LeukemiaPhase 1/2NCT02053545
Haplo-identical SCT for High Risk (HR) Hematologic Malignancies w/Post-Transplant In-Vivo T-cell Depletion
A Phase 1/2 study testing Conditioning Regimen & GVHD Prophylaxis in people with Leukemia and Lymphoma, run by Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Although a majority of children with leukemia and most hematological malignancies (Hodgkin's and Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas) can be cured with conventional chemotherapy, a subset of patients with resistant/recurrent high-risk disease are not cured with conventional treatment regimens. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- What is being tested?
- Conditioning Regimen & GVHD Prophylaxis
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Dec 2013to 11 May 2017
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients must have confirmed diagnosis of hematologic malignancy (leukemia, lymphoma or MDS) with the following:
- Resistant/refractory hematologic malignancies (disease exceeding 5% of marrow cells by morphology, which is a description of white blood cell types as assessed via light microscopy; or with measurable extramedullary disease, which is detection of leukemia at sites other than blood and marrow. This includes disease that infiltrates into tissues other than the spleen and marrow. i.e. nodal disease, which is leukemia and/or lymphoma involving a lymph node or chloroma, which is a collection of leukemic cells forming a mass/tumor mass) (Stratum 1).
- Or have relapsed following an initial allogeneic HSCT (Stratum 1).
- And/or lack an adequately matched unrelated donor (URD) or unrelated cord blood (URB) hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) source (see protocol section 2) (Strata 1, 2 \& 3).
- Adequate cardiac, pulmonary, renal, and hepatic functions
- Central vascular access providing a combined 3 access ports for all patients.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Females of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test prior to therapy. Pregnancy tests will only be done prior to therapy. Sexually active patients will be informed of the risk of not using adequate contraception.
- Recipient or legal guardian must be informed of the study, and have signed a consent form.
- Recipients must have a related haplo-identical donor.
Who cannot join
- High risk hematologic malignancies in remission (and no prior allogeneic HSCT), where allogeneic HSCT is indicated but an appropriately matched HSC source (sibling, unrelated adult or UCB) is available.
- Patients with systemic infections and/or organ dysfunction mandating a reduced intensity conditioning regimen are also excluded.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
About this study
Official title: Haplo-identical Stem Cell Transplantation (SCT) for High-Risk Hematologic Malignancies With Post-Transplant In-Vivo T-cell Depletion
Although a majority of children with leukemia and most hematological malignancies (Hodgkin's and Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas) can be cured with conventional chemotherapy, a subset of patients with resistant/recurrent high-risk disease are not cured with conventional treatment regimens. Investigators hypothesize that HSCT from a partially matched donor can be safe and effective for patients with very high risk hematologic malignancies when combined with post-transplant cyclophosphamide for prevention of graft-vs-host disease (GVHD).
Read the detailed description
For patients whose disease cannot be brought into remission the prognoses are worse primarily due to high rates of post-HSCT relapse. For patients who have poor donor options (i.e., lack an adequately matched allogeneic marrow donor), the prognoses are worse for a successful outcome due to higher rates of treatment related mortality (TRM). Their options are to seek investigational treatments without HSCT or alternative investigational HSCT protocols for which they are eligible. Patients who have relapsed after an allogeneic HSCT are at high risk for either relapse or TRM after a subsequent HSCT, even if an additional state of complete remission can be achieved prior to the subsequent HSCT.
This current treatment protocol is designed to assess alternative HSCT treatments for patients with refractory/very high risk disease features and/or inadequate single sources of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)- matched -donor stem cells. The goal is to cure their hematological malignancy with the combination of chemotherapy and potentially destruction of cancerous cells by the new, donor immune cells.
For patients whose only potential for cure is allogeneic HSCT but who are lacking a well matched relative or unrelated donor source, haplo-identical donors (i.e., "half identical" donors) are a remaining option. However, without some form of immune manipulation of the donor marrow (e.g. pre-infusion in vitro or in the test tube/laboratory T-depletion, or depletion of donor T-cells), outcomes after haplo-identical HSCT have very poor results with unacceptable TRM, non-engraftment or severe graft-vs-host disease (GVHD)2 leading to fatal complications. GVHD is a complication that can occur after a stem cell or bone marrow transplant in which the newly transplanted donor cells attack the healthy tissues in the transplant recipient's body.
Thus, to better treat resistant leukemia, there is a need for either improved cytoreduction (pre-transplant reduction in the number of the cancer/leukemia cells) regimens for refractory disease, and/or for improved methods of eliminating cancer cells after the transplant has occurred.
Using well matched donors, investigators have studied the use of HSCT using mild chemotherapy but exploiting the donor cell immune reaction post-stem cell infusion to "allow" the reaction against leukemia and lymphoma cancer cells. This has generally proven ineffective for patients with disease not in remission at the time of transplant.
Thus new approaches to combat residual refractory disease are still needed. Also, for patients lacking well-matched donors, new methods to facilitate use of haplo-identical donors are needed.
Investigators hypothesize that HSCT from a partially matched (haplo-identical) related (usually sibling or parent or child) donor can be safe and effective for patients with very high risk hematologic malignancies when combined with an intensive, myeloablative (marrow destroying) cytoreduction treatment pre-HSCT followed by post-transplant cyclophosphamide for prevention of Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) in the recipient. This approach has been employed at other centers, primarily in adult recipients.2-4 One center's experience in pediatric patients demonstrated that non-relapse mortality was low and donor engraftment occurred in 12 of 12 patients.5 More experience with this approach is needed in pediatric HSCT patients.
In this Pilot Study, investigators hope to determine the likelihood that a myeloablative cytoreduction regimen followed by haplo-identical HSCT and high-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide leads to adequate engraftment for high-risk hematologic malignancy patients. The patients that will be transplanted on this study are patients whose likelihood of survival without a transplant would be very low (<10-15 %, whether due to relapse after prior HSCT, poor disease control, or no matched donor available).
This treatment protocol does not involve an investigational drug but the combination of chemotherapy drugs in a new sequence/scheduling along with the use of haplo-identical donor stem cells. In this treatment protocol, patients will be treated in three different strata according to what defines their high-risk for a poor outcome. Each stratum will be comprised of a pre-transplant chemotherapy conditioning regimen followed by infusion of haplo-identical related donor marrow stem cells, followed in turn by post-transplant cyclophosphamide as immunosuppression to prophylax against GVHD.
The chemotherapeutic agents in this study, including cyclophosphamide, are routinely administered in children and adolescents for treatment. Cyclophosphamide is most commonly administered as a component of the pre-transplant cytoreduction therapy. However, for this treatment protocol investigators plan to assess the ability of utilizing a combined approach of the chemotherapeutic agents, with cyclophosphamide, as an effective prevention of GVHD infused after receiving a transplant from a closely matched (but not identical) family member.
The common elements of this research are high-dose cytoreduction therapy prior to HSCT, high-dose cyclophosphamide following HSCT and partially matched, related donor bone marrow cells as the source of stem cells infused for transplantation. The research question is the outcome of the patients treated with this combination. The cytoreduction regimen is tailored for the specific risk (prior HSCT, poor disease control vs no matched donor source of stem cells).
- Being tested
- Conditioning Regimen & GVHD Prophylaxis
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Lymphoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Conditioning Regimen & GVHD ProphylaxisDrug
Stratum 1 (Refractory disease, relapse after previous transplant): Radiation Therapy (if patient had prior Central Nervous System (CNS) disease), Clofarabine, Melphalan,Thiotepa, Stem Cell Transplant, Cyclophosphamide, Mesna, Tacrolimus and MMF
Stratum 2 (Myeloid in remission): Radiation Therapy (if patient had prior CNS disease), Busulfan, Fludarabine, Thiotepa, Stem Cell Transplant, Cyclophosphamide, Mesna, Tacrolimus, MMF
Stratum 3 (Lymphoid in remission): Radiation Therapy (if patient had prior CNS disease), TBI, Fludarabine, Thiotepa, Stem Cell Transplant, Cyclophosphamide, Mesna, Tacrolimus, MMF
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Conditioning Regimen & GVHD Prophylaxis | Experimental | Stratum 1 (Refractory disease, relapse after previous transplant): Clofarabine, Melphalan,Thiotepa, Cyclophosphamide, Mesna, Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)
Stratum 2 (Myeloid in remission): Busulfan, Fludarabine, Thiotepa, Cyclophosphamide, Mesna, Tacrolimus, MMF
Stratum 3 (Lymphoid in remission): Fractionated total body irradiation (fTBI), Fludarabine, Thiotepa, Cyclophosphamide, Mesna, Tacrolimus, MMF Receives: Drug: Conditioning Regimen & GVHD Prophylaxis |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cumulative non-relapse mortality at 100 days and 365 days post haplo-identical transplant
Patients will be followed regularly for engraftment, complications, and disease control. Non-relapse mortality and overall survival will be recorded from date of HSCT.
Measured: 1 Year
Secondary outcomes (1)
Cumulative acute and chronic GVHD, cumulative relapse rates, and overall survival and event free survival
Measured: 1 Year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2013
- Primary completion11 May 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion11 May 2017
Why it stopped: Study closed with no enrollment.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Reggie E Duerst, MD, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
- Investigators
- Reggie Duerst, MD, Principal investigator, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02053545
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SCT 0813 Haplo
- Status last verified
- Aug 2019
- First submitted
- 31 Dec 2013
- Last updated
- 30 Aug 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Aug 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Haplo-identical Stem Cell Transplantation (SCT) for High-Risk Hematologic Malignancies With Post-Transplant In-Vivo T-cell Depletion
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02053545
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SCT 0813 Haplo
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Study closed with no enrollment.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2013
- Primary completion
- 11 May 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 11 May 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Although a majority of children with leukemia and most hematological malignancies (Hodgkin's and Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas) can be cured with conventional chemotherapy, a subset of patients with resistant/recurrent high-risk disease are not cured with conventional treatment regimens. Investigators hypothesize that HSCT from a partially matched donor can be safe and effective for patients with very high risk hematologic malignancies when combined with post-transplant cyclophosphamide for prevention of graft-vs-host disease (GVHD).
Detailed description
For patients whose disease cannot be brought into remission the prognoses are worse primarily due to high rates of post-HSCT relapse. For patients who have poor donor options (i.e., lack an adequately matched allogeneic marrow donor), the prognoses are worse for a successful outcome due to higher rates of treatment related mortality (TRM). Their options are to seek investigational treatments without HSCT or alternative investigational HSCT protocols for which they are eligible. Patients who have relapsed after an allogeneic HSCT are at high risk for either relapse or TRM after a subsequent HSCT, even if an additional state of complete remission can be achieved prior to the subsequent HSCT.
This current treatment protocol is designed to assess alternative HSCT treatments for patients with refractory/very high risk disease features and/or inadequate single sources of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)- matched -donor stem cells. The goal is to cure their hematological malignancy with the combination of chemotherapy and potentially destruction of cancerous cells by the new, donor immune cells.
For patients whose only potential for cure is allogeneic HSCT but who are lacking a well matched relative or unrelated donor source, haplo-identical donors (i.e., "half identical" donors) are a remaining option. However, without some form of immune manipulation of the donor marrow (e.g. pre-infusion in vitro or in the test tube/laboratory T-depletion, or depletion of donor T-cells), outcomes after haplo-identical HSCT have very poor results with unacceptable TRM, non-engraftment or severe graft-vs-host disease (GVHD)2 leading to fatal complications. GVHD is a complication that can occur after a stem cell or bone marrow transplant in which the newly transplanted donor cells attack the healthy tissues in the transplant recipient's body.
Thus, to better treat resistant leukemia, there is a need for either improved cytoreduction (pre-transplant reduction in the number of the cancer/leukemia cells) regimens for refractory disease, and/or for improved methods of eliminating cancer cells after the transplant has occurred.
Using well matched donors, investigators have studied the use of HSCT using mild chemotherapy but exploiting the donor cell immune reaction post-stem cell infusion to "allow" the reaction against leukemia and lymphoma cancer cells. This has generally proven ineffective for patients with disease not in remission at the time of transplant.
Thus new approaches to combat residual refractory disease are still needed. Also, for patients lacking well-matched donors, new methods to facilitate use of haplo-identical donors are needed.
Investigators hypothesize that HSCT from a partially matched (haplo-identical) related (usually sibling or parent or child) donor can be safe and effective for patients with very high risk hematologic malignancies when combined with an intensive, myeloablative (marrow destroying) cytoreduction treatment pre-HSCT followed by post-transplant cyclophosphamide for prevention of Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) in the recipient. This approach has been employed at other centers, primarily in adult recipients.2-4 One center's experience in pediatric patients demonstrated that non-relapse mortality was low and donor engraftment occurred in 12 of 12 patients.5 More experience with this approach is needed in pediatric HSCT patients.
In this Pilot Study, investigators hope to determine the likelihood that a myeloablative cytoreduction regimen followed by haplo-identical HSCT and high-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide leads to adequate engraftment for high-risk hematologic malignancy patients. The patients that will be transplanted on this study are patients whose likelihood of survival without a transplant would be very low (<10-15 %, whether due to relapse after prior HSCT, poor disease control, or no matched donor available).
This treatment protocol does not involve an investigational drug but the combination of chemotherapy drugs in a new sequence/scheduling along with the use of haplo-identical donor stem cells. In this treatment protocol, patients will be treated in three different strata according to what defines their high-risk for a poor outcome. Each stratum will be comprised of a pre-transplant chemotherapy conditioning regimen followed by infusion of haplo-identical related donor marrow stem cells, followed in turn by post-transplant cyclophosphamide as immunosuppression to prophylax against GVHD.
The chemotherapeutic agents in this study, including cyclophosphamide, are routinely administered in children and adolescents for treatment. Cyclophosphamide is most commonly administered as a component of the pre-transplant cytoreduction therapy. However, for this treatment protocol investigators plan to assess the ability of utilizing a combined approach of the chemotherapeutic agents, with cyclophosphamide, as an effective prevention of GVHD infused after receiving a transplant from a closely matched (but not identical) family member.
The common elements of this research are high-dose cytoreduction therapy prior to HSCT, high-dose cyclophosphamide following HSCT and partially matched, related donor bone marrow cells as the source of stem cells infused for transplantation. The research question is the outcome of the patients treated with this combination. The cytoreduction regimen is tailored for the specific risk (prior HSCT, poor disease control vs no matched donor source of stem cells).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Conditioning Regimen & GVHD Prophylaxis | Experimental | Drug: Conditioning Regimen & GVHD ProphylaxisStratum 1 (Refractory disease, relapse after previous transplant): Clofarabine, Melphalan,Thiotepa, Cyclophosphamide, Mesna, Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) Stratum 2 (Myeloid in remission): Busulfan, Fludarabine, Thiotepa, Cyclophosphamide, Mesna, Tacrolimus, MMF Stratum 3 (Lymphoid in remission): Fractionated total body irradiation (fTBI), Fludarabine, Thiotepa, Cyclophosphamide, Mesna, Tacrolimus, MMF |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patients must have confirmed diagnosis of hematologic malignancy (leukemia, lymphoma or MDS) with the following:
- Resistant/refractory hematologic malignancies (disease exceeding 5% of marrow cells by morphology, which is a description of white blood cell types as assessed via light microscopy; or with measurable extramedullary disease, which is detection of leukemia at sites other than blood and marrow. This includes disease that infiltrates into tissues other than the spleen and marrow. i.e. nodal disease, which is leukemia and/or lymphoma involving a lymph node or chloroma, which is a collection of leukemic cells forming a mass/tumor mass) (Stratum 1).
- Or have relapsed following an initial allogeneic HSCT (Stratum 1).
- And/or lack an adequately matched unrelated donor (URD) or unrelated cord blood (URB) hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) source (see protocol section 2) (Strata 1, 2 \& 3).
- Adequate cardiac, pulmonary, renal, and hepatic functions
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- High risk hematologic malignancies in remission (and no prior allogeneic HSCT), where allogeneic HSCT is indicated but an appropriately matched HSC source (sibling, unrelated adult or UCB) is available.
- Patients with systemic infections and/or organ dysfunction mandating a reduced intensity conditioning regimen are also excluded.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Conditioning Regimen & GVHD ProphylaxisStratum 1 (Refractory disease, relapse after previous transplant): Radiation Therapy (if patient had prior Central Nervous System (CNS) disease), Clofarabine, Melphalan,Thiotepa, Stem Cell Transplant, Cyclophosphamide, Mesna, Tacrolimus and MMF Stratum 2 (Myeloid in remission): Radiation Therapy (if patient had prior CNS disease), Busulfan, Fludarabine, Thiotepa, Stem Cell Transplant, Cyclophosphamide, Mesna, Tacrolimus, MMF Stratum 3 (Lymphoid in remission): Radiation Therapy (if patient had prior CNS disease), TBI, Fludarabine, Thiotepa, Stem Cell Transplant, Cyclophosphamide, Mesna, Tacrolimus, MMF | Drug | Conditioning Regimen & GVHD Prophylaxis |
Primary outcome
Cumulative non-relapse mortality at 100 days and 365 days post haplo-identical transplant
Time frame: 1 Year
Patients will be followed regularly for engraftment, complications, and disease control. Non-relapse mortality and overall survival will be recorded from date of HSCT.
1 secondary outcome
Cumulative acute and chronic GVHD, cumulative relapse rates, and overall survival and event free survival
Time frame: 1 Year
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Aug 2019.
Related trials for Leukemia
Recruiting
A Multicenter Study to Evaluate Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Testing and Monitoring of B-Cell Recovery to Guide Management Following Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CART) Induced Remission in Children and Young Adults With B Lineage Acute Lymph...
B-All, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Nemtabrutinib for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)/Small Lymphocytic Leukemia (SLL) Refractory to Covalent Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor or Pirtobrutinib and Previously Treated With a BCL2 Inhibitor
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Small Lymphocytic Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study Evaluating the Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Mosunetuzumab and a Combined Regimen of Mosunetuzumab and Venetoclax in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Fludarabine Dosing in Children and Young Adults With B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Not yet recruiting
Busulfan-Based Versus TBI-Based Conditioning for Adult ALL-CR2 Allo-HSCT
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Reggie Duerst, MD principal investigator
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Conditioning Regimen & GVHD Prophylaxis in people with Leukemia and Lymphoma, run by Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cumulative non-relapse mortality at 100 days and 365 days post haplo-identical transplant (time frame: 1 Year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Aug 2019.