AzTrials
AzTrials

Liver TumourPhase 2NCT02041065

Waterjet Versus Ultrasound Dissection During Hepatic Transection

A Phase 2 study testing Waterjet induced dissection and CUSA induced dissection in people with Liver Tumour, run by Karolinska University Hospital at 1 site in Sweden.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Before liver transection patients are allocated to either waterjet or CUSA to divide the liver parenchyma. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Liver Tumour
What is being tested?
Waterjet induced dissection and CUSA induced dissection
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
84 participants
Where
1 siteSweden
Study dates
Feb 2011to Mar 2015
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Hepatic tumour suitable for resection
  • patients 18 year or older Segmental resection Local resection Left sided hemihepatectomy

Who cannot join

  • Right sided hemihepatectoyReresection In Situ Split Liver Extended left- and rightsided hemihepatectomy Lobus caudatus resection Central resections Hilus tumour/Klatskin/Cholangiocarcinoma Surgery on biliary tree Extended resection on other organs
  • Resection on gallbladder Resection on other organs during the same operation.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Sweden1 site
  • Karolinska University Hospital, Centra of Gastroenterology

    Stockholm, 14186

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

Before liver transection patients are allocated to either waterjet or CUSA to divide the liver parenchyma.

Read the detailed description

Transection time, bloodloss, total operation time and postoperative complication rates are registered.

Conditions
Liver Tumour
Being tested
Waterjet induced dissection, CUSA induced dissection
Keywords
Liver transection, Bloodloss, Operation time, Safety, feasibility
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Waterjet induced dissectionDevice

    Waterjet induced dissection of the liver during resection.Waterjet dissection device mechanically separates hepatic tissue from bile ducts and vessels, the latter two to be separately ligated.

  • CUSA induced dissectionDevice

    Ultrasound based destruction of the liver

Study groups in NCT02041065
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Waterjet induced dissectionExperimentalWaterjet induced dissection of the liver during resection.Waterjet dissection device mechanically separates hepatic tissue from bile ducts and vessels, the latter two to be separately ligated.
Receives: Device: Waterjet induced dissection
CUSA induced dissectionActive comparatorCUSA transection of the liver. Ultrasound based destruction of the liver parenchyma to allow separate ligation of the bile duct and intrahepatic vessels.
Receives: Device: CUSA induced dissection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Peroperative bloodloss

    Peroperative bloodloss in ml during liver transection by use of either waterjet or CUSA.

    Measured: During liver transection (on an average<90 min)

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Transection time in minutes

    Measured: During liver transection (on an average< 90 minutes)

  2. Operation time in minutes

    Measured: Time spent in theater in minutes (on an average <240 minutes)

  3. Hospital stay in days

    Measured: Days spent in hospital after surgery (on an average < 10 days)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Jan 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2011
  3. Primary completionFeb 2015
  4. Study completionMar 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
84 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02041065
Sponsor's protocol ID
2011/2:4
Other IDs
2011/2.4
Status last verified
Aug 2015
First submitted
9 Oct 2013
Last updated
1 Sep 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Waterjet induced dissection and CUSA induced dissection in people with Liver Tumour, run by Karolinska University Hospital at 1 site in Sweden.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Sep 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Peroperative bloodloss (time frame: During liver transection (on an average<90 min)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Sep 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in