AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast CancerPhase 2NCT02032498

Evaluation of Two Techniques for the SLN Detection in BC Patients

A Phase 2 study testing Indocyanine Green in people with Breast Cancer, run by Jules Bordet Institute at 1 site in Belgium.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The revision of our data shows that since its introduction in our institution (Jules Bordet Institute) in 1998 (until 2010, the year of the last review of cases), 53 patients underwent neoadjuvant therapy before selective sentinel lymph node dissection followed by conventional axillary dissection. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Breast Cancer
What is being tested?
Indocyanine Green
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
214 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
Jul 2013to Dec 2014
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Female patients submitted to mastectomy or tumorectomy with Complete Axillary Node Dissection (but to whose SLN procedure might be proposed in the future).
  • General operability.
  • Informed consent form signed

Who cannot join

  • Age less than18 years old.
  • Former operation in the axilla and/or breast.
  • Any previous radiotherapy at the concerned breast and/or axilla and/or chest wall.
  • History of allergy or hypersensitivity against the investigational product (its active substance or ingredients), to iodine or to shellfish.
  • Apparent hyperthyroidism, autonomous thyroid adenoma, unifocal, multifocal or disseminated autonomies of the thyroid gland.
  • Documented coronary disease.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Jules Bordet Institute

    Brussels, Brussels Capital, 1000

    Pierre Bourgeois, MD, 003225413276, pierre.bourgeois@bordet.be

    Jean-Marie Nogaret, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of Near- InfraRed Imaging of ICG in Comparison With the Lymphoscintigraphic Technique Using Intramammary and Peritumoral Injection of 99mTc-HSA-Nanocolloids for the SLN Detection in BC Patients.

The revision of our data shows that since its introduction in our institution (Jules Bordet Institute) in 1998 (until 2010, the year of the last review of cases), 53 patients underwent neoadjuvant therapy before selective sentinel lymph node dissection followed by conventional axillary dissection.

The analysis of these cases shows that:

Read more
  • The lack of demonstration of sentinel lymph nodes observed in 8 cases (6 cN0) is associated in 75% of them with a pN+ status
  • If scintigraphic imaging is "positive" (demonstration of the sentinel lymph nodes: 35 cN0 and 10 cN+), our results appear favorable with a single false negative SLN result (False Negative Rate = 1/20 or 5%).

Therefore we propose additional technique for LN detection by indocyanine green, we hypothesize that the combination of two different injections improves the technique of sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Read the detailed description

The principal objective of this study is to evaluate the detection rate, the false negative rate and the overall accuracy of the lymphofluoroscopic research of the sentinel lymph nodes after periareolar injections of Indocyanine Green (ICG) in combination and in comparison with our classical intramammary and peritumoral injections of 99mTc-HSA-Nanocolloids in patients with breast cancer. These patients are currently out of the inclusion criteria and still undergo systematically complete axillary node dissection.

In this study (which would include at least 200 patients over a period of 2 years, with at least 100 patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy) the involved surgeons would continue to perform complete axillary node dissections.

The radioactive SLN would be retrieved ex vivo in the axillary piece (with the gamma probe, after intramammary and peritumoral injections of radiocolloids the day before the surgery, or at least 3 hours before, with scintigraphic preoperative images as already performed routinely for patients described in the introduction 1 of this letter). These radioactive lymph nodes would thereafter been controlled for their possible fluorescence (with our fluorescence camera and after periareolar injection of ICG in the operating room just before the surgery). Finally, in the service of Pathology, all the lymph nodes found by the pathologist in the axillary piece will be controlled for their possible fluorescence.

With this approach, the surgeon will not have to search for SLN and the operative duration will not be extended.

Secondary objectives:

The current literature about the results of SLNB technique has not yet considered the influence of the addition of SPECT-CT imaging (standard approach in our institute since more than 3 years) to planar imaging. In this study, we propose to analyse in a prospective manner the contribution of SPECT-CT: contribution of the analysis of the signal intensity of active lymph nodes on SPECT slides to define a resection threshold corresponding to lymph nodes at risk of being pN+, accuracy for the anatomic localization, better accuracy of the number of SLN on the SPECT-CT versus planar image, better definition of the number of lymph nodes (to be analysed on the CT) covered by a radioactive spot (we have already observed 3 adjacent lymph nodes under one only active spot).

In this last case, such spots covering several lymph nodes would be analysed for the possible fluorescence of each lymph node.

The fluorescence of the detected lymph nodes will be analysed semi-quantitatively and related to their pN+ characteristics (pNi, pNµ, pN1, pNmacro). This first analysis may have major implications when our surgeons will perform an in vivo research of fluorescent SLN (see also Bourgeois et al. 2003).

Finally, we propose to analyse the kinetic and the vascular characteristics (aspects of the vessels on the images) of ICG migration from its injection point to the axilla. We will try to define possible predictive parameters of extended and/or macroscopic involvement of axillary lymph nodes.

Conditions
Breast Cancer
Being tested
Indocyanine Green
Keywords
sentinel lymph nodes, radiocolloids, Indocyanine Green, complementarity, axillary lymph node dissection
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Indocyanine GreenDrug

    Also called ICG

    Superficial injection of ICG in combination with deep injection of 99mTc-HSA to evaluate the complementarity of the two techniques

Study groups in NCT02032498
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Indocyanine GreenExperimentalsuperficial injections of Indocyanine Green in the breast
Receives: Drug: Indocyanine Green

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. false negative rate for each technique (fluorescence and radiocolloids)

    Measured: 1 week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Jan 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2013
  3. Primary completionOct 2014 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2014 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
214 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02032498
Sponsor's protocol ID
2013-001555-12
Status last verified
Jul 2014
First submitted
20 Nov 2013
Last updated
24 Jul 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Indocyanine Green in people with Breast Cancer, run by Jules Bordet Institute at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jul 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Jean-Marie Nogaret, MD (00322541 ext. 3165, jeanmarie.nogaret@bordet.be), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

false negative rate for each technique (fluorescence and radiocolloids) (time frame: 1 week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jul 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in