AzTrials
AzTrials

Neurogenic Lung EdemaNCT02032082

Rule of Carbone Monoxyde in the Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion Reconditionning

A study testing Carbone monoxide in people with Neurogenic Lung Edema, run by University Hospital of Mont-Godinne at 1 site in Belgium.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) is not a new concept and has been widely used to study lung function in small animals. It also has been shown to be a useful technique to evaluate lungs from donation after cardiac death (DCD) (Yeung, Thorac Surg Clin, 2009). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 5 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Neurogenic Lung Edema
What is being tested?
Carbone monoxide
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
Jan 2014to Jan 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 5 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Lung Edema

Who cannot join

  • Infection Severe Emphysema Tumor

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • CHU Mont-Godinne

    Yvoir, Namur, 5530

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) is not a new concept and has been widely used to study lung function in small animals. It also has been shown to be a useful technique to evaluate lungs from donation after cardiac death (DCD) (Yeung, Thorac Surg Clin, 2009). It has been recently demonstrated successful application of an acellular EVLP technique in optimalizing lung function ex vivo for an extended period of time. Following 12 h of normothermic EVLP, patients were transplanted and demonstrated immediate life-sustaining function with promising short-term evolution (Aigner, Am J Transplant, 2012; Sanchez, J Heart Lung Transplant, 2012; Cypel, N Engl J Med, 2011).

Lung donation obtained after carbon monoxide intoxication has been recognized as excellent organs because of less general inflammation and less primary graft dysfunction after procedure. In a murine model of brain dead, carbon monoxide inhalation at a low concentration (50 to 500 parts per million (ppm)) exerts significant cytoprotection in several lung injury models via its vasodilatation, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic properties (Dong, J Heart Lung transplant, 2010). The carbon monoxide inhalation down-regulates pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-alpha, IL-6) along with the increase of anti-inflammatory cytokine (IL-10) in recipient serum. The inhalation significantly decreases cell apoptosis in lung grafts, inhibiting mRNA and protein expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and caspase-3 in lung grafts (Zhou, Chin Med J, 2008).

Apoptotis and inflammatory processes may, in part, concern alveolar tissue. Research in the field of biomarkers is now opening new perspectives with the development of non-invasive tests allowing for monitoring inflammation and damage in the deep lung. Blood tests (Bernard, Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 2005) measuring lung-specific proteins (pneumoproteins) such as Clara cell protein (CC16) and surfactant-associated proteins (A, B or D) are now available to evaluate the permeability and/or the cellular integrity of the pulmonary epithelium. These dosages may constitute an interesting way for monitoring the quality of the lung before implantation.

Being tested
Carbone monoxide

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Carbone monoxideOther

Study groups in NCT02032082
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ex vivo without CONo interventionNot described
EX Vivo with carbone monoxideExperimentalDuring the Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion reconditioning,the lungs will be ventilated wit h Oxygen (21%) and Carbon Monoxide (250ppm).
Receives: Other: Carbone monoxide

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence on Primary Graft Dysfunction

    Measured: Up to 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Jan 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2014
  3. Primary completionJan 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJan 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02032082
Sponsor's protocol ID
EVLP-CO
Status last verified
Mar 2016
First submitted
8 Jan 2014
Last updated
15 Mar 2016
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Carbone monoxide in people with Neurogenic Lung Edema, run by University Hospital of Mont-Godinne at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Mar 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence on Primary Graft Dysfunction (time frame: Up to 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Mar 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in