Metatarsal FractureNCT02050698
Hard-soled Shoe Versus Short Leg Walking Cast for a Fifth Metatarsal Avulsion Fracture: A Randomized Multicenter Noninferiority Trial
A study testing Protected weightbearing in a hard-soled shoe and Protected weightbearing in a short leg walking cast in people with Metatarsal Fracture and Treatment, run by Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital at 3 sites in South Korea.
Trial summary
Fifth metatarsal avulsion fractures are common and can usually be treated conservatively. Symptomatic care consisting of protected weightbearing in a hard-soled shoe, air-cast walking boot, or below-knee walking cast have been successful. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Metatarsal Fracture, Treatment
- What is being tested?
- Protected weightbearing in a hard-soled shoe and Protected weightbearing in a short leg walking cast
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 96 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesSouth Korea
- Study dates
- Jan 2014to Jan 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- age between 18 and 65 years
- fifth metatarsal avulsion fracture
Who cannot join
- open fractures
- pathologic fractures
- a fifth metatarsal avulsion fracture combined with other lower extremity injuries such as Lisfranc injury
- patients with diabetes or neuroarthropathy
- patients with obesity (BMI >30, weight >100 kg)
- any other conditions that are expected to prevent the patients from following the study protocol
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
South Korea3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Recruiting
Sanbon Hospital, Wonkwang University College of Medicine
Gunpo, Gyeongi, 435-040
Yu Mi Kim, MD, PhD, +82-31-390-2224, castkim@hanmail.net
- Recruiting
CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University
Seongnam, Gyeongi, 463-712
Young Rak Choi, MD, +82-31-780-5298, jeanguy@hanmail.net
- Recruiting
Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine
Seoul, 150-950
Hyong Nyun Kim, MD, PhD, +82-2-829-5165, hyongnyun@naver.com
Hyong Nyun Kim, MD, PhD
About this study
Fifth metatarsal avulsion fractures are common and can usually be treated conservatively. Symptomatic care consisting of protected weightbearing in a hard-soled shoe, air-cast walking boot, or below-knee walking cast have been successful. Several papers reported that early rehabilitation may decrease ankle stiffness, muscle and bone atrophy, and aids in early return to activities. However, early motion of the ankle joint may have the risk of displacement of the fifth metatarsal avulsion fractures. However, studies using hard-sole shoe for protected weightbearing and allowing motion of the ankle joint had successful results. Clapper et al. compared the results of hard-soled shoe and walking cast for a fifth metatarsal avulsion fracture and reported that all avulsion fractures healed uneventfully and that the results were similar between the two. However, this was not a randomized controlled trial.
Devices such as air-cast walking boot, plaster slipper, or Jone's dressing can also be used for the treatment. However, we decided to compare results of hard-soled shoe and short leg walking cast for the treatment of a fifth metatarsal avulsion fracture.
We hypothesized that the 100mm visual analogue scale (VAS) assessed on 6 months after a fifth metatarsal avulsion fracture treated with protected weightbearing in a hard-soled shoe is not inferior to protected weightbearing in a short leg walking cast but is superior to short leg walking cast with respect to time to return to normal daily life and patient's satisfaction.
Read the detailed description
This study is a noninferiority, randomized controlled trial of patients presenting to multiple centers. The primary outcome measure is the 100mm VAS assessed on 6 months after a fifth metatarsal avulsion fracture. 100mm VAS was compared between the experimental group (hard-soled shoe) and the control group (short leg walking cast) on 6 months follow-up examination. The 100mm VAS is widely used self assessment tool for evaluating pain after fracture. The secondary objectives were to determine whether hard-soled shoe was superior to short leg walking cast with respect to time until return to normal daily life and patient's satisfaction.
The sample size was determined using methods appropriate for noninferiority trials, assuming 90% power and a significance level of 0.05. We performed a pilot study on 18 patients and assessed 100mm VAS on 6 months. Pooled standard deviation was 16.6. To find out whether the hard-soled shoe is not inferior to short leg walking cast for a fifth metatarsal avulsion fracture, 74 patients were required to have 90% power that the lower limit of an one-sided 95% confidence interval for the difference between two treatments will be above the noninferiority margin of -10. We assumed the drop-out rate to be 20%. Adding this number, 96 patients were required for the study.
Determination of the noninferiority margin was based on clinical significance. Todd et al. reported on a study of 48 patients that the minimum clinically significant difference of 100mm VAS was 13mm and that differences of less than this amount, even if statistically significant, are unlikely to be of clinical significance. We decided that the noninferiority margin at 10 mm difference which is less than this amount will be adequate to prove noninferiority of the experiment group (hard-soled shoe) over the control group (short leg walking cast).
After 1 weeks of immobilization in a short leg posterior splint, patients are randomized to experiment group (hard-soled shoe) and control group (short leg walking cast). Randomization was stratified by the study centers. Block randomization were used and the investigators were blinded to the block sizes being used to ensure allocation concealment. Delayed union was defined as a lack of bridging callus on 3 of 5 cortices at 12 weeks. Nonunion was defined as lack of cortical bridging or a clearly visible fracture line, at 14 weeks post injury.
If a subject had discontinued prior to completion of 6 months, the last observation was carried forward for the intent-to-treat analysis. Subjects who crossed over to the other treatment arm, for an example, patients in experiment group(hard-soled shoe) who changed to short leg walking cast or in control group (short leg walking cast) who changed to hard-soled shoe, were analyzed according to their initial group allocation for the intent-to-treat analysis. Additionally, an as-treated (per-protocal) analysis was also conducted on patients who completed the 6 months follow-up with the protocol assigned.
Although previous studied have not documented an increase risk of reduction loss with protected weightbearing in a hard-soled shoe protocol, a safety rule was put in place to assure patients, clinicians, and the health research ethics board that the safety of our patients was a priority. Reduction loss was not a primary outcome, but it was monitored carefully regardless of published evidence. A safety rule established a priori eliminated any dissent among the research team and participating surgeons about stopping the study in the event of an apparent adverse outcome related to protected weightbearing in a hard-soled shoe. If a difference of greater than three spontaneous reduction loss occurred between the groups, the intervention would be halted. A reduction loss or metal failure was defined as one that occurred without patient instigation of inappropriate activity. The reduction loss was to be monitored by study personnel not involved in the outcome assessment.
- Conditions
- Metatarsal Fracture, Treatment
- Being tested
- Protected weightbearing in a hard-soled shoe, Protected weightbearing in a short leg walking cast
- Keywords
- fift metatarsal avulsion fracture, hard-soled shoe, short leg walking cast, protected weightbearing
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Protected weightbearing in a hard-soled shoeProcedure or surgery
Patients allocated to experiment group are allowed tolerable weightbearing in a hard-soled shoe after one week of immobilization in a posterior splint
Protected weightbearing in a short leg walking castProcedure or surgery
Patients allocated to control group are allowed tolerable weightbearing in a short leg walking cast after one week of immobilization in a posterior splint
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| short leg walking cast | Active comparator | After 1 weeks of immobilization in a short leg posterior splint, patient is allowed protected weightbearing in a short leg walking cast Receives: Procedure: Protected weightbearing in a short leg walking cast |
| hard-soled shoe | Experimental | After 1 weeks of immobilization in a short leg posterior splint, patient is allowed tolerable weightbearing in a hard-soled shoe Receives: Procedure: Protected weightbearing in a hard-soled shoe |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
100mm visual analogue scale (VAS)
The 100mm VAS is widely used self assessment tool for evaluating pain after fracture.
Measured: 6 months after a fifth metatarsal avulsion fracture
Secondary outcomes (2)
Time to return to preinjury activity
Measured: upto 6 months
patients' subjective satisfactions
Measured: 3, 5, 8, 12 weeks and 6 months after injury
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Jan 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2014
- Primary completionJan 2016 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Metatarsal FractureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 96 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hyong Nyun Kim, Hallym University Medical Center
- Investigators
- Hyong Nyun Kim, MD, PhD, Study chair, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of MedicineHyong Nyun Kim, MD, PhD, Study director, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02050698
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB2014-OS01
- Status last verified
- Oct 2015
- First submitted
- 29 Jan 2014
- Last updated
- 14 Oct 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP, Bonacci R. Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Apr;27(4):485-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70238-x.
PubMed 8604867Clapper MF, O'Brien TJ, Lyons PM. Fractures of the fifth metatarsal. Analysis of a fracture registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Jun;(315):238-41.
PubMed 7634674Gray AC, Rooney BP, Ingram R. A prospective comparison of two treatment options for tuberosity fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Foot (Edinb). 2008 Sep;18(3):156-8. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2008.02.002. Epub 2008 May 19.
PubMed 20307430Heineck J, Wolz M, Haupt C, Rammelt S, Schneiders W. Fifth metatarsal avulsion fracture: a rational basis for postoperative treatment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009 Aug;129(8):1089-92. doi: 10.1007/s00402-008-0756-x. Epub 2008 Sep 26.
PubMed 18818936Shahid MK, Punwar S, Boulind C, Bannister G. Aircast walking boot and below-knee walking cast for avulsion fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal: a comparative cohort study. Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Jan;34(1):75-9. doi: 10.1177/1071100712460197.
PubMed 23386764Vorlat P, Achtergael W, Haentjens P. Predictors of outcome of non-displaced fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal. Int Orthop. 2007 Feb;31(1):5-10. doi: 10.1007/s00264-006-0116-9. Epub 2006 May 23.
PubMed 16721621Wiener BD, Linder JF, Giattini JF. Treatment of fractures of the fifth metatarsal: a prospective study. Foot Ankle Int. 1997 May;18(5):267-9. doi: 10.1177/107110079701800504.
PubMed 9167925
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Oct 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Hard-soled Shoe Versus Short Leg Walking Cast for a Fifth Metatarsal Avulsion Fracture: A Randomized Multicenter Noninferiority Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02050698
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB2014-OS01
- Conditions
- Metatarsal Fracture, Treatment
- Keywords
- fift metatarsal avulsion fracture, hard-soled shoe, short leg walking cast, protected weightbearing
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 96 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2014
- Primary completion
- Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 31 Jan 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Fifth metatarsal avulsion fractures are common and can usually be treated conservatively. Symptomatic care consisting of protected weightbearing in a hard-soled shoe, air-cast walking boot, or below-knee walking cast have been successful. Several papers reported that early rehabilitation may decrease ankle stiffness, muscle and bone atrophy, and aids in early return to activities. However, early motion of the ankle joint may have the risk of displacement of the fifth metatarsal avulsion fractures. However, studies using hard-sole shoe for protected weightbearing and allowing motion of the ankle joint had successful results. Clapper et al. compared the results of hard-soled shoe and walking cast for a fifth metatarsal avulsion fracture and reported that all avulsion fractures healed uneventfully and that the results were similar between the two. However, this was not a randomized controlled trial.
Devices such as air-cast walking boot, plaster slipper, or Jone's dressing can also be used for the treatment. However, we decided to compare results of hard-soled shoe and short leg walking cast for the treatment of a fifth metatarsal avulsion fracture.
We hypothesized that the 100mm visual analogue scale (VAS) assessed on 6 months after a fifth metatarsal avulsion fracture treated with protected weightbearing in a hard-soled shoe is not inferior to protected weightbearing in a short leg walking cast but is superior to short leg walking cast with respect to time to return to normal daily life and patient's satisfaction.
Detailed description
This study is a noninferiority, randomized controlled trial of patients presenting to multiple centers. The primary outcome measure is the 100mm VAS assessed on 6 months after a fifth metatarsal avulsion fracture. 100mm VAS was compared between the experimental group (hard-soled shoe) and the control group (short leg walking cast) on 6 months follow-up examination. The 100mm VAS is widely used self assessment tool for evaluating pain after fracture. The secondary objectives were to determine whether hard-soled shoe was superior to short leg walking cast with respect to time until return to normal daily life and patient's satisfaction.
The sample size was determined using methods appropriate for noninferiority trials, assuming 90% power and a significance level of 0.05. We performed a pilot study on 18 patients and assessed 100mm VAS on 6 months. Pooled standard deviation was 16.6. To find out whether the hard-soled shoe is not inferior to short leg walking cast for a fifth metatarsal avulsion fracture, 74 patients were required to have 90% power that the lower limit of an one-sided 95% confidence interval for the difference between two treatments will be above the noninferiority margin of -10. We assumed the drop-out rate to be 20%. Adding this number, 96 patients were required for the study.
Determination of the noninferiority margin was based on clinical significance. Todd et al. reported on a study of 48 patients that the minimum clinically significant difference of 100mm VAS was 13mm and that differences of less than this amount, even if statistically significant, are unlikely to be of clinical significance. We decided that the noninferiority margin at 10 mm difference which is less than this amount will be adequate to prove noninferiority of the experiment group (hard-soled shoe) over the control group (short leg walking cast).
After 1 weeks of immobilization in a short leg posterior splint, patients are randomized to experiment group (hard-soled shoe) and control group (short leg walking cast). Randomization was stratified by the study centers. Block randomization were used and the investigators were blinded to the block sizes being used to ensure allocation concealment. Delayed union was defined as a lack of bridging callus on 3 of 5 cortices at 12 weeks. Nonunion was defined as lack of cortical bridging or a clearly visible fracture line, at 14 weeks post injury.
If a subject had discontinued prior to completion of 6 months, the last observation was carried forward for the intent-to-treat analysis. Subjects who crossed over to the other treatment arm, for an example, patients in experiment group(hard-soled shoe) who changed to short leg walking cast or in control group (short leg walking cast) who changed to hard-soled shoe, were analyzed according to their initial group allocation for the intent-to-treat analysis. Additionally, an as-treated (per-protocal) analysis was also conducted on patients who completed the 6 months follow-up with the protocol assigned.
Although previous studied have not documented an increase risk of reduction loss with protected weightbearing in a hard-soled shoe protocol, a safety rule was put in place to assure patients, clinicians, and the health research ethics board that the safety of our patients was a priority. Reduction loss was not a primary outcome, but it was monitored carefully regardless of published evidence. A safety rule established a priori eliminated any dissent among the research team and participating surgeons about stopping the study in the event of an apparent adverse outcome related to protected weightbearing in a hard-soled shoe. If a difference of greater than three spontaneous reduction loss occurred between the groups, the intervention would be halted. A reduction loss or metal failure was defined as one that occurred without patient instigation of inappropriate activity. The reduction loss was to be monitored by study personnel not involved in the outcome assessment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| short leg walking cast | Active comparator | Procedure: Protected weightbearing in a short leg walking castAfter 1 weeks of immobilization in a short leg posterior splint, patient is allowed protected weightbearing in a short leg walking cast |
| hard-soled shoe | Experimental | Procedure: Protected weightbearing in a hard-soled shoeAfter 1 weeks of immobilization in a short leg posterior splint, patient is allowed tolerable weightbearing in a hard-soled shoe |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- age between 18 and 65 years
- fifth metatarsal avulsion fracture
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- open fractures
- pathologic fractures
- a fifth metatarsal avulsion fracture combined with other lower extremity injuries such as Lisfranc injury
- patients with diabetes or neuroarthropathy
- patients with obesity (BMI >30, weight >100 kg)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Protected weightbearing in a hard-soled shoePatients allocated to experiment group are allowed tolerable weightbearing in a hard-soled shoe after one week of immobilization in a posterior splint | Procedure or surgery | hard-soled shoe |
| Protected weightbearing in a short leg walking castPatients allocated to control group are allowed tolerable weightbearing in a short leg walking cast after one week of immobilization in a posterior splint | Procedure or surgery | short leg walking cast |
Primary outcome
100mm visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time frame: 6 months after a fifth metatarsal avulsion fracture
The 100mm VAS is widely used self assessment tool for evaluating pain after fracture.
2 secondary outcomes
Time to return to preinjury activity
Time frame: upto 6 months
patients' subjective satisfactions
Time frame: 3, 5, 8, 12 weeks and 6 months after injury
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Oct 2015.
- Background: PubMed 8604867Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP, Bonacci R. Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Apr;27(4):485-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70238-x.
- Background: PubMed 7634674Clapper MF, O'Brien TJ, Lyons PM. Fractures of the fifth metatarsal. Analysis of a fracture registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Jun;(315):238-41.
- Background: PubMed 20307430Gray AC, Rooney BP, Ingram R. A prospective comparison of two treatment options for tuberosity fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Foot (Edinb). 2008 Sep;18(3):156-8. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2008.02.002. Epub 2008 May 19.
- Background: PubMed 18818936Heineck J, Wolz M, Haupt C, Rammelt S, Schneiders W. Fifth metatarsal avulsion fracture: a rational basis for postoperative treatment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009 Aug;129(8):1089-92. doi: 10.1007/s00402-008-0756-x. Epub 2008 Sep 26.
- Background: PubMed 23386764Shahid MK, Punwar S, Boulind C, Bannister G. Aircast walking boot and below-knee walking cast for avulsion fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal: a comparative cohort study. Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Jan;34(1):75-9. doi: 10.1177/1071100712460197.
- Background: PubMed 16721621Vorlat P, Achtergael W, Haentjens P. Predictors of outcome of non-displaced fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal. Int Orthop. 2007 Feb;31(1):5-10. doi: 10.1007/s00264-006-0116-9. Epub 2006 May 23.
- Background: PubMed 9167925Wiener BD, Linder JF, Giattini JF. Treatment of fractures of the fifth metatarsal: a prospective study. Foot Ankle Int. 1997 May;18(5):267-9. doi: 10.1177/107110079701800504.
Related trials for Metatarsal Fracture
Recruiting
Transverse Pinning Versus Antegrade Intramedullary Pinning for Neck and Shaft Metatarsal Fractures
Transverse Pinning for Metatarsal Fractures, Versus Antegrade Intramedullary Pinning for Metatarsal Fractures
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluate the Continued Safety and Performance of the Foot and Ankle Products
Hyperpronated Foot, Reconstruction Surgeries of the Foot
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Data Collection Protocol to Evaluate the Real World Usage of the Orthofix AccelStim Device to Treat Fresh Metatarsal Fractures
Metatarsal Fracture
Recruiting
Treatment of Fifth Metatarsal Zone 3 Fractures
Fractures, Stress, Metatarsal Fracture
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hyong Nyun Kim, MD, PhD study chair
Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine
Hyong Nyun Kim, MD, PhD study director
Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Protected weightbearing in a hard-soled shoe and Protected weightbearing in a short leg walking cast in people with Metatarsal Fracture and Treatment, run by Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital at 3 sites in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Hyong Nyun Kim, MD, PhD (+82-2-829-5165, hyongnyun@naver.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
100mm visual analogue scale (VAS) (time frame: 6 months after a fifth metatarsal avulsion fracture). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02050698, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Oct 2015.