AzTrials
AzTrials

Peripheral Obliterative ArteriopathyDAGNCT02037178

Screening for Arteriopathy in General Medicine: a Preliminary Feasibility Study

An observational study of Peripheral Obliterative Arteriopathy, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 2 sites in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The main objective of this study is to evaluate the inter-observer concordance when measuring the maximum value of the external antero-posterior diameter of the sub-renal aorta (both cross-sectional and longitudinal ultrasound views are measured). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Peripheral Obliterative Arteriopathy
What is being tested?
First ultrasound reading and Second ultrasound interpretation
How many people
300 participants
Where
2 sitesFrance
Study dates
28 Oct 2014to 20 Dec 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study populations consists of men and women consulting with general practitioners and who are at high risk for cardio vascular disease a defined by the French Society of Vascular Medecin.

Who may be able to join

  • The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent
  • The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
  • The patient falls into one of the following 4 groups as defined by the French Society of Vascular Medecin (2006):
  • (1) Men and women 60-75 years of age who are active smokers or ex-smokers
  • (2) Men over 75 years of age
  • (3) Women over 75 years of age who smoke and who have known hypertension
  • (4) Men and women over 50 years of age with a family history of aneurysm of the abdominal aorta

Who cannot join

  • The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
  • The patient is under judicial protection, under tutorship or curatorship
  • The patient refuses to sign the consent
  • It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
  • The subject has an allergy to the gel used for ultrasound examination.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

France2 sites
  • CHRU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau

    Nîmes, 30029

  • Centre Médico Sportif

    Nîmes, 30908

Other trials in France

About this study

The main objective of this study is to evaluate the inter-observer concordance when measuring the maximum value of the external antero-posterior diameter of the sub-renal aorta (both cross-sectional and longitudinal ultrasound views are measured). The first measure is made by a general practitioner in private practice; second reading are made by an expert in vascular medicine.

Read the detailed description

The secondary objectives of this study are:

  1. To assess the prevalence of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) detected by ultrasound measurement of the anterior and posterior longitudinal outer diameter of the sub-renal abdominal aorta in a high cardiovascular risk population consulting with general practitioners (defined according to recommendations stated by the French Society of Vascular Medicine).
  2. To assess the prevalence of Peripheral Obliterative Arteriopathy of the Legs (POAL) by measuring the Systolic Pressure Index (SPI) at the toe (ratio of arterial pressure in upper limbs versus lower limbs). Measures are made by a general practitioner in the same population.
  3. To assess the quality and interpretability of ultrasound recordings and ultrasound acquistion failure rate. These second measures are made by an expert in vascular medecine. This evaluation with use a 3-level scale:
  4. appropriate image was not obtained or not recognized expert - uninterpretable
  5. poor image quality - interpretable
  6. image of good or very good quality - interpretable
  7. To calculate the impact of risk cofactors such as hypertension , smoking, age and family history among patients diagnosed with AAA.
  8. Evaluation of general practitioner training from a qualitative and quantitative point of view after 4 h of training organized by Dr. Bobbià .
Being tested
First ultrasound reading, Second ultrasound interpretation
Keywords
Peripheral Obliterative Arteriopathy of the legs, Screening by generalists, Ultrasound
Medical subject headings
Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease 1

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • First ultrasound readingOther

    First ultrasound reading of the sub-renal abdominal aorta by a general practitioner.

  • Second ultrasound interpretationOther

    The untrasound images recorded by general practitioners will be interpreted a second time by an expert in vascular medecine, and evaluated for their image quality.

Study groups in NCT02037178
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
The study populationSee inclusion/exclusion criteria. Intervention: First ultrasound reading Intervention: Second ultrasound interpretation
Receives: Other: First ultrasound reading; Other: Second ultrasound interpretation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Largest external antero-posterior diameter of the sub-renal abdominal aorta (mm)

    Measures made using both cross-sectional and longitudinal ultrasounds.

    Measured: Baseline (day 0)

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. SPI at the toe (mmHg)

    Measured: baseline (Day 0)

  2. Largest external antero-posterior diameter of the sub-renal abdominal aorta (mm) : second interpretation of echographic material by a second expert

    Measures made using both cross-sectional and longitudinal ultrasounds.

    Measured: maximum of three months

  3. Ultrasound quality as assessed by the second expert

    This evaluation with use a 3-level scale:

    1. appropriate image was not obtained or not recognized expert - uninterpretable
    2. poor image quality - interpretable
    3. image of good or very good quality - interpretable

    Measured: maximum of three months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jan 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start28 Oct 2014
  3. Primary completion20 Dec 2017
  4. Study completion20 Dec 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
300 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02037178
Sponsor's protocol ID
LOCAL/2013/JLLD-01
Other IDs
2013-A01583-42
Acronym
DAG
Status last verified
Jan 2018
First submitted
14 Jan 2014
Last updated
3 Jan 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Peripheral Obliterative Arteriopathy, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 2 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Largest external antero-posterior diameter of the sub-renal abdominal aorta (mm) (time frame: Baseline (day 0)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jan 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in