AzTrials
AzTrials

Cystic FibrosisNCT02029521

Supplementation of Oral Reduced Glutathione in Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis Patients

A study testing Oral reduced l-glutathione in people with Cystic Fibrosis, run by Clark Bishop at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Many individuals with cystic fibrosis experience growth failure. The reasons are not clear, but inflammation of the gut in these patients seems to be one important reason. Glutathione is important to normal function of the intestine and lungs. Glutathione functions to decrease inflammation and to thin mucus. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 months to 10 years
Conditions the study is for
Cystic Fibrosis
What is being tested?
Oral reduced l-glutathione
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
47 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
Mar 2011to Jul 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 months to 10 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • -Diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis by either of the following criteria: >60 sweat chloride test or paired deleterious DNA cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) mutations (Ambry genetics, Genetech or ARUP);
  • -Pancreatic insufficient as defined by doctor's prescription of pancreatic enzymes.

Who cannot join

  • Hospitalized for bowel obstruction or surgery in the six months prior to enrollment;
  • had had a pulmonary exacerbation or oral steroid use or IV antibiotics within one month of enrollment,
  • who had been taking either GSH or N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) within the 12 month period immediately prior to the trial,
  • chronically infected with Burkholderia cepacia.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • Study site

    Turin

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Supplementation of Oral Reduced Glutathione in Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis for Growth Failure

Many individuals with cystic fibrosis experience growth failure. The reasons are not clear, but inflammation of the gut in these patients seems to be one important reason. Glutathione is important to normal function of the intestine and lungs. Glutathione functions to decrease inflammation and to thin mucus. However, in cystic fibrosis, glutathione gets trapped inside of cells, so it cannot travel to the surface of the cells and perform its proper function. Moreover, glutathione has been shown to improve nutritional status in patients with AIDS and cancer.

Investigators hypothesize that supplementation of oral glutathione to pediatric individuals with cystic fibrosis could improve growth failure.

Read the detailed description

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is known principally for its pulmonary consequences. However, for most individuals with CF, the earliest manifestations are not pulmonary, but gastro-intestinal. Many children experience growth failure. Chronic gut inflammation also develops. Research has also established that lung function scores are significantly correlated with Body Mass Index (BMI) and weight percentile in CF. Therefore, interventions to improve the gastro-intestinal dimension of CF in early childhood have the potential to ameliorate the course of the disease over the life span of the patient. Both Cochrane Database reviews and a recent review commissioned by the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation found only fair evidence for current nutritional guidelines.Therefore, there is a pressing need for a treatment for CF growth failure that is more effective and less invasive than current treatments.

The discovery that CF is associated with significantly diminished efflux of reduced glutathione (GSH) from most cells in the body offers a new perspective on the pathophysiology of this disease. GSH plays several important roles; among the most important are the following: 1) primary water-soluble antioxidant; 2) mucolytic capable of cleaving disulfide bonds; and 3) regulator of immune system function. The relationship between redox ratio (GSH:GSSG) and total glutathione (GSH+GSSG) and the initiation of inflammation is well established in the research literature.

GSH is also an important component of the epithelial lining fluid of the intestines, helping to keep intestinal mucus thin, serving to defend the intestinal system against reactive oxygen species, and keeping inflammation in check under normal circumstances. GSH is an FDA-approved treatment for AIDS-related cachexia. The growing recognition of GSH system dysfunction in CF, coupled with an established research literature on the role of GSH in gastro-intestinal function and weight gain in non-CF contexts, suggest a new intervention for growth failure in early childhood in CF patients. Specifically, investigators hypothesized that oral glutathione could effectively treat CF growth failure in pediatric patients.

Conditions
Cystic Fibrosis
Being tested
Oral reduced l-glutathione, Placebo
Keywords
cystic fibrosis, growth Failure, glutathione
Medical subject headings
Cystic Fibrosis, Failure to Thrive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Oral reduced l-glutathioneDietary supplement

    The treatment was pharmaceutical-grade Reduced L-Glutathione (GSH) with a daily dose of 65 mg/kg. The placebo was calcium citrate with a daily dose of 65 mg/kg. The daily dose of each substance was divided into three doses given at mealtime.

  • PlaceboDietary supplement

    calcium citrate with a daily dose of 65 mg/kg. The daily dose of each substance was divided into three doses given at mealtime.

Study groups in NCT02029521
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Oral reduced l-glutathioneExperimentalThe treatment was pharmaceutical-grade Reduced L-Glutathione (GSH) with a daily dose of 65 mg/kg.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Oral reduced l-glutathione
Placebo Calcium CitratePlacebo comparatorThe placebo was calcium citrate with a daily dose of 65 mg/kg. The daily dose of each substance was divided into three doses given at mealtime.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Weight Percentile at 3 Months

    Weight Percentile at 3 months adjusted for sex and age

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Height Percentile

    Height Percentile adjusted for sex and age

    Measured: 3 months

  3. BMI Percentile

    Body Mass Index percentile adjusted for sex and age. Standard BMI are not available for participants under 2 years of age

    Measured: 3 months

  4. BMI Percentile

    Body Mass Index percentile adjusted for sex and age. Not available for participants under 2 years of age.

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Weight Percentile

    Weight percentile, adjusted for sex and age

    Measured: 6 months

  6. Height Percentile

    The subjects were measured over the course of the study to determine if treatment improved height percentile.

    Measured: 6 Months

  7. Fecal Calprotectin

    Fecal Calprotectin, a measure of gut inflammation, was measured to see if the treatment decreased this outcome.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (32)
  1. Forced Vital Capacity

    Forced vital capacity percent predicted

    Measured: 3 months

  2. FEV1

    Forced expiratory volume at one second, percent predicted

    Measured: 3 months

  3. Bacteriology

    Expectorated sputum or throat swab

    Measured: 3 months

  4. Forced Vital Capacity

    Percent predicted of forced vital capacity.

    Measured: 6 months

  5. FEV1

    Forced expiratory volume at one second, percent predicted.

    Measured: 6 months

  6. C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

    CRP was measured to determine if this test fell during the course of treatment.

    Measured: 6 months

  7. White Blood Cell Count

    White blood cell count was measure at the beginning and end of the study to determine if treatment affected this test.

    Measured: 6 months

  8. Vitamin E

    Serum Vitamin E levels were measured to determine if treatment affected this test.

    Measured: 6 months

  9. Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)

    ALT was measured to determine if liver function was affected by treatment over the course of the study.

    Measured: 6 Months

  10. Bacteriology

    Expectorated sputum or throat swab

    Measured: 6 Months

  11. Frequency of Abdominal Pain

    Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent

    Measured: 6 months

  12. Severity of Abdominal Pain

    Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe

    Measured: 6 months

  13. Frequency of Belching

    Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent

    Measured: 6 months

  14. Severity of Belching

    Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe

    Measured: 6 months

  15. Frequency of Flatulence

    Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent

    Measured: 6 months

  16. Severity of Flatulence

    Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe

    Measured: 6 months

  17. Frequency of Lack of Appetite

    Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent

    Measured: 6 months

  18. Severity of Lack of Appetite

    Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe

    Measured: 6 months

  19. Frequency of Bloating

    Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent

    Measured: 6 months

  20. Severity of Bloating

    Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe

    Measured: 6 months

  21. Frequency of Nausea

    Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent

    Measured: 6 months

  22. Severity of Nausea

    Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe

    Measured: 6 months

  23. Frequency of Vomiting

    Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent

    Measured: 6 months

  24. Severity of Vomiting

    Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe

    Measured: 6 months

  25. Frequency of Heart Burn

    Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent

    Measured: 6 months

  26. Severity of Heart Burn

    Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe

    Measured: 6 months

  27. Frequency of Diarrhea

    Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent

    Measured: 6 months

  28. Severity of Diarrhea

    Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe

    Measured: 6 months

  29. Frequency of More Than 2 Bowel Movements Per Day

    Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent

    Measured: 6 months

  30. Severity of More Than 2 Bowel Movements Per Day

    Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe

    Measured: 6 months

  31. Frequency of Less Than 2 Bowel Movements Per Week

    Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent

    Measured: 6 months

  32. Severity of Less Than 2 Bowel Movements Per Week

    Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jan 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2011
  3. Primary completionMar 2012
  4. Study completionJul 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
47 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02029521
Sponsor's protocol ID
FIMP/clin.stud/2010/1.
Status last verified
Jan 2016
First submitted
30 Dec 2013
Last updated
8 Feb 2016
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Oral reduced l-glutathione in people with Cystic Fibrosis, run by Clark Bishop at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Aug 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Weight Percentile at 3 Months (time frame: 3 months). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Feb 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in