Hepatocellular CarcinomaNCT02051283
Pretreatment MRI Predicting Outcome After Radio-frequency Ablation of HCC
An observational study of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
HCC is classified as keratin (K) 19 positive or K19 negative. K19 is a biliary/hepatic progenitor cell (HPC) marker only expressed in a subset of HCC with poor prognosis and high risk of early recurrence after treatment; particularly in radio-frequency ablation (RFA). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- RFA
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- Feb 2014to Dec 2016
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: * Documented and diagnosed liver confined hepatocellular carcinoma by existing imaging criteria according to currently accepted international guidelines (< 4cm). * Treatment radio-frequency ablation - (percutaneous, laparascopy, laparatomy) * Availability of pretreatment MRI with three phase contrast enhanced images and diffusion-weighted sequence prior to treatment. * Follow-up of at least 2 years.
Who may be able to join
- Documented and diagnosed liver confined hepatocellular carcinoma by existing imaging criteria according to currently accepted international guidelines (< 4cm).
- Treatment radio-frequency ablation - (percutaneous, laparascopy, laparatomy)
- Availability of pretreatment MRI with three phase contrast enhanced images and diffusion-weighted sequence prior to treatment.
- Follow-up of at least 2 years.
Who cannot join
- Non availability of pathologic confirmation or biopsy during radio-frequency ablation.
- Post-treatment follow-up < 2 years.
- Treatment other than RFA
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Belgium1 site
University Hospitals UZ Leuven, Gasthuisberg
Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, 3000
Vandecaveye, vincent.vandecaveye@uzleuven.be
Vincent Vandecaveye, MD, PhD
About this study
Official title: Value of Pretreatment MRI Determined Parameters for Predicting Outcome After Radio-frequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
HCC is classified as keratin (K) 19 positive or K19 negative. K19 is a biliary/hepatic progenitor cell (HPC) marker only expressed in a subset of HCC with poor prognosis and high risk of early recurrence after treatment; particularly in radio-frequency ablation (RFA). These patients consequently show worse survival compared to patients with K19 negative HCC.
A recent publication has shown the value of pretreatment biopsy with K19 staining and suggests that the role of routine biopsies in potentially curable HCC should be reconsidered.
Read more
However, currently, pretreatment biopsies are rarely performed in the diagnosis of HCC due to the excellent performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detection, diagnosis and staging of cirrhotic livers.
Previous publications have indicated imaging patterns that may be associated with worse prognostic tumoral parameters.
If MRI determined imaging parameters could indeed provide a surrogate marker for presence of K19 and/or microvascular invasion as potential important prognostic factors in RFA of HCC, these imaging parameters may thus hold prognostic information towards RFA treatment and possibly predict treatment outcome. .
The purpose of the retrospective study is thus to evaluate MRI determined imaging parameters at pretreatment MRI for their predictive value towards outcome (disease free survival) of radio-frequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma.
If successful, pretreatment MRI parameters may be used for selecting patient with high risk of unfavorable outcome after RFA and select the patients for more aggressive treatment such as surgical resection or upfront transplantation.
Read the detailed description
Recent pathological, immunohistochemical and molecular profiling have progressively revealed the complex classification of primary liver cancers and have resulted in a subclassification roughly separating mucinous cholangiocarcinomas from mixed tumors from "pure" hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
In addition, HCC is classified as keratin (K) 19 positive or K19 negative. K19 is a biliary/hepatic progenitor cell (HPC) marker only expressed in a subset of HCC with poor prognosis and high risk of early recurrence after treatment; particularly in radio-frequency ablation (RFA). These patients consequently show worse survival compared to patients with K19 negative HCC.
A recent publication has shown the value of pretreatment biopsy with K19 staining and suggests that the role of routine biopsies in potentially curable HCC should be reconsidered.
However, currently, pretreatment biopsies are rarely performed in the diagnosis of HCC due to the excellent performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detection, diagnosis and staging of cirrhotic livers. This progression of MRI is based on technical refining of three-phase contrast-enhanced imaging, development of the cellular marker sequence diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) and hepatospecific biliary contrast-agents. While pretreatment biopsies would have incremental value in treatment planning, its routine application in daily clinical practice is faced with multiple problems. First, K19 evaluation at histopathology can - in most cases - only reliably be performed on whole resection specimens and is more difficult on biopsies. Second, routine biopsies would lead to a dramatic increase in workload for radiologists and pathologists influencing daily practice and organization. Also, lesions are not always readily detectable at ultrasound and possibly not eligible for percutaneous biopsy requiring laparoscopy guided biopsy under anesthesia. Third, the risk of tract seeding remains controversial but has not been completely excluded.
Previous publications have indicated imaging patterns that may be associated with worse prognostic tumoral parameters. The corona sign seen at CT during arterial portography and hepatic arteriography (invasive imaging only performed in Japan) is associated with the presence of microvascular invasion. However, this sign has not yet been described at MRI. Also MRI derived parameters may predict the presence of HCC expressing progenitor cell markers, including K19. If MRI determined imaging parameters could indeed provide a surrogate marker for presence of K19 and/or microvascular invasion as potential important prognostic factors in RFA of HCC, these imaging parameters may thus hold prognostic information towards RFA treatment and possibly predict treatment outcome. The hypothesis is that lesions showing features correlating to K19 positivity such as persistent (rim) enhancement and rim like intensity at DWI may correlate to worse prognosis than HCC that don't express these imaging features.
If confirmed, MRI may be the first line modality adapting the patients management; either by selecting patients who actually would benefit from biopsy or identifying patients in who more invasive treatment is necessary (for instance: surgical resection instead of RFA in child A patients; ablation with wider margins in patients not eligible for surgery).
However, before performing a prospective or interventional study, experience needs to be gained with the various possible imaging patterns, aiming to find significant correlations between imaging parameters and adverse prognosis.
The purpose of the retrospective study is thus to evaluate MRI determined imaging parameters at pretreatment MRI for their predictive value towards outcome (disease free survival) of radio-frequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma.
If successful, pretreatment MRI parameters may be used for selecting patient with high risk of unfavorable outcome after RFA and select the patients for more aggressive treatment such as surgical resection or upfront transplantation.
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Being tested
- RFA
- Keywords
- Hepatocellular carcinoma, RFA, MRI
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RFAOther
RFA
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| patients with HCC eligible for RFA | patients with HCC eligible for RFA Receives: Other: RFA |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Predictive value of MRI determined contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted sequence pattern towards outcome (tumour recurrence < 1 year versus > 1 year)
Predictive value of MRI determined contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted sequence pattern towards outcome (tumour recurrence < 1 year versus > 1 year)
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Correlation of predictive MRI parameters with histology obtained from biopsy during radio-frequency ablation (tumor grade, microvascular invasion, Keratin 19 status)
Correlation of predictive MRI parameters with histology obtained from biopsy during radio-frequency ablation (tumor grade, microvascular invasion, Keratin 19 status)
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Jan 2014 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2014
- Primary completionDec 2016 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2016 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Hepatocellular CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02051283
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Sbis
- Status last verified
- Jan 2014
- First submitted
- 29 Jan 2014
- Last updated
- 31 Jan 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Jan 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Value of Pretreatment MRI Determined Parameters for Predicting Outcome After Radio-frequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02051283
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Sbis
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Keywords
- Hepatocellular carcinoma, RFA, MRI
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 2014
- Primary completion
- Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2016 (estimated)
- First posted
- 31 Jan 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
HCC is classified as keratin (K) 19 positive or K19 negative. K19 is a biliary/hepatic progenitor cell (HPC) marker only expressed in a subset of HCC with poor prognosis and high risk of early recurrence after treatment; particularly in radio-frequency ablation (RFA). These patients consequently show worse survival compared to patients with K19 negative HCC.
A recent publication has shown the value of pretreatment biopsy with K19 staining and suggests that the role of routine biopsies in potentially curable HCC should be reconsidered.
However, currently, pretreatment biopsies are rarely performed in the diagnosis of HCC due to the excellent performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detection, diagnosis and staging of cirrhotic livers.
Previous publications have indicated imaging patterns that may be associated with worse prognostic tumoral parameters.
If MRI determined imaging parameters could indeed provide a surrogate marker for presence of K19 and/or microvascular invasion as potential important prognostic factors in RFA of HCC, these imaging parameters may thus hold prognostic information towards RFA treatment and possibly predict treatment outcome. .
The purpose of the retrospective study is thus to evaluate MRI determined imaging parameters at pretreatment MRI for their predictive value towards outcome (disease free survival) of radio-frequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma.
If successful, pretreatment MRI parameters may be used for selecting patient with high risk of unfavorable outcome after RFA and select the patients for more aggressive treatment such as surgical resection or upfront transplantation.
Detailed description
Recent pathological, immunohistochemical and molecular profiling have progressively revealed the complex classification of primary liver cancers and have resulted in a subclassification roughly separating mucinous cholangiocarcinomas from mixed tumors from "pure" hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
In addition, HCC is classified as keratin (K) 19 positive or K19 negative. K19 is a biliary/hepatic progenitor cell (HPC) marker only expressed in a subset of HCC with poor prognosis and high risk of early recurrence after treatment; particularly in radio-frequency ablation (RFA). These patients consequently show worse survival compared to patients with K19 negative HCC.
A recent publication has shown the value of pretreatment biopsy with K19 staining and suggests that the role of routine biopsies in potentially curable HCC should be reconsidered.
However, currently, pretreatment biopsies are rarely performed in the diagnosis of HCC due to the excellent performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detection, diagnosis and staging of cirrhotic livers. This progression of MRI is based on technical refining of three-phase contrast-enhanced imaging, development of the cellular marker sequence diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) and hepatospecific biliary contrast-agents. While pretreatment biopsies would have incremental value in treatment planning, its routine application in daily clinical practice is faced with multiple problems. First, K19 evaluation at histopathology can - in most cases - only reliably be performed on whole resection specimens and is more difficult on biopsies. Second, routine biopsies would lead to a dramatic increase in workload for radiologists and pathologists influencing daily practice and organization. Also, lesions are not always readily detectable at ultrasound and possibly not eligible for percutaneous biopsy requiring laparoscopy guided biopsy under anesthesia. Third, the risk of tract seeding remains controversial but has not been completely excluded.
Previous publications have indicated imaging patterns that may be associated with worse prognostic tumoral parameters. The corona sign seen at CT during arterial portography and hepatic arteriography (invasive imaging only performed in Japan) is associated with the presence of microvascular invasion. However, this sign has not yet been described at MRI. Also MRI derived parameters may predict the presence of HCC expressing progenitor cell markers, including K19. If MRI determined imaging parameters could indeed provide a surrogate marker for presence of K19 and/or microvascular invasion as potential important prognostic factors in RFA of HCC, these imaging parameters may thus hold prognostic information towards RFA treatment and possibly predict treatment outcome. The hypothesis is that lesions showing features correlating to K19 positivity such as persistent (rim) enhancement and rim like intensity at DWI may correlate to worse prognosis than HCC that don't express these imaging features.
If confirmed, MRI may be the first line modality adapting the patients management; either by selecting patients who actually would benefit from biopsy or identifying patients in who more invasive treatment is necessary (for instance: surgical resection instead of RFA in child A patients; ablation with wider margins in patients not eligible for surgery).
However, before performing a prospective or interventional study, experience needs to be gained with the various possible imaging patterns, aiming to find significant correlations between imaging parameters and adverse prognosis.
The purpose of the retrospective study is thus to evaluate MRI determined imaging parameters at pretreatment MRI for their predictive value towards outcome (disease free survival) of radio-frequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma.
If successful, pretreatment MRI parameters may be used for selecting patient with high risk of unfavorable outcome after RFA and select the patients for more aggressive treatment such as surgical resection or upfront transplantation.
Study design
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| patients with HCC eligible for RFA | – | Other: RFApatients with HCC eligible for RFA |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- * Documented and diagnosed liver confined hepatocellular carcinoma by existing imaging criteria according to currently accepted international guidelines (< 4cm). * Treatment radio-frequency ablation - (percutaneous, laparascopy, laparatomy) * Availability of pretreatment MRI with three phase contrast enhanced images and diffusion-weighted sequence prior to treatment. * Follow-up of at least 2 years.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Documented and diagnosed liver confined hepatocellular carcinoma by existing imaging criteria according to currently accepted international guidelines (< 4cm).
- Treatment radio-frequency ablation - (percutaneous, laparascopy, laparatomy)
- Availability of pretreatment MRI with three phase contrast enhanced images and diffusion-weighted sequence prior to treatment.
- Follow-up of at least 2 years.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Non availability of pathologic confirmation or biopsy during radio-frequency ablation.
- Post-treatment follow-up < 2 years.
- Treatment other than RFA
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RFARFA | Other | patients with HCC eligible for RFA |
Primary outcome
Predictive value of MRI determined contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted sequence pattern towards outcome (tumour recurrence < 1 year versus > 1 year)
Time frame: 2 years
Predictive value of MRI determined contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted sequence pattern towards outcome (tumour recurrence < 1 year versus > 1 year)
1 secondary outcome
Correlation of predictive MRI parameters with histology obtained from biopsy during radio-frequency ablation (tumor grade, microvascular invasion, Keratin 19 status)
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Jan 2014.
Related trials for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Real-world Evaluation of the HistoSonics Edison System for Treatment of Liver Tumors Across Multidisciplinary Users (BOOMBOX: Master Study)
Liver Neoplasms, Primary Liver Cancer
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT With Histopathology Validation in Patients With Various Cancers
Bladder Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Evaluate Patient-Reported Satisfaction, Effectiveness, and Safety of Atezolizumab in Participants Treated in Routine Clinical Practice
Lung Cancer, Hepatocellular Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jan 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Predictive value of MRI determined contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted sequence pattern towards outcome (tumour recurrence < 1 year versus > 1 year) (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jan 2014.