Ventral HerniaNCT02053168
A Prospective, Multicenter All Comers Study of Phasix Mesh for Ventral or Incisional Hernia Repair
A study testing Resorbable Mesh in people with Ventral Hernia and Incisional Hernia, run by C. R. Bard at 6 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Collect data on safety, performance, and effectiveness of Phasix Mesh in subject requiring primary ventral and incisional hernias. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Ventral Hernia, Incisional Hernia
- What is being tested?
- Resorbable Mesh
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 33 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Feb 2014to 23 Feb 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject or subject's legally authorized representative must be willing to give written informed consent
- Subject must be diagnosed with ventral or incisional hernia
- Subject must be willing to undergo open ventral hernia repair and be able to undergo all other study procedures as outlined in this protocol.
Who cannot join
- Subject is an active smoker (if attempts to quit smoking within two weeks of surgery have failed and the patient is still an active smoker at the time of surgery).
- Subject's hernia has recurred four or more times.
- Subject's body mass index (BMI) >40 kg/m2.
- Subject has peritonitis.
- Subject is on or suspected to be placed on chemotherapy medications during any part of the study.
- Chronic steroid use or immunosuppression drugs (> 6 months).
Show all 15Show fewer
- Subject has cirrhosis, and/or ascites.
- Subject is American Society of Anesthesiology Class 4 or 5.
- Subject is pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the course of the study.
- Subject is known to be infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
- Subject has a life expectancy of less than 2 years at the time of enrollment.
- Subject has been treated with an investigational product in the past 30 days.
- Subject is part of the site personnel directly involved with this study
- Subject has a known allergy to tetracycline hydrochloride or kanamycin sulfate, the test device or its component materials.
- Subject has any condition that in the opinion of the Investigator would preclude the use of the study device, or preclude the subject from completing the follow-up requirements
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country.
6 sites in 1 country
United States6 sites
Beverly Hills Hernia Center
Beverly Hills, California, 90210
Florida Hospital Celebration Health
Celebration, Florida, 34747
University Hospitals Case Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048
Methodist Physicians Clinic
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114
Oregon Health and Sciences University
Portland, Oregon, 97239
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Multicenter All Comers Study of a Novel Resorbable Mesh (Phasix Mesh) for Ventral or Incisional Hernia Repair
Collect data on safety, performance, and effectiveness of Phasix Mesh in subject requiring primary ventral and incisional hernias.
Read the detailed description
Pilot Study of patients across all wound classes for recurrence
- Conditions
- Ventral Hernia, Incisional Hernia
- Being tested
- Resorbable Mesh
- Medical subject headings
- Hernia, Ventral, Incisional Hernia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Resorbable MeshDevice
Phasix Mesh
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Resorbable Mesh | Other | Phasix Mesh Receives: Device: Resorbable Mesh |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Hernia Recurrence
A recurrent hernia was defined as any hernia identified or confirmed by the investigator, during any study follow-up visit, in approximately the same position as the hernia repaired in the study procedure. Potential hernias identified via incidental magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) scan were evaluated by the operating surgeon for clinical significance and confirmation of hernia recurrence.
Measured: 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months, 18 Months, 24 Months, >24 Months
Secondary outcomes (10)
Number of Participants With Device Related Adverse Events
In this study, a device-related adverse event is defined as any undesirable clinical event occurring in the abdominal space including the lower abdominal, inguinal and pubic regions (including the skin), as well as any other undesirable clinical events judged to be related to the study device or surgical procedure regardless of anatomical region.
Measured: 24 Months
Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) Total Score - Change From Baseline
The Carolinas Comfort Scale is a short, hernia-specific 8-category questionnaire designed to measure patient perception of symptoms and patient satisfaction with a scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 5 (disabling symptoms). The change was calculated as the mean value at 24 months minus the mean value at baseline.
Measured: Baseline and 24 months postoperative
Short Form (SF)-12 Version 2 - Physical Component Summary (Change From Baseline)
Short Form (SF)-12 Version 2 is a multipurpose, 12-item health survey that measures seven domains of health: general health, physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health (role-physical), role limitations due to emotional problems (role-emotional), bodily pain, vitality and mental health, and social functioning. It yields two summary measures of physical and mental health: the physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS). The scores range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health. The change was calculated as the mean value at 24 months minus the mean value at baseline.
Measured: Baseline and 24 months postoperative
Short Form (SF)-12 Version 2 - Mental Component Summary (Change From Baseline)
Short Form (SF)-12 Version 2 is a multipurpose, 12-item health survey that measures seven domains of health: general health, physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health (role-physical), role limitations due to emotional problems (role-emotional), bodily pain, vitality and mental health, and social functioning. It yields scale scores for each of these seven health domains, and two summary measures of physical and mental health: the physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS). The scores range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health. The change was calculated as the mean value at 24 months minus the mean value at baseline.
Measured: Baseline and 24 months postoperative
Surgical Procedure Time
Measured from incision to closure (skin to skin).
Measured: Duration of index procedure (mean of 242.5 mins)
Length of Hospital Stay
Measured from end of index procedure to hospital discharge
Measured: 10 Months
Number of Study Related Post Operative Surgical Procedures
Measured: 24 Months
Number of Study Related Post Operative New Hospital Admissions
Measured: 24 Months
Number of Related Post-operative Visits Unrelated to Standard of Care
Measured: 24 Months
Incidence of Seroma
Measured: 24 Months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2014
- Primary completion23 Feb 2017
- Study completion23 Feb 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Ventral HerniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 33 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- C. R. Bard
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Yuri Novitsky, MD, Principal investigator, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02053168
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DVL-HE-015
- Status last verified
- Apr 2018
- First submitted
- 31 Jan 2014
- Last updated
- 11 May 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 May 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Multicenter All Comers Study of a Novel Resorbable Mesh (Phasix Mesh) for Ventral or Incisional Hernia Repair
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02053168
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DVL-HE-015
- Conditions
- Ventral Hernia, Incisional Hernia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 33 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- C. R. BardIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Feb 2014
- Primary completion
- 23 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 23 Feb 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 11 May 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Collect data on safety, performance, and effectiveness of Phasix Mesh in subject requiring primary ventral and incisional hernias.
Detailed description
Pilot Study of patients across all wound classes for recurrence
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Resorbable Mesh | Other | Device: Resorbable MeshPhasix Mesh |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Subject or subject's legally authorized representative must be willing to give written informed consent
- Subject must be diagnosed with ventral or incisional hernia
- Subject must be willing to undergo open ventral hernia repair and be able to undergo all other study procedures as outlined in this protocol.
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Subject is an active smoker (if attempts to quit smoking within two weeks of surgery have failed and the patient is still an active smoker at the time of surgery).
- Subject's hernia has recurred four or more times.
- Subject's body mass index (BMI) >40 kg/m2.
- Subject has peritonitis.
- Subject is on or suspected to be placed on chemotherapy medications during any part of the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Resorbable MeshPhasix Mesh | Device | Resorbable Mesh |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Hernia Recurrence
Time frame: 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months, 18 Months, 24 Months, >24 Months
A recurrent hernia was defined as any hernia identified or confirmed by the investigator, during any study follow-up visit, in approximately the same position as the hernia repaired in the study procedure. Potential hernias identified via incidental magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) scan were evaluated by the operating surgeon for clinical significance and confirmation of hernia recurrence.
10 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Device Related Adverse Events
Time frame: 24 Months
Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) Total Score - Change From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline and 24 months postoperative
Short Form (SF)-12 Version 2 - Physical Component Summary (Change From Baseline)
Time frame: Baseline and 24 months postoperative
Short Form (SF)-12 Version 2 - Mental Component Summary (Change From Baseline)
Time frame: Baseline and 24 months postoperative
Surgical Procedure Time
Time frame: Duration of index procedure (mean of 242.5 mins)
Length of Hospital Stay
Time frame: 10 Months
Number of Study Related Post Operative Surgical Procedures
Time frame: 24 Months
Number of Study Related Post Operative New Hospital Admissions
Time frame: 24 Months
Number of Related Post-operative Visits Unrelated to Standard of Care
Time frame: 24 Months
Incidence of Seroma
Time frame: 24 Months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 May 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Ventral Hernia
Recruiting
GORE® ENFORM Biomaterial Product Study
Hernia, Ventral, Hernia, Hiatal
RecruitingPhase 4
Preoperative BOTOX® Injection for Large Ventral Hernia Repair
Hernia Abdominal Wall, Botox Injection
Recruiting
Duramesh Versus Minimally Invasive IPOM for High-Risk Umbilical Hernia Repairs
Umbilical Hernia, Ventral Hernia
Not yet recruiting
SUTURE TYPE AND RECURRENCE RISK AFTER INCISIONAL HERNIA REPAIR
Ventral Incisional Hernia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
ORION Study: Mesh Position and Risk During Subsequent Minimally Invasive Abdominal Surgery
Ventral Hernia Repair
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Yuri Novitsky, MD principal investigator
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Resorbable Mesh in people with Ventral Hernia and Incisional Hernia, run by C. R. Bard at 6 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 May 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Hernia Recurrence (time frame: 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months, 18 Months, 24 Months, >24 Months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2018.