Aggressive B Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas at High Risk for R-CHOP-21-induced NeutropeniaPhase 3AVOIDNCT02044276
A comparatiVe Study on Efficacy and Safety of Lipegfilgrastim in Comparison to Pegfilgrastim in Elderly Patients With Aggressive B Cell Non-HOdgkin Lymphomas at hIgh Risk for R-CHOP-21-inDuced Neutropenia
A Phase 3 study testing lipegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim in people with Aggressive B Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas at High Risk for R-CHOP-21-induced Neutropenia, run by Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. at 60 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate non-inferiority of lipegfilgrastim to pegfilgrastim for the duration of severe neutropenia in the first cycle of chemotherapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Aggressive B Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas at High Risk for R-CHOP-21-induced Neutropenia
- What is being tested?
- lipegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 101 participants
- Where
- 60 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 31 Mar 2014to 24 Apr 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Signed and dated Independent Ethics Committee (IEC)-approved written informed consent
- Age ≥65 years and ≤85 years
- Histological documentation of aggressive B cell NHL
- Planned to receive systemic anticancer therapy with at least 6 cycles of R-CHOP-21, according to local standards
- ECOG score ≤2
- Life expectancy of at least 3 months
Show all 11Show fewer
- Adequate bone marrow, renal and hepatic function within 14 days before start of chemotherapy
- The patient is capable of understanding and complying with parameters as outlined in the protocol
- Women of childbearing potential (not surgically sterile or 2 years postmenopausal) must use a medically accepted method of contraception and must agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the treatment and for 30 days after discontinuation of study drug.
- The patient, if a man, is surgically sterile, or, if capable of producing offspring, is currently using an approved method of birth control and agrees to continued use of this method for the duration of the treatment (and for 90 days after taking the last dose of study
- Other Criteria apply, please contact the investigator for more information
Who cannot join
- Participation in a clinical study within 30 days before randomization
- Any chemotherapy within the last 3 months before start of chemotherapy. A prephase to reduce tumor burden prior to start of R-CHOP is allowed.
- The patient is a pregnant or lactating woman. (Any woman becoming pregnant during the study will be withdrawn from the study.)
- Major surgical procedure, open biopsy, or significant traumatic injury within 28 days before start of chemotherapy.
- Active cardiac disease
- Arterial or venous thrombotic or embolic events such as cerebrovascular accident (including transient ischemic attacks), deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism within the 6 months before start of chemotherapy.
Show all 15Show fewer
- Ongoing infection, known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, tuberculosis, or chronic hepatitis B or C.
- Patients with evidence or history of bleeding diathesis.
- Non-healing wound, ulcer or bone fracture.
- Renal failure requiring hemo- or peritoneal dialysis.
- Any conditions that may interfere with the patient's participation in the study or evaluation of the study results.
- Known hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs, study drug classes, or excipients in the formulation.
- Any illness or medical conditions that are unstable or could jeopardize the safety of the patient and his/her compliance in the study.
- Treatment with lithium at screening or planned during the study.
- Other Criteria apply, please contact the investigator for more information
Trial locations and contacts
60 sites in 3 countries.
60 sites in 3 countries
Germany51 sites
Teva Investigational Site 32284
Aurich, 26603
Teva Investigational Site 32314
Bad Soden am Taunus, 65812
Teva Investigational Site 32267
Berlin, 10117
Teva Investigational Site 32277
Berlin, 10707
Teva Investigational Site 32292
Bochum, 44791
Teva Investigational Site 32400
Bonn, 53105
Teva Investigational Site 32318
Bonn, 53113
Teva Investigational Site 32294
Bottrop, 46236
Teva Investigational Site 32275
Cologne, 50674
Teva Investigational Site 32282
Dresden, 01127
Teva Investigational Site 32269
Dresden, 01307
Teva Investigational Site 32303
Dresden, 01307
Teva Investigational Site 32308
Frankfurt (Oder), 15236
Teva Investigational Site 32302
Frankfurt-Hochst, 65929
Teva Investigational Site 32276
Frechen, 50226
Teva Investigational Site 32293
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106
Teva Investigational Site 32290
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79110
Teva Investigational Site 32322
Fulda, 36043
Teva Investigational Site 32320
Fürth, 90766
Teva Investigational Site 32273
Goslar, 38642
Teva Investigational Site 32296
Gütersloh, 33332
Teva Investigational Site 32319
Halle, 06110
Teva Investigational Site 32272
Hamburg, 22081
Teva Investigational Site 32295
Heilbronn, 74078
Teva Investigational Site 32270
Herne, 44623
Teva Investigational Site 32401
Herne, 44625
Teva Investigational Site 32279
Hof, 95028
Teva Investigational Site 32297
Kaiserslautern, 67655
Teva Investigational Site 32310
Kassel, 34119
Teva Investigational Site 32280
Kiel, 24116
Teva Investigational Site 32309
Krefeld, 47805
Teva Investigational Site 32287
Lahr, 77933
Teva Investigational Site 32289
Langen, 63225
Teva Investigational Site 32313
Lebach, 66822
Teva Investigational Site 32311
Leer, 26789
Teva Investigational Site 32278
Leipzig, 04103
Teva Investigational Site 32281
Mülheim, 45468
Teva Investigational Site 32301
München, D-81377
Teva Investigational Site 32274
Oldenburg, 26121
Teva Investigational Site 32306
Pößneck, 07381
Teva Investigational Site 32304
Ravensburg, 88212
Teva Investigational Site 32291
Rotenburg (Wümme), 27356
Teva Investigational Site 32315
Singen, 78224
Teva Investigational Site 32300
Stade, 21680
Teva Investigational Site 32288
Stolberg, 52222
Teva Investigational Site 32268
Stuttgart, 70174
Teva Investigational Site 32321
Stuttgart, 70376
Teva Investigational Site 32305
Torgau, 04860
Teva Investigational Site 32266
Villingen-Schwenningen, 78052
Teva Investigational Site 32317
Villingen-Schwenningen, 78052
Teva Investigational Site 32286
Weiden, 92637
Spain5 sites
Teva Investigational Site 31074
Barcelona, 08003
Teva Investigational Site 31071
Madrid, 28006
Teva Investigational Site 31070
Madrid, 28222
Teva Investigational Site 31073
Valencia, 46010
Teva Investigational Site 31072
Valencia, 46026
Italy4 sites
Teva Investigational Site 30061
Campobasso, 86100
Teva Investigational Site 30059
Milan, 20162
Teva Investigational Site 30063
Naples, 80131
Teva Investigational Site 30062
Torino, 10126
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Phase IIIB, Open-label, Two-arm, Multicenter, comparatiVe Study on Efficacy and Safety of Lipegfilgrastim (Lonquex, TEVA) in Comparison to Pegfilgrastim (Neulasta(R), Amgen) in Elderly Patients With Aggressive B Cell Non-HOdgkin Lymphomas at hIgh Risk for R-CHOP-21-inDuced Neutropenia - AVOID Neutropenia
The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate non-inferiority of lipegfilgrastim to pegfilgrastim for the duration of severe neutropenia in the first cycle of chemotherapy.
- Being tested
- lipegfilgrastim, pegfilgrastim
- Keywords
- Neutropenia, NHL, Non-Hodgkin lymphomas, R-CHOP-21
- Medical subject headings
- Neutropenia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
lipegfilgrastimDrug
Also called XM22
6 mg
pegfilgrastimDrug
Also called Neulasta®
6 mg
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| lipegfilgrastim. | Experimental | subcutaneous (SC) injection of 6 mg lipegfilgrastim Receives: Drug: lipegfilgrastim |
| pegfilgrastim | Active comparator | SC injection of 6 mg pegfilgrastim Receives: Drug: pegfilgrastim |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) ANC <0.5 * 10^9/L
Grade 4 neutropenia measured in days
Measured: 3 weeks
Secondary outcomes (6)
Incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) (strict definition)
Body temperature of >38.5°C for at least one hour and ANC<1*10^9/L
Measured: 18 weeks
Incidence of FN
A single temperature of ≥38.3°C or ≥38.0°C for at least one hour and ANC <1 * 10^9/L
Measured: 18 weeks
Incidence of very severe neutropenia
The occurrence of at least one incidence of ANC <0.1 * 10*9/L
Measured: 3 weeks
Incidence of infections
Incidence and severity of infections
Measured: 18 weeks
Time to ANC recovery
The time in days from start of chemotherapy administration until the ANC increases to ≥1.0 x 109/L, ≥1.5 x 109/L, and ≥2.0 x 109/L after the expected nadir
Measured: 3 weeks
Summary of participants with adverse events
Measured: 9 Months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jan 2014 (estimated)
- Study start31 Mar 2014
- Primary completion29 Aug 2017
- Study completion24 Apr 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Aggressive B Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas at High Risk for R-CHOP-21-induced NeutropeniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 101 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Teva Medical Expert, MD, Study director, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02044276
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- XM22-ONC-305
- Other IDs
- 2013-001284-23
- Acronym
- AVOID
- Status last verified
- Jun 2022
- First submitted
- 21 Jan 2014
- Last updated
- 8 Jun 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Link H, Illerhaus G, Martens UM, Salar A, Depenbusch R, Kohler A, Engelhardt M, Mahlmann S, Zaiss M, Lammerich A, Bias P, Buchner A. Efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim in elderly patients with aggressive B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL): results of the randomized, open-label, non-inferiority AVOID neutropenia study. Support Care Cancer. 2021 May;29(5):2519-2527. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05711-7. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
PubMed 32944800
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jun 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Phase IIIB, Open-label, Two-arm, Multicenter, comparatiVe Study on Efficacy and Safety of Lipegfilgrastim (Lonquex, TEVA) in Comparison to Pegfilgrastim (Neulasta(R), Amgen) in Elderly Patients With Aggressive B Cell Non-HOdgkin Lymphomas at hIgh Risk for R-CHOP-21-inDuced Neutropenia - AVOID Neutropenia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02044276
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AVOID / XM22-ONC-305
- Keywords
- Neutropenia, NHL, Non-Hodgkin lymphomas, R-CHOP-21
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 101 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 31 Mar 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Apr 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Jan 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate non-inferiority of lipegfilgrastim to pegfilgrastim for the duration of severe neutropenia in the first cycle of chemotherapy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| lipegfilgrastim. | Experimental | Drug: lipegfilgrastimsubcutaneous (SC) injection of 6 mg lipegfilgrastim |
| pegfilgrastim | Active comparator | Drug: pegfilgrastimSC injection of 6 mg pegfilgrastim |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Signed and dated Independent Ethics Committee (IEC)-approved written informed consent
- Age ≥65 years and ≤85 years
- Histological documentation of aggressive B cell NHL
- Planned to receive systemic anticancer therapy with at least 6 cycles of R-CHOP-21, according to local standards
- ECOG score ≤2
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Participation in a clinical study within 30 days before randomization
- Any chemotherapy within the last 3 months before start of chemotherapy. A prephase to reduce tumor burden prior to start of R-CHOP is allowed.
- The patient is a pregnant or lactating woman. (Any woman becoming pregnant during the study will be withdrawn from the study.)
- Major surgical procedure, open biopsy, or significant traumatic injury within 28 days before start of chemotherapy.
- Active cardiac disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| lipegfilgrastimAlso: XM226 mg | Drug | lipegfilgrastim. |
| pegfilgrastimAlso: Neulasta®6 mg | Drug | pegfilgrastim |
Primary outcome
Duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) ANC <0.5 * 10^9/L
Time frame: 3 weeks
Grade 4 neutropenia measured in days
6 secondary outcomes
Incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) (strict definition)
Time frame: 18 weeks
Incidence of FN
Time frame: 18 weeks
Incidence of very severe neutropenia
Time frame: 3 weeks
Incidence of infections
Time frame: 18 weeks
Time to ANC recovery
Time frame: 3 weeks
Summary of participants with adverse events
Time frame: 9 Months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jun 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32944800Link H, Illerhaus G, Martens UM, Salar A, Depenbusch R, Kohler A, Engelhardt M, Mahlmann S, Zaiss M, Lammerich A, Bias P, Buchner A. Efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim in elderly patients with aggressive B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL): results of the randomized, open-label, non-inferiority AVOID neutropenia study. Support Care Cancer. 2021 May;29(5):2519-2527. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05711-7. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Teva Medical Expert, MD study director
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
60 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing lipegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim in people with Aggressive B Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas at High Risk for R-CHOP-21-induced Neutropenia, run by Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. at 60 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 60 sites in Germany, Spain, Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) ANC <0.5 * 10^9/L (time frame: 3 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02044276, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jun 2022.