AzTrials
AzTrials

Patient SafetyFIRSTNCT02050789

Flexibility In Duty Hour Requirements for Surgical Trainees Trial - "the FIRST Trial"

A study testing flexible duty hours in people with Patient Safety and Resident Work Hours, run by Northwestern University.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Resident duty hour requirements in the U.S. are still evolving as stakeholders continue to debate how best to (re)structure postgraduate medical education. There is concern that current restrictions may be detrimental to patient care and resident training. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Patient Safety, Resident Work Hours
What is being tested?
flexible duty hours
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
152 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jul 2014to 30 Jun 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • General Surgery Residency Programs participating in ACS NSQIP

Who cannot join

  • Childrens' and VA Hospitals

About this study

Official title: Allowing Flexibility in Surgical Resident Duty Hours Trial

Resident duty hour requirements in the U.S. are still evolving as stakeholders continue to debate how best to (re)structure postgraduate medical education.

There is concern that current restrictions may be detrimental to patient care and resident training. To investigate these issues, the investigators will be conducting a one-year, prospective randomized trial to examine how flexibility of duty hour requirements affects patient care when compared to current resident duty hour requirements. Further information about the study is available on the FIRST Trial website http://www.thefirsttrial.org/.

Read the detailed description

Residency programs will be randomized to either (1) an intervention arm that eliminates several Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) duty hour requirements or (2) to a usual care arm where programs will continue adhering to current ACGME requirements. Programs in the intervention arm will be granted a waiver from current duty hour requirements by the ACGME and allowed to eliminate all resident duty hour rules with the following exceptions: Duty hours limited to 80 hours/week averaged over 4 weeks, minimum of one free day (no duty)/week averaged over 4 weeks, may not take in-house call more frequently than every 3rd night, averaged over 4 weeks, allowed to increase duty requirement flexibility for chief residents. The intent of the intervention arm is to allow flexibility in surgical resident duty hours and improve continuity of care. Subsequently, the investigators will compare multiple postoperative outcomes between the two study arms using data collected through the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP). The results of this study will provide high-quality empirical evidence upon which to base resident duty hour requirements in the future.

Updated April 1, 2014

Detailed statistical analysis plan available on the FIRST Trial website. http://www.thefirsttrial.org/Approval/Approval

A listing of the 152 ACS-NSQIP hospitals that have elected to participate in the FIRST Trial is available on the FIRST Trial website. http://www.thefirsttrial.org/Hospitals/Hospitals

Updated July 14, 2014

Post-Randomization documents available for control and intervention arms on FIRST Trial website.

http://www.thefirsttrial.org/PostRandomization/PostRandomization

Updated August 2014

'FIRST Trial-Policies \& Procedures Survey for Program Directors' survey administered to general surgery program directors via Survey Monkey.

Updated January 2015

Resident survey regarding duty hour policies and procedures administered at the end of the annual ABS In-Training Examination (ABSITE®).

Updated April 1, 2015

The Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) was convened March 10, 2015 to review the results of planned interim analysis. After review, they voted to allow the FIRST Trial to continue. All other aspects of the trial are on track.

Updated May 24, 2016

Results from the study were released February 2, 2016 and the study has been extended for an additional year, through the 2016-2017 academic year.

Additional programs were enrolled in the one-year extension study.

March 10, 2017

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) released a final set of revisions to the professional standards all accredited US residency and fellowship programs follow in preparing today's physicians for a lifetime of practice. The new model also directly addresses requests from medical educators and residents by recognizing the risk of burnout and depression for physicians. Programs and institutions will be responsible for prioritizing physician well-being, ensuring protected time with patients, minimizing non-physician obligations, and ensuring that residents have the opportunity to access medical and dental care.

The total number of clinical and educational hours for residents has not changed. Starting the 2017-2018 academic year, the standards require that all programs and residents adhere to the maximum limits averaged over four weeks:

  • a maximum of 80 hours per week
  • one day free from clinical experience or education in seven
  • in-house call no more frequent than every third night
  • a maximum of 24 continuous work hours for all residents.

Updated September 12, 2017

Resident survey data collected with the 2016 and 2017 ABSITE Survey were collected and analyzed. Topics that emerged for further qualitative and quantitative analysis are as follows:

  • Gender differences in resident outcomes
  • Burnout and psychological wellbeing among residents
  • Coercion and the decision to stay longer shifts within the flexible arm
  • Needle stick and motor vehicle accident rates among US General Surgery residents
  • Residency preparation (readiness) and the effects on burnout and wellbeing
Being tested
flexible duty hours

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • flexible duty hoursBehavioural

    Also called Waiver from current duty hour requirements by the ACGME., Allowed to eliminate all resident duty hour rules except:, Duty hours limited to 80 hrs/week averaged over 4 weeks., Min of 1 free day (no duty)/week averaged over 4 weeks.

    If a hospital is assigned to the intervention arm, all categorical and preliminary general surgery residents in that general surgery program will switch to the flexible duty hours while at an enrolled hospital.

Study groups in NCT02050789
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Usual Care ArmNo interventionPrograms will continue adhering to current ACGME requirements.
Intervention ArmExperimentalThe intent of the intervention arm is to allow flexibility in surgical resident duty hours and improve continuity of care.
Receives: Behavioral: flexible duty hours

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Death or Serious Morbidity

    The primary outcome for the trial is a composite measure of Death or Serious Morbidity.

    Measured: 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Jan 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2014
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2017
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
152 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02050789
Sponsor's protocol ID
FIRST Trial
Acronym
FIRST
Status last verified
Sep 2017
First submitted
24 Jan 2014
Last updated
13 Sep 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Saadat LV, Dahlke AR, Rajaram R, Kreutzer L, Love R, Odell DD, Bilimoria KY, Yang AD. Program Director Perceptions of Surgical Resident Training and Patient Care under Flexible Duty Hour Requirements. J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Jun;222(6):1098-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.03.026. Epub 2016 Apr 4.

    PubMed 27234632
  • Bilimoria KY, Chung JW, Hedges LV, Dahlke AR, Love R, Cohen ME, Hoyt DB, Yang AD, Tarpley JL, Mellinger JD, Mahvi DM, Kelz RR, Ko CY, Odell DD, Stulberg JJ, Lewis FR. National Cluster-Randomized Trial of Duty-Hour Flexibility in Surgical Training. N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 25;374(8):713-27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1515724. Epub 2016 Feb 2.

    PubMed 26836220
  • Bilimoria KY, Chung JW, Hedges LV, Dahlke AR, Love R, Cohen ME, Tarpley J, Mellinger J, Mahvi DM, Kelz RR, Ko CY, Hoyt DB, Lewis FH. Development of the Flexibility in Duty Hour Requirements for Surgical Trainees (FIRST) Trial Protocol: A National Cluster-Randomized Trial of Resident Duty Hour Policies. JAMA Surg. 2016 Mar;151(3):273-81. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4990.

    PubMed 26720622

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing flexible duty hours in people with Patient Safety and Resident Work Hours, run by Northwestern University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Death or Serious Morbidity (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02050789, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Sep 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in