AzTrials
AzTrials

Intraoperative ComplicationsNCT02025075

Hemodynamic and Respiratory Variations During Laparoscopic Surgery With and Without Deep Neuromuscular Blockade.

A study testing Rocuronium in people with Intraoperative Complications and Postoperative Complications, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this study is to investigate the effect of depth of neuromuscular block (NMB) on global and regional (dependent versus nondependent) respiratory mechanics during laparoscopic surgery. Furthermore, we will investigate if the level of NMB influences intraoperative hemodynamic and cerebral oxygenation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Rocuronium
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
37 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2014to Oct 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Elective patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic surgery with expected duration > 2h
  • Physical status ASA I - III

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy
  • Severe cardiac disease (NYHA class III or IV, acute coronary syndrome, or persistent ventricular tachyarrhythmia)
  • Previous lung surgery
  • History of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Gastro-esophageal pathology (including but not limited to recent gastric or esophageal surgery including bypass/banding, history of esophageal varices, known anatomical gastric or esophageal defects such as strictures, hernias or fistulas)
  • Mechanical ventilation within the last 30 days
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Neuromuscular disease
  • Consented for another interventional study or refusal to participate in the present study
  • Hypersensitivity (e.g., anaphylaxis) to rocuronium bromide or other neuromuscular blocking agents

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Prospective, Double-blind, Randomized, Crossover Design Study to Compare the Hemodynamic and Respiratory Variations During Laparoscopic Surgery in Patients With and Without Deep Neuromuscular Blockade.

The goal of this study is to investigate the effect of depth of neuromuscular block (NMB) on global and regional (dependent versus nondependent) respiratory mechanics during laparoscopic surgery. Furthermore, we will investigate if the level of NMB influences intraoperative hemodynamic and cerebral oxygenation.

Being tested
Rocuronium
Keywords
Tomography, Oximetry, Echocardiography
Medical subject headings
Intraoperative Complications, Postoperative Complications, Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RocuroniumDrug

    Also called Zemuron

    Rocuronium 0.6 - 1.2 mg/kg with the dose adjusted to achieve 1-2 post-tetanic counts (Deep NMB) or 1-2 twitches in the train-on-four (Moderate NMB).

Study groups in NCT02025075
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Deep Neuromuscular Block (NMB)ExperimentalMuscle paralysis with rocuronium 0.6 - 1.2 mg/kg with the dose adjusted to achieve 1-2 post-tetanic counts (neuromuscular function monitor).
Receives: Drug: Rocuronium
Moderate Neuromuscular block (NMB)Active comparatorMuscle paralysis with rocuronium 0.6 - 1.2 mg/kg with the dose adjusted to achieve 1-2 twitches in the train-on-four (neuromuscular function monitor).
Receives: Drug: Rocuronium

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Regional Change in Air Content (Delta Z, %)

    We will measure continuous respiratory flows and pressures in the intraoperative period to assess continuously the compliance and resistance of the respiratory system (T1 to T5). In addition, we will use an esophageal balloon to assess esophageal pressures and partition the global mechanical properties of the respiratory system, into their lung and chest wall components (T1 to T5). Regional lung aeration will be assessed for quantification of intraoperative lung recruitment using Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) (T0 to T6). Percent change was calculated using electrical impedance measurements obtained at time T0 as reference.

    Measured: BL; During pneumoperitoneum; Stage w/2 depths neuromuscular blockade targeted - TOF1 and Deep: 1-2 twitches in post-tetanic count (50-Hz tetanus followed by three-second pause and 15 1-Hz stimuli); and immediately after release of pneumoperitoneum

  2. Ejection Fraction (%)

    To assess cardiac performance, transthoracic echocardiography will be used. Ejection fraction was measured as fractional shortening (FS). FS is the fraction of any diastolic dimension that is lost in systole. FS = 100*(LVEDD - LVESD) / LVEDD, LVEDD = LV end-diastolic dimension (mm); LVESD = LV end-systolic dimension (mm).

    Measured: BL; During pneumoperitoneum; Stage w/2 depths neuromuscular blockade targeted - TOF1 and Deep: 1-2 twitches in post-tetanic count (50-Hz tetanus followed by three-second pause and 15 1-Hz stimuli); and immediately after release of pneumoperitoneum

  3. Cerebral Oximetry (%)

    Regional cerebral oxygenation will be assessed continuously during the intraoperative period using NIRS technology.

    Measured: BL; During pneumoperitoneum; Stage w/2 depths neuromuscular blockade targeted - TOF1 and Deep: 1-2 twitches in post-tetanic count (50-Hz tetanus followed by three-second pause and 15 1-Hz stimuli); and immediately after release of pneumoperitoneum

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Postoperative Pain

    The patient will be inquired about pain with a visual analogue scale (VAS). Pain will be evaluated as incisional pain using VAS (0 = no pain; 100 = worst possible pain).

    Measured: Postoperative Day 1

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Dec 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2014
  3. Primary completionOct 2015
  4. Study completionOct 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
37 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02025075
Sponsor's protocol ID
Merck-50706
Status last verified
Apr 2017
First submitted
19 Dec 2013
Last updated
30 May 2017
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Joris J, Cigarini I, Legrand M, Jacquet N, De Groote D, Franchimont P, Lamy M. Metabolic and respiratory changes after cholecystectomy performed via laparotomy or laparoscopy. Br J Anaesth. 1992 Oct;69(4):341-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/69.4.341.

    PubMed 1419439
  • Ivankovich AD, Miletich DJ, Albrecht RF, Heyman HJ, Bonnet RF. Cardiovascular effects of intraperitoneal insufflation with carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide in the dog. Anesthesiology. 1975 Mar;42(3):281-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-197503000-00008.

    PubMed 123134
  • Dexter SP, Vucevic M, Gibson J, McMahon MJ. Hemodynamic consequences of high- and low-pressure capnoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1999 Apr;13(4):376-81. doi: 10.1007/s004649900993.

    PubMed 10094751
  • Karsten J, Heinze H, Meier T. Impact of PEEP during laparoscopic surgery on early postoperative ventilation distribution visualized by electrical impedance tomography. Minerva Anestesiol. 2014 Feb;80(2):158-66. Epub 2013 Jul 23.

    PubMed 23877309

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Rocuronium in people with Intraoperative Complications and Postoperative Complications, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 May 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Regional Change in Air Content (Delta Z, %) (time frame: BL; During pneumoperitoneum; Stage w/2 depths neuromuscular blockade targeted - TOF1 and Deep: 1-2 twitches in post-tetanic count (50-Hz tetanus followed by three-second pause and 15 1-Hz stimuli); and immediately after release of pneumoperitoneum). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02025075, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 May 2017.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in