Benign Prostatic HyperplasiaNCT02054013
Prostatic Artery Embolization vs. Conventional Transurethral Prostatectomy in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
A study testing Prostatic artery embolization and monopolar transurethral prostatectomy in people with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, run by Daniel Stephan Engeler at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a prevalent entity, affecting over 50% of men older than 60 years. The clinical picture of the disease includes lower urinary tract symptoms such as interrupted and weak urinary stream, nocturia, urgency and leaking and even sexual dysfunction in some individuals. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
- What is being tested?
- Prostatic artery embolization and monopolar transurethral prostatectomy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 101 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 11 Feb 2014to 16 Jul 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Men older than 40
- Patient must be a candidate for TURP
- Refractory to medical therapy or patient is not willing to consider (further) medical treatment
- Patient has a prostate size of at least 25 ml and not more than 80 ml, measured by ultrasound
- IPSS ≥8
- QoL ≥3
- Qmax<12 and/or urinary retention
- Written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Mild symptoms (IPSS <8)
- Severe atherosclerosis
- Severe tortuosity in the aortic bifurcation or internal iliac arteries
- Acontractile detrusor
- Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction
- Urethral stenosis
Show all 12Show fewer
- Bladder diverticulum
- Bladder stone with surgical indication
- Allergy to intravenous contrast media
- Contraindication for MRI imaging
- Preinterventionally proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate
- Renal failure (GFR<60ml/min)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Prostatic Artery Embolization vs. Conventional Transurethral Prostatectomy in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Prospective Randomized Trial
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a prevalent entity, affecting over 50% of men older than 60 years. The clinical picture of the disease includes lower urinary tract symptoms such as interrupted and weak urinary stream, nocturia, urgency and leaking and even sexual dysfunction in some individuals. Medical therapy is usually the first-line treatment. However, the efficacy of drugs like alpha-blockers is limited, and as disease progresses more invasive treatment options have to be taken into consideration. In cases with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) is the standard treatment. TURP, however, is limited to prostates smaller than 60-80ml and the procedure is associated with a complication rate. The cumulative short-term morbidity rate is around 11% and the necessity for surgical revision is as high as 6%. Bleeding requiring transfusions and transurethral resection syndrome represent potentially serious threats to elderly and frail patients. Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) has been suggested as a minimal invasive alternative procedure, which can be performed in an outpatient setting with rapid recovery and low morbidity.
The investigators hypothesize that PAE is non-inferior in the treatment of symptomatic BPH compared to conventional and established TUR-P.
- Conditions
- Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
- Being tested
- Prostatic artery embolization, monopolar transurethral prostatectomy
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Hyperplasia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Prostatic artery embolizationProcedure or surgery
monopolar transurethral prostatectomyProcedure or surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Prostatic artery embolization | Experimental | Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) has been suggested as a minimal invasive alternative procedure with rapid recovery and low morbidity Receives: Procedure: Prostatic artery embolization |
| Conventional monopolar transurethral prostatectomy | Other | Standard treatment Receives: Procedure: monopolar transurethral prostatectomy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes in the International Prostate Symptom Score
Measured: Baseline and 12 weeks after intervention
Secondary outcomes (10)
Changes of prostate volume using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks and 24 months after intervention
Changes in bladder diary
Changes in bladder diary (difference of voids during daytime and night-time, difference voided volume, difference liquid intake, difference incontinence episodes)
Measured: Baseline and at all follow up controls
Pre- and postoperative changes in C-reactive Protein, Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), serum amyloid A, Interleukin-6 and Interleukin-10
Measured: Baseline and 1 day, 2 days, 1 and 6 weeks post intervention
Changes in urodynamic parameters
Measured: Baseline and 12 and 24 months after intervention
Duration of hospitalization post procedure
Measured: hospital discharge
Duration of post procedure catheterization
Measured: baseline and post intervention
Changes in the CPSI and IIEF
Measured: baseline and at all follow-up controls after the intervention
Procedure time and radiation parameters
Measured: after intervention
Comparison of prostate size, measured preoperatively by TRUS and MRI at baseline Comparison of prostate size, measured preoperatively by TRUS and MRI at baseline Comparison of prostate size measured by TRUS and MRI
Measured: baseline
Percentage of prostate tissue devascularized, based on contrast-enhanced MRI
Measured: 12 weeks and 24 months after intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Study start11 Feb 2014
- Primary completion19 Sep 2017
- Study completion16 Jul 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Benign Prostatic HyperplasiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 101 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Daniel Stephan Engeler
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Daniel Stephan Engeler, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen
- Investigators
- Daniel Engeler, MD, Principal investigator, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02054013
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CTU 13.030
- Status last verified
- Dec 2022
- First submitted
- 31 Jan 2014
- Last updated
- 7 Dec 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Abt D, Mordasini L, Hechelhammer L, Kessler TM, Schmid HP, Engeler DS. Prostatic artery embolization versus conventional TUR-P in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: protocol for a prospective randomized non-inferiority trial. BMC Urol. 2014 Nov 25;14:94. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-14-94.
PubMed 25425136Abt D, Hechelhammer L, Mullhaupt G, Markart S, Gusewell S, Kessler TM, Schmid HP, Engeler DS, Mordasini L. Comparison of prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia: randomised, open label, non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2018 Jun 19;361:k2338. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2338.
PubMed 29921613Mullhaupt G, Hechelhammer L, Diener PA, Engeler DS, Gusewell S, Schmid HP, Mordasini L, Abt D. Ejaculatory disorders after prostatic artery embolization: a reassessment of two prospective clinical trials. World J Urol. 2020 Oct;38(10):2595-2599. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-03036-7. Epub 2019 Dec 7.
PubMed 31813028Mullhaupt G, Hechelhammer L, Engeler DS, Gusewell S, Betschart P, Zumstein V, Kessler TM, Schmid HP, Mordasini L, Abt D. In-hospital cost analysis of prostatic artery embolization compared with transurethral resection of the prostate: post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial. BJU Int. 2019 Jun;123(6):1055-1060. doi: 10.1111/bju.14660. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
PubMed 30578705Abt D, Mullhaupt G, Hechelhammer L, Markart S, Gusewell S, Schmid HP, Mordasini L, Engeler DS. Prostatic Artery Embolisation Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: 2-yr Outcomes of a Randomised, Open-label, Single-centre Trial. Eur Urol. 2021 Jul;80(1):34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.02.008. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
PubMed 33612376Mullhaupt G, Hechelhammer L, Graf N, Mordasini L, Schmid HP, Engeler DS, Abt D. Prostatic Artery Embolisation Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Obstruction: 5-year Outcomes of a Randomised, Open-label, Noninferiority Trial. Eur Urol Focus. 2024 Sep;10(5):788-795. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.03.001. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
PubMed 38531756
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Dec 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prostatic Artery Embolization vs. Conventional Transurethral Prostatectomy in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Prospective Randomized Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02054013
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CTU 13.030
- Conditions
- Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 101 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Daniel Stephan EngelerUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 11 Feb 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 16 Jul 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a prevalent entity, affecting over 50% of men older than 60 years. The clinical picture of the disease includes lower urinary tract symptoms such as interrupted and weak urinary stream, nocturia, urgency and leaking and even sexual dysfunction in some individuals. Medical therapy is usually the first-line treatment. However, the efficacy of drugs like alpha-blockers is limited, and as disease progresses more invasive treatment options have to be taken into consideration. In cases with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) is the standard treatment. TURP, however, is limited to prostates smaller than 60-80ml and the procedure is associated with a complication rate. The cumulative short-term morbidity rate is around 11% and the necessity for surgical revision is as high as 6%. Bleeding requiring transfusions and transurethral resection syndrome represent potentially serious threats to elderly and frail patients. Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) has been suggested as a minimal invasive alternative procedure, which can be performed in an outpatient setting with rapid recovery and low morbidity.
The investigators hypothesize that PAE is non-inferior in the treatment of symptomatic BPH compared to conventional and established TUR-P.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Prostatic artery embolization | Experimental | Procedure: Prostatic artery embolizationProstatic artery embolization (PAE) has been suggested as a minimal invasive alternative procedure with rapid recovery and low morbidity |
| Conventional monopolar transurethral prostatectomy | Other | Procedure: monopolar transurethral prostatectomyStandard treatment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Men older than 40
- Patient must be a candidate for TURP
- Refractory to medical therapy or patient is not willing to consider (further) medical treatment
- Patient has a prostate size of at least 25 ml and not more than 80 ml, measured by ultrasound
- IPSS ≥8
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Mild symptoms (IPSS <8)
- Severe atherosclerosis
- Severe tortuosity in the aortic bifurcation or internal iliac arteries
- Acontractile detrusor
- Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Prostatic artery embolization | Procedure or surgery | Prostatic artery embolization |
| monopolar transurethral prostatectomy | Procedure or surgery | Conventional monopolar transurethral prostatectomy |
Primary outcome
Changes in the International Prostate Symptom Score
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after intervention
10 secondary outcomes
Changes of prostate volume using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks and 24 months after intervention
Changes in bladder diary
Time frame: Baseline and at all follow up controls
Pre- and postoperative changes in C-reactive Protein, Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), serum amyloid A, Interleukin-6 and Interleukin-10
Time frame: Baseline and 1 day, 2 days, 1 and 6 weeks post intervention
Changes in urodynamic parameters
Time frame: Baseline and 12 and 24 months after intervention
Duration of hospitalization post procedure
Time frame: hospital discharge
Duration of post procedure catheterization
Time frame: baseline and post intervention
Changes in the CPSI and IIEF
Time frame: baseline and at all follow-up controls after the intervention
Procedure time and radiation parameters
Time frame: after intervention
Comparison of prostate size, measured preoperatively by TRUS and MRI at baseline Comparison of prostate size, measured preoperatively by TRUS and MRI at baseline Comparison of prostate size measured by TRUS and MRI
Time frame: baseline
Percentage of prostate tissue devascularized, based on contrast-enhanced MRI
Time frame: 12 weeks and 24 months after intervention
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Dec 2022.
- Background: PubMed 25425136Abt D, Mordasini L, Hechelhammer L, Kessler TM, Schmid HP, Engeler DS. Prostatic artery embolization versus conventional TUR-P in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: protocol for a prospective randomized non-inferiority trial. BMC Urol. 2014 Nov 25;14:94. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-14-94.
- Background: PubMed 29921613Abt D, Hechelhammer L, Mullhaupt G, Markart S, Gusewell S, Kessler TM, Schmid HP, Engeler DS, Mordasini L. Comparison of prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia: randomised, open label, non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2018 Jun 19;361:k2338. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2338.
- Background: PubMed 31813028Mullhaupt G, Hechelhammer L, Diener PA, Engeler DS, Gusewell S, Schmid HP, Mordasini L, Abt D. Ejaculatory disorders after prostatic artery embolization: a reassessment of two prospective clinical trials. World J Urol. 2020 Oct;38(10):2595-2599. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-03036-7. Epub 2019 Dec 7.
- Background: PubMed 30578705Mullhaupt G, Hechelhammer L, Engeler DS, Gusewell S, Betschart P, Zumstein V, Kessler TM, Schmid HP, Mordasini L, Abt D. In-hospital cost analysis of prostatic artery embolization compared with transurethral resection of the prostate: post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial. BJU Int. 2019 Jun;123(6):1055-1060. doi: 10.1111/bju.14660. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
- Background: PubMed 33612376Abt D, Mullhaupt G, Hechelhammer L, Markart S, Gusewell S, Schmid HP, Mordasini L, Engeler DS. Prostatic Artery Embolisation Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: 2-yr Outcomes of a Randomised, Open-label, Single-centre Trial. Eur Urol. 2021 Jul;80(1):34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.02.008. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38531756Mullhaupt G, Hechelhammer L, Graf N, Mordasini L, Schmid HP, Engeler DS, Abt D. Prostatic Artery Embolisation Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Obstruction: 5-year Outcomes of a Randomised, Open-label, Noninferiority Trial. Eur Urol Focus. 2024 Sep;10(5):788-795. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.03.001. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
Related trials for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
RecruitingObservational study
ProVIDE Studies Post Exit Analysis
BPH With Symptomatic Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Recruiting
Clinical Study on Prostate Thermal Vapor Ablation Guided by MRI/TRUS Fusion Imaging
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Standard Versus Double Alpha Blockers Treatment for Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Obstruction
BPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia)
RecruitingObservational study
Impact of Long-term Dutasteride Use on Perioperative Outcomes of HoLEP
Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign
Recruiting
Learning Curve of Tri-lobar HoLEP Versus En-bloc HoLEP
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Outflow Obstruction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Daniel Engeler, MD principal investigator
Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Prostatic artery embolization and monopolar transurethral prostatectomy in people with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, run by Daniel Stephan Engeler at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes in the International Prostate Symptom Score (time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02054013, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Dec 2022.