AzTrials
AzTrials

Displaced Extra-articular Distal Radius FracturesVIPERNCT02030496

Volar Internal Plate Fixation vs. Plaster in Extra- Articular Distal Radial Fractures

A study testing open reduction and internal fixation and Closed reduction and plaster in people with Displaced Extra-articular Distal Radius Fractures, run by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) at 1 site in Netherlands.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the distal radius are common and account for an estimated 17% of all fractures diagnosed. Two-thirds of these fractures are displaced and require reduction. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
What is being tested?
open reduction and internal fixation and Closed reduction and plaster
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
90 participants
Where
1 siteNetherlands
Study dates
Jan 2013to May 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients ≥ 18 years and ≤ 75 years
  • Extra-articular (AO type A) displaced distal radius fracture, as classified on lateral, posterior anterior and lateral carporadial radiographs by a radiologist or trauma surgeon.
  • Acceptable closed reduction obtained according to current Dutch guidelines within 12 hours after presentation at the Emergency Department (ED).

Who cannot join

  • Open distal radius fractures
  • Multiple trauma patients (Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥16)
  • Other fractures of the affected extremity
  • Patients with impaired wrist function prior to injury due to arthritis/neurological disorders of the upper limb
  • Patient suffering from disorders of bone metabolism, connective tissue or (joint) hyperflexibility.
  • Insufficient comprehension of the Dutch language to understand the treatment information and informed consent forms as judged by the attending physician.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Netherlands1 site
  • Academic Medical Center

    Amsterdam, 1105AZ

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

BACKGROUND:

Fractures of the distal radius are common and account for an estimated 17% of all fractures diagnosed. Two-thirds of these fractures are displaced and require reduction. Although distal radius fractures are considered to be relatively harmless, inadequate treatment may result in impaired function of the wrist. The consequences of post-traumatic loss of function are comprehensive, both on an individual and a social level, and have long been underestimated. Despite the substantial implications, no evidence-based treatment method yet exists. Good results have been described both in patients treated conservatively and surgically. Nevertheless, 60% of all fractures redislocate after conservative treatment at which point surgical reduction and fixation is the treatment of choice. Recently, the use of volar locking plates has become more popular. This type of osteosynthesis employs a volar approach to the wrist and provides immediate stable fixation of the reduced fracture. This stability allows for early mobilisation and may therefore result in an improved regain of function. The aim of this study is to compare the functional outcome following surgical reduction and fixation with a volar locking plate with the functional outcome following closed reduction and plaster immobilisation at one year follow-up in patients with displaced extra-articular distal radius fractures.

Read more

DESIGN:

This single blinded randomised controlled trial will randomise between open reduction and internal fixation with a volar locking plate (intervention group) and closed reduction followed by plaster immobilisation (control group). The study population will consist of all consecutive adult patients who are diagnosed with a displaced extra-articular distal radius fracture which has been adequately reduced at the Emergency Department. The primary outcome (functional outcome) will be assessed by means of the Disability Arm Shoulder Hand Score (DASH). Since the treatment allocated involves a surgical procedure, randomisation status will not be blinded. However, the researcher assessing the outcome at one year will be unaware of the treatment allocation. In total, 90 patients will be included in this trial which will be conducted in the Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam and its partners of the regional trauma care network.

Being tested
open reduction and internal fixation, Closed reduction and plaster
Keywords
distal radius fractures, Closed reduction, Open reduction internal fixation, Volar plate, Redislocation, Unstable fracture, Extra-articular fracture, Colles fracture, Barton fracture
Medical subject headings
Wrist Fractures, Colles' Fracture

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • open reduction and internal fixationProcedure or surgery

    The surgery will be performed by a certified trauma surgeon. After the fracture site is exposed, the fracture will be reduced and provisionally fixed with K-Wires and reduction forceps. An appropriate volar locking plate which best suits the anatomy of the wrist and the fracture type will be selected. Screw placement and fracture reduction will be confirmed intra-operatively by radiographic images. No post-operative fixation will be applied and patients will be instructed to use the affected extremity in daily activities as pain allows. According to Dutch treatment standards, vitamin C 500 milligrams will be prescribed to all patients at initial presentation and for a duration of two months in order to prevent Complex Regional Pain Syndrome.

  • Closed reduction and plasterOther

    Closed reduction will be performed according to the Robert-Jones method. This involves increasing the deformity first, then applying continuous traction and immobilising wrist and hand in the reduced position. Additional radiographs will be performed to verify the quality of the reduction. After this has been confirmed, the wrist will be immobilised according to Dutch guidelines: a splint for one week followed by a circular cast for another four weeks. According to Dutch treatment standards, vitamin C 500 milligrams will be prescribed to all patients at initial presentation and for a duration of two months in order to prevent Complex Regional Pain Syndrome.

Study groups in NCT02030496
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Closed reduction and plasterActive comparatorClosed reduction will be performed and after adequate reduction has been confirmed, the wrist will be immobilised according to Dutch guidelines: a splint for one week followed by a circular cast for another four weeks.
Receives: Other: Closed reduction and plaster
open reduction and internal fixationActive comparatorThe intervention group will be treated with open reduction and internal fixation with a volar locking plate.
Receives: Procedure: open reduction and internal fixation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Wrist function/pain/disability at one year assessed with DASH score

    the primary endpoint of this study is wrist function, pain and disability as measured with the DASH score. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is a 30-item, self-report questionnaire designed to measure physical function and symptoms in patients with any or several musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb.

    Measured: At12 months follow up

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Wrist function at one year assessed with PRWE score

    The PRWE questionnaire is a 15-item questionnaire designed to measure wrist pain and disability in activities of daily living. The PRWE allows patients to rate their levels of wrist pain and disability from 0 to 10, and consists of three subscales: Pain, Function and Cosmetics.

    Measured: 6 weeks, three, six and 12 months

  2. Quality of Life

    Quality of Life assessed using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire. The SF-36 is a validated multipurpose, short form health survey which contains 36 questions representing eight different health domains. These domains are combined into a mental and physical component scale. From each domain, scores ranging from 0 to 100 points are derived, with lower scores indicating poorer quality of life.

    Measured: 6 weeks, three, six and 12 months

  3. Pain

    Pain as indicated on a visual Analogue Scale (VAS), in which 0 implies no pain and 10 the worst possible pain. Patients will be asked to give an estimation of the type and quantity of pain medication taken during all follow-up visits.

    Measured: 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months

  4. Patient satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction at one year by simply asking patients if they are satisfied with the result (yes/no).

    Measured: at one year

  5. Range of motion

    Range of motion of the wrist measured on both sides with a handheld goniometer.

    Measured: 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months

  6. Grip strength

    Grip strength as measured with a dynamometer.

    Measured: 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months

  7. Radiological parameters

    Radiological parameters: radial inclination, volar/dorsal tilt, comminution, ulnar variance and radial length measured digitally in the Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) on standard posterior anterior (PA), lateral carporadial and lateral X-rays of the wrist. Radiographs will be obtained according to standardised procedures. PA radiographs with the shoulder in 90 degrees abduction, elbow in 90 degrees flexion and the wrist in neutral position; lateral X-rays with the shoulder in neutral position and elbow in 90 degrees flexion; and the lateral carporadial radiographs will be obtained by positioning the lower arm on a 20-25 degrees angled wedge.

    Measured: At one year

  8. Complications

    Complication rate such as: loss of reduction, cross-overs from conservative to operative treatment, fracture malunion or non-union, wound and/or plate infection, tendon irritation and/or rupture, neuropathy and the occurrence of complex regional pain syndrome.

    Measured: 1 week, 2-3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jan 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2013
  3. Primary completionMar 2017
  4. Study completionMay 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
90 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02030496
Sponsor's protocol ID
NL37754.018.12
Acronym
VIPER
Status last verified
Mar 2018
First submitted
6 Jan 2014
Last updated
27 Mar 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing open reduction and internal fixation and Closed reduction and plaster in people with Displaced Extra-articular Distal Radius Fractures, run by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) at 1 site in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Wrist function/pain/disability at one year assessed with DASH score (time frame: At12 months follow up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Mar 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in