AzTrials
AzTrials

Hepatitis CELFNCT02044523

Noninvasive Staging of Liver Fibrosis: MR vs Ultrasound

An observational study of Hepatitis C and Hepatitis B, run by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Liver fibrosis is an important public health problem, with a substantial morbidity and mortality due to progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. All causes of chronic liver disease may lead to fibrosis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Transient elastography, acoustic radiation force impulse, magnetic resonance elastography
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
108 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Jan 2014to Jun 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The target population is adults with any of the three main causes of liver fibrosis: HBV, HCV or NASH. For the purpose of this study, we will recruit patients seen at the hepatology clinic of St-Luc Hospital, a tertiary care center.

Who may be able to join

  • are adults;
  • must undergo a liver biopsy as part of their clinical standard of care for suspected or known chronic liver disease caused by HBV, HCV or NASH;
  • understand French or English instruction;
  • Autoimmune Hepatitis

Who cannot join

  • have any contra-indication to MRI (such as claustrophobia, pacemaker, metallic clips for a neurosurgical procedure);
  • are pregnant or trying to become pregnant;
  • have a weight or girth preventing them from entering the MR magnet bore;
  • are unable to understand or unwilling to provide written informed consent for this study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal

    Montreal, Quebec, H2X 0A9

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Magnetic Resonance and Ultrasound Elastography With Liver Biopsy for Noninvasive Staging of Liver Fibrosis

Liver fibrosis is an important public health problem, with a substantial morbidity and mortality due to progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. All causes of chronic liver disease may lead to fibrosis. The traditional diagnostic approach requires a biopsy for assessing the severity of liver disease prior to therapy.

However, liver biopsy has several limitations: cost, sampling error, and procedure-related morbidity and mortality. Considering the high prevalence of viral hepatitis and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, a condition often associated with obesity and type 2 diabetes, there is an urgent need for noninvasive screening, diagnosis and monitoring strategies of chronic liver disease severity.

Read more

Our team has the expertise to investigate ultrasound-based and magnetic resonance-based elastographic methods for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis.

The primary objective of this cross-sectional study is to compare the sensitivity of elastographic methods for detecting histology-determined significant fibrosis.

The secondary objectives are to compare the diagnostic accuracy of these elastographic methods and the influence of potential confounders (inflammation, steatosis and iron deposition) on their diagnostic accuracy.

Read the detailed description

Background: Liver fibrosis is an important public health problem, with a substantial morbidity and mortality due to cirrhosis (the end stage) and hepatocellular carcinoma. All causes of chronic liver disease may lead to fibrosis. The amount of fibrosis determines the prognosis and influences the response to treatment of chronic liver disease.

Several elastographic methods have been proposed for noninvasive detection and staging of liver fibrosis. Transient elastography (Fibroscan) is widely used by clinicians. Acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) is an elastography technique recently integrated in clinical ultrasound systems that may provide similar diagnostic performance to transient elastography. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a new method that can be integrated to a liver MRI study, which would allow liver stiffness, steatosis, iron overload and inflammation quantification in chronic liver disease.

Objectives: 1) To compare the sensitivity of MRE and ARFI for detecting histology-determined significant fibrosis (F ≥ 2). Secondary objectives: 2) To compare the diagnostic accuracy of MRE, ARFI and Fibroscan for predicting histology-determined fibrosis stages. 3) To determine the influence of inflammation, steatosis, and iron deposition on the diagnostic accuracy of MRE, ARFI and Fibroscan for predicting fibrosis. 4) To determine thresholds optimizing sensitivity of ARFI and Fibroscan to screen patients and optimizing specificity of MRE to confirm liver fibrosis stage.

Design: This will be a cross-sectional imaging trial comparing feasibility, diagnostic and fibrosis staging accuracy of stiffness measurements by elastographic methods in 108 patients with chronic liver disease, using histopathology as the reference standard. Paired index tests (MRE, ARFI and Fibroscan) will be performed as research procedures in close temporal proximity to the reference test (liver biopsy).

Inclusion criteria: consecutive adult patients with known or suspected chronic liver disease secondary to hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, or nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) undergoing a liver biopsy for clinical indications.

Exclusion criteria: any contraindication to MRI, refusal to participate or provide informed consent, pregnant women, any other cause of chronic liver disease than hepatitis B, hepatitis C or NAFLD.

Being tested
Transient elastography, acoustic radiation force impulse, magnetic resonance elastography
Keywords
Chronic liver disease, Fibrosis, Elastography, Ultrasound, Magnetic resonance elastography, Diagnostic performance, Sensitivity and specificity
Medical subject headings
Hepatitis C, Hepatitis B, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Fibrosis, Hypersensitivity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Transient elastography, acoustic radiation force impulse, magnetic resonance elastographyDevice

    Also called Transient elastography (Fibroscan), Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI), Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE)

    Transient elastography (Fibroscan) Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE)

Study groups in NCT02044523
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Hepatis C, Hepatitis B, NAFLDAll patients enrolled will undergo: * Transient Elastography (Fibroscan) * Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) * Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE)
Receives: Device: Transient elastography, acoustic radiation force impulse, magnetic resonance elastography

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Histology-determined fibrosis stage

    Measured: Within 6 weeks of elastographic methods

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Fibroscan-determined liver stiffness

    Measured: Within 6 weeks of liver biopsy

  2. Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI)-determined liver stiffness

    Measured: Within 6 weeks of liver biopsy

  3. Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE)-determined liver stiffness

    Measured: Within 6 weeks of liver biopsy

  4. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-based Proton Density Fat Fraction (PDFF)

    Measured: Within 6 weeks of liver biopsy

  5. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) cine-tagging of cardiac-induced motion for staging liver fibrosis

    Measured: Within 6 weeks of liver biopsy

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Jan 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2014
  3. Primary completionJun 2018
  4. Study completionJun 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
108 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02044523
Sponsor's protocol ID
CE12.062
Acronym
ELF
Status last verified
Jul 2017
First submitted
20 Jan 2014
Last updated
20 Sep 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Lefebvre T, Wartelle-Bladou C, Wong P, Sebastiani G, Giard JM, Castel H, Murphy-Lavallee J, Olivie D, Ilinca A, Sylvestre MP, Gilbert G, Gao ZH, Nguyen BN, Cloutier G, Tang A. Prospective comparison of transient, point shear wave, and magnetic resonance elastography for staging liver fibrosis. Eur Radiol. 2019 Dec;29(12):6477-6488. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06331-4. Epub 2019 Jul 5.

    PubMed 31278577

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Hepatitis C and Hepatitis B, run by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Histology-determined fibrosis stage (time frame: Within 6 weeks of elastographic methods). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02044523, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Sep 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in