Patella ChondromalaciaNCT02012413
Effect of Pulsed Signal Therapy in Patella Chondromalacia
A study testing PST - Pulsed Signal Therapy in people with Patella Chondromalacia, run by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
PST (pulsed signal therapy) is a unique form of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF) for stimulating healing of damaged structures such as cartilage, bones and soft tissues. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 50 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Patella Chondromalacia
- What is being tested?
- PST - Pulsed Signal Therapy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 41 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- Nov 2012to Dec 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 50 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- patellofemoral pain syndrome without tibiofemoral and trochlear chondral degeneration according to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI);
- presence of patellar chondropathy confirmed by MRI;
- not having started using direct action drugs on the cartilage in the last 6 months;
- absence of prior surgery on the studied knee;
- absence of invasive procedures, such as knee infiltration, in the previous 12 months;
- absence of disease in the contralateral limb that would cause an excessive burden on the studied limb; and
- absence of contraindications to performing PST, including a pacemaker, cancer, infectious disease activity, severe heart failure, arrhythmias, angina, epilepsy and pregnancy.
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Brazil1 site
Hospital das Clínicas - Universty of São Paulo
São Paulo, 05403-010
About this study
Official title: Effect of Pulsed Signal Therapy in Patella Chondromalacia. Randomized Prospective Trial.
PST (pulsed signal therapy) is a unique form of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF) for stimulating healing of damaged structures such as cartilage, bones and soft tissues. The physical effect of the pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) has been focus of research in various studies, with cartilage being the most studied, and which has demonstrated an increase in the synthesis of proteoglican and collagen in vitro. This is an randomized, controlled and double blind clinical trial. The main objective is to evaluate clinical improvement regarding anterior knee pain after PST intervention in patients with patellar condropathy.
Read the detailed description
The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Clinical Hospital (Hospital das Clinicas), University of São Paulo (Universidade de São Paulo - USP) under number 0253/11.
This patient population is estimated to a total of 40 knees, with the patients meeting the following inclusion criteria:
- aged between 20 and 50 years;
- male or female;
- patellofemoral pain syndrome without tibiofemoral and trochlear chondral degeneration according to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI);
- presence of patellar chondropathy confirmed by MRI;
- not having started using direct action drugs on the cartilage in the last 6 months;
- absence of prior surgery on the studied knee;
- absence of invasive procedures, such as knee infiltration, in the previous 12 months;
- absence of disease in the contralateral limb that would cause an excessive burden on the studied limb; and
- absence of contraindications to performing PST, including a pacemaker, cancer, infectious disease activity, severe heart failure, arrhythmias, angina, epilepsy and pregnancy.
The presence of patellofemoral pain is identified by anamnesis and physical examination performed by knee surgeons with more than 10 years' experience. The presence of all of the following criteria is required for diagnosis: typical complaint of anterior knee pain with a duration longer than 3 months (when going up or down stairs, squatting, remaining for long periods with bent knees), pain on palpation of the patellar articular surface and pain on patellar compression (reproducing the patient's complaint).
After inclusion in the study, all of the patients will be instructed (for the duration of the study) not to use drugs with a direct action on the cartilage (e.g., chondroprotectors, such as glucosamine and chondroitin) to avoid confounding biases regarding the effects of the treatments. No patients will be included who had started using these drugs in the previous 6 months to avoid the initial effect of this treatment being a confounder in terms of clinical improvement.
The study is designed so that the patient and the orthopedist evaluating the clinical outcome do not know to which group the patient belongs (i.e., a double-blind study).
After patient inclusion and signing of the terms of free and informed consent, the patients will be randomized by a computer into 2 equal groups, i.e., the control and PST groups. The patients with both knees included in the study will receive randomization for the right knee, and the left will be automatically allocated into the other group. This method was selected to best demonstrate any differences between groups. The final distribution of patients into groups will be therefore not equalized.
PST application will be then directed to the patellofemoral joint. The PST application protocol is as follows: 9 daily 1-hour applications, with 5 in the first week, a break for the weekend, and 4 more the following week.
The control group patients will be submitted to placebo PST treatment with the same protocol and the device connected not generating magnetic pulses. The device operates silently, and it is not possible for the patient to determine whether they are receiving the placebo or treatment, thus maintaining patient blinding. For patients with both knees included, 9 sessions of the treatment are performed on one side and 9 more sessions of the placebo on the other.
All of the participants are instructed to maintain their usual level of physical activity.
The Kujala score will be taken after 3, 6 and 12 months in both groups. If superiority of the PST group is observed, it was decided for ethical reasons that the placebo group should receive the PST treatment and would again be followed up for 1-year post-treatment, with the Kujala score ascertained at 3, 6 and 12 months.
A sample of approximately 20 patients in each group was used for an alpha of 5% and beta of 20%. An effect size of 8 to 10 between groups was sought and is considered clinically significant in terms of Kujala score.
- Conditions
- Patella Chondromalacia
- Being tested
- PST - Pulsed Signal Therapy, Placebo - Sham PST
- Keywords
- knee, chondromalacia, patella, pulsed signal therapy, PST
- Medical subject headings
- Chondromalacia Patellae, Cartilage Diseases, Patella Fracture
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PST - Pulsed Signal TherapyDevice
Also called PST, PEMF, Pulsed Eletromagnetic Field
PST application is a painless over-the-skin eletromagnetic field application. 9 sessions of application of electromagnetic therapy - PST - during 60 minutes
Placebo - Sham PSTDevice
Also called Placebo
Placebo PST will be performed by applying the same device over the patient knee. The machine is not applying the PST but it appears to be on. In this way, patients are blinded to the intervation.
9 sessions of application of Sham PST - during 60 minutes
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PST group | Active comparator | roughly 20 patients will be treated with PST protocol, outcomes will be Kujala score improvement at 3, 6 and 12 months. Receives: Device: PST - Pulsed Signal Therapy |
| Control group | Placebo comparator | roughly 20 patients will be submitted to a placebo PST protocol, outcomes will be Kujala score improvement at 3, 6 and 12 months. Receives: Device: Placebo - Sham PST |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinical improvement - Kujala score
A functional score (Kujala) will be performed before, at 3 months, at 6 months and at one year after PST intervention and placebo.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2012
- Primary completionMar 2015
- Study completionDec 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Patella ChondromalaciaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Sao Paulo General HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 41 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Marco Kawamura Demange, University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
- Investigators
- Adriana Lucia P Silva, B.Sc., M.Sc., Principal investigator, University of Sao PauloRiccardo G Gobbi, M.D., Principal investigator, University of Sao PauloGilberto L Camanho, M.D., Ph.D, Study chair, University of Sao PauloMarco K Demange, M.D., Ph.D, Study director, University of Sao Paulo
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02012413
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2012/50167-6
- Status last verified
- Apr 2017
- First submitted
- 8 Aug 2013
- Last updated
- 25 Apr 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Apr 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Pulsed Signal Therapy in Patella Chondromalacia. Randomized Prospective Trial.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02012413
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2012/50167-6
- Conditions
- Patella Chondromalacia
- Keywords
- knee, chondromalacia, patella, pulsed signal therapy, PST
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 41 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao Paulo General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
PST (pulsed signal therapy) is a unique form of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF) for stimulating healing of damaged structures such as cartilage, bones and soft tissues. The physical effect of the pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) has been focus of research in various studies, with cartilage being the most studied, and which has demonstrated an increase in the synthesis of proteoglican and collagen in vitro. This is an randomized, controlled and double blind clinical trial. The main objective is to evaluate clinical improvement regarding anterior knee pain after PST intervention in patients with patellar condropathy.
Detailed description
The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Clinical Hospital (Hospital das Clinicas), University of São Paulo (Universidade de São Paulo - USP) under number 0253/11.
This patient population is estimated to a total of 40 knees, with the patients meeting the following inclusion criteria:
- aged between 20 and 50 years;
- male or female;
- patellofemoral pain syndrome without tibiofemoral and trochlear chondral degeneration according to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI);
- presence of patellar chondropathy confirmed by MRI;
- not having started using direct action drugs on the cartilage in the last 6 months;
- absence of prior surgery on the studied knee;
- absence of invasive procedures, such as knee infiltration, in the previous 12 months;
- absence of disease in the contralateral limb that would cause an excessive burden on the studied limb; and
- absence of contraindications to performing PST, including a pacemaker, cancer, infectious disease activity, severe heart failure, arrhythmias, angina, epilepsy and pregnancy.
The presence of patellofemoral pain is identified by anamnesis and physical examination performed by knee surgeons with more than 10 years' experience. The presence of all of the following criteria is required for diagnosis: typical complaint of anterior knee pain with a duration longer than 3 months (when going up or down stairs, squatting, remaining for long periods with bent knees), pain on palpation of the patellar articular surface and pain on patellar compression (reproducing the patient's complaint).
After inclusion in the study, all of the patients will be instructed (for the duration of the study) not to use drugs with a direct action on the cartilage (e.g., chondroprotectors, such as glucosamine and chondroitin) to avoid confounding biases regarding the effects of the treatments. No patients will be included who had started using these drugs in the previous 6 months to avoid the initial effect of this treatment being a confounder in terms of clinical improvement.
The study is designed so that the patient and the orthopedist evaluating the clinical outcome do not know to which group the patient belongs (i.e., a double-blind study).
After patient inclusion and signing of the terms of free and informed consent, the patients will be randomized by a computer into 2 equal groups, i.e., the control and PST groups. The patients with both knees included in the study will receive randomization for the right knee, and the left will be automatically allocated into the other group. This method was selected to best demonstrate any differences between groups. The final distribution of patients into groups will be therefore not equalized.
PST application will be then directed to the patellofemoral joint. The PST application protocol is as follows: 9 daily 1-hour applications, with 5 in the first week, a break for the weekend, and 4 more the following week.
The control group patients will be submitted to placebo PST treatment with the same protocol and the device connected not generating magnetic pulses. The device operates silently, and it is not possible for the patient to determine whether they are receiving the placebo or treatment, thus maintaining patient blinding. For patients with both knees included, 9 sessions of the treatment are performed on one side and 9 more sessions of the placebo on the other.
All of the participants are instructed to maintain their usual level of physical activity.
The Kujala score will be taken after 3, 6 and 12 months in both groups. If superiority of the PST group is observed, it was decided for ethical reasons that the placebo group should receive the PST treatment and would again be followed up for 1-year post-treatment, with the Kujala score ascertained at 3, 6 and 12 months.
A sample of approximately 20 patients in each group was used for an alpha of 5% and beta of 20%. An effect size of 8 to 10 between groups was sought and is considered clinically significant in terms of Kujala score.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PST group | Active comparator | Device: PST - Pulsed Signal Therapyroughly 20 patients will be treated with PST protocol, outcomes will be Kujala score improvement at 3, 6 and 12 months. |
| Control group | Placebo comparator | Device: Placebo - Sham PSTroughly 20 patients will be submitted to a placebo PST protocol, outcomes will be Kujala score improvement at 3, 6 and 12 months. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- patellofemoral pain syndrome without tibiofemoral and trochlear chondral degeneration according to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI);
- presence of patellar chondropathy confirmed by MRI;
- not having started using direct action drugs on the cartilage in the last 6 months;
- absence of prior surgery on the studied knee;
- absence of invasive procedures, such as knee infiltration, in the previous 12 months;
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PST - Pulsed Signal TherapyAlso: PST, PEMF, Pulsed Eletromagnetic FieldPST application is a painless over-the-skin eletromagnetic field application. 9 sessions of application of electromagnetic therapy - PST - during 60 minutes | Device | PST group |
| Placebo - Sham PSTAlso: PlaceboPlacebo PST will be performed by applying the same device over the patient knee. The machine is not applying the PST but it appears to be on. In this way, patients are blinded to the intervation. 9 sessions of application of Sham PST - during 60 minutes | Device | Control group |
Primary outcome
Clinical improvement - Kujala score
Time frame: 12 months
A functional score (Kujala) will be performed before, at 3 months, at 6 months and at one year after PST intervention and placebo.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Apr 2017.
Related trials for Patella Chondromalacia
Not yet recruiting
Sports Rehabilitation Therapy for Knee Joint Sports Injuries: A Case Study of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Patellar Chondromalacia
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury, Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Assessing the Effect of Different Grades of Chondromalacia on Static and Dynamic Balance Using Biodex Balance System
Chondromalacia Patella
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Adriana Lucia P Silva, B.Sc., M.Sc. principal investigator
University of Sao Paulo
Riccardo G Gobbi, M.D. principal investigator
University of Sao Paulo
Gilberto L Camanho, M.D., Ph.D study chair
University of Sao Paulo
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PST - Pulsed Signal Therapy in people with Patella Chondromalacia, run by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinical improvement - Kujala score (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Apr 2017.