TaxanePhase 2NCT02024568
Exploratory Study on the Use of Pregabalin for the Treatment of Taxol Related Arthralgia-Myalgia
A Phase 2 study testing Pregabalin in people with Taxane and Drug-related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions, run by Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.
Trial summary
Paclitaxel is chemotherapeutic agent used in many of the most common anti-cancer regimens. Its use is frequently associated with moderate to severe muscle and joint pain that may persist for several days after the treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Taxane, Drug-related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions, Pain
- What is being tested?
- Pregabalin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 38 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIsrael
- Study dates
- Dec 2013to May 2015
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Fulfillment of screening criteria.
- Experience of myalgia-arthralgia related pain of moderate or worse degree of severity after a course of paclitaxel containing chemotherapy.
Who cannot join
- Ongoing treatment with pregabalin or gabapentin.
- Known restricting adverse events related to treatment with pregabalin or gabapentin.
- Renal failure with GFR less than 30ml/min.
- Participation in clinical trial 3 weeks or less prior to screening.
- Confounding myalgia and / or arthralgia unrelated to chemotherapy.
- Medical condition compromising the likelihood of completing the trial.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Israel1 site
Assaf HaRofeh Medical Center
Be'er Ya'akov (Zerifin), 7030000
Jonathan Grunfeld, M.D.
About this study
Paclitaxel is chemotherapeutic agent used in many of the most common anti-cancer regimens. Its use is frequently associated with moderate to severe muscle and joint pain that may persist for several days after the treatment. This side effect, known as "Arthralgia-Myalgia Syndrome, has a significant impact on the quality of life and functional abilities of those receiving the treatment, and is not alleviated by many of the interventions attempted for that purpose.
Sporadic reports suggest that a drug called gabapentin may be effective in the management of this adverse effect. Observations from our practice indicate that pregabalin, which possesses similar biological activity to that of gabapentin, may also be useful in preventing and treating paclitaxel associated myalgia - arthralgia.
The current study represents an initial evaluation of the hypothesis that pregabalin may be beneficial in the management of the symptoms due to the "Arthralgia-Myalgia Syndrome". The investigation will be carried out in the format of a small scale, randomized, placebo controlled trial with patients receiving paclitaxel in the course of standard treatment for breast cancer.
Read the detailed description
Taxane Related Arthralgia-Myalgia Syndrome:
Paclitaxel and docetaxel are the major representatives of the drug class of taxanes, agents commonly used in the treatment of a variety of solid tumors. They interfere with the mitotic process of dividing cells by stabilizing the microtubules and are the mainstay of treatment in lung, breast, and ovarian cancer, among others. The adverse side effects associated with taxane treatment frequently impair the quality of life of cancer patients and occasionally impose discontinuation of the oncological treatment of choice (Forsyth, Balmaceda et al. 1997; Saibil, Fitzgerald et al. 2010).
The phenomenon of diffuse pain involving joints and muscles in the wake of treatment with taxanes commonly referred to as Taxane related Arthralgia-Myalgia Syndrome (from here on noted as TAMS) is well known and documented (Rowinsky, Chaudhry et al. 1993). It is common, as apparent from a recent retrospective study of patients treated with regimens used for breast cancer which revealed an 80% incidence of taxane related pain (Saibil, Fitzgerald et al. 2010).
The pain may be localized, regional or diffuse, most commonly in the back, hips, shoulders, thighs, legs and feet (Loprinzi, Maddocks-Christianson et al. 2007). It is usually depicted as arthralgia-myalgia due to the difficulty to associate it clearly with either the joints or the muscles (Loprinzi, Maddocks-Christianson et al. 2007). The nature of the sensation is described as aching, deep pain, often with associated radiating, shooting, stabbing, pulsating elements (Loprinzi, Maddocks-Christianson et al. 2007). The sensation is of unique quality previously unencountered by those experiencing it, the description of which is not compatible with established reports of neuropathic pain.
The syndrome may be of incapacitating intensity, capable of imposing days of bed restriction on those suffering from it. This burden is often extended to significant others who have to remain and care for the daily needs of those handicapped by the pain. Attempts of treatment with steroids, non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs and opioid analgesics frequently fail to produce satisfactory results (Garrison, McCune et al. 2003).
Pregabalin - Basic Pharmacology and Potential for Treatment of TAMS:
Pregabalin is a small molecule with an established efficacy in the treatment of neuropathic pain (Gajraj 2007). It is known to interact with the α2-δ subunit of voltage gated calcium channels present in multiple tissues, most prominently in brain and muscle (Taylor, Angelotti et al. 2007).
Pregabalin is rapidly absorbed via a specialized transport system, reaching a peak concentration in the serum circa one hour after oral ingestion (Gajraj 2005). Bioavailability exceeds 90% and the pharmacokinetic profile is linear throughout the clinically relevant concentrations (Gajraj 2005). It does not bind significantly to proteins in the blood stream, does not undergo any modification during its passage through the organism, and is eliminated unchanged in the urine (Gajraj 2005). No significant pharmacokinetic interactions have been reported to date (Gajraj 2007).
Currently pregabalin is being used in the treatment of neuropathic pain and as an anti-epileptic agent (Gajraj 2007). Accumulated evidence is supportive of a high degree of safety in its use, with the most common side effects constituting of mild to moderate degree dizziness, somnolence, feeling drunk, fatigue and increased weight (Harmark, van Puijenbroek et al. 2011).
Sporadic reports suggest that gabapentin may be effective in alleviating Taxol related arthralgia-myalgia symptoms (Nguyen and Lawrence 2004). On grounds of similar pharmacodynamics (Bryans and Wustrow 1999) it may be hypothesized that pregabalin also has potential to alleviate the paclitaxel related arthralgia-myalgia. Furthermore, observations from our clinical oncology service are supportive of this hypothesis.
Evaluation of the Taxane Related Arthralgia-Myalgia Syndrome:
Pain constitutes a major component of the Taxane related Arthralgia-Myalgia Syndrome (from here on referred to as TAMS) (Garrison, McCune et al. 2003). We propose that pregabalin may have a significantly beneficial effect on the pain secondary to this syndrome. Consequently, evaluation of the pain before and after treatment with the study drug by means of a well established pain scoring method is required.
Modern pain research acknowledges the subjective and complex nature of pain that complicates its assessment. Furthermore, ethical imperatives place constraints on the comparative control to serve the in evaluation of a novel analgesic intervention (Silverman, O'Connor et al. 1993). One of the solutions to this issue, using normalized ordinal evaluations of pain and analgesic drug consumption around a central value in a manner that also accounts for changes in analgesic drug requirements (Silverman, O'Connor et al. 1993) will serve for direct assessment of the study hypothesis.
The Integrated Assessment of Pain Score and Rescue Analgesic Treatment evaluation according to Silverman et al will be augmented by raw pain assessment by means of a well established pain scoring method (Farrar, Portenoy et al. 2000).
Bed restriction is a direct result of the TAMS that is often described by those suffering from it. It is hereby proposed to monitor bed restriction by recording the number of hours spent in horizontal position between the time of getting up from the night's sleep and the hour of going to bed at the end of the day. The proposed measure will compare the number of hours spent in the horizontal position on the day preceding the taxane treatment, and the number of hours spent in that position on the day with the highest score of pain during the week following treatment. The sample size is not calculated to serve the validation of this novel measure, but an effort to assess its association with established quality-of-life scores will be made.
The current proposal is focused on evaluating an intervention with potential to have a positive impact on the quality of life of individuals receiving chemotherapy with taxanes. The FACT-Taxane scale is a psychometric tool specifically developed to assess the impact of taxane based treatment (Cella, Peterman et al. 2003). However, quality of life is a composite measure, and requires a larger sample size to determine efficacy, and therefore it will only serve as a secondary endpoint.
- Being tested
- Pregabalin, Placebo
- Keywords
- Pregabalin, Arthralgia Myalgia Syndrome, Paclitaxel, Pain management, Breast cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions, Pain, Breast Neoplasms, Myotoxicity, Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PregabalinDrug
Also called Lyrica
See arm description
PlaceboDrug
See arm description
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pregabalin | Active comparator | Includes 19 out of 38 subjects reporting athralgia-myalgia in the wake of paclitaxel infusion in the course of breast cancer treatment.
Pregabalin started on the evening before receiving infusion of paclitaxel and 5 day thereafter. Initial dosing of 75mg twice daily (morning + evening). Option for dose increase with additional 75mg in case of inadequate pain control. A minimal interval of 2 hours is required between doses.
In case of poorly tolerated side effects a reduction to 50mg doses is available.
Access to additional analgesic interventions is open as required for patient wellbeing. Receives: Drug: Pregabalin |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Includes 19 out of 38 subjects reporting athralgia-myalgia in the wake of paclitaxel infusion in the course of breast cancer treatment.
Placebo externally identical to the pregabalin 75mg capsules will be started on the evening before receiving infusion of paclitaxel and 5 day thereafter. Initial dosing of 1 capsule twice daily (morning + evening). Option for dose increase with additional capsule in case of inadequate pain control. A minimal interval of 2 hours is required between doses.
In case of poorly tolerated side effects a reduction to capsules with the appearance of 50mg pregabalin capsules is available.
Access to additional analgesic interventions is open as required for patient wellbeing. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Integrated Numeric Pain Scores and Rescue Analgesic Medication Requirement as calculated by the method proposed by Silverman et al (Silverman, O'Connor et al. 1993).
Modern pain research acknowledges the subjective and complex nature of pain that complicates its assessment. Furthermore, ethical imperatives place constraints on the comparative control to serve the in evaluation of a novel analgesic intervention (Silverman, O'Connor et al. 1993). One of the solutions to this issue, using normalized ordinal evaluations of pain and analgesic drug consumption around a central value in a manner that also accounts for changes in analgesic drug requirements (Silverman, O'Connor et al. 1993) will serve for direct assessment of the study hypothesis.
Measured: 16 months from study initiation
Secondary outcomes (3)
Numeric Pain Score (NPS)
Numeric Pain score (NPS*) evaluation of Myalgia / Arthralgia related pain. The scores to be considered will be the maximum values recorded over the course of the 7 days starting on the day the taxane is administered.
*Numerical Rating Scale: 0-1 No pain; 2-3 Mild pain; 4-5 Discomforting - moderate pain; 6-7 Distressing - severe pain; 8-9 Intense - very severe pain; 10 - Unbearable pain
Measured: 8 days after receiving cycle of paclitaxel
The additional number of hours spent in horizontal position (∆HHP**)
The additional number of hours spent in horizontal position (∆HHP**) as when lying down in bed, on couch, etc., during waking time will serve as an additional endpoint. It will be derived by subtracting the number of hours spent in horizontal position prior to taxane treatment from the number of hours in that position during the day with the highest pain score in the course of the week following treatment. Daytime hours will be calculated as the time between getting up in the morning and going to bed in the evening on the day preceding the infusion of the taxane.
HHP - the number of Hours in Horizontal Position. ∆HHP - the additional number of hours in horizontal position; Post Treatment HHP - Baseline HHP = ∆HHP.
Measured: 8 days after receiving cycle of paclitaxel
FACT-taxane score
The FACT-Taxane scale is a psychometric tool specifically developed to assess the impact of taxane based treatment on the quality of life (Cella, Peterman et al. 2003). Both the severity of pain and associated impact on daily activities, as well as established side effects of the study drug may affect the score on this scale.
Measured: On day of recruitment to active phase + one week after 4th cycle of paclitaxel since recruitment to active phase.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2013
- Primary completionMar 2015 (estimated)
- Study completionMay 2015 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (14)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for TaxaneStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 38 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jonathan Grunfeld, M.D., Principal investigator, Employee of Asaf Harofeh M.C.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02024568
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 105/13
- Other IDs
- WS1826148
- Status last verified
- Dec 2013
- First submitted
- 17 Dec 2013
- Last updated
- 31 Dec 2013
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Bryans JS, Wustrow DJ. 3-substituted GABA analogs with central nervous system activity: a review. Med Res Rev. 1999 Mar;19(2):149-77. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-1128(199903)19:23.0.co;2-b.
PubMed 10189176Cella D, Peterman A, Hudgens S, Webster K, Socinski MA. Measuring the side effects of taxane therapy in oncology: the functional assesment of cancer therapy-taxane (FACT-taxane). Cancer. 2003 Aug 15;98(4):822-31. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11578.
PubMed 12910528Farrar JT, Portenoy RK, Berlin JA, Kinman JL, Strom BL. Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures. Pain. 2000 Dec 1;88(3):287-294. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00339-0.
PubMed 11068116Forsyth PA, Balmaceda C, Peterson K, Seidman AD, Brasher P, DeAngelis LM. Prospective study of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy with quantitative sensory testing. J Neurooncol. 1997 Oct;35(1):47-53. doi: 10.1023/a:1005805907311.
PubMed 9266440Gajraj NM. Pregabalin for pain management. Pain Pract. 2005 Jun;5(2):95-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2005.05205.x.
PubMed 17177755Gajraj NM. Pregabalin: its pharmacology and use in pain management. Anesth Analg. 2007 Dec;105(6):1805-15. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000287643.13410.5e.
PubMed 18042886Garrison JA, McCune JS, Livingston RB, Linden HM, Gralow JR, Ellis GK, West HL. Myalgias and arthralgias associated with paclitaxel. Oncology (Williston Park). 2003 Feb;17(2):271-7; discussion 281-2, 286-8.
PubMed 12632867Harmark L, van Puijenbroek E, Straus S, van Grootheest K. Intensive monitoring of pregabalin: results from an observational, Web-based, prospective cohort study in the Netherlands using patients as a source of information. Drug Saf. 2011 Mar 1;34(3):221-31. doi: 10.2165/11585030-000000000-00000.
PubMed 21332246Loprinzi CL, Maddocks-Christianson K, Wolf SL, Rao RD, Dyck PJ, Mantyh P, Dyck PJ. The Paclitaxel acute pain syndrome: sensitization of nociceptors as the putative mechanism. Cancer J. 2007 Nov-Dec;13(6):399-403. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e31815a999b.
PubMed 18032978Nguyen VH, Lawrence HJ. Use of gabapentin in the prevention of taxane-induced arthralgias and myalgias. J Clin Oncol. 2004 May 1;22(9):1767-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.99.298. No abstract available.
PubMed 15118009Rowinsky EK, Chaudhry V, Forastiere AA, Sartorius SE, Ettinger DS, Grochow LB, Lubejko BG, Cornblath DR, Donehower RC. Phase I and pharmacologic study of paclitaxel and cisplatin with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: neuromuscular toxicity is dose-limiting. J Clin Oncol. 1993 Oct;11(10):2010-20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.10.2010.
PubMed 7692001Saibil S, Fitzgerald B, Freedman OC, Amir E, Napolskikh J, Salvo N, Dranitsaris G, Clemons M. Incidence of taxane-induced pain and distress in patients receiving chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer: a retrospective, outcomes-based survey. Curr Oncol. 2010 Aug;17(4):42-7. doi: 10.3747/co.v17i4.562.
PubMed 20697513Silverman DG, O'Connor TZ, Brull SJ. Integrated assessment of pain scores and rescue morphine use during studies of analgesic efficacy. Anesth Analg. 1993 Jul;77(1):168-70. No abstract available.
PubMed 8317727Taylor CP, Angelotti T, Fauman E. Pharmacology and mechanism of action of pregabalin: the calcium channel alpha2-delta (alpha2-delta) subunit as a target for antiepileptic drug discovery. Epilepsy Res. 2007 Feb;73(2):137-50. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2006.09.008. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
PubMed 17126531
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Dec 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Exploratory Study on the Use of Pregabalin for the Treatment of Taxol Related Arthralgia-Myalgia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02024568
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 105/13
- Keywords
- Pregabalin, Arthralgia Myalgia Syndrome, Paclitaxel, Pain management, Breast cancer
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 38 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assaf-Harofeh Medical CenterOther government
- Study start
- Dec 2013
- Primary completion
- Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Study completion
- May 2015 (estimated)
- First posted
- 31 Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Paclitaxel is chemotherapeutic agent used in many of the most common anti-cancer regimens. Its use is frequently associated with moderate to severe muscle and joint pain that may persist for several days after the treatment. This side effect, known as "Arthralgia-Myalgia Syndrome, has a significant impact on the quality of life and functional abilities of those receiving the treatment, and is not alleviated by many of the interventions attempted for that purpose.
Sporadic reports suggest that a drug called gabapentin may be effective in the management of this adverse effect. Observations from our practice indicate that pregabalin, which possesses similar biological activity to that of gabapentin, may also be useful in preventing and treating paclitaxel associated myalgia - arthralgia.
The current study represents an initial evaluation of the hypothesis that pregabalin may be beneficial in the management of the symptoms due to the "Arthralgia-Myalgia Syndrome". The investigation will be carried out in the format of a small scale, randomized, placebo controlled trial with patients receiving paclitaxel in the course of standard treatment for breast cancer.
Detailed description
Taxane Related Arthralgia-Myalgia Syndrome:
Paclitaxel and docetaxel are the major representatives of the drug class of taxanes, agents commonly used in the treatment of a variety of solid tumors. They interfere with the mitotic process of dividing cells by stabilizing the microtubules and are the mainstay of treatment in lung, breast, and ovarian cancer, among others. The adverse side effects associated with taxane treatment frequently impair the quality of life of cancer patients and occasionally impose discontinuation of the oncological treatment of choice (Forsyth, Balmaceda et al. 1997; Saibil, Fitzgerald et al. 2010).
The phenomenon of diffuse pain involving joints and muscles in the wake of treatment with taxanes commonly referred to as Taxane related Arthralgia-Myalgia Syndrome (from here on noted as TAMS) is well known and documented (Rowinsky, Chaudhry et al. 1993). It is common, as apparent from a recent retrospective study of patients treated with regimens used for breast cancer which revealed an 80% incidence of taxane related pain (Saibil, Fitzgerald et al. 2010).
The pain may be localized, regional or diffuse, most commonly in the back, hips, shoulders, thighs, legs and feet (Loprinzi, Maddocks-Christianson et al. 2007). It is usually depicted as arthralgia-myalgia due to the difficulty to associate it clearly with either the joints or the muscles (Loprinzi, Maddocks-Christianson et al. 2007). The nature of the sensation is described as aching, deep pain, often with associated radiating, shooting, stabbing, pulsating elements (Loprinzi, Maddocks-Christianson et al. 2007). The sensation is of unique quality previously unencountered by those experiencing it, the description of which is not compatible with established reports of neuropathic pain.
The syndrome may be of incapacitating intensity, capable of imposing days of bed restriction on those suffering from it. This burden is often extended to significant others who have to remain and care for the daily needs of those handicapped by the pain. Attempts of treatment with steroids, non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs and opioid analgesics frequently fail to produce satisfactory results (Garrison, McCune et al. 2003).
Pregabalin - Basic Pharmacology and Potential for Treatment of TAMS:
Pregabalin is a small molecule with an established efficacy in the treatment of neuropathic pain (Gajraj 2007). It is known to interact with the α2-δ subunit of voltage gated calcium channels present in multiple tissues, most prominently in brain and muscle (Taylor, Angelotti et al. 2007).
Pregabalin is rapidly absorbed via a specialized transport system, reaching a peak concentration in the serum circa one hour after oral ingestion (Gajraj 2005). Bioavailability exceeds 90% and the pharmacokinetic profile is linear throughout the clinically relevant concentrations (Gajraj 2005). It does not bind significantly to proteins in the blood stream, does not undergo any modification during its passage through the organism, and is eliminated unchanged in the urine (Gajraj 2005). No significant pharmacokinetic interactions have been reported to date (Gajraj 2007).
Currently pregabalin is being used in the treatment of neuropathic pain and as an anti-epileptic agent (Gajraj 2007). Accumulated evidence is supportive of a high degree of safety in its use, with the most common side effects constituting of mild to moderate degree dizziness, somnolence, feeling drunk, fatigue and increased weight (Harmark, van Puijenbroek et al. 2011).
Sporadic reports suggest that gabapentin may be effective in alleviating Taxol related arthralgia-myalgia symptoms (Nguyen and Lawrence 2004). On grounds of similar pharmacodynamics (Bryans and Wustrow 1999) it may be hypothesized that pregabalin also has potential to alleviate the paclitaxel related arthralgia-myalgia. Furthermore, observations from our clinical oncology service are supportive of this hypothesis.
Evaluation of the Taxane Related Arthralgia-Myalgia Syndrome:
Pain constitutes a major component of the Taxane related Arthralgia-Myalgia Syndrome (from here on referred to as TAMS) (Garrison, McCune et al. 2003). We propose that pregabalin may have a significantly beneficial effect on the pain secondary to this syndrome. Consequently, evaluation of the pain before and after treatment with the study drug by means of a well established pain scoring method is required.
Modern pain research acknowledges the subjective and complex nature of pain that complicates its assessment. Furthermore, ethical imperatives place constraints on the comparative control to serve the in evaluation of a novel analgesic intervention (Silverman, O'Connor et al. 1993). One of the solutions to this issue, using normalized ordinal evaluations of pain and analgesic drug consumption around a central value in a manner that also accounts for changes in analgesic drug requirements (Silverman, O'Connor et al. 1993) will serve for direct assessment of the study hypothesis.
The Integrated Assessment of Pain Score and Rescue Analgesic Treatment evaluation according to Silverman et al will be augmented by raw pain assessment by means of a well established pain scoring method (Farrar, Portenoy et al. 2000).
Bed restriction is a direct result of the TAMS that is often described by those suffering from it. It is hereby proposed to monitor bed restriction by recording the number of hours spent in horizontal position between the time of getting up from the night's sleep and the hour of going to bed at the end of the day. The proposed measure will compare the number of hours spent in the horizontal position on the day preceding the taxane treatment, and the number of hours spent in that position on the day with the highest score of pain during the week following treatment. The sample size is not calculated to serve the validation of this novel measure, but an effort to assess its association with established quality-of-life scores will be made.
The current proposal is focused on evaluating an intervention with potential to have a positive impact on the quality of life of individuals receiving chemotherapy with taxanes. The FACT-Taxane scale is a psychometric tool specifically developed to assess the impact of taxane based treatment (Cella, Peterman et al. 2003). However, quality of life is a composite measure, and requires a larger sample size to determine efficacy, and therefore it will only serve as a secondary endpoint.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pregabalin | Active comparator | Drug: PregabalinIncludes 19 out of 38 subjects reporting athralgia-myalgia in the wake of paclitaxel infusion in the course of breast cancer treatment. Pregabalin started on the evening before receiving infusion of paclitaxel and 5 day thereafter. Initial dosing of 75mg twice daily (morning + evening). Option for dose increase with additional 75mg in case of inadequate pain control. A minimal interval of 2 hours is required between doses. In case of poorly tolerated side effects a reduction to 50mg doses is available. Access to additional analgesic interventions is open as required for patient wellbeing. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboIncludes 19 out of 38 subjects reporting athralgia-myalgia in the wake of paclitaxel infusion in the course of breast cancer treatment. Placebo externally identical to the pregabalin 75mg capsules will be started on the evening before receiving infusion of paclitaxel and 5 day thereafter. Initial dosing of 1 capsule twice daily (morning + evening). Option for dose increase with additional capsule in case of inadequate pain control. A minimal interval of 2 hours is required between doses. In case of poorly tolerated side effects a reduction to capsules with the appearance of 50mg pregabalin capsules is available. Access to additional analgesic interventions is open as required for patient wellbeing. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Fulfillment of screening criteria.
- Experience of myalgia-arthralgia related pain of moderate or worse degree of severity after a course of paclitaxel containing chemotherapy.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Ongoing treatment with pregabalin or gabapentin.
- Known restricting adverse events related to treatment with pregabalin or gabapentin.
- Renal failure with GFR less than 30ml/min.
- Participation in clinical trial 3 weeks or less prior to screening.
- Confounding myalgia and / or arthralgia unrelated to chemotherapy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PregabalinAlso: LyricaSee arm description | Drug | Pregabalin |
| PlaceboSee arm description | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Integrated Numeric Pain Scores and Rescue Analgesic Medication Requirement as calculated by the method proposed by Silverman et al (Silverman, O'Connor et al. 1993).
Time frame: 16 months from study initiation
Modern pain research acknowledges the subjective and complex nature of pain that complicates its assessment. Furthermore, ethical imperatives place constraints on the comparative control to serve the in evaluation of a novel analgesic intervention (Silverman, O'Connor et al. 1993). One of the solutions to this issue, using normalized ordinal evaluations of pain and analgesic drug consumption around a central value in a manner that also accounts for changes in analgesic drug requirements (Silverman, O'Connor et al. 1993) will serve for direct assessment of the study hypothesis.
3 secondary outcomes
Numeric Pain Score (NPS)
Time frame: 8 days after receiving cycle of paclitaxel
The additional number of hours spent in horizontal position (∆HHP**)
Time frame: 8 days after receiving cycle of paclitaxel
FACT-taxane score
Time frame: On day of recruitment to active phase + one week after 4th cycle of paclitaxel since recruitment to active phase.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Dec 2013.
- Background: PubMed 10189176Bryans JS, Wustrow DJ. 3-substituted GABA analogs with central nervous system activity: a review. Med Res Rev. 1999 Mar;19(2):149-77. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-1128(199903)19:23.0.co;2-b.
- Background: PubMed 12910528Cella D, Peterman A, Hudgens S, Webster K, Socinski MA. Measuring the side effects of taxane therapy in oncology: the functional assesment of cancer therapy-taxane (FACT-taxane). Cancer. 2003 Aug 15;98(4):822-31. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11578.
- Background: PubMed 11068116Farrar JT, Portenoy RK, Berlin JA, Kinman JL, Strom BL. Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures. Pain. 2000 Dec 1;88(3):287-294. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00339-0.
- Background: PubMed 9266440Forsyth PA, Balmaceda C, Peterson K, Seidman AD, Brasher P, DeAngelis LM. Prospective study of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy with quantitative sensory testing. J Neurooncol. 1997 Oct;35(1):47-53. doi: 10.1023/a:1005805907311.
- Background: PubMed 17177755Gajraj NM. Pregabalin for pain management. Pain Pract. 2005 Jun;5(2):95-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2005.05205.x.
- Background: PubMed 18042886Gajraj NM. Pregabalin: its pharmacology and use in pain management. Anesth Analg. 2007 Dec;105(6):1805-15. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000287643.13410.5e.
- Background: PubMed 12632867Garrison JA, McCune JS, Livingston RB, Linden HM, Gralow JR, Ellis GK, West HL. Myalgias and arthralgias associated with paclitaxel. Oncology (Williston Park). 2003 Feb;17(2):271-7; discussion 281-2, 286-8.
- Background: PubMed 21332246Harmark L, van Puijenbroek E, Straus S, van Grootheest K. Intensive monitoring of pregabalin: results from an observational, Web-based, prospective cohort study in the Netherlands using patients as a source of information. Drug Saf. 2011 Mar 1;34(3):221-31. doi: 10.2165/11585030-000000000-00000.
- Background: PubMed 18032978Loprinzi CL, Maddocks-Christianson K, Wolf SL, Rao RD, Dyck PJ, Mantyh P, Dyck PJ. The Paclitaxel acute pain syndrome: sensitization of nociceptors as the putative mechanism. Cancer J. 2007 Nov-Dec;13(6):399-403. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e31815a999b.
- Background: PubMed 15118009Nguyen VH, Lawrence HJ. Use of gabapentin in the prevention of taxane-induced arthralgias and myalgias. J Clin Oncol. 2004 May 1;22(9):1767-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.99.298. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 7692001Rowinsky EK, Chaudhry V, Forastiere AA, Sartorius SE, Ettinger DS, Grochow LB, Lubejko BG, Cornblath DR, Donehower RC. Phase I and pharmacologic study of paclitaxel and cisplatin with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: neuromuscular toxicity is dose-limiting. J Clin Oncol. 1993 Oct;11(10):2010-20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.10.2010.
- Background: PubMed 20697513Saibil S, Fitzgerald B, Freedman OC, Amir E, Napolskikh J, Salvo N, Dranitsaris G, Clemons M. Incidence of taxane-induced pain and distress in patients receiving chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer: a retrospective, outcomes-based survey. Curr Oncol. 2010 Aug;17(4):42-7. doi: 10.3747/co.v17i4.562.
Related trials for Taxane
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Carboplatin, Taxane And Ramucirumab for Patients With NSCLC After Pemetrexed or Pembrolizumab Maintenance
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Study of Opevesostat (MK-5684) Versus Alternative NHA in mCRPC (MK-5684-003)
Prostate Cancer Metastatic
Not yet recruiting
Continuous Controlled Cooling for Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy
Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN)
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of Paclitaxel Polymeric Micelles Combined With HP and Adebelimab Versus Taxane Combined With HP as First-Line Treatment for Advanced HER2-Positive Breast Cancer
Advanced HER2-positive Breast Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Compare DB-1303/BNT323 Versus T-DM1 in Breast Cancer
HER2-positive Breast Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jonathan Grunfeld, M.D. principal investigator
Employee of Asaf Harofeh M.C.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Pregabalin in people with Taxane and Drug-related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions, run by Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Dec 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jonathan Grunfeld, M.D. (++972-(0)57-7346453, grunfeldj@asaf.health.gov.il), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Integrated Numeric Pain Scores and Rescue Analgesic Medication Requirement as calculated by the method proposed by Silverman et al (Silverman, O'Connor et al. 1993). (time frame: 16 months from study initiation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02024568, which also lists 14 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Dec 2013.