AzTrials
AzTrials

Heart Failure, SystolicPhase 2/3NCT02044211

Blended Collaborative Care for Heart Failure and Co-Morbid Depression

A Phase 2/3 study testing Collaborative Care for Heart Failure and Collaborative Care for Depression in people with Heart Failure, Systolic and Depression, run by University of Pittsburgh at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Depression is highly prevalent among patients with heart failure (HF) and associated with lower levels of health-related quality of life and physical functioning, and higher risk of rehospitalization and mortality, and higher health costs. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and older
What is being tested?
Collaborative Care for Heart Failure and Collaborative Care for Depression
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
756 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Feb 2014to Jul 2020
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Systolic heart failure (documented ejection fraction ≤ 40%).
  • HF symptoms meeting criteria for New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes II, III or IV.
  • Inpatient two-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) screen-positive for depression; or PHQ-2 screen negative for depression and PHQ-9 <5 if non-depressed control.
  • PHQ-9 ≥ 10 when reassessed two-weeks following hospital discharge, or PHQ-9 <5 if non-depressed control.
  • No cognitive impairment (as documented in the record, use of donepezil or similar medications for treating cognitive impairment, or the Montreal Cognitive Assessment).
  • Able to be evaluated and treated for depression as an outpatient.
  • English speaking, not illiterate, or possessing any other communication barrier.
  • Have a household telephone.

Who cannot join

  • Receiving active treatment for a mood or anxiety disorder from a mental health specialist.
  • Unstable medical condition as indicated by history, physical, and/or laboratory findings.
  • Presence of non-cardiovascular conditions likely to be fatal within 12 months (e.g., cancer).
  • Organic mood syndromes, including those secondary to medical illness or drugs.
  • Active suicidal ideation.
  • Current or history of psychotic illness.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Current or history of bipolar illness according to patient self-report, past medical history, and diagnostic criteria.
  • Current alcohol or other substance abuse as evidenced by chart review and the AUDIT-C questionnaire.
  • Age ≤ 21 years.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Pittsburgh

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213

Other trials in United States

About this study

Depression is highly prevalent among patients with heart failure (HF) and associated with lower levels of health-related quality of life and physical functioning, and higher risk of rehospitalization and mortality, and higher health costs. This Project will compare the effectiveness of a "blended" telephone-delivered collaborative care intervention for treating both HF and depression to: (1) collaborative care for HF-alone ("enhanced usual care"; eUC); and (2) doctors' "usual care" for depression (UC). If proven effective and cost-effective, the potentially more powerful, scalable, efficient "blended" care approach for treating HF and co-morbid depression could have profound implications for improving chronic illness care and stimulate development of "blended" interventions for treating other clusters of related medical conditions.

Read the detailed description

Heart failure (HF) is an important public health problem that affects approximately 6.6 million Americans. Despite improvements in cardiac care, it remains the leading cause for hospitalization among Medicare patients and the only major cardiovascular disease whose mortality rate has remained essentially unchanged over the past decade. This failure to improve HF outcomes may be due, in part, to unrecognized and/or inadequately treated depression that is highly prevalent in HF patients. Yet while new HF treatment guidelines advocate routine screening for depression, this recommendation is unlikely to be widely adopted without trial evidence that depression care improves outcomes and efficient methods to provide it.

"Collaborative care" strategies are being increasingly utilized to improve care for HF and other chronic medical conditions, and we recently demonstrated its clinical and cost-effectiveness at treating depression following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Yet it may be impractical for health care delivery systems to support separate treatment programs for HF and depression. Thus we are encouraged by emerging evidence indicating "blended" collaborative care strategies that target both psychiatric and physical conditions produce greater improvements in mood symptoms and control of cardiovascular risk factors than programs focused solely on depression to propose testing a novel adaptation that could be provided in routine care.

The Specific Aims of this Project are to: (1) evaluate the effectiveness of a telephone-delivered "blended" collaborative care intervention for treating HF and depression that could be adopted into routine clinical practice if proven effective; and (2) advance our understanding of the moderators and mediators of depression treatment on clinical outcomes. We will screen hospitalized patients with systolic HF for depression, and then randomize 625 who screen positive and have at least a moderately elevated level of depressive symptoms at two-weeks following hospital discharge to either: (1) collaborative care for treating both HF and depression ("blended"); (2) collaborative care for treating HF alone (enhanced usual care (eUC)); or (3) their doctors' "usual care" (UC). Additionally, we will enroll 125 non-depressed HF patients to better evaluate the benefits derived from treating depression (total N=750). Our co-primary hypotheses will test whether "blended" collaborative care can produce at 12-months follow-up a: (A) 0.50 effect size (ES) or greater improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) vs. UC; and (B) 0.30 ES or greater improvement in HRQoL vs. eUC. Secondary hypotheses will evaluate the effects of our "blended" intervention on mood, functional status, adherence with guideline-consistent care, incidence of cardiovascular events, health care utilization, and costs.

Improving chronic illness care for medically complex patients is one of the major challenges facing medicine today. We propose to test the effectiveness of an innovative, efficient, scalable, and sustainable intervention that could transform the way HF and other cardiovascular disorders are treated in routine practice.

Being tested
Collaborative Care for Heart Failure, Collaborative Care for Depression
Keywords
Heart Failure, Systolic, Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Mood Disorder
Medical subject headings
Heart Failure, Systolic, Depression, Cardiovascular Diseases, Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Mood Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Collaborative Care for Heart FailureBehavioural

    Nurse care managers will provide patients with education for their heart failure to facilitate self-management for their condition. In addition, the nurse will telephone the patient to review with their medical history, medications, diet, activity and sleep patterns, and plans for follow-up medical appointments, and offer basic care coordination relative to heart failure care including assistance attaining authorization for home health services in concert with the patient's primary care physician (PCP), and follow-up appointments.

    After case review with a study internist, the care manager may send treatment recommendations to the patient's physician(s) regarding guideline-indicated care. Afterwards, the care manager will telephone the patient approximately every other week to monitor and promote adherence with recommended care, and suggest adjustments in treatment as applicable following discussion with the clinical team and notification of the patient's PCP and cardiologist.

  • Collaborative Care for DepressionBehavioural

    The care manager will telephone patients randomized to "blended" care patient to review their psychiatric history including use of antidepressant pharmacotherapy, herbal supplements, and alcohol possibly used to self-medicate depressive symptoms; provide basic psychoeducation about depression and its impact on cardiac disease; recommend various self-management strategies (e.g., sufficient rest and exercise); and describe treatment options. They will include: (1) use of a workbook or computer program to enhance patients' understanding and ability to self-care; (2) initiation or adjustment of antidepressant pharmacotherapy prescribed under their primary care physicians' direction; or (3) referral to a local mental health specialist. The nurse will then telephone the patient to monitor symptoms and pharmacotherapy use, practice skills imparted through workbook assignments, promote adherence with recommended care, and suggest adjustments in treatment as applicable.

Study groups in NCT02044211
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Collaborative Care for Heart Failure + DepressionActive comparatorCollaborative care program for heart failure and depression involving a nurse care manager providing counseling and treatment advice via telephone Interventions: Behavioral: Counseling for heart failure self-care Counseling for depression Drug: Pharmacotherapy for heart failure Pharmacotherapy for depression
Receives: Behavioral: Collaborative Care for Heart Failure; Behavioral: Collaborative Care for Depression
Collaborative Care for Heart Failure OnlyActive comparatorCollaborative care program for heart failure and depression involving a nurse care manager providing counseling and treatment advice via telephone Interventions: Behavioral: Counseling for heart failure self-care Usual care for depression Drug: Pharmacotherapy for heart failure Usual Care for depression
Receives: Behavioral: Collaborative Care for Heart Failure
Usual Care for Heart Failure and DepressionNo interventionControl group will receive their doctors' usual care for heart failure and depression
Non-Depressed Comparison CohortNo interventionControl group will receive their doctors' usual care for heart failure

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Mental Component Summary (SF-12 MCS)

    Mental Health-Related Quality of Life

    Measured: 12-Months Follow-Up

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12)

    Disease-Specific Health-Related Quality of Life

    Measured: 12-Month Follow-Up

  2. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (17-Item)

    Mood symptoms

    Measured: 12-Months Follow-Up

  3. Incidence of Rehospitalization

    Measured: 12-Month Follow-Up

  4. Mortality

    All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality

    Measured: 12-Month Follow-Up

  5. Health Care Costs

    Claims data

    Measured: 12-Month Follow-Up

  6. Employment

    Measured: 12-Months Follow-Up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jan 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2014
  3. Primary completionOct 2018
  4. Study completionJul 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
"Blended" intervention: Blended, centralized, nurse-provided, telephone-delivered collaborative care for both heart failure and depression; Collaborative care for heart failure: Blended, centralized, nurse-provided, telephone-delivered collaborative care for heart failure alone Usual Care: PCPs usual care for heart failure and depression; and Non-Depressed comparison cohort (randomly sampled, not randomized).
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
756 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02044211
Sponsor's protocol ID
R01HL114016
Status last verified
Aug 2020
First submitted
21 Jan 2014
Last updated
5 Aug 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Deveney TK, Belnap BH, Mazumdar S, Rollman BL. The prognostic impact and optimal timing of the Patient Health Questionnaire depression screen on 4-year mortality among hospitalized patients with systolic heart failure. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2016 Sep-Oct;42:9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 30.

    PubMed 27638965
  • Schuster JM, Belnap BH, Roth LH, Rollman BL. The Checklist Manifesto in action: integrating depression treatment into routine cardiac care. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2016 May-Jun;40:1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Jan 22. No abstract available.

    PubMed 26916974
  • Herbeck Belnap B, Anderson A, Abebe KZ, Ramani R, Muldoon MF, Karp JF, Rollman BL. Blended Collaborative Care to Treat Heart Failure and Comorbid Depression: Rationale and Study Design of the Hopeful Heart Trial. Psychosom Med. 2019 Jul/Aug;81(6):495-505. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000706.

    PubMed 31083056
  • Rollman BL. Exercise and Cognitive Training to Improve Neurocognitive Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure: Can Cardiac Rehabilitation Deliver? Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;27(8):820-822. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 6. No abstract available.

    PubMed 31151835
  • Bober T, Guhl EN, Rothenberger S, Jeong K, Abebe KZ, Holber J, Anderson AM, Magnani JW, Johnson AE, Rollman BL. Impact of Neighborhood Factors on Heart Failure Outcomes: Secondary Analysis From the Hopeful Heart Trial. JACC Adv. 2025 Oct;4(10 Pt 2):102146. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102146. Epub 2025 Sep 14.

    PubMed 40953541
  • Carrillo A, Belnap BH, Rothenberger SD, Feldman R, Rollman BL, Celano CM. Psychosocial predictors of health behavior adherence in heart-failure patients with comorbid depression: a secondary analysis of the Hopeful Heart trial. BMC Psychol. 2024 Jun 4;12(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01816-4.

    PubMed 38835104
  • Sadlonova M, Chavanon ML, Kwonho J, Abebe KZ, Celano CM, Huffman J, Herbeck Belnap B, Rollman BL. Depression Subtypes in Systolic Heart Failure: A Secondary Analysis From a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry. 2023 Sep-Oct;64(5):444-456. doi: 10.1016/j.jaclp.2023.03.008. Epub 2023 Mar 29.

    PubMed 37001642
  • Holber JP, Abebe KZ, Huang Y, Jakicic JM, Anderson AM, Belnap BH, Rollman BL. The Relationship Between Objectively Measured Step Count, Clinical Characteristics, and Quality of Life Among Depressed Patients Recently Hospitalized With Systolic Heart Failure. Psychosom Med. 2022 Feb-Mar 01;84(2):231-236. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000001034.

    PubMed 34724453
  • Rollman BL, Anderson AM, Rothenberger SD, Abebe KZ, Ramani R, Muldoon MF, Jakicic JM, Herbeck Belnap B, Karp JF. Efficacy of Blended Collaborative Care for Patients With Heart Failure and Comorbid Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Oct 1;181(10):1369-1380. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.4978.

    PubMed 34459842

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing Collaborative Care for Heart Failure and Collaborative Care for Depression in people with Heart Failure, Systolic and Depression, run by University of Pittsburgh at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Mental Component Summary (SF-12 MCS) (time frame: 12-Months Follow-Up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02044211, which also lists 9 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Aug 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in