical variables were show by absolute and relative frequencies, including the confidence interval of 95%.
For the description of the continuous variables will be use the mean, standard deviation, median, mode, minimum and maximum, including the total number of valid values.
In the case of compare subgroups of patients, will be use for quantitative variables parametric tests or nonparametric as characteristics of the variables under study. For qualitative variables will be use Chi-square test.
Statistical analysis was planned with the SAS statistical package version 9.1 or later.
Two interim analysis will be performed when the last patient peforms the end of treatment visit and when the last patient performd the 24 months follow-up visit.
Final analysis will be performed at the end of the study.
- Conditions
- Lymphoma
- Being tested
- RCOMP, RCHOP
- Keywords
- Follicular lymphoma, large B-cell lymphoma
- Medical subject headings
- Lymphoma, Lymphoma, Follicular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RCOMPDrug
Also called Rituximab, Myocet, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine
Day 1: Rituximab 375 mg/m2; Myocet® 50 mg/m2; cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2; vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (maximum 2 mg); prednisone 60 mg/m2 Days 2-5: Prednisone, 60 mg/m2 Administered every 21 days × 6 cycles
RCHOPDrug
Also called Rituximab, Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine
Day 1: Rituximab 375 mg/m2; Doxorubicin 50 mg/m2; cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2; vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (maximum 2 mg); prednisone 60 mg/m2 Days 2-5: Prednisone, 60 mg/m2 Administered every 21 days × 6 cycles
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| RCOMP | Experimental | R-COMP Regimen:
Day 1: Rituximab 375 mg/m2; Myocet® 50 mg/m2; cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2; vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (maximum 2 mg); prednisone 60 mg/m2 Days 2-5: Prednisone, 60 mg/m2 Administered every 21 days × 6 cycles Receives: Drug: RCOMP |
| RCHOP | Active comparator | R-CHOP Regimen:
Day 1: Rituximab 375 mg/m2; Doxorubicin 50 mg/m2; cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2; vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (maximum 2 mg); prednisone 60 mg/m2 Days 2-5: Prednisone, 60 mg/m2 Administered every 21 days × 6 cycles Receives: Drug: RCHOP |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Subclinical cardiac toxicity
Subclinical cardiac toxicity determined by the percentage of measurings experiencing a decrease in LEVF determined by echocardiography with final LEVF <55% at day 135
Measured: Day 135
Subclinical cardiac toxicity
Subclinical cardiac toxicity determined by the percentage of measurings experiencing a decrease in LEVF determined by echocardiography with final LEVF <55% at day 225
Measured: Day 225
Secondary outcomes (5)
Survival
Event free survial, progression free survival and overall survival at 2 and 5 years.
Measured: 2 and 5 years
Response rate
Overall response rates and complete responses evaluated by the International Harmonization Project for response criteria in lymphoma
Measured: Day 135
Cardiac/cardiovascular toxicity
Rate of cardiac/cardiovascular toxicity according to the CTC criteria (version 4.0) of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) during the treatment and during 5 years
Measured: During 5 years
Toxicity (except cardiac)
No cardiotoxicity according to the CTC criteria (version 4.0) of the NCI during 24 months
Measured: During 2 years
Cardiac biomarkers
Cardiotoxicity determined by elevated values of troponin and NT-proBNP and decreased values of LEVF determined during 12 months
Measured: During 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Study start11 Oct 2013
- Primary completionOct 2016
- Study completionAug 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for LymphomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 91 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Grupo Español de Linfomas y Transplante Autólogo de Médula Ósea
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Dr. Alejandro Martin, Principal investigator, University of SalamancaDr. Juan Manuel Sancho, Principal investigator, Germans Trias i Pujol HospitalDr. Francisco Gual, Principal investigator, Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02012088
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GEL-R-COMP-2013
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 11 Nov 2013
- Last updated
- 26 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Cheson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME, Gascoyne RD, Specht L, Horning SJ, Coiffier B, Fisher RI, Hagenbeek A, Zucca E, Rosen ST, Stroobants S, Lister TA, Hoppe RT, Dreyling M, Tobinai K, Vose JM, Connors JM, Federico M, Diehl V; International Harmonization Project on Lymphoma. Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Feb 10;25(5):579-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.2403. Epub 2007 Jan 22.
PubMed 17242396Rigacci L, Mappa S, Nassi L, Alterini R, Carrai V, Bernardi F, Bosi A. Liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin in combination with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone and rituximab in patients with lymphoma and concurrent cardiac diseases or pre-treated with anthracyclines. Hematol Oncol. 2007 Dec;25(4):198-203. doi: 10.1002/hon.827.
PubMed 17654614Luminari S, Montanini A, Caballero D, Bologna S, Notter M, Dyer MJS, Chiappella A, Briones J, Petrini M, Barbato A, Kayitalire L, Federico M. Nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin (MyocetTM) combination (R-COMP) chemotherapy in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): results from the phase II EUR018 trial. Ann Oncol. 2010 Jul;21(7):1492-1499. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp544. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
PubMed 20007997Levine AM, Tulpule A, Espina B, Sherrod A, Boswell WD, Lieberman RD, Nathwani BN, Welles L. Liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin in combination with standard agents (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone) in patients with newly diagnosed AIDS-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of therapy and correlates of response. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jul 1;22(13):2662-70. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.10.093.
PubMed 15226333Cardinale D, Sandri MT, Colombo A, Colombo N, Boeri M, Lamantia G, Civelli M, Peccatori F, Martinelli G, Fiorentini C, Cipolla CM. Prognostic value of troponin I in cardiac risk stratification of cancer patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy. Circulation. 2004 Jun 8;109(22):2749-54. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000130926.51766.CC. Epub 2004 May 17.
PubMed 15148277Cardinale D, Sandri MT. Role of biomarkers in chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2010 Sep-Oct;53(2):121-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2010.04.002.
PubMed 20728699Cardinale D, Salvatici M, Sandri MT. Role of biomarkers in cardioncology. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011 Sep 6;49(12):1937-48. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.692.
PubMed 21892906Sancho JM, Fernandez-Alvarez R, Gual-Capllonch F, Gonzalez-Garcia E, Grande C, Gutierrez N, Penarrubia MJ, Batlle-Lopez A, Gonzalez-Barca E, Guinea JM, Gimeno E, Penalver FJ, Fuertes M, Bastos M, Hernandez-Rivas JA, Moraleda JM, Garcia O, Sorigue M, Martin A. R-COMP versus R-CHOP as first-line therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in patients >/=60 years: Results of a randomized phase 2 study from the Spanish GELTAMO group. Cancer Med. 2021 Feb;10(4):1314-1326. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3730. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
PubMed 33492774
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase II, Randomised, Multicentre Study With Two Treatment Arms (R-COMP Versus R-CHOP) in Newly Diagnosed Elderly Patients (≥60 Years) With Non-localised Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)/Follicular Lymphoma Grade IIIb.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02012088
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GEL-R-COMP-2013
- Conditions
- Lymphoma
- Keywords
- Follicular lymphoma, large B-cell lymphoma
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 91 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Grupo Español de Linfomas y Transplante Autólogo de Médula ÓseaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 11 Oct 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Oct 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The Phase II study proposed here assesses the hypothesis that replacing doxorubicin by Myocet® in the R-CHOP regimen would yield comparable antitumour efficacy with a lower cardiotoxicity for first-line treatment in elderly patients with non-localised DLBCL/Follicular lymphoma grade IIIb
Detailed description
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common histological subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). This is an aggressive lymphoma, with an incidence in Western countries estimated at 5-6 cases/100,000 inhabitants/year that increases with age.
Treatment for patients with DLBCL is currently based on immunochemotherapy, of which the R-CHOP regimen, which includes cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) in combination with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab and is administered every 21 days for a total of 6-8 cycles, is the most commonly used.
Cardiotoxicity is one of the undesirable effects that limit the use of anthracyclines, such as doxorubicin, as part of the CHOP regimen, which is caused by the formation of complexes between ferric ions and the anthracycline within the myocyte. Because of their oxidative properties, these complexes are toxic and produce highly reactive free radicals that damage the lipid membrane and lead to the cell death of myocytes. Several studies have linked the onset of cardiotoxicity with old age, high cumulative doses of doxorubicin, cardiovascular risk factors and previous heart disease, among others. Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity is cumulative and irreversible. Moreover, left ventricular dysfunction is an important late effect in patients with aggressive NHL who survive long term and, according to some studies, have received doxorubicin at doses higher than 200 mg/m². Cardiotoxicity may be silent or subclinical, which is usually detected as a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), or clinical, with varying degrees of congestive heart failure (CHF). Depending on the symptoms, cardiotoxicity also differs between acute, subacute, late or chronic. The first is manifested at an early stage, usually as arrhythmia, transient ECG changes or pericarditis, among others, is usually reversible, is not detrimental to the continuation of treatment and is not associated with subacute and late toxicity.
Chronic cardiotoxicity could be early or late. Early-onset cardiotoxicity occurs within 1 year after anthracycline treatment and late-onset cardiotoxicity occurs more than 1 year after completion of anthracycline treatment. In the latter two, cardiotoxicity is associated with the lesion of cardiomyocytes and is therefore considered irreversible. The incidence of cardiotoxicity varies among different studies, depending on patient follow-up or the definition of cardiotoxicity used (acute, subacute or late).
In addition to clinical findings, the determination of LVEF or, more recently, the use of biomarkers, are the most commonly used methods to diagnose and assess cardiotoxicity. Regarding the identification of biomarkers, troponin I and N-terminal fragment of pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are the most commonly used and investigated in the context of clinical studies. The advantages of using biomarkers include their minimally invasive identification, which is less expensive than echocardiography, and, unlike radionuclide ventriculography, they avoid irradiation of the patient. Furthermore, the interpretation of their results does not depend on the observer's experience, thus avoiding interobserver variability. Several studies have shown the role of troponins as indicators of early anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity or other chemotherapeutic agents, which are able to predict impaired ventricular function and higher incidence of cardiac events in patients with elevated values of this marker compared with patients with normal troponin values. Regarding the use of brain natriuretic peptides such as NT-proBNP, several studies have shown a correlation between persistently high values of this biomarker and impaired heart function parameters, in particular LVEF.
Myocet® (non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin) is one of the several strategies developed to reduce cardiotoxicity and maintain the therapeutic efficacy of the R-CHOP regimen. Non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin has shown a similar efficacy and less cardiotoxicity than conventional doxorubicin in the treatment of women with metastatic breast cancer. In addition, several studies in patients with NHL have shown similar response rates with regimens containing non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin to those obtained in historical controls with conventional doxorubicin, with a low incidence of clinical and subclinical cardiovascular events. The treatment is relatively well tolerated, while myelosuppression is its most important toxicity.
Most of these phase I and II studies (with or without rituximab), which assessed Myocet® in combination with cyclophosphamide; vincristine and prednisone, showed that it is an active treatment in newly diagnosed patients with aggressive NHL.
100% of the data registered on CRFs will be source data verified. eCRDs will be used in order to register the data. Nine monitoring visits per site will be performed.
First monitoring vistit will be performed when the first patient is included Second monitoring visit willb be performed when the third patient is included Third monitoring visit will be perforemd when the fifth patient is included Fourth monitoring visit will be performed then the last patient finish study treatment One monitoring visit per year will be performed during follow-up phase.
CRO (Dynamic) Standard Operating Procedures will be used to manage the clinical trial.
Sample size of the study is based on the hypothesis of a LEVF decrease <55% in the 15% of patients assigned to R-CHOP treatment group and 5% of patients assigned to R-COMP treatment group.
Categorical variables were show by absolute and relative frequencies, including the confidence interval of 95%.
For the description of the continuous variables will be use the mean, standard deviation, median, mode, minimum and maximum, including the total number of valid values.
In the case of compare subgroups of patients, will be use for quantitative variables parametric tests or nonparametric as characteristics of the variables under study. For qualitative variables will be use Chi-square test.
Statistical analysis was planned with the SAS statistical package version 9.1 or later.
Two interim analysis will be performed when the last patient peforms the end of treatment visit and when the last patient performd the 24 months follow-up visit.
Final analysis will be performed at the end of the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| RCOMP | Experimental | Drug: RCOMPR-COMP Regimen: Day 1: Rituximab 375 mg/m2; Myocet® 50 mg/m2; cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2; vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (maximum 2 mg); prednisone 60 mg/m2 Days 2-5: Prednisone, 60 mg/m2 Administered every 21 days × 6 cycles |
| RCHOP | Active comparator | Drug: RCHOPR-CHOP Regimen: Day 1: Rituximab 375 mg/m2; Doxorubicin 50 mg/m2; cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2; vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (maximum 2 mg); prednisone 60 mg/m2 Days 2-5: Prednisone, 60 mg/m2 Administered every 21 days × 6 cycles |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- ≥60 years of age
- Histological confirmed DLBCL/follicular lymphoma grade IIIb by WHO classification, with any IPI (International Prognostic Index)
- Newly diagnosed, with no previous treatment
- Non-localised stage, i.e. lymphoma that does not fit into a single radiotherapy field (including clinical stage IA with large tumour mass until stage IV) with at least one measurable lesion
- ECOG performance status 0 to 2
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Clinical stage I without large tumour mass or clinical stage IIA with fewer than three affected areas (stage-IIB patients are considered suitable, regardless of the number of affected areas)
- CNS infiltration
- Transformed lymphoma, although with no previous treatment, as well as other histological subtypes such as mantle cell lymphoma, peripheral T-cell lymphoma and its variants and post-transplant lymphoproliferative syndrome
- Clinically significant secondary cardiovascular disease
- Signs of any severe, acute or chronic and active infection
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RCOMPAlso: Rituximab, Myocet, Cyclophosphamide, VincristineDay 1: Rituximab 375 mg/m2; Myocet® 50 mg/m2; cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2; vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (maximum 2 mg); prednisone 60 mg/m2 Days 2-5: Prednisone, 60 mg/m2 Administered every 21 days × 6 cycles | Drug | RCOMP |
| RCHOPAlso: Rituximab, Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide, VincristineDay 1: Rituximab 375 mg/m2; Doxorubicin 50 mg/m2; cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2; vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (maximum 2 mg); prednisone 60 mg/m2 Days 2-5: Prednisone, 60 mg/m2 Administered every 21 days × 6 cycles | Drug | RCHOP |
Primary outcome
Subclinical cardiac toxicity
Time frame: Day 135
Subclinical cardiac toxicity determined by the percentage of measurings experiencing a decrease in LEVF determined by echocardiography with final LEVF <55% at day 135
Subclinical cardiac toxicity
Time frame: Day 225
Subclinical cardiac toxicity determined by the percentage of measurings experiencing a decrease in LEVF determined by echocardiography with final LEVF <55% at day 225
5 secondary outcomes
Survival
Time frame: 2 and 5 years
Response rate
Time frame: Day 135
Cardiac/cardiovascular toxicity
Time frame: During 5 years
Toxicity (except cardiac)
Time frame: During 2 years
Cardiac biomarkers
Time frame: During 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Feb 2024.
- Background: PubMed 17242396Cheson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME, Gascoyne RD, Specht L, Horning SJ, Coiffier B, Fisher RI, Hagenbeek A, Zucca E, Rosen ST, Stroobants S, Lister TA, Hoppe RT, Dreyling M, Tobinai K, Vose JM, Connors JM, Federico M, Diehl V; International Harmonization Project on Lymphoma. Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Feb 10;25(5):579-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.2403. Epub 2007 Jan 22.
- Results publication: PubMed 17654614Rigacci L, Mappa S, Nassi L, Alterini R, Carrai V, Bernardi F, Bosi A. Liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin in combination with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone and rituximab in patients with lymphoma and concurrent cardiac diseases or pre-treated with anthracyclines. Hematol Oncol. 2007 Dec;25(4):198-203. doi: 10.1002/hon.827.
- Results publication: PubMed 20007997Luminari S, Montanini A, Caballero D, Bologna S, Notter M, Dyer MJS, Chiappella A, Briones J, Petrini M, Barbato A, Kayitalire L, Federico M. Nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin (MyocetTM) combination (R-COMP) chemotherapy in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): results from the phase II EUR018 trial. Ann Oncol. 2010 Jul;21(7):1492-1499. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp544. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
- Results publication: PubMed 15226333Levine AM, Tulpule A, Espina B, Sherrod A, Boswell WD, Lieberman RD, Nathwani BN, Welles L. Liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin in combination with standard agents (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone) in patients with newly diagnosed AIDS-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of therapy and correlates of response. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jul 1;22(13):2662-70. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.10.093.
- Results publication: PubMed 15148277Cardinale D, Sandri MT, Colombo A, Colombo N, Boeri M, Lamantia G, Civelli M, Peccatori F, Martinelli G, Fiorentini C, Cipolla CM. Prognostic value of troponin I in cardiac risk stratification of cancer patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy. Circulation. 2004 Jun 8;109(22):2749-54. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000130926.51766.CC. Epub 2004 May 17.
- Results publication: PubMed 20728699Cardinale D, Sandri MT. Role of biomarkers in chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2010 Sep-Oct;53(2):121-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2010.04.002.
- Results publication: PubMed 21892906Cardinale D, Salvatici M, Sandri MT. Role of biomarkers in cardioncology. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011 Sep 6;49(12):1937-48. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.692.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33492774Sancho JM, Fernandez-Alvarez R, Gual-Capllonch F, Gonzalez-Garcia E, Grande C, Gutierrez N, Penarrubia MJ, Batlle-Lopez A, Gonzalez-Barca E, Guinea JM, Gimeno E, Penalver FJ, Fuertes M, Bastos M, Hernandez-Rivas JA, Moraleda JM, Garcia O, Sorigue M, Martin A. R-COMP versus R-CHOP as first-line therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in patients >/=60 years: Results of a randomized phase 2 study from the Spanish GELTAMO group. Cancer Med. 2021 Feb;10(4):1314-1326. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3730. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
- Sponsor web pageLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Ibrutinib Combination Therapy in Transplant Ineligible Individuals With Newly Diagnosed Primary CNS Lymphoma
Non-hodgkin Lymphoma
RecruitingObservational study
Blood, Urine, and Tissue Collection for Cutaneous Lymphoma, Eczema, and Atopic Dermatitis Research
Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, Sezary Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Testing the Addition of an Anti-Cancer Drug, Glofitamab, to the Usual Chemotherapy Treatment (Alternating R-CHOP/R-DHAP) for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Ann Arbor Stage II Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Ann Arbor Stage III Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Brentuximab Vedotin and Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With CD30-Positive Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma
Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma, Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, ALK-Negative
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dr. Alejandro Martin principal investigator
University of Salamanca
Dr. Juan Manuel Sancho principal investigator
Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital
Dr. Francisco Gual principal investigator
Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital
14 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing RCOMP and RCHOP in people with Lymphoma, run by Grupo Español de Linfomas y Transplante Autólogo de Médula Ósea at 14 sites in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 14 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Subclinical cardiac toxicity (time frame: Day 135). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02012088, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Feb 2024.