AzTrials
AzTrials

Polycythemia VeraPhase 3RESPONSE-2NCT02038036

Ruxolitinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients With HU Resistant or Intolerant Polycythemia Vera vs Best Available Therapy.

A Phase 3 study testing Best Available Therapy and Ruxolitinib in people with Polycythemia Vera, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 48 sites in 12 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study compared the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib to Best Available Therapy (BAT) in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) who were hydroxyurea (HU) resistant or intolerant and did not have a palpable spleen. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Polycythemia Vera
What is being tested?
Best Available Therapy and Ruxolitinib
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
149 participants
Where
48 sitesin 12 countries
Study dates
25 Mar 2014to 7 Apr 2020
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Confirmed diagnosis of PV according to the 2008 World Health Organization criteria, Non-palpable spleen, Phlebotomy dependent, Resistant to or intolerant of hydroxyurea, ECOG performance status of 0, 1 or 2.

Who cannot join

  • Inadequate liver or renal function, Significant bacterial, fungal, parasitic, or viral infection requiring treatment, Active malignancy within the past 5 years, excluding specific skin cancers, Previously received treatment with a JAK inhibitor, Being treated with any investigational agent, Women who are pregnant or nursing.
  • Other inclusion/exclusion criteria apply.

Trial locations and contacts

48 sites in 12 countries.

48 sites in 12 countries

Germany9 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Augsburg, 86150

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Dresden, 01307

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Jena, 07740

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Leipzig, 04103

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Magdeburg, 39120

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Mainz, 55131

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, 68305

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Minden, 32429

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Ulm, 89081

Other trials in Germany

Spain9 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    A Coruña, Galicia, 15006

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Alicante, Valencia, 03010

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Barcelona, Catalonia, 08035

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de G.C, 35010

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Madrid, 28034

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Madrid, 28046

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Málaga, Andalusia, 29010

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Pamplona, Navarre, 31008

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Salamanca, Castille and León, 37007

Other trials in Spain

France7 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bayonne, Bayonne Cedex, 64109

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bordeaux, 33076

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Brest, 29200

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Lille, 59020

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Nice, 06202

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Paris, 75010

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Toulouse, 31059

Other trials in France

Italy7 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bologna, BO, 40138

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Florence, FI, 50134

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Milan, MI, 20122

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Pavia, PV, 27100

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Rome, Lazio, 00168

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Torino, TO, 10126

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Varese, VA, 21100

Other trials in Italy

Hungary3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Budapest, 1085

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Debrecen, 4032

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kaposvár, 7400

Other trials in Hungary

Israel3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Nahariya, 22100

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Netanya, 42150

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tel Aviv, 6423906

Other trials in Israel

Belgium2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Antwerp, 2060

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Leuven, 3000

Other trials in Belgium

India2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632 004

Other trials in India

South Korea2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Seoul, 03080

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Seoul, 03722

Other trials in South Korea

Turkey (Türkiye)2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Izmir, 35040

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Talas / Kayseri, 38039

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

Australia1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Herston, Queensland, 4029

Other trials in Australia

Canada1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Randomized, Open Label, Multicenter Phase IIIb Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib Versus Best Available Therapy in Patients With Polycythemia Vera Who Are Hydroxyurea Resistant or Intolerant (Response 2)

This study compared the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib to Best Available Therapy (BAT) in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) who were hydroxyurea (HU) resistant or intolerant and did not have a palpable spleen.

Read the detailed description

This was a prospective, multi-center, open-label, randomized, Phase IIIb study evaluating efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib versus BAT as selected by the Investigator in patients with PV who are resistant to, or intolerant of HU.

The study comprised of the following periods:

Screening Period (up to 5 weeks: Day -35 to Day -1): Screening evaluations were performed at one or more clinic visits, and reviewed to determine eligibility before the patient was randomized in the study.

Core Treatment Period (Day 1 to Week 80):

Patients were randomized in 1:1 ratio to either treatment group (ruxolitinib or BAT) and were to be treated with their randomized treatment.

Crossover Treatment Period (Week 28 or after) for BAT patients only:

Patients randomized to BAT who did not respond by Week 28 were eligible to crossover and start treatment with ruxolitinib. Patients crossing over on or after Week 28 had to complete all assessments for the End of Treatment (EoT) visit of the Core Treatment Period followed by the assessments in Cross-over visit evaluation schedule.

Extended Treatment Period (Week 80 to Week 260):

Patients receiving ruxolitinib at Week 80 (including patients who have crossed over from BAT) were eligible to continue up to Week 260 in the Extended Treatment Period. Patients continued the ruxolitinib dose that they received at Week 80. Patients who received BAT at Week 80 were not eligible to enter the Extended Treatment Period and had to have the EoT visit at Week 80 and an End of study (EoS) visit 30 days after the EoT visit.

Follow-up Period:

Patients were followed for safety during 30 days after the last dose of study drug and EoS visit assessments were performed post 30 days after the last dose of study drug. Patients who completed EoT (Week 80 for patients who received BAT, Week 260 for patients who received ruxolitinib or from the time of premature discontinuation) were to be followed-up for every 3 months for survival till the end of the study.

Being tested
Best Available Therapy, Ruxolitinib
Keywords
Polycythemia Vera, Hematologic Diseases, Myeloproliferative Disorders, Bone Marrow Diseases, Hydroxyurea, INC424, Ruxolitinib
Medical subject headings
Polycythemia Vera, Hematologic Diseases, Myeloproliferative Disorders, Bone Marrow Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Best Available TherapyDrug

    Also called BAT

    Best Available Therapy as selected by the investigator from: Hydroxyurea, Pegylated-Interferon (IFN/PEG-IFN), pipobroman, anagrelide, IMIDs, or observation. Participants randomized to BAT who did not respond by Week 28 were eligible to crossover and start treatment with ruxolitinib.

  • RuxolitinibDrug

    Also called INC424

    Ruxolitinib was administered at a starting dose of 10 mg twice a day (bid). Dose was adjusted based on efficacy and safety parameters up to a maximum dose of 25 mg bid.

Study groups in NCT02038036
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
RuxolitinibExperimentalRuxolitinib was administered at a starting dose of 10 mg twice a day (bid). Dose was adjusted based on efficacy and safety parameters up to a maximum dose of 25 mg bid.
Receives: Drug: Ruxolitinib
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Active comparatorBest Available Therapy as selected by the investigator from: Hydroxyurea, Pegylated-Interferon (IFN/PEG-IFN), pipobroman, anagrelide, IMIDs, or observation. Participants randomized to BAT who did not respond by Week 28 were eligible to crossover and start treatment with ruxolitinib.
Receives: Drug: Best Available Therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants Achieving Hematocrit (Hct) Control at Week 28

    Proportion of patients achieving Hct control at Week 28 was defined by the absence of phlebotomy eligibility starting at Week 8 and continuing through Week 28, with no more than one phlebotomy eligibility occurring post randomization and prior to Week 8.

    Phlebotomy eligibility was defined by:

    • Confirmed Hct > 45% that is at least 3 percentage points higher than the Hct obtained at Baseline Or
    • Confirmed Hct > 48% The confirmation occurred 2 to 14 days subsequent to the initial observation.

    Measured: Week 28

Secondary outcomes (24)
  1. Number of Participants Achieving a Complete Hematological Remission at Week 28

    Proportion of patients achieving a complete hematological remission at Week 28 was defined by:

    • Hct control at Week 28 defined by the absence of phlebotomy eligibility starting at Week 8 and continuing through Week 28, with no more than one phlebotomy eligibility occurring post randomization and prior to Week 8, and
    • WBC < 10 x109/L at Week 28, and
    • Platelets ≤ 400 x 109/L at Week 28

    Measured: Week 28

  2. Number of Participants Achieving a Hematocrit (Hct) Control at Week 52 and Week 80

    Proportion of patients achieving a Hct control at Week 52 was defined by the absence of phlebotomy eligibility starting at Week 8 and continuing through Week 52, and no more than one phlebotomy eligibility occurring post randomization and prior to Week 8

    • Endpoint for Week 80 was defined, similarly.

    Measured: Week 52 and 80

  3. Number of Participants Achieving a Complete Hematological Remission at Week 52 and Week 80

    Proportion of patients achieving a complete hematological remission at Week 52, was defined by:

    • Hct control at Week 52, as defined by the absence of phlebotomy eligibility starting at Week 8 and continuing through Week 52 with no more than one phlebotomy eligibility occurring post randomization and prior to Week 8, and
    • White Blood Count (WBC) < 10 x10^9/L at Week 52, and
    • Platelets ≤ 400 x 10^9/L at Week 52
    • Endpoint for Week 80 was defined, similarly.

    Measured: Week 52 and 80

  4. Number of Participants With Phlebotomies Over Time

    Phlebotomy eligibility was defined by Confirmed Hct > 45% that is at least 3 percentage points higher than the Hct obtained at Baseline Or Confirmed Hct > 48%. The confirmation occurred 2 to 14 days subsequent to the initial observation.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 260

  5. Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) at Each Visit

    Hematocrit is the volume percentage of red blood cells (RBC) in the blood.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 40, 52, 66, 80, 92, 104, 117, 130, 143, 156, 169, 182, 195, 208, 221, 234, 247 and 260

  6. Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) at Each Scheduled Visit After Crossover in Participants Randomized to BAT Who Cross Over to Ruxolitinib

    Hematocrit is the percentage of red blood cells (RBC) in the blood.

    Measured: Baseline (last assessment before cross over), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 40, 52, 64, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206, 219 and 232 after cross-over

  7. Spleen Length by Visit

    Spleen length was assessed by manual palpation at every study visit.

    Measured: Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 40, 52, 66, 80, 92, 104, 117, 130, 143, 156, 169, 182, 195, 208, 221, 234, 247 and 260

  8. Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status to Week 28

    The ECOG scale of performance status described the level of functioning of participants in terms of their ability to care for themselves, daily activity, and physical ability. The ECOG performance was recorded as per ECOG performance status grades ranging from 0 (fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction) to 5 (dead).

    Measured: Baseline and Week 28

  9. Number of Participants Achieving a Partial Remission Based on the European Leukemia Net (ELN) and International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) Criteria at Week 28

    Proportion of patients achieving a partial remission at Week 28, based on the ELN and IWG-MRT criteria, as defined by:

    • Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score (MPN-SAF TSS) score reduction of greater than or equal to 10 points from baseline to Week 28, and
    • Hct control defined by the absence of phlebotomy eligibility starting at Week 8 and continuing through Week 28, with no more than one phlebotomy eligibility occurring post randomization and prior to Week 8, and
    • WBC < 10 x10^9/L at Week 28, and
    • Platelets ≤ 400 x 10^9/L at Week 28, and
    • No palpable spleen at Week 28, and
    • No hemorrhagic or thrombotic events, and
    • No transformation into post-PV myelofibrosis, myelodysplastic syndrome (IWG-MRT criteria) or acute leukemia (WHO criteria).

    Measured: Week 28

  10. Number of Participants Who Achieved Partial Remission Based on the European Leukemia Net (ELN) and International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) Criteria at Week 52 and Week 80

    Proportion of patients who achieved partial remission at Week 52 based on the ELN and IWG-MRT criteria, as defined by:

    • MPN-SAF TSS score reduction of greater than or equal to 10 points from baseline to Week 52 and
    • Hct control defined by the absence of phlebotomy eligibility starting at Week 8 and continuing through Week 52 with no more than one phlebotomy eligibility occurring post randomization and prior to Week 8, and
    • WBC < 10 x109/L at Week 52 and
    • Platelets ≤ 400 x 109/L at Week 52 and
    • No palpable spleen at Week 52 and
    • No hemorrhagic or thrombotic events, and
    • No transformation into post-PV myelofibrosis, myelodysplastic syndrome (IWG-MRT criteria) or acute leukemia (WHO criteria).
    • Endpoint for Week 80 was defined, similarly.

    Measured: Week 52 and 80

  11. Number of Participants Achieving a Hematocrit (Hct) Control at Week 104, Week 156, Week 208 and Week 260.

    Proportion of patients achieving a Hct control at Week 104 as defined by the absence of phlebotomy eligibility starting at Week 8 and continuing through Week 104 and with no more than one phlebotomy eligibility occurring post randomization and prior to Week 8 Endpoint for Week 156, Week 208 and Week 260 were defined, similarly.

    Measured: From Week 8 to Week 104, 156, 208 and 260

  12. Number of Participants Achieving a Complete Hematological Remission at Week 104, Week 156, Week 208 and Week 260

    Proportion of patients achieving a complete hematological remission at Week 104 as defined by Hct control defined by the absence of phlebotomy eligibility starting at Week 8 and continuing through Week 104, with no more than one phlebotomy eligibility occurring post randomization and prior to Week 8, and

    • WBC < 10 x10^9/L at Week 104, and
    • Platelets ≤ 400 x 10^9/L at Week 104 Endpoint for Week 156, Week 208 and Week 260 were defined, similarly.

    Measured: From Week 8 to Week 104, 156, 208 and 260

  13. Number of Participants Who Achieved Partial Remission Based on the European Leukemia Net (ELN) and International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) Criteria at Week 104, Week 156, Week 208 and Week 260.

    Proportion of patients who achieved partial remission at Week 104, based on the ELN and IWG-MRT criteria, as defined by:

    • MPN-SAF TSS score reduction of greater than or equal to 10 points from baseline to Week 104, and
    • Hct control defined by the absence of phlebotomy eligibility starting at Week 8 and continuing through Week 104, with no more than one phlebotomy eligibility occurring post-randomization and prior to Week 8, and
    • WBC < 10 x10^9/L at Week 104, and
    • Platelets ≤ 400 x 10^9/L at Week 104, and
    • No palpable spleen at Week 104, and
    • No hemorrhagic or thrombotic events, and
    • No transformation into post-PV myelofibrosis, myelodysplastic syndrome (IWG-MRT criteria) or acute leukemia (WHO criteria) Endpoint for Week 156, Week 208 and Week 260 are defined, similarly.

    Measured: From Week 8 to Week 104, 156, 208 and 260

  14. Number of Participants With Transformation Free Survival Events

    Transformation-free survival is defined as one of the following:

    1. Myelofibrosis (MF) as evidenced by bone marrow biopsy, or
    2. Acute leukemia as evidenced by bone marrow blast counts of at least 20%, or peripheral blast counts of at least 20% lasting at least 2 weeks.
    3. Death due to any cause during treatment period

    Measured: Week 260 (ruxolitinib arm) and Week 80 (BAT arm)

  15. Number of Participants With Overall Survival (OS) Events

    Overall survival (OS) event is defined as death due to any cause. OS events were counted in the BAT arm, irrespective of whether participants crossed over to receive ruxolitinib when the event occurred.

    Measured: up to Week 260

  16. Change From Baseline in Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score (MPN-SAF TSS)

    The MPN-SAF TSS is a disease specific questionnaire comprised of 10 items that measures fatigue related to MPN disease and the severity of nine of the most prevalent associated symptoms. Each item is scored on a scale ranging from 0 (no fatigue/absent) to 10 (As bad as you can imagine/worst imaginable).The MPN-SAF TSS is computed as the average of the observed items multiplied by 10 to achieve a 0-to-100 scale. The MPN-SAF TSS thus has a possible score range of 0 to 100 where a decrease indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 28, 40, 52, 80, 92, 104, 117, 130, 143, 156, 169, 182, 195, 208, 221, 234 and 247

  17. Change From Baseline in Total Scores of MPN-SAF by Visit in Patients From BAT Group Who Cross Over to Ruxolitinib After Crossover

    The MPN-SAF TSS is a disease specific questionnaire comprised of 10 items that measures fatigue related to MPN disease and the severity of nine of the most prevalent associated symptoms. Each item is scored on a scale ranging from 0 (no fatigue/absent) to 10 (As bad as you can imagine/worst imaginable).The MPN-SAF TSS is computed as the average of the observed items multiplied by 10 to achieve a 0-to-100 scale. The MPN-SAF TSS thus has a possible score range of 0 to 100 where a decrease indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline (last assessment before cross over), Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 40, 52, 92, 104, 117, 130, 143, 156, 169, 182, 195, 208, 221, 234 and 247 after cross-over

  18. Change From Baseline in Score as Per European Quality of Life 5-Dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire

    EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for measuring health outcomes in a wide range of health conditions and treatments. It consists of visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) which records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labeled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'worst imaginable health state'. The EQ VAS scores were anchored on 100 = the best health you can imagine and 0 = worst health you can imagine.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 28, 52, 80, 92, 104, 117, 130, 143, 156, 169, 182, 195, 208, 221, 234 and 247

  19. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS, by Visit in Patients From BAT Group Who Cross Over to Ruxolitinib After Crossover

    EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for measuring health outcomes in a wide range of health conditions and treatments. It consists of visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) which records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labeled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'worst imaginable health state'. The EQ VAS scores were anchored on 100 = the best health you can imagine and 0 = worst health you can imagine.

    Measured: Baseline (last assessment before cross over), Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 52, 92, 104, 117, 130, 143, 156, 169, 182, 195, 208, 221, 234 and 247 after cross-over

  20. Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire

    The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) is a six item questionnaire which intended to measure work and activity impairment associated with polycythemia vera. WPAI consisted of 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the polycythemia vera; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the polycythemia vera on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the polycythemia vera on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work). Higher WPAI scores indicated greater activity impairment. Scores were multiplied by 100 to express in percentages.

    Percent work time missed due to problem (past 7 days) =Q2/(Q2+Q4) Percent impairment while working due to problem (past 7 days): Q5/10 Percent overall work impairment due to problem (past 7 says): Q2/(Q2+Q4)+[(1 Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)] Percent activity impairment due to problem (past 7 says): Q6/10

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 28, 52 and 80

  21. Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI), by Visit in Patients From BAT Group Who Cross Over to Ruxolitinib After Crossover

    The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) is a six item questionnaire which intended to measure work and activity impairment associated with polycythemia vera. WPAI consisted of 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the polycythemia vera; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the polycythemia vera on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the polycythemia vera on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work). Higher WPAI scores indicated greater activity impairment. Scores were multiplied by 100 to express in percentages.

    Percent work time missed due to problem (past 7 days) =Q2/(Q2+Q4) Percent impairment while working due to problem (past 7 days): Q5/10 Percent overall work impairment due to problem (past 7 says): Q2/(Q2+Q4)+[(1 Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)] Percent activity impairment due to problem (past 7 says): Q6/10

    Measured: Baseline (last assessment before cross over), Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 28 and 52 after cross-over

  22. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

    The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is comprised of a single question intended to measure a patient's perspective of improvement or deterioration over time relative to treatment. The PGIC uses a seven-point scale where one (1) equals very much improved and seven (7) equals very much worse.

    Measured: Week 4, 8, 16, 28, 40, 52 and 80

  23. Summary of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), by Visit in Patients From BAT Group Who Cross Over to Ruxolitinib After Crossover

    The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is comprised of a single question intended to measure a patient's perspective of improvement or deterioration over time relative to treatment. The PGIC uses a seven-point scale where one (1) equals very much improved and seven (7) equals very much worse.

    Measured: Baseline (last assessment before cross over), Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 40, and 52 after cross-over

  24. Number of Participants Developing Thrombosis

    Proportion of participants developing any arterial or venous thromboembolic event

    Measured: From randomization to Week 80 for BAT and Week 260 for Ruxolitinib

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jan 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start25 Mar 2014
  3. Primary completion29 Sep 2015
  4. Study completion7 Apr 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
149 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02038036
Sponsor's protocol ID
CINC424B2401
Acronym
RESPONSE-2
Status last verified
Jun 2021
First submitted
14 Jan 2014
Last updated
20 Jul 2021
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

Publications

  • Harrison CN, Kiladjian JJ, Hamer-Maansson JE, Naim A, Palandri F, Passamonti F. Ruxolitinib treatment in patients with polycythemia vera reduces JAK2 variant allele frequency and improves symptom burden and hematocrit control. Ther Adv Hematol. 2026 Mar 24;17:20406207261425083. doi: 10.1177/20406207261425083. eCollection 2026.

    PubMed 41890273
  • Passamonti F, Palandri F, Saydam G, Callum J, Devos T, Guglielmelli P, Vannucchi AM, Zor E, Zuurman M, Gilotti G, Zhang Y, Griesshammer M. Ruxolitinib versus best available therapy in inadequately controlled polycythaemia vera without splenomegaly (RESPONSE-2): 5-year follow up of a randomised, phase 3b study. Lancet Haematol. 2022 Jul;9(7):e480-e492. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(22)00102-8. Epub 2022 May 18.

    PubMed 35597252
  • Kiladjian JJ, Guglielmelli P, Griesshammer M, Saydam G, Masszi T, Durrant S, Passamonti F, Jones M, Zhen H, Li J, Gadbaw B, Perez Ronco J, Khan M, Verstovsek S. Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib after and versus interferon use in the RESPONSE studies. Ann Hematol. 2018 Apr;97(4):617-627. doi: 10.1007/s00277-017-3225-1. Epub 2018 Feb 2.

    PubMed 29396713
  • Passamonti F, Griesshammer M, Palandri F, Egyed M, Benevolo G, Devos T, Callum J, Vannucchi AM, Sivgin S, Bensasson C, Khan M, Mounedji N, Saydam G. Ruxolitinib for the treatment of inadequately controlled polycythaemia vera without splenomegaly (RESPONSE-2): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b study. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jan;18(1):88-99. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30558-7. Epub 2016 Dec 2.

    PubMed 27916398

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Best Available Therapy and Ruxolitinib in people with Polycythemia Vera, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 48 sites in 12 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 48 sites in Germany, Spain, France, Italy, Hungary and 7 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Jul 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants Achieving Hematocrit (Hct) Control at Week 28 (time frame: Week 28). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02038036, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jul 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in