Renal TransplantNCT02049827
Evaluation of a Predictive Immunovirological Test Occurrence of BK Virus Nephropathy in Renal Transplant
A study testing participation in the study in people with Renal Transplant, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for end stage renal disease (ESRD) improving the quantity and quality of life for dialysis patients. Although prolongation of graft survival in the short term by preventing the release is observed by immunosuppression (IS) powerful, the longer-term survival has not… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Renal Transplant
- What is being tested?
- participation in the study
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 19 Feb 2014to 26 Jul 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Renal transplant > 12 months
- positive for BKV viremia
- immunosuppressive therapy including tacrolimus and mycophenolate
Who cannot join
- immunosuppressive therapy including cyclosporine and / or mTOR inhibitor
- Pregnant Women
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for end stage renal disease (ESRD) improving the quantity and quality of life for dialysis patients. Although prolongation of graft survival in the short term by preventing the release is observed by immunosuppression (IS) powerful, the longer-term survival has not improved . Indeed, the IS can not only have a direct deleterious effect on the kidney transplant , but too weak IS can promote rejection, and too strong, promote the emergence of a viral disease polyomavirus BK ( BKV ) . BK nephropathy (BKVAN ) virus is accompanied by an irreversible impairment of the renal function , leading to a loss of the graft followed by a premature return to dialysis in at least 50 % of cases. Plasma BKV reactivation was observed mainly during the first year of transplantation in 15% of patients and complications annually BKVAN concern about 5 % of recipients . Currently , treatment options are very limited , only the decrease in IS shows a partially effective when care is early . There is no specific antiviral effective treatment of this disease . In addition, there is no way to predict which patients will develop BKV reactivation BKVAN despite lower tax.
The diagnosis of interstitial nephritis BKV based on the detection of viral DNA by PCR and plasma is confirmed by histological analysis of renal tissue . Plasma quantitative PCR ( qPCR) to measure the progression of the disease and therapeutic efficacy. Control of BKV viremia is the direct antiviral immune response quality based primarily on a very effective anti- T lymphocyte activity BKV reflection. In this context, the inhibition of lymphocyte activation induced by IS blocks the establishment of T-cell responses anti- BKV in most transplant, a very low presence of T lymphocytes is generally observed in these patients anti- BKV (LYT - BKV) blood .
Read more
Our preliminary studies have validated in vitro a sensitive test to measure the functionality of blood LYT - BKV. This test is used to evaluate the concentration and functionality of LYT - BKV present in small volume of blood by measuring their specific proliferation after stimulation with peptide cocktails BKV. Proof of concept of the feasibility of this test was established on a small series of samples and highlights significant differences in lymphocyte anti-BKV different patients.
Put to good use during the post-transplant follow-up, this type of test can provide the clinician with valuable data to assess the quality of anti- BKV T response compared to the intensity and type of IS treatment. Early identification of patients at risk of reactivation of BKV, or at risk of BKVAN if BKV viremia observed , would adapt the therapeutic response and monitoring arrangements at the fair. The objective of this project is to conduct a feasibility study to assess the relevance of post-transplant monitoring of anti- BKV T response of BKV viremic patients during the first year post- transplant. Immunological data will be analyzed in relation to virological data and bioclinical data.
- Conditions
- Renal Transplant
- Being tested
- participation in the study
- Keywords
- Renal transplant, BK virus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
participation in the studyOther
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Renal transplant | Experimental | Not described Receives: Other: participation in the study |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Measure of BKV viral
Quantitative Measurement of BKV viral load decline after IS. Negativation sign healing, persistence is poor prognosis.
Measured: at 6 months and 12 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
stability, decrease, increase of viremia
The evolution of viremia (stability, decrease, increase) profile may also be considered to analyze the immunological data obtained.
Measured: 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jan 2014 (estimated)
- Study start19 Feb 2014
- Primary completion26 Jul 2018
- Study completion26 Jul 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Renal TransplantStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Laetitia ALBANO, MD, Study director, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02049827
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 13-AOI-03
- Status last verified
- Apr 2023
- First submitted
- 28 Jan 2014
- Last updated
- 18 Apr 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Apr 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of a Predictive Immunovirological Test Occurrence of BK Virus Nephropathy in Renal Transplant
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02049827
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 13-AOI-03
- Conditions
- Renal Transplant
- Keywords
- Renal transplant, BK virus
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 19 Feb 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Jul 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Jan 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for end stage renal disease (ESRD) improving the quantity and quality of life for dialysis patients. Although prolongation of graft survival in the short term by preventing the release is observed by immunosuppression (IS) powerful, the longer-term survival has not improved . Indeed, the IS can not only have a direct deleterious effect on the kidney transplant , but too weak IS can promote rejection, and too strong, promote the emergence of a viral disease polyomavirus BK ( BKV ) . BK nephropathy (BKVAN ) virus is accompanied by an irreversible impairment of the renal function , leading to a loss of the graft followed by a premature return to dialysis in at least 50 % of cases. Plasma BKV reactivation was observed mainly during the first year of transplantation in 15% of patients and complications annually BKVAN concern about 5 % of recipients . Currently , treatment options are very limited , only the decrease in IS shows a partially effective when care is early . There is no specific antiviral effective treatment of this disease . In addition, there is no way to predict which patients will develop BKV reactivation BKVAN despite lower tax.
The diagnosis of interstitial nephritis BKV based on the detection of viral DNA by PCR and plasma is confirmed by histological analysis of renal tissue . Plasma quantitative PCR ( qPCR) to measure the progression of the disease and therapeutic efficacy. Control of BKV viremia is the direct antiviral immune response quality based primarily on a very effective anti- T lymphocyte activity BKV reflection. In this context, the inhibition of lymphocyte activation induced by IS blocks the establishment of T-cell responses anti- BKV in most transplant, a very low presence of T lymphocytes is generally observed in these patients anti- BKV (LYT - BKV) blood .
Our preliminary studies have validated in vitro a sensitive test to measure the functionality of blood LYT - BKV. This test is used to evaluate the concentration and functionality of LYT - BKV present in small volume of blood by measuring their specific proliferation after stimulation with peptide cocktails BKV. Proof of concept of the feasibility of this test was established on a small series of samples and highlights significant differences in lymphocyte anti-BKV different patients.
Put to good use during the post-transplant follow-up, this type of test can provide the clinician with valuable data to assess the quality of anti- BKV T response compared to the intensity and type of IS treatment. Early identification of patients at risk of reactivation of BKV, or at risk of BKVAN if BKV viremia observed , would adapt the therapeutic response and monitoring arrangements at the fair. The objective of this project is to conduct a feasibility study to assess the relevance of post-transplant monitoring of anti- BKV T response of BKV viremic patients during the first year post- transplant. Immunological data will be analyzed in relation to virological data and bioclinical data.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Renal transplant | Experimental | Other: participation in the study |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Renal transplant > 12 months
- positive for BKV viremia
- immunosuppressive therapy including tacrolimus and mycophenolate
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- immunosuppressive therapy including cyclosporine and / or mTOR inhibitor
- Pregnant Women
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| participation in the study | Other | Renal transplant |
Primary outcome
Measure of BKV viral
Time frame: at 6 months and 12 months
Quantitative Measurement of BKV viral load decline after IS. Negativation sign healing, persistence is poor prognosis.
1 secondary outcome
stability, decrease, increase of viremia
Time frame: 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Apr 2023.
Related trials for Renal Transplant
Enrolling by invitation
Online Exercise Program for Transplant Patients: A Pilot Study
Kidney Transplantation, Physical Function
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Mezagitamab in Adults With Late Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR) After a Kidney Transplant
Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR)
Not yet recruiting
Hypothermic Kidney Machine Perfusion With Omnisol
End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Kidney Transplant
Not yet recruitingEarly Phase 1
Biomarker-Guided Mycophenolate Mofetil Elimination in Low-Risk Older Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients
Kidney Transplant Recipient
Recruiting
Non-Invasive Monitoring of Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients and Immunosuppression Personalization: an Open-labeled Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study
Pediatric Kidney Disease, Transplant;Failure,Kidney
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Laetitia ALBANO, MD study director
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing participation in the study in people with Renal Transplant, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Measure of BKV viral (time frame: at 6 months and 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Apr 2023.