Binge DrinkingNCT02045108
Cognitive Retraining and Brain Stimulation for Alcohol Use
A study testing Active Retraining and Active TDCS in people with Binge Drinking, run by The Mind Research Network at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The overarching goal of this study is to determine whether combined cognitive training and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) reduces drinking in high-risk drinkers. To this end, specific study purposes are: 1) replicate previous findings that cognitive retraining reduces drinking levels, 2) test whether… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 30 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Binge Drinking
- What is being tested?
- Active Retraining and Active TDCS
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 77 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2014to Dec 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 30 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 21-30 years
- At least five binge drinking episodes (4+ drinks for men; 3+ drinks for women) for the past month
- Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) score greater than 8
- Right handed
Who cannot join
- History of treatment for alcohol dependence (AD) or desire for treatment
- History of alcohol withdrawal
- History of brain injury
- Currently taking psychotropic medications (e.g. antidepressants, antipsychotics)
- Female subjects who are pregnant
- Evidence of recent illicit drug use on a urine screen
Show all 11Show fewer
- Left handed
- Prior participation in a brain stimulation study
- Implanted brain medical devices
- Electromedical devices
- Latex allergy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
The Mind Research Network and University of New Mexico Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse and Addiction
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106
About this study
Official title: Modifying Alcohol Approach Motivations With tDCS and Cognitive Retraining
The overarching goal of this study is to determine whether combined cognitive training and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) reduces drinking in high-risk drinkers. To this end, specific study purposes are: 1) replicate previous findings that cognitive retraining reduces drinking levels, 2) test whether cognitive retraining can be enhanced with tDCS, and 3) investigate the neural changes that result from cognitive retraining and tDCS. We hypothesize that those participants who receive alcohol avoidance cognitive training will have greater reductions in drinking. In turn, those participants who receive a higher level of applied tDCS during alcohol avoidance response training will have better avoidance learning, as well as, a larger reduction in drinking behavior. Finally, those participants receiving a higher level of applied tDCS will have more neuronal response associated with alcohol avoidance during the brain imaging session.
- Conditions
- Binge Drinking
- Being tested
- Active Retraining, Sham TDCS, Active TDCS, Sham Retraining
- Medical subject headings
- Binge Drinking
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Active RetrainingBehavioural
Sham TDCSDevice
Active TDCSDevice
Sham RetrainingBehavioural
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active TDCS + Active Retraining | Experimental | 2.0 milliamps (mA) of TDCS applied during active alcohol avoidance retraining Receives: Behavioral: Active Retraining; Device: Active TDCS |
| Sham TDCS + Active Retraining | Experimental | .1 mA of TDCS applied during active alcohol avoidance retraining Receives: Behavioral: Active Retraining; Device: Sham TDCS |
| Active TDCS + Sham retraining | Experimental | 2.0 mA of TDCS applied during sham alcohol avoidance retraining Receives: Device: Active TDCS; Behavioral: Sham Retraining |
| Sham TDCS + Sham Retraining | Sham comparator | 0.1 mA of TDCS applied during sham alcohol avoidance retraining Receives: Device: Sham TDCS; Behavioral: Sham Retraining |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Drinks Per Drinking Day
Number of standard drinks will be assessed using the Timeline Follow-back method to obtain the number of drinks consumed on each day of the prior 30 days. Drinks per drinking day will be the mean number of drinks consumed on days on which alcohol was consumed.
Measured: Screening Visit
Alcohol Approach Bias
For each participant, bias is computed by taking the median response times to approaching alcohol pictures - response times to avoiding alcohol pictures, as measured with a pull or push of a joystick. Group means of these medians are presented as the outcome measure.
Measured: Baseline
Drinks Per Drinking Day
Number of standard drinks will be assessed using the Timeline Follow-back method to obtain the number of drinks consumed on each day since the last administration of the Timeline Follow-back. Drinks per drinking day will be the mean number of drinks consumed on days on which alcohol was consumed.
Measured: 1 week post-baseline
Drinks Per Drinking Day
Number of standard drinks will be assessed using the Timeline Follow-back method to obtain the number of drinks consumed on each day since the last administration of the Timeline Follow-back. Drinks per drinking day will be the mean number of drinks consumed on days on which alcohol was consumed.
Measured: 2 weeks post-baseline
Drinks Per Drinking Day
Number of standard drinks will be assessed using the Timeline Follow-back method to obtain the number of drinks consumed on each day since the last administration of the Timeline Follow-back. Drinks per drinking day will be the mean number of drinks consumed on days on which alcohol was consumed.
Measured: 3 weeks post-baseline
Drinks Per Drinking Day
Number of standard drinks will be assessed using the Timeline Follow-back method to obtain the number of drinks consumed on each day since the last administration of the Timeline Follow-back. Drinks per drinking day will be the mean number of drinks consumed on days on which alcohol was consumed.
Measured: 4 weeks post-baseline
Drinks Per Drinking Day
Number of standard drinks will be assessed using the Timeline Follow-back method to obtain the number of drinks consumed on each day since the last administration of the Timeline Follow-back. Drinks per drinking day will be the mean number of drinks consumed on days on which alcohol was consumed.
Measured: 5 weeks post-baseline
Drinks Per Drinking Day
Number of standard drinks will be assessed using the Timeline Follow-back method to obtain the number of drinks consumed on each day since the last administration of the Timeline Follow-back. Drinks per drinking day will be the mean number of drinks consumed on days on which alcohol was consumed.
Measured: 8 weeks post-baseline
Alcohol Approach Bias
For each participant, bias is computed by taking the median response times to approaching alcohol pictures - response times to avoiding alcohol pictures, as measured with a pull or push of a joystick. Group means of these medians are presented as the outcome measure.
Measured: 1 week after treatment
Drinks Per Drinking Day
Number of standard drinks will be assessed using the Timeline Follow-back method to obtain the number of drinks consumed on each day since the last administration of the Timeline Follow-back. Drinks per drinking day will be the mean number of drinks consumed on days on which alcohol was consumed.
Measured: Baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Jan 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2014
- Primary completionDec 2015
- Study completionDec 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Binge DrinkingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 77 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Mind Research Network
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Eric D Claus, Ph.D., Principal investigator, Mind Research Network and LBERI
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02045108
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20-520
- Other IDs
- 1R21AA021201-01A1
- Status last verified
- Mar 2018
- First submitted
- 20 Jan 2014
- Last updated
- 20 Mar 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Mar 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Modifying Alcohol Approach Motivations With tDCS and Cognitive Retraining
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02045108
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 20-520
- Conditions
- Binge Drinking
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 77 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Mind Research NetworkUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
- Study start
- Jan 2014
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Jan 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 20 Mar 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The overarching goal of this study is to determine whether combined cognitive training and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) reduces drinking in high-risk drinkers. To this end, specific study purposes are: 1) replicate previous findings that cognitive retraining reduces drinking levels, 2) test whether cognitive retraining can be enhanced with tDCS, and 3) investigate the neural changes that result from cognitive retraining and tDCS. We hypothesize that those participants who receive alcohol avoidance cognitive training will have greater reductions in drinking. In turn, those participants who receive a higher level of applied tDCS during alcohol avoidance response training will have better avoidance learning, as well as, a larger reduction in drinking behavior. Finally, those participants receiving a higher level of applied tDCS will have more neuronal response associated with alcohol avoidance during the brain imaging session.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active TDCS + Active Retraining | Experimental | Behavioral: Active Retraining, Device: Active TDCS2.0 milliamps (mA) of TDCS applied during active alcohol avoidance retraining |
| Sham TDCS + Active Retraining | Experimental | Behavioral: Active Retraining, Device: Sham TDCS.1 mA of TDCS applied during active alcohol avoidance retraining |
| Active TDCS + Sham retraining | Experimental | Device: Active TDCS, Behavioral: Sham Retraining2.0 mA of TDCS applied during sham alcohol avoidance retraining |
| Sham TDCS + Sham Retraining | Sham comparator | Device: Sham TDCS, Behavioral: Sham Retraining0.1 mA of TDCS applied during sham alcohol avoidance retraining |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 30 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age 21-30 years
- At least five binge drinking episodes (4+ drinks for men; 3+ drinks for women) for the past month
- Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) score greater than 8
- Right handed
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- History of treatment for alcohol dependence (AD) or desire for treatment
- History of alcohol withdrawal
- History of brain injury
- Currently taking psychotropic medications (e.g. antidepressants, antipsychotics)
- Female subjects who are pregnant
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Active Retraining | Behavioural | Active TDCS + Active Retraining, Sham TDCS + Active Retraining |
| Sham TDCS | Device | Sham TDCS + Active Retraining, Sham TDCS + Sham Retraining |
| Active TDCS | Device | Active TDCS + Active Retraining, Active TDCS + Sham retraining |
| Sham Retraining | Behavioural | Active TDCS + Sham retraining, Sham TDCS + Sham Retraining |
Primary outcome
Drinks Per Drinking Day
Time frame: Screening Visit
Number of standard drinks will be assessed using the Timeline Follow-back method to obtain the number of drinks consumed on each day of the prior 30 days. Drinks per drinking day will be the mean number of drinks consumed on days on which alcohol was consumed.
Alcohol Approach Bias
Time frame: Baseline
For each participant, bias is computed by taking the median response times to approaching alcohol pictures - response times to avoiding alcohol pictures, as measured with a pull or push of a joystick. Group means of these medians are presented as the outcome measure.
Drinks Per Drinking Day
Time frame: 1 week post-baseline
Number of standard drinks will be assessed using the Timeline Follow-back method to obtain the number of drinks consumed on each day since the last administration of the Timeline Follow-back. Drinks per drinking day will be the mean number of drinks consumed on days on which alcohol was consumed.
Drinks Per Drinking Day
Time frame: 2 weeks post-baseline
Number of standard drinks will be assessed using the Timeline Follow-back method to obtain the number of drinks consumed on each day since the last administration of the Timeline Follow-back. Drinks per drinking day will be the mean number of drinks consumed on days on which alcohol was consumed.
Drinks Per Drinking Day
Time frame: 3 weeks post-baseline
Number of standard drinks will be assessed using the Timeline Follow-back method to obtain the number of drinks consumed on each day since the last administration of the Timeline Follow-back. Drinks per drinking day will be the mean number of drinks consumed on days on which alcohol was consumed.
Drinks Per Drinking Day
Time frame: 4 weeks post-baseline
Number of standard drinks will be assessed using the Timeline Follow-back method to obtain the number of drinks consumed on each day since the last administration of the Timeline Follow-back. Drinks per drinking day will be the mean number of drinks consumed on days on which alcohol was consumed.
Drinks Per Drinking Day
Time frame: 5 weeks post-baseline
Number of standard drinks will be assessed using the Timeline Follow-back method to obtain the number of drinks consumed on each day since the last administration of the Timeline Follow-back. Drinks per drinking day will be the mean number of drinks consumed on days on which alcohol was consumed.
Drinks Per Drinking Day
Time frame: 8 weeks post-baseline
Number of standard drinks will be assessed using the Timeline Follow-back method to obtain the number of drinks consumed on each day since the last administration of the Timeline Follow-back. Drinks per drinking day will be the mean number of drinks consumed on days on which alcohol was consumed.
Alcohol Approach Bias
Time frame: 1 week after treatment
For each participant, bias is computed by taking the median response times to approaching alcohol pictures - response times to avoiding alcohol pictures, as measured with a pull or push of a joystick. Group means of these medians are presented as the outcome measure.
Drinks Per Drinking Day
Time frame: Baseline
Number of standard drinks will be assessed using the Timeline Follow-back method to obtain the number of drinks consumed on each day since the last administration of the Timeline Follow-back. Drinks per drinking day will be the mean number of drinks consumed on days on which alcohol was consumed.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Mar 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Binge Drinking
Recruiting
Multisensory Processing of Alcohol Cues in Young Adult Binge Drinkers
Drinking, Binge
Recruiting
Understanding the Associations Between Romantic Relationship Conflict, Psychophysiological Responding and Alcohol Misuse Among Emerging Adults
Heavy Episodic Drinking
Recruiting
Preliminary Trial of an Avatar Guided Digital Intervention for Emerging Adults
Binge Alcohol Consumption, Suicidal Ideation
Recruiting
Reset Challenge: Reducing High-risk Drinking for Cancer Prevention
Alcohol Drinking, Heavy Drinking
Recruiting
Text-Based Messaging Strategies for Preventing Subsequent Problematic Alcohol Use
Alcohol Drinking, Binge Drinking
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Eric D Claus, Ph.D. principal investigator
Mind Research Network and LBERI
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Active Retraining and Active TDCS in people with Binge Drinking, run by The Mind Research Network at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Mar 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Drinks Per Drinking Day (time frame: Screening Visit). The study lists 10 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Mar 2018.