AzTrials
AzTrials

Complications; Cesarean SectionNCT02036697

Hemodynamic Effects of Low Dose Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section

A study testing Bupivacaine 4.5, Bupivacaine 9 and Morphine in people with Complications; Cesarean Section and Effects of; Anesthesia, Spinal and Epidural, in Pregnancy, run by University of Manitoba at 1 site in Canada.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

We propose to study the effects on hemodynamics (blood pressure, cardiac output, and central venous pressure) of two doses of bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia during cesarean section: a higher dose of 12 mg to a lower dose of 4.5 mg. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 40 years, women only
What is being tested?
Bupivacaine 4.5, Bupivacaine 9 and Morphine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Nov 2013to Dec 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 40 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult females having elective, repeat cesarean sections who have given informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • • Contraindications to dural puncture
  • BMI >40
  • Elective C/S presenting in labour or with rupture of membranes
  • Placenta previa or accrete

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Health Sciences Centre

    Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0W2

Other trials in Canada

About this study

We propose to study the effects on hemodynamics (blood pressure, cardiac output, and central venous pressure) of two doses of bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia during cesarean section: a higher dose of 12 mg to a lower dose of 4.5 mg. We will examine recovery times, incidence of hypotension, and compare pain control and maternal satisfaction during and after cesarean section.

We hypothesize that low dose bupivacaine spinal anesthesia will provide equivalent anesthesia for cesarean section compared to conventional dose bupivacaine, with less hypotension, faster recovery time, and enhanced maternal satisfaction. Maternal satisfaction will be assessed by self-reported pain scores, incidence of nausea and vomiting, shivering, and ability to interact with baby in the OR.

Read the detailed description

Hypothesis

It is hypothesized that low dose spinal anesthesia can provide equivalent anesthesia for cesarean section as higher conventional dose spinal anesthesia, with less hypotension, faster recovery and enhanced maternal satisfaction.

Patient Population

Adult females having elective, repeat cesarean sections who have given informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Contraindications to dural puncture
  • BMI >40
  • Elective C/S presenting in labour or with rupture of membranes
  • Placenta previa or accrete

Methodology

Patients will be screened in the antenatal clinic at Women's Hospital, Health Sciences Centre (HSC), Winnipeg during one of their regularly scheduled visits. If patients are scheduled at another antenatal clinic in the city, we will ask the obstetrician to briefly mention the study to potential study patients, and if they are interested give them the consent form to take home and read. We will then phone patients, obtain verbal consent and discuss any questions they may have. On the morning of their procedure we will obtain written consent, and answer any additional questions they may have. Alternatively, patients will be approached by their obstetrician in clinic, and if interested will be given the option to go to the Pre-Anesthesia Clinic at HSC where a member of our study team will discuss the study with them and obtain written consent.

Potential patients will be provided with information regarding the study and consent will be obtained prior to their enrollment in the study. Forty patients will be randomized into two groups: 1. Conventional dose spinal anesthesia 2. Low dose spinal anesthesia. Randomization will occur via sealed envelope prior to their scheduled cesarean section. The patient will be blinded to the randomization.

All women will have standard monitors. In addition, a radial arterial line will be inserted for continuous blood pressure measurement and cardiac output measurements using the FloTrac sensor and Vigileo monitor(cardiac output monitor using arterial waveform analysis, Edwards Life Sciences). All women will receive a preload of 500ml of Ringers Lactate solution intravenously.

The conventional dose control group will receive a spinal anesthetic consisting of hyperbaric bupivacaine 1.2cc (9mg) with fentanyl 15mg and preservative free morphine 150mcg. The patient will be in the sitting position for the dural puncture and then positioned supine, in the left lateral tilt position after the anesthetic solution has been given. Once block height has been established the patient will be placed in 20-30 degrees trendelenberg for the cesarean section.

The low-dose spinal group will receive a spinal anesthetic consisting of hyperbaric bupivacaine 4.5mg with fentanyl 15mg and preservative free morphine 150mcg. The patient will be positioned on her side, right side down and head down 20-30 degrees for the dural puncture and then positioned supine in the left lateral tilt position after the anesthetic solution has been given. The OR table will be kept in 20-30 degrees head down for the cesarean section.

Blood pressure will be monitored continuously. Cardiac output measurement will be done immediately prior to administering the spinal and immediately after positioning in a left lateral tilt position and then every five minutes until the end of the operation.

All women will be instructed in the use of a patient controlled analgesia (PCA) remifentanil infusion which they can use during the cesarean section if they experience any discomfort. If this is not adequate, 60-70% nitrous oxide will be attempted. If adequate pain control cannot be established and the cesarean section is not near completion, conversion to a general anesthetic will be the next step. All women will receive rectal naproxen at the conclusion of the surgery unless there is a contraindication or bleeding is a concern. All women will receive prophylactic ondansetron intraoperatively unless there is a contraindication.

Decreases in mean blood pressure greater than 20% from baseline or less than 90 mm Hg will be defined as hypotension and will be treated with incremental doses of phenylephrine (50-100mcg IV) or ephedrine (5mg) if maternal heart rate is less than 60 bpm. A 500cc lactated ringers bolus will be co-administered with initiation of the spinal anesthetic. Further fluids will be administered with a goal of approximately 1-1.5 liters intraoperatively. Each patient will in addition receive 20 units Oxytocin in 500cc saline. Additional fluid or uterotonics will be given as necessary for bleeding or hypotension and will be taken into account at the end.

Levels of sensory and motor blockade will be recorded just prior to skin prep, following arrival in recovery room and then every 30 minutes thereafter. Sensory block will be monitored by dermatome level at which there is a loss of sensation to ice. Motor blockade will be checked using the modified Bromage score (0 = no impairment, 1 = unable to raise extended legs but able to move knees and ankles, 2 = unable to raise extended legs or to flex knees but able to move feet, 3 = unable to flex ankles, knees or hips).

Maternal satisfaction will be assessed as self reported pain scores, nausea/vomiting, shivering, ability to interact with baby in the OR.

Outcome measures will include the following

  1. Hemodynamics (BP, heart rate (HR), Cardiac Index)
  2. Time to completion of spinal anesthetic (from skin puncture to positioning in the left lateral tilt position)
  3. Surgical time (skin incision to skin closure)
  4. Total remifentanil administration during the procedure
  5. Total phenylephrine administration during the procedure
  6. Administration of any other sedatives/anti-emetics
  7. Fetal cord blood gases (arterial and venous) and Apgar scores
  8. Maternal satisfaction scores
  9. Bilateral sensory block levels Bromage scores on arrival to PACU and every 30 minutes until the patient is discharge ready
  10. Time to being discharge ready from PACU
  11. Complications (difficult spinal, PDPH)

Outcome 1 to 6 will be recorded intraoperatively (average time 90 to 120 minutes). Outcomes 6 to 10 will be recorded in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU)(average stay 4 to 6 hours). Outcome 11 will be recorded for the duration of the patient's hospital stay.

Patients will be followed for the duration of their hospital stay (estimated three days).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis will be done by the Biostatistical Consulting Unit of the University of Manitoba. It will consist of analysis of variance for repeated measures for continuous variables, student's T-test and Chi square analysis for non-parametric variables. P<0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

We propose to study 20 patients in each group.

Being tested
Bupivacaine 4.5, Bupivacaine 9, Morphine, Fentanyl
Keywords
Cesarean section, spinal anesthesia, low dose spinal, bupivacaine, hemodynamics, blood pressure, cardiac output
Medical subject headings
Personal Satisfaction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Bupivacaine 4.5Drug

    Bupivacaine hyperbaric, 4.5 mg

  • Bupivacaine 9Drug

    Bupivacaine hyperbaric, 9 mg

  • MorphineDrug

    morphine 150 mcg.

  • FentanylDrug

    15 mcg

Study groups in NCT02036697
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Low Dose SpinalExperimentalHyperbaric bupivacaine 4.5mg with fentanyl 15mcg and preservative free morphine 150mcg. The patient will be positioned right side down and head down 20-30 degrees for the dural puncture and then positioned supine in the left lateral tilt position after the anesthetic solution has been given. The OR table will be kept in 20-30 degrees head down for the cesarean section.
Receives: Drug: Bupivacaine 4.5; Drug: Morphine; Drug: Fentanyl
Control Spinal GroupActive comparatorHyperbaric bupivacaine 1.2cc (9mg) with fentanyl 15mcg and preservative free morphine 150mcg. The patient will be in the sitting position for the dural puncture and then positioned supine, in the left lateral tilt position after the anesthetic solution has been given. Once block height has been established the patient will be placed in 20-30 degrees trendelenberg for the cesarean section.
Receives: Drug: Bupivacaine 9; Drug: Morphine; Drug: Fentanyl

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Recovery room length of stay

    The primary endpoint is the expected reduction in the Recovery Room length of stay. Based on a predicted 50-100% reduction in length of stay, alpha 0.05, power of 80%, and given an anticipated drop-out rate of 10%, a sample size of n = 20 study patients per group is required.

    Measured: Current recovery room average length of stay is 4 hours

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Hemodynamics

    Intraoperative management during Cesarean section, Hemodynamics (BP, HR, Cardiac Index)

    Measured: Average duration of surgery is 100 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jan 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2013
  3. Primary completionJun 2014
  4. Study completionDec 2015

Why it stopped: Difficulty with patient recruitment.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02036697
Sponsor's protocol ID
B2013060
Status last verified
May 2016
First submitted
26 Sep 2013
Last updated
8 Nov 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Bupivacaine 4.5, Bupivacaine 9 and Morphine in people with Complications; Cesarean Section and Effects of; Anesthesia, Spinal and Epidural, in Pregnancy, run by University of Manitoba at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Difficulty with patient recruitment.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Recovery room length of stay (time frame: Current recovery room average length of stay is 4 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Nov 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in