CancerNCT02015078
Black Family Eating Behaviors Study
An observational study of Cancer and Obesity, run by National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Despite broad awareness of the role that diet plays in increasing obesity risk, adherence to public health recommendations for maintaining healthy eating is low. Insights gained from weight loss intervention trials find that trial participants report difficulty in restricting calories, dissatisfaction with the pace of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- How many people
- 314 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 14 Dec 2013to 22 Jun 2015
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Targets are family members attending African American family reunions.@@@@@@
Who may be able to join
- For Phase 1 of the study, targets are family members attending African American family reunions. Therefore, the eligibility to participate will be: age 18 or older; not currently pregnant; attending the targeted family reunion.
- For Phase 2 of the study, the population for the study are adults (18 to 70 years-old), with the capability to read English. As this is a feasibility and exploration study, the recruitment is intended to be broad and to include various populations and profiles.
Who cannot join
- -Pregnant women will be excluded from participation in the study due to the focus on eating behaviors and weight.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina
About this study
Despite broad awareness of the role that diet plays in increasing obesity risk, adherence to public health recommendations for maintaining healthy eating is low. Insights gained from weight loss intervention trials find that trial participants report difficulty in restricting calories, dissatisfaction with the pace of weight loss, inability to control eating, low palatability of recommended foods and strong food cravings. Indeed, recent systematic reviews provide empirical support that these subjective experiences that trial participants describe likely represent eating-related traits or phenotypes . While amassing evidence supports individual variation in these eating-related traits, to date there has been no systematic effort to characterize robust eating-related phenotypes. Proposed is a Sub-study initially planned to be piggy-backed on a planned Study being conducted by investigators at the University of North Carolina (UNC-- Linnan, Dilworth- Anderson \& Evans). The UNC Parent Study was a feasibility study using community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches to explore possible intervention strategies aimed to reduce the burden of chronic disease and cancer among African American families. The NHGRI-led eating behavior Sub-study is proposed to be integrated with the UNC Parent Study (hereafter referred to as Phase 1). The additional aims of the Sub-study (hereafter referred to as Phase 2) are to gain understanding of whether we can characterize clusters of eating-related behaviors that may be associated with adherence to weight management and weight outcomes. This current protocol lays out the specific qualitative activities planned for Phase 1 which include conducting structured interviews with Black Family Reunion organizers (N=8) and a sample of reunion participants (N=40). We also describe the larger quantitative survey proposed for Phase 2. Pending the feasibility of the sub-study with the African-American community, we will collect information on eating-related behaviors in a large sample of individuals (N=350). If the initial assessments (Phase1) prove that this is not a viable study to be conducted in that setting, we will consider other population groups and other settings.
We are also considering Phase 3 activities if we identify clusters of eating-related phenotypes within individuals. Amended IRB applications will be submitted prior to launching Phase 3.
Read the detailed description
Despite broad awareness of the role that diet plays in increasing obesity risk, adherence to public health recommendations for maintaining healthy eating is low. Insights gained from weight loss intervention trials find that trial participants report difficulty in restricting calories, dissatisfaction with the pace of weight loss, inability to control eating, low palatability of recommended foods and strong food cravings. Indeed, recent systematic reviews provide empirical support that these subjective experiences that trial participants describe likely represent eating-related traits or phenotypes . While amassing evidence supports individual variation in these eating-related traits, to date there has been no systematic effort to characterize robust eating-related phenotypes. Proposed is a Sub-study initially planned to be piggy-backed on a planned Study being conducted by investigators at the University of North Carolina (UNC-- Linnan, Dilworth- Anderson \& Evans). The UNC Parent Study was a feasibility study using community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches to explore possible intervention strategies aimed to reduce the burden of chronic disease and cancer among African American families. The NHGRI-led eating behavior Sub-study is proposed to be integrated with the UNC Parent Study (hereafter referred to as Phase 1). The additional aims of the Sub-study (hereafter referred to as Phase 2) are to gain understanding of whether we can characterize clusters of eating-related behaviors that may be associated with adherence to weight management and weight outcomes. This current protocol lays out the specific qualitative activities planned for Phase 1 which include conducting structured interviews with Black Family Reunion organizers (N=8) and a sample of reunion participants (N=40). We also describe the larger quantitative survey proposed for Phase 2. Pending the feasibility of the sub-study with the African-American community, we will collect information on eating-related behaviors in a large sample of individuals (N=350). If the initial assessments (Phase1) prove that this is not a viable study to be conducted in that setting, we will consider other population groups and other settings.
We are also considering Phase 3 activities if we identify clusters of eating-related phenotypes within individuals. Amended IRB applications will be submitted prior to launching Phase 3.
- Keywords
- African American, Eating Behavior Phenotypes, Obesity, Natural History
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Obesity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| African Americans | Targets are family members attending African American family reunions. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Phase 3
To assess whether the occurrence of robust eating- related behavior clusters differ significantly between blood relatives and non-blood relatives (i.e., spouses and unrelated kin).
Measured: Completed
Phase 2
To assess whether robust phenotypes of eating-related behaviors (e.g., appetite for palatable foods, disinhibition, pickiness, and new food phobia) can be characterized.
Measured: Completed
Phase 1
To assess the feasibility of:(a)recruiting African American family reunion-organizers and participants to take part in a health promotion and genetics- related research study. (b)administering survey assessments to assess individual s and kindreds (blood and nonblood relatives ) interest in learning about eating-related (ER) behaviors and weight outcomes.
Measured: Completed
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Study start14 Dec 2013
- Primary completion15 Apr 2015
- Study completion22 Jun 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 314 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
- Collaborators
- Duke University, National Cancer Institute (NCI), University of North Carolina
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Susan Persky, Ph.D., Principal investigator, National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02015078
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 999914014
- Other IDs
- 14-HG-N014
- Status last verified
- Jan 2024
- First submitted
- 14 Dec 2013
- Last updated
- 16 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Akter SM, Roy SK, Thakur SK, Sultana M, Khatun W, Rahman R, Saliheen SS, Alam N. Effects of third trimester counseling on pregnancy weight gain, birthweight, and breastfeeding among urban poor women in Bangladesh. Food Nutr Bull. 2012 Sep;33(3):194-201. doi: 10.1177/156482651203300304.
PubMed 23156122Appelhans BM, Woolf K, Pagoto SL, Schneider KL, Whited MC, Liebman R. Inhibiting food reward: delay discounting, food reward sensitivity, and palatable food intake in overweight and obese women. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011 Nov;19(11):2175-82. doi: 10.1038/oby.2011.57. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
PubMed 21475139Baranowski T, Baranowski JC, Watson KB, Jago R, Islam N, Beltran A, Martin SJ, Nguyen N, Tepper BJ. 6-n-propylthiouracil taster status not related to reported cruciferous vegetable intake among ethnically diverse children. Nutr Res. 2011 Aug;31(8):594-600. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
PubMed 21925344Persky S, Bouhlal S, Goldring MR, McBride CM. Beliefs about genetic influences on eating behaviors: Characteristics and associations with weight management confidence. Eat Behav. 2017 Aug;26:93-98. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
PubMed 28199907
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Black Family Eating Behaviors Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02015078
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 999914014
- Keywords
- African American, Eating Behavior Phenotypes, Obesity, Natural History
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 314 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)US National Institutes of Health
- Collaborators
- Duke University, National Cancer Institute (NCI), University of North Carolina
- Study start
- 14 Dec 2013
- Primary completion
- 15 Apr 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Jun 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Despite broad awareness of the role that diet plays in increasing obesity risk, adherence to public health recommendations for maintaining healthy eating is low. Insights gained from weight loss intervention trials find that trial participants report difficulty in restricting calories, dissatisfaction with the pace of weight loss, inability to control eating, low palatability of recommended foods and strong food cravings. Indeed, recent systematic reviews provide empirical support that these subjective experiences that trial participants describe likely represent eating-related traits or phenotypes . While amassing evidence supports individual variation in these eating-related traits, to date there has been no systematic effort to characterize robust eating-related phenotypes. Proposed is a Sub-study initially planned to be piggy-backed on a planned Study being conducted by investigators at the University of North Carolina (UNC-- Linnan, Dilworth- Anderson \& Evans). The UNC Parent Study was a feasibility study using community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches to explore possible intervention strategies aimed to reduce the burden of chronic disease and cancer among African American families. The NHGRI-led eating behavior Sub-study is proposed to be integrated with the UNC Parent Study (hereafter referred to as Phase 1). The additional aims of the Sub-study (hereafter referred to as Phase 2) are to gain understanding of whether we can characterize clusters of eating-related behaviors that may be associated with adherence to weight management and weight outcomes. This current protocol lays out the specific qualitative activities planned for Phase 1 which include conducting structured interviews with Black Family Reunion organizers (N=8) and a sample of reunion participants (N=40). We also describe the larger quantitative survey proposed for Phase 2. Pending the feasibility of the sub-study with the African-American community, we will collect information on eating-related behaviors in a large sample of individuals (N=350). If the initial assessments (Phase1) prove that this is not a viable study to be conducted in that setting, we will consider other population groups and other settings.
We are also considering Phase 3 activities if we identify clusters of eating-related phenotypes within individuals. Amended IRB applications will be submitted prior to launching Phase 3.
Detailed description
Despite broad awareness of the role that diet plays in increasing obesity risk, adherence to public health recommendations for maintaining healthy eating is low. Insights gained from weight loss intervention trials find that trial participants report difficulty in restricting calories, dissatisfaction with the pace of weight loss, inability to control eating, low palatability of recommended foods and strong food cravings. Indeed, recent systematic reviews provide empirical support that these subjective experiences that trial participants describe likely represent eating-related traits or phenotypes . While amassing evidence supports individual variation in these eating-related traits, to date there has been no systematic effort to characterize robust eating-related phenotypes. Proposed is a Sub-study initially planned to be piggy-backed on a planned Study being conducted by investigators at the University of North Carolina (UNC-- Linnan, Dilworth- Anderson \& Evans). The UNC Parent Study was a feasibility study using community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches to explore possible intervention strategies aimed to reduce the burden of chronic disease and cancer among African American families. The NHGRI-led eating behavior Sub-study is proposed to be integrated with the UNC Parent Study (hereafter referred to as Phase 1). The additional aims of the Sub-study (hereafter referred to as Phase 2) are to gain understanding of whether we can characterize clusters of eating-related behaviors that may be associated with adherence to weight management and weight outcomes. This current protocol lays out the specific qualitative activities planned for Phase 1 which include conducting structured interviews with Black Family Reunion organizers (N=8) and a sample of reunion participants (N=40). We also describe the larger quantitative survey proposed for Phase 2. Pending the feasibility of the sub-study with the African-American community, we will collect information on eating-related behaviors in a large sample of individuals (N=350). If the initial assessments (Phase1) prove that this is not a viable study to be conducted in that setting, we will consider other population groups and other settings.
We are also considering Phase 3 activities if we identify clusters of eating-related phenotypes within individuals. Amended IRB applications will be submitted prior to launching Phase 3.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| African Americans | – | –Targets are family members attending African American family reunions. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Targets are family members attending African American family reunions.@@@@@@
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- For Phase 1 of the study, targets are family members attending African American family reunions. Therefore, the eligibility to participate will be: age 18 or older; not currently pregnant; attending the targeted family reunion.
- For Phase 2 of the study, the population for the study are adults (18 to 70 years-old), with the capability to read English. As this is a feasibility and exploration study, the recruitment is intended to be broad and to include various populations and profiles.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -Pregnant women will be excluded from participation in the study due to the focus on eating behaviors and weight.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Phase 3
Time frame: Completed
To assess whether the occurrence of robust eating- related behavior clusters differ significantly between blood relatives and non-blood relatives (i.e., spouses and unrelated kin).
Phase 2
Time frame: Completed
To assess whether robust phenotypes of eating-related behaviors (e.g., appetite for palatable foods, disinhibition, pickiness, and new food phobia) can be characterized.
Phase 1
Time frame: Completed
To assess the feasibility of:(a)recruiting African American family reunion-organizers and participants to take part in a health promotion and genetics- related research study. (b)administering survey assessments to assess individual s and kindreds (blood and nonblood relatives ) interest in learning about eating-related (ER) behaviors and weight outcomes.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jan 2024.
- Background: PubMed 23156122Akter SM, Roy SK, Thakur SK, Sultana M, Khatun W, Rahman R, Saliheen SS, Alam N. Effects of third trimester counseling on pregnancy weight gain, birthweight, and breastfeeding among urban poor women in Bangladesh. Food Nutr Bull. 2012 Sep;33(3):194-201. doi: 10.1177/156482651203300304.
- Background: PubMed 21475139Appelhans BM, Woolf K, Pagoto SL, Schneider KL, Whited MC, Liebman R. Inhibiting food reward: delay discounting, food reward sensitivity, and palatable food intake in overweight and obese women. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011 Nov;19(11):2175-82. doi: 10.1038/oby.2011.57. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
- Background: PubMed 21925344Baranowski T, Baranowski JC, Watson KB, Jago R, Islam N, Beltran A, Martin SJ, Nguyen N, Tepper BJ. 6-n-propylthiouracil taster status not related to reported cruciferous vegetable intake among ethnically diverse children. Nutr Res. 2011 Aug;31(8):594-600. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28199907Persky S, Bouhlal S, Goldring MR, McBride CM. Beliefs about genetic influences on eating behaviors: Characteristics and associations with weight management confidence. Eat Behav. 2017 Aug;26:93-98. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
Related trials for Cancer
Enrolling by invitation
Exercise Intervention for Breast Cancer Patients With Sarcopenia
Sarcopenia, Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Comparing TAK-928 With Docetaxel in Adults With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
IO Resistant Squamous and Nonsquamous NSCLC
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Saruparib in HRDsig+ Solid Tumors
Malignant Neoplastic Disease (Disorder)
RecruitingPhase 2
IGFBP-2 Vaccine to Prevent Ovarian Cancer Progression in Patients With Serologic Detection of Recurrence
Fallopian Tube Carcinoma, Ovarian Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Nemtabrutinib for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)/Small Lymphocytic Leukemia (SLL) Refractory to Covalent Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor or Pirtobrutinib and Previously Treated With a BCL2 Inhibitor
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Small Lymphocytic Leukemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Susan Persky, Ph.D. principal investigator
National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cancer and Obesity, run by National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Phase 3 (time frame: Completed). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02015078, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jan 2024.