AzTrials
AzTrials

Hepatocellular CarcinomaNCT02051283

Pretreatment MRI Predicting Outcome After Radio-frequency Ablation of HCC

An observational study of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

HCC is classified as keratin (K) 19 positive or K19 negative. K19 is a biliary/hepatic progenitor cell (HPC) marker only expressed in a subset of HCC with poor prognosis and high risk of early recurrence after treatment; particularly in radio-frequency ablation (RFA). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
What is being tested?
RFA
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
Feb 2014to Dec 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: * Documented and diagnosed liver confined hepatocellular carcinoma by existing imaging criteria according to currently accepted international guidelines (< 4cm). * Treatment radio-frequency ablation - (percutaneous, laparascopy, laparatomy) * Availability of pretreatment MRI with three phase contrast enhanced images and diffusion-weighted sequence prior to treatment. * Follow-up of at least 2 years.

Who may be able to join

  • Documented and diagnosed liver confined hepatocellular carcinoma by existing imaging criteria according to currently accepted international guidelines (< 4cm).
  • Treatment radio-frequency ablation - (percutaneous, laparascopy, laparatomy)
  • Availability of pretreatment MRI with three phase contrast enhanced images and diffusion-weighted sequence prior to treatment.
  • Follow-up of at least 2 years.

Who cannot join

  • Non availability of pathologic confirmation or biopsy during radio-frequency ablation.
  • Post-treatment follow-up < 2 years.
  • Treatment other than RFA

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • University Hospitals UZ Leuven, Gasthuisberg

    Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, 3000

    Vandecaveye, vincent.vandecaveye@uzleuven.be

    Vincent Vandecaveye, MD, PhD

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: Value of Pretreatment MRI Determined Parameters for Predicting Outcome After Radio-frequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

HCC is classified as keratin (K) 19 positive or K19 negative. K19 is a biliary/hepatic progenitor cell (HPC) marker only expressed in a subset of HCC with poor prognosis and high risk of early recurrence after treatment; particularly in radio-frequency ablation (RFA). These patients consequently show worse survival compared to patients with K19 negative HCC.

A recent publication has shown the value of pretreatment biopsy with K19 staining and suggests that the role of routine biopsies in potentially curable HCC should be reconsidered.

Read more

However, currently, pretreatment biopsies are rarely performed in the diagnosis of HCC due to the excellent performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detection, diagnosis and staging of cirrhotic livers.

Previous publications have indicated imaging patterns that may be associated with worse prognostic tumoral parameters.

If MRI determined imaging parameters could indeed provide a surrogate marker for presence of K19 and/or microvascular invasion as potential important prognostic factors in RFA of HCC, these imaging parameters may thus hold prognostic information towards RFA treatment and possibly predict treatment outcome. .

The purpose of the retrospective study is thus to evaluate MRI determined imaging parameters at pretreatment MRI for their predictive value towards outcome (disease free survival) of radio-frequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

If successful, pretreatment MRI parameters may be used for selecting patient with high risk of unfavorable outcome after RFA and select the patients for more aggressive treatment such as surgical resection or upfront transplantation.

Read the detailed description

Recent pathological, immunohistochemical and molecular profiling have progressively revealed the complex classification of primary liver cancers and have resulted in a subclassification roughly separating mucinous cholangiocarcinomas from mixed tumors from "pure" hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

In addition, HCC is classified as keratin (K) 19 positive or K19 negative. K19 is a biliary/hepatic progenitor cell (HPC) marker only expressed in a subset of HCC with poor prognosis and high risk of early recurrence after treatment; particularly in radio-frequency ablation (RFA). These patients consequently show worse survival compared to patients with K19 negative HCC.

A recent publication has shown the value of pretreatment biopsy with K19 staining and suggests that the role of routine biopsies in potentially curable HCC should be reconsidered.

However, currently, pretreatment biopsies are rarely performed in the diagnosis of HCC due to the excellent performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detection, diagnosis and staging of cirrhotic livers. This progression of MRI is based on technical refining of three-phase contrast-enhanced imaging, development of the cellular marker sequence diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) and hepatospecific biliary contrast-agents. While pretreatment biopsies would have incremental value in treatment planning, its routine application in daily clinical practice is faced with multiple problems. First, K19 evaluation at histopathology can - in most cases - only reliably be performed on whole resection specimens and is more difficult on biopsies. Second, routine biopsies would lead to a dramatic increase in workload for radiologists and pathologists influencing daily practice and organization. Also, lesions are not always readily detectable at ultrasound and possibly not eligible for percutaneous biopsy requiring laparoscopy guided biopsy under anesthesia. Third, the risk of tract seeding remains controversial but has not been completely excluded.

Previous publications have indicated imaging patterns that may be associated with worse prognostic tumoral parameters. The corona sign seen at CT during arterial portography and hepatic arteriography (invasive imaging only performed in Japan) is associated with the presence of microvascular invasion. However, this sign has not yet been described at MRI. Also MRI derived parameters may predict the presence of HCC expressing progenitor cell markers, including K19. If MRI determined imaging parameters could indeed provide a surrogate marker for presence of K19 and/or microvascular invasion as potential important prognostic factors in RFA of HCC, these imaging parameters may thus hold prognostic information towards RFA treatment and possibly predict treatment outcome. The hypothesis is that lesions showing features correlating to K19 positivity such as persistent (rim) enhancement and rim like intensity at DWI may correlate to worse prognosis than HCC that don't express these imaging features.

If confirmed, MRI may be the first line modality adapting the patients management; either by selecting patients who actually would benefit from biopsy or identifying patients in who more invasive treatment is necessary (for instance: surgical resection instead of RFA in child A patients; ablation with wider margins in patients not eligible for surgery).

However, before performing a prospective or interventional study, experience needs to be gained with the various possible imaging patterns, aiming to find significant correlations between imaging parameters and adverse prognosis.

The purpose of the retrospective study is thus to evaluate MRI determined imaging parameters at pretreatment MRI for their predictive value towards outcome (disease free survival) of radio-frequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

If successful, pretreatment MRI parameters may be used for selecting patient with high risk of unfavorable outcome after RFA and select the patients for more aggressive treatment such as surgical resection or upfront transplantation.

Being tested
RFA
Keywords
Hepatocellular carcinoma, RFA, MRI
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RFAOther

    RFA

Study groups in NCT02051283
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
patients with HCC eligible for RFApatients with HCC eligible for RFA
Receives: Other: RFA

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Predictive value of MRI determined contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted sequence pattern towards outcome (tumour recurrence < 1 year versus > 1 year)

    Predictive value of MRI determined contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted sequence pattern towards outcome (tumour recurrence < 1 year versus > 1 year)

    Measured: 2 years

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Correlation of predictive MRI parameters with histology obtained from biopsy during radio-frequency ablation (tumor grade, microvascular invasion, Keratin 19 status)

    Correlation of predictive MRI parameters with histology obtained from biopsy during radio-frequency ablation (tumor grade, microvascular invasion, Keratin 19 status)

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Jan 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2014
  3. Primary completionDec 2016 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2016 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02051283
Sponsor's protocol ID
Sbis
Status last verified
Jan 2014
First submitted
29 Jan 2014
Last updated
31 Jan 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jan 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Predictive value of MRI determined contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted sequence pattern towards outcome (tumour recurrence < 1 year versus > 1 year) (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jan 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in