AzTrials
AzTrials

NevusNCT02012751

Nevus Doctor Clinical Decision Support

A study testing Nevus doctor program in people with Nevus and Melanoma, run by University Hospital of North Norway at 1 site in Norway.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The "Nevus doctor" is a dermatoscopy based computer decision support tool to assist general practitioners (GPs) in the classification of pigmented skin lesions (PSLs). The aim of the program "Nevus doctor" is to help GPs increase their diagnostic accuracy, in particular regarding the selection of suspicious PSLs that… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Nevus, Melanoma
What is being tested?
Nevus doctor program
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
49 participants
Where
1 siteNorway
Study dates
Oct 2014to Sep 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Pigmented skin lesion

Who cannot join

  • -

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Norway1 site
  • Kirkenes Legesenter

    Kirkenes, Finnmark Fylke, 9915

Other trials in Norway

About this study

Official title: Nevus Doctor Clinical Decision Support Program for Pigmented Skin Lesions and Melanoma

The "Nevus doctor" is a dermatoscopy based computer decision support tool to assist general practitioners (GPs) in the classification of pigmented skin lesions (PSLs). The aim of the program "Nevus doctor" is to help GPs increase their diagnostic accuracy, in particular regarding the selection of suspicious PSLs that need biopsy or referral to specialist health care for further assessment. The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic performance of the decision support tool in a primary care setting in Norway. We hypothesize that the diagnostic accuracy of the computer program "Nevus doctor" is better than the performance of the GPs.

Read the detailed description

In the trial GPs examine patients who attend a primary health care center. A given PSL is first assessed clinically by the GP and afterwards photographed. A clinical photograph as well as a dermatoscopic photograph is taken, the latter using a dermatoscope attached to the lens of the camera. The dermatoscopic image is then processed by the computer program. The performance of "Nevus doctor" is compared with the GPs' assessment. A dermatologist reviews all cases based on the clinical and dermatoscopic photographs and this assessment serves as the reference standard.

Conditions
Nevus, Melanoma
Being tested
Nevus doctor program
Keywords
Computer-assisted diagnosis, General practice, Dermatoscopy, Melanoma, Nevus
Medical subject headings
Nevus, Melanoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Nevus doctor programDevice

    The Nevus doctor program supplies a diagnostic category of pigmented skin lesions based on dermatoscopy images.

Study groups in NCT02012751
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Nevus doctor programExperimentalUse of Nevus doctor program to assess the diagnostic category of pigmented skin lesions
Receives: Device: Nevus doctor program

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of correct test results

    The computer program tests whether the appearance of a skin lesion is suggestive of skin cancer. There are two possible test outcomes: "suspicious" or "not suspicious". The reference standard is the assessment done by a dermatologist. The number (and percentage) of skin lesions correctly classified as "suspicious" or "not suspicious" is reported. Furthermore sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values are calculated.

    Measured: Up to 2 weeks from enrollment

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Patterns regarding false test results

    All cases with false test results are described in order to identify any pattern that can help to explain the false test result: correlation with specific types of skin lesions, poor image quality, gender and age of the patients.

    Measured: Up to 2 weeks from enrollment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Dec 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2014
  3. Primary completionSep 2016
  4. Study completionSep 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
49 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02012751
Sponsor's protocol ID
2013/1206
Status last verified
Jun 2016
First submitted
4 Dec 2013
Last updated
28 Oct 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Nevus doctor program in people with Nevus and Melanoma, run by University Hospital of North Norway at 1 site in Norway.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Oct 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of correct test results (time frame: Up to 2 weeks from enrollment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Oct 2016.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in