AzTrials
AzTrials

Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS)Phase 1/2NCT02035514

Phase I-II Clinical Trial With Autologous Bone Marrow Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for the Therapy of Multiple Sclerosis

A Phase 1/2 study testing Bone marrow autologous mesenchymal stem cells transplantation in people with Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS), run by Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Immunomodulatory therapies to treat the relapsing-remitting phase of multiple sclerosis (MS) are designed to ameliorate the inflammatory processes that mediate the damage to the central nervous system (CNS) and to delay progression of the disease. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 years
What is being tested?
Bone marrow autologous mesenchymal stem cells transplantation
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
9 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
Dec 2013to Jul 2016
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients
  • Age 18-50 years
  • Disease duration >= 2 and <= 10 years
  • EDSS: 3.0 - 6.5
  • 1) Patients who do not wish to be subjected to approved immunomodulatory treatments (interferon beta and acetato de glatiramer) 2) Patients who have tried and had to withdraw within a year due to adverse events 3) Patients who have not responded to them after at least 1 year of continuous treatment. Lack of response is considered one or more of the following
  • >= 1 moderate-severe relapses in past 12 months
Show all 14Show fewer
  • >= 2 moderate-severe relapses in past 24 months
  • >= 1 Gadolinium enhancing lesions in a MRI performed in previous 12 months
  • Relapse:
  • Mild: Increase of < 1 EDSS point
  • Moderate: Increase of >= 1 EDSS point (if baseline EDSS 3.0-5.0) or 0.5 EDSS points (if baseline EDSS >= 5.5)
  • Severe: Increase of >=3 EDSS point
  • Social, mental and physical ability to communicate with physicians and to understand the requirements of the protocol
  • Has given informed consent to participate in the study

Who cannot join

  • RRMS not fulfilling inclusion criteria
  • SPMS or PPMSTreatment with any immunosuppressive therapy, including natalizumab and fingolimod, within the 3 months prior to randomization
  • Treatment with any immunosuppressive therapy, including natalizumab and fingolimod, within the 3 months prior to randomization
  • Treatment with interferon-beta or glatiramer acetate within the 30 days prior to randomization
  • Treatment with corticosteroids within the 30 days prior to randomization
  • Relapse occurred during the 60 days prior to randomization
Show all 10Show fewer
  • History of cancer or clinical or laboratory results indicative of severe systemic diseases, including infection for HIV, Hepatitis B or C
  • Pregnancy or risk of pregnancy/ lactation
  • Current treatment with an investigational therapy
  • Inability to give written informed consent in accordance with research ethics board guidelines

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital

    Badalona, Barcelona, 08916

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Immunomodulatory therapies to treat the relapsing-remitting phase of multiple sclerosis (MS) are designed to ameliorate the inflammatory processes that mediate the damage to the central nervous system (CNS) and to delay progression of the disease. To date, there is no effective means to stop the progression of disease and induce remyelination. Adult stem cells therapy show great promise and is rapidly developing as alternative therapeutic strategy. We propose the use of bone marrow-derived autologous Mesenchymal (BM-MSC) Stem Cells transplantation to treat patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), despite immunomodulatory therapy. Taking advantage of the potential that MSC possess strong immunomodulatory properties thought to play a role in the maintenance of peripheral tolerance and in the control of autoimmunity and that may stimulate repair and regeneration of lesions, we plan a trial of a single injection of autologous BM-MSC into eight patients. First, we aim to assess the feasibility, safety and tolerability of autologous MSC therapy in RRMS. Second, we plan to evaluate the effects of BM-MSC transplantation on MS disease activity by clinical, neurophysiological, immunological and imaging assessments. Autologous MSC will be obtained from bone marrow aspirates, purified by culture and characterized by surface antigen expression. A single dose of autologous BM-MSC will be injected intravenously. Clinical, neurological and immunological assessments will be scheduled at baseline (before BM-MSC transplantation) at 1, 3, and 6 months after transplant. The imaging will be performed at 3 and 6 months after transplant. Proposed trial will enable us to ascertain whether autologous BM-MSC transplantation is a feasible and safe procedure, and whether BM-MSC can establish an environment of immune tolerance and through the local production of neurotrophic/growth factors, might induce neuroprotection and improvement in CNS function.

Read the detailed description

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, demyelinating disease of the CNS. Onset typically occurs in early adulthood. Patients present with intermittent symptoms that are partially reversible; this form is termed relapsing-remitting (RRMS). Over time, most patients develop secondary-progressive MS (SPMS) which manifests as irreversible and gradual neurological impairments that often progress without acute relapses. Beta-interferons or glatiramer acetate represents the first line therapeutic option for RRMS. Clinical trials confirm that show partial efficacy, though they do not prevent the onset of secondary progression. SPMS, is the consequence of axonal loss and neurodegeneration and no current therapy has been effective. Stem cell therapy show great promise and is rapidly developing as alternative therapeutic strategy. Clinical indications for adult stem cells, which can be safely harvested and normally behave well without formation of tumours, are rapidly increasing. The majority of human stem cell trials have focused on clinical applications for haematopoietic stem cells (HSC), mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), or both, which can be easily obtained in clinically sufficient numbers from peripheral blood, bone marrow, adipose tissue, or umbilical cord blood and placenta. MSC can readily be isolated from a small sample of bone marrow and rapidly expanded so as to generate large numbers of cells for autologous therapies. When administered intravenously have an immune suppressive effect that can ameliorate animal autoimmune diseases. MSC transplantation significantly improves clinical outcome in experimental allergic encephalitis (EAE), the animal model of MS. When intravenously injected, MSC may migrate to inflammatory brain lesions and promote survival of brain-resident cells. Several disease models demonstrate axonal neuroprotection following MSC therapy, with some evidence that this is potentially mediated through the production of neurotrophic/growth factors, and/or immunomodulatory effects of MSC. For that reasons, MSC have become the focus of research as a potential cell therapy for inducing neuroprotection in human neurodegenerative diseases such as MS.

A growing body of literature confirms the therapeutic MSC biological properties, and provide a plausible mechanism of action to guide clinical trial design with a number of phase I/II trials in MS patients now underway. Experimental clinical trials in MS are being considered or have recently been initiated by several research groups, which are testing the therapeutic potential of different sources of MSC. Learning from previous clinical studies, and taking advantage of the potential that adult BM-MSC may stimulate repair and remyelination, to plan a clinical trial in patients with inflammatory MS seems reasonable. We propose a safety trial of a single intravenous injection of autologous bone marrow-derived MSC into 8 subjects with RRMS. The trial proposed here will enable us to ascertain whether autologous BM-MSC transplantation is a safe procedure, and whether BM-MSC therapy during the relapsing-remitting phase of MS can establish a immunomodulatory and regenerative microenvironment and reverse neurological disability in RRMS patients.

Being tested
Bone marrow autologous mesenchymal stem cells transplantation
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, mesenchymal stem cells, autologous transplantation, MRI efficacy, clinical safety
Medical subject headings
Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting, Multiple Sclerosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Bone marrow autologous mesenchymal stem cells transplantationBiological

Study groups in NCT02035514
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm 1ExperimentalA single infusion of up to 1 million cells per Kg of autologous MSC stem cells vs placebo. The treatment will be on day 0 and placebo on month 6.
Receives: Biological: Bone marrow autologous mesenchymal stem cells transplantation
Arm 2ExperimentalA single infusion of up to 1 million cells per Kg of autologous MSC stem cells vs placebo. The treatment will be on month 6 and placebo on day 0.
Receives: Biological: Bone marrow autologous mesenchymal stem cells transplantation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from baseline in safety

    • Physical examination, vital signs (HR, RR, BP, axillary temp), analytical results (biochemistry, hematology,) electrocardiographic monitoring, pulse oximetry and adverse events.
    • Clinical worsening both new relapses or disability measured by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), until the end of the study.

    Measured: Baseline, month 12

  2. Change from baseline in effectiveness by MRI

    • Cumulative number of MRI Gd-enhancing lesions (3 and 6 months post-treatment).

    Measured: Baseline, month 6

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Feasibility

    • Availability of a viable product that allows the treatment, checking whether the procedures can be performed as indicated in protocol.

    Measured: month 12

  2. Change from baseline in effectiveness by MRI

    • Cumulative number of lesions visualized on T2 sequence (3 and 6 months post-treatment).

    Measured: baseline, month 3

  3. Change in clinical efficacy

    • EDSS score at months 1
    • Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) scale at months 1

    Measured: baseline, month 1

  4. Change in Quality of life

    • Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL-54)

    Measured: Baseline, month 6 post-treatment

  5. Immunology

    • Dosing of G, A and M immunoglobulins, and complement factors C3 and C4
    • Determination of lymphocyte subpopulations using cell surface staining and flow cytometry analysis. T lymphocyte subpopulations (CD4 and CD8), B lymphocytes, NK cells, dendritic and T regulatory cells will be analyzed
    • Quantification in serum by "Cytometricbeadarray" (CBA) and subsequent flow cytometry: IL-2, 4, 6, interferon (IFN) IFN-γ, interleukin (IL) IL-10, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) TNF-α or by ELISA: T-cell growth factor (TGF) TGF-β and IL-17.

    Measured: baseline, month 6 post-treatment

  6. Axonal effect

    • Optical coherence tomography (OCT)

    Measured: baseline, month 6

  7. Change from baseline in effectiveness by MRI

    • Cumulative number of lesions visualized on T2 sequence (3 and 6 months post-treatment).

    Measured: baseline, month 6

  8. Change in clinical efficacy

    • EDSS score at months 3
    • MSFC scale at months 3

    Measured: baseline, month 3

  9. Change in clinical efficacy

    • EDSS score at month 6 post-treatment
    • MSFC scale at month 6 post-treatment
    • Frequency of relapses 6 months post-treatment
    • Proportion of patients free of relapses 6 months post-treatment,
    • Number of relapses requiring corticosteroid treatment 6 months post-treatment
    • Time to first relapse from the baseline

    Measured: baseline, month 6 post-treatment

  10. Change in Quality of life

    • MSQOL-54

    Measured: baseline, month 1

  11. Change in Quality of life

    • MSQOL-54

    Measured: baseline, month 3

  12. Immunology

    • Dosing of G, A and M immunoglobulins, and complement factors C3 and C4
    • Determination of lymphocyte subpopulations using cell surface staining and flow cytometry analysis. T lymphocyte subpopulations (CD4 and CD8), B lymphocytes, natural killer (NK) cells, dendritic and T regulatory cells will be analyzed
    • Quantification in serum by "Cytometricbeadarray" (CBA) and subsequent flow cytometry: IL-2, 4, 6, IFN-γ, IL-10, TNF-α or by ELISA: TGF-β and IL-17.

    Measured: baseline, month 1

  13. Immunology

    • Dosing of G, A and M immunoglobulins, and complement factors C3 and C4
    • Determination of lymphocyte subpopulations using cell surface staining and flow cytometry analysis. T lymphocyte subpopulations (CD4 and CD8), B lymphocytes, NK cells, dendritic and T regulatory cells will be analyzed
    • Quantification in serum by "Cytometricbeadarray" (CBA) and subsequent flow cytometry: IL-2, 4, 6, IFN-γ, IL-10, TNF-α or by ELISA: TGF-β and IL-17.

    Measured: baseline, month 3

  14. Axonal effect

    • OCT

    Measured: baseline, month 12 post-treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Jan 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2013
  3. Primary completionJul 2016
  4. Study completionJul 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
9 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02035514
Sponsor's protocol ID
CELLTRiMS
Other IDs
2010-024081-21
Status last verified
Dec 2016
First submitted
17 Dec 2013
Last updated
15 Dec 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Uccelli A, Laroni A, Brundin L, Clanet M, Fernandez O, Nabavi SM, Muraro PA, Oliveri RS, Radue EW, Sellner J, Soelberg Sorensen P, Sormani MP, Wuerfel JT, Battaglia MA, Freedman MS; MESEMS study group. MEsenchymal StEm cells for Multiple Sclerosis (MESEMS): a randomized, double blind, cross-over phase I/II clinical trial with autologous mesenchymal stem cells for the therapy of multiple sclerosis. Trials. 2019 May 9;20(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3346-z.

    PubMed 31072380

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing Bone marrow autologous mesenchymal stem cells transplantation in people with Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS), run by Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Dec 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from baseline in safety (time frame: Baseline, month 12). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02035514, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Dec 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in