AzTrials
AzTrials

HypercholesterolemiaPhase 3NCT02023879

Phase III Study To Evaluate Alirocumab in Patients With Hypercholesterolemia Not Treated With a Statin (ODYSSEY CHOICE II)

A Phase 3 study testing Alirocumab, Non-statin LMT and Diet Alone in people with Hypercholesterolemia, run by Sanofi at 43 sites in 8 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Primary Objective: To demonstrate the reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by a regimen of Alirocumab including a starting dose of 150 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) as add-on to non-statin lipid modifying background therapy or as monotherapy in comparison with placebo in participants with primary… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hypercholesterolemia
What is being tested?
Alirocumab, Non-statin LMT and Diet Alone
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
233 participants
Where
43 sitesin 8 countries
Study dates
16 Dec 2013to 30 Jun 2017
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants with primary hypercholesterolemia (heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia [heFH] or non-FH) not adequately controlled with their non-statin LMT (either ezetimibe or fenofibrate) or diet alone.

Who cannot join

  • LDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at screening for statin intolerant participants at very high cardiovascular (CV) risk;
  • LDL-C <100 mg/dL (<2.59 mmol/L) at screening for statin intolerant participants at high or moderate CV risk or, participants not fulfilling the statin intolerant definition at moderate CV risk;
  • LDL-C ≥160 mg/dL (≥4.1 mmol/L) at screening for participants receiving diet only or, participants not fulfilling the statin intolerant definition at moderate CV risk and receiving a non-statin LMT.
  • The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Trial locations and contacts

43 sites in 8 countries.

43 sites in 8 countries

United States8 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 840704

    Atlantis, Florida, 33462

  • Investigational Site Number 840703

    Beverly Hills, California, 90211

  • Investigational Site Number 840707

    Durham, North Carolina, 27710

  • Investigational Site Number 840706

    Fall River, Massachusetts, 02720

  • Investigational Site Number 840708

    Jacksonville, Florida, 32216

  • Investigational Site Number 840701

    Sarasota, Florida, 34239

  • Investigational Site Number 840705

    St Louis, Missouri, 63131

  • Investigational Site Number 840702

    Summerville, South Carolina, 29485

Other trials in United States

Netherlands8 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 528701

    Amsterdam, 1105 AZ

  • Investigational Site Number 528708

    Den Helder, 1782 GZ

  • Investigational Site Number 528702

    Hoogeveen, 7909 AA

  • Investigational Site Number 528703

    Hoorn, 1625 HV

  • Investigational Site Number 528706

    Rotterdam, 3045 PM

  • Investigational Site Number 528709

    Sneek, 8601 ZK

  • Investigational Site Number 528704

    Utrecht, 3584 CX

  • Investigational Site Number 528707

    Venlo, 5912 BL

Other trials in Netherlands

Spain8 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 724703

    A Coruña, 15006

  • Investigational Site Number 724707

    Barcelona, 08025

  • Investigational Site Number 724710

    Barcelona, 08035

  • Investigational Site Number 724702

    Córdoba, 14004

  • Investigational Site Number 724705

    Granada, 18012

  • Investigational Site Number 724709

    Sant Joan Despí, 08970

  • Investigational Site Number 724706

    Santiago de Compostela, 15706

  • Investigational Site Number 724701

    Zaragoza, 50009

Other trials in Spain

Canada6 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 124703

    Chicoutimi, G7H 7P2

  • Investigational Site Number 124701

    Québec, G1V 4M6

  • Investigational Site Number 124704

    Sherbrooke, J1H 1Z1

  • Investigational Site Number 124706

    Toronto, M9V 4B4

  • Investigational Site Number 124702

    Vancouver, V5Z 1M9

  • Investigational Site Number 124705

    Victoria, V8T 5G4

Other trials in Canada

Denmark5 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 208703

    Aarhus, 8200

  • Investigational Site Number 208702

    Esbjerg, 6700

  • Investigational Site Number 208701

    Glostrup Municipality, 2600

  • Investigational Site Number 208704

    Hvidovre, 2650

  • Investigational Site Number 208705

    Køge, 4600

Other trials in Denmark

Australia3 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 036703

    Ashford, 5035

  • Investigational Site Number 036702

    Perth, 6000

  • Investigational Site Number 036701

    Woolloongabba, 4102

Other trials in Australia

Belgium3 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 056702

    Antwerp, 2060

  • Investigational Site Number 056703

    Haine-Saint-Paul, 7100

  • Investigational Site Number 056701

    Leuven, 3000

Other trials in Belgium

New Zealand2 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 554702

    Auckland, 1023

  • Investigational Site Number 554701

    Christchurch, 8011

Other trials in New Zealand

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia Not Treated With a Statin

Primary Objective:

To demonstrate the reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by a regimen of Alirocumab including a starting dose of 150 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) as add-on to non-statin lipid modifying background therapy or as monotherapy in comparison with placebo in participants with primary hypercholesterolemia not treated with a statin.

Secondary Objective:

  • To evaluate the effects on other lipid parameters of Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W versus placebo.
  • To evaluate the safety and tolerability of Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W.

Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W was added as a calibrator arm.

Read the detailed description

The core study duration was approximately 35 weeks per participant (screening: 3 weeks, double-blind treatment period: 24 weeks; follow-up: 8 weeks). Participants who successfully completed the treatment period had the possibility to participate in an optional open-label treatment period with Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W until second quarter 2017 or until the drug is commercially available in the country, whatever occurred first.

Being tested
Alirocumab, Placebo (for Alirocumab), Non-statin LMT, Diet Alone
Medical subject headings
Hypercholesterolemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AlirocumabDrug

    Also called SAR236553, REGN727, Praluent®

    Solution for injection in the abdomen, thigh, or outer area of the upper arm by self-injection or by another designated person using auto-injector (also known as pre-filled pen).

  • Placebo (for Alirocumab)Drug

    Solution for injection in the abdomen, thigh, or outer area of the upper arm by self-injection or by another designated person using auto-injector (also known as pre-filled pen).

  • Non-statin LMTDrug

    Ezetimibe or Fenofibrate at stable dose as background therapy.

  • Diet AloneOther

    Stable cholesterol-lowering diet as background therapy.

Study groups in NCT02023879
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Placebo Q2WPlacebo comparatorPeriod 1: Placebo (for Alirocumab) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 2 weeks (Q2W) added to stable non-statin lipid modifying therapy (LMT) or diet alone for 24 weeks. Period 2: Alirocumab 150 mg SC injection every 4 weeks (Q4W) from Week 24 until second quarter 2017 or until the drug is commercially available in the country, whatever occurred first. Alirocumab dose could be either up-titrated to 150 mg Q2W from Week 36 or maintained according to the investigator judgement and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values. Subsequent down titration to 150 mg Q4W was allowed.
Receives: Drug: Alirocumab; Drug: Placebo (for Alirocumab); Drug: Non-statin LMT; Other: Diet Alone
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/Up to 150 mg Q2W (Calibrator)OtherPeriod 1: Alirocumab 75 mg SC injection Q2W added to stable non-statin LMT or diet alone for 24 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg Q2W from Week 12 when targeted LDL-C levels at Week 8 were not achieved i.e. LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) or ≥100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) depending on cardiovascular risk or <30% LDL-C reduction from baseline. Period 2: Alirocumab 150 mg SC injection Q4W from Week 24 until second quarter 2017 or until the drug is commercially available in the country, whatever occurred first. Alirocumab dose could be either up-titrated to 150 mg Q2W from Week 36 or maintained according to the investigator judgement and LDL-C values. Subsequent down titration to 150 mg Q4W was allowed.
Receives: Drug: Alirocumab; Drug: Non-statin LMT; Other: Diet Alone
Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W/Up to 150 mg Q2WExperimentalPeriod 1: Alirocumab 150 mg SC injection Q4W alternating with placebo (for alirocumab) Q4W added to stable non-statin LMT or diet alone for 24 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg Q2W from Week 12 when targeted LDL-C levels at Week 8 were not achieved i.e. LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) or ≥100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) depending on cardiovascular risk or <30% LDL-C reduction from baseline. Period 2: Alirocumab 150 mg SC injection Q4W from Week 24 until second quarter 2017 or until the drug is commercially available in the country, whatever occurred first. Alirocumab dose could be either up-titrated to 150 mg Q2W from Week 36 or maintained according to the investigator judgement and LDL-C values. Subsequent down titration to 150 mg Q4W was allowed.
Receives: Drug: Alirocumab; Drug: Placebo (for Alirocumab); Drug: Non-statin LMT; Other: Diet Alone

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 24 - Intent-to-Treat (ITT Analysis)

    Adjusted Least-squares (LS) means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from a mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) to account for missing data. All available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment were used in the model (ITT analysis).

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

Secondary outcomes (25)
  1. Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 24 - On-Treatment Analysis

    Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 24 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection) (on-treatment analysis).

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  2. Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on-or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  3. Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis

    Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 24 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection).

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  4. Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C to Averaged Weeks 9 to 12 - ITT- Analysis

    Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on-or off-treatment and assigning a weight of 0.25 for Week 9, 10, 11 and 12 time points.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  5. Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Averaged Week 9 to 12 - On-Treatment Analysis

    Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 24 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection) and assigning a weight of 0.25 for Week 9, 10, 11 and 12 time points.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  6. Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B at Week 24 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on-or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  7. Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B at Week 24 - On-treatment Analysis

    Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 24 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection).

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  8. Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 24 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on-or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  9. Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 24 - On-treatment Analysis

    Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 24 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection).

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  10. Percent Change From Baseline in Total-C at Week 24 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on-or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  11. Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B at Week 12 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on-or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  12. Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on-or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  13. Percent Change From Baseline in Total-C at Week 12 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on-or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  14. Percentage of Very High Cardiovascular (CV) Risk Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <70 mg/dL (<1.81 mmol/L) or Moderate or High CV Risk Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (<2.59 mmol/L) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis

    Moderate CV risk: 10-year fatal cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk Systemic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) ≥1 and <5%.

    High CV risk: 10-year fatal CVD risk SCORE ≥5% or moderate chronic kidney disease or type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus without target organ damage or familial hypercholesterolemia.

    Very high CV risk: history of documented coronary heart disease, ischemic stroke, peripheral artery disease, transient ischemic attack, abdominal aortic aneurysm, or carotid artery occlusion >50% without symptoms; carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stent procedure; renal artery stenosis, or renal artery stent procedure; or type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus with target organ damage.

    Adjusted percentages at Week 24 were obtained from a multiple imputation approach model for handling of missing data. All available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment were included.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  15. Percentage of Very High CV Risk Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C< 70 mg/dL (<1.81 mmol/L) or Moderate or High CV Risk Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C< 100 mg/dL (<2.59 mmol/L) at Week 24 - On-treatment Analysis

    Adjusted percentages at Week 24 from multiple imputation approach including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 24 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection).

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  16. Percentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C< 70 mg/dL (<1.81 mmol/L) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted percentages at Week 24 from last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  17. Percentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <70 mg/dL (<1.81 mmol/L) at Week 24 - On-treatment Analysis

    Adjusted percentages at Week 24 from LOCF approach including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 24 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection).

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  18. Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 24 from a multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on-or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  19. Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at Week 12 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 12 from a multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  20. Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 24 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on-or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  21. Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 12 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on-or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  22. Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 24 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 24 from a multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on-or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  23. Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 12 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 12 from a multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on-or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  24. Percent Change From Baseline in Apo A-1 at Week 24 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on-or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  25. Percent Change From Baseline in Apo A-1 at Week 12 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on-or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Dec 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study start16 Dec 2013
  3. Primary completion27 Oct 2014
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A double-blind treatment period of 24 weeks (3 parallel arms) followed by an open-label extension period (single arm)
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
233 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02023879
Sponsor's protocol ID
EFC13786
Other IDs
2013-002659-14, U1111-1146-3517
Status last verified
Jun 2018
First submitted
6 Dec 2013
Last updated
27 Jul 2018
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Stroes E, Guyton JR, Lepor N, Civeira F, Gaudet D, Watts GF, Baccara-Dinet MT, Lecorps G, Manvelian G, Farnier M; ODYSSEY CHOICE II Investigators. Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab 150 mg Every 4 Weeks in Patients With Hypercholesterolemia Not on Statin Therapy: The ODYSSEY CHOICE II Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Sep 13;5(9):e003421. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003421.

    PubMed 27625344

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Alirocumab, Non-statin LMT and Diet Alone in people with Hypercholesterolemia, run by Sanofi at 43 sites in 8 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 43 sites in United States, Netherlands, Spain, Canada, Denmark and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Mar 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 24 - Intent-to-Treat (ITT Analysis) (time frame: From Baseline to Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02023879, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jul 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in