Parkinson's DiseasePhase 1/2NCT02055261
Pedunculopontine Nucleus Stimulation for Gait Disorders in Parkinson's Disease
A Phase 1/2 study testing Low frequency DBS of the pedunculopontine nucleus in people with Parkinson's Disease, run by Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The appearance of postural instability and gait disorders is a major turning point in the evolution of Parkinson's disease (PD). These axial symptoms are usually unresponsive to L-Dopa and represent a severe impairment for the patients due to frequent falls and reduced outside mobility. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Parkinson's Disease
- What is being tested?
- Low frequency DBS of the pedunculopontine nucleus
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 6 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- May 2009to May 2012
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Parkinson's disease
- Age < 70 and > = 18 years
- Improvement > or = 50 % during acute levodopa test
- Score > or = 2 on item 29 of UPDRS part 3 score obtained in "off" drug state
- No previous DBS
- No evidence of atypical parkinsonism
Show all 10Show fewer
- No dementia (MATTIS > 129)
- No psychiatric disease
- Contraception if woman
- Informed consent
Who cannot join
- Contra indication to surgery
- Contra indication to MRI
- Severe life threatening comorbidity
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effects of Low Frequency Deep Brain Stimulation of the Pedunculopontine Nucleus on Gait and Balance Disorders of Parkinson's Disease
The appearance of postural instability and gait disorders is a major turning point in the evolution of Parkinson's disease (PD). These axial symptoms are usually unresponsive to L-Dopa and represent a severe impairment for the patients due to frequent falls and reduced outside mobility. There is no effective pharmacological treatment available for these symptoms, and their pathophysiology is not well known : it is currently assumed that non-dopaminergic brainstem lesions participate to axial symptoms in PD. Surgically, these patients cannot benefit from high frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) since this operation tends to even aggravate axial symptoms unresponsive to L-Dopa in some patients. A dysfunction of the pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) might be at the origin of these axial symptoms, since the PPN participates in the maintenance of posture and motion in primates. In PD patients, recent reports have suggested that low frequency stimulation of the PPN may equally improve gait and posture. However, these results are debatable due to methodological limitations, insufficient clinical evaluation and uncertain anatomical targeting. Thus, our aim is to propose a low frequency PPN stimulation to six advanced PD patients according to the usual criteria for STN DBS who are, however, unsuitable for this operation due to gait and posture disorders. We will perform a randomized, double-blind and cross over design (two months periods with and without DBS randomly assigned to each patient). The targeting will be allowed by a a three-dimensional and deformable atlas of the basal ganglia fusioned with the stereotaxic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of each patient. Evaluations will comprise 1 month before surgery and in "Off" and "On" stimulation condition:
- clinical motor assessment in both "Off" and "On" drug state, including cardinal parkinsonian signs, gait and balance
- gait initiation physiological evaluation
- cognitive and behavioral testing If our hypothesis is confirmed, low frequency PPN stimulation may well represent a substantial improvement of our therapeutic options for advanced PD patients suffering from debilitating gait and posture disorders unresponsive to L-Dopa.
- Conditions
- Parkinson's Disease
- Being tested
- Low frequency DBS of the pedunculopontine nucleus
- Medical subject headings
- Parkinson Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Low frequency DBS of the pedunculopontine nucleusDevice
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| OFF PPN DBS-ON PPN DBS | Other | Patients randomly allocated to the order OFF Low frequency DBS of the pedunculopontine nucleus then ON Low frequency DBS of the pedunculopontine nucleus Receives: Device: Low frequency DBS of the pedunculopontine nucleus |
| ON PPN DBS - OFF PPN DBS | Other | Patients randomly allocated to the order ON Low frequency DBS of the pedunculopontine nucleus then OFF Low frequency DBS of the pedunculopontine nucleus Receives: Device: Low frequency DBS of the pedunculopontine nucleus |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change of Rating scale for gait evaluation between 'Off stim off drug" and "On stim off drug" conditions
The primary outcome criteria will be the comparison between RSGE total score in obtained 'Off' and 'On' stimulation conditions either at 4 or 6 months after surgery according to the randomized order of the cross-over
Measured: 4 months and 6 months after surgery
Secondary outcomes (15)
Adverse events records
Measured: 1 month before surgery, 1-2-3-4-5-6 months after surgery
Change of UPDRS part 3 score between "Off Stim Off drug" and "ON stim Off drug" conditions
Measured: 4 and 6 months after surgery
Change of Rating scale for gait evaluation between 'Off stim on drug" and "On stim on drug" conditions
Measured: 4 and 6 months after surgery
Change of UPDRS part 3 score between "Off Stim On drug" and "ON stim On drug" conditions
Measured: 4 and 6 months after surgery
Change of UPDRS part 3 score between "Off Stim Off drug" and "No stim Off drug" conditions
Measured: 1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of UPDRS part 3 score between "Off Stim On drug" and "No stim On drug" conditions
Measured: 1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of Rating scale for gait evaluation between 'Off stim Off drug" and "No stim off drug" conditions
Measured: 1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of Rating scale for gait evaluation between 'Off stim On drug" and "No stim on drug" conditions
Measured: 1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of Rating scale for gait evaluation between 'On stim Off drug" and "No stim off drug" conditions
Measured: 1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of Rating scale for gait evaluation between 'On stim On drug" and "No stim On drug" conditions
Measured: 1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of gait physiological parameters between "Off Stim Off drug" and "ON stim Off drug" conditions
Measured: 4 and 6 months after surgery
Change of gait physiological parameters between "Off Stim On drug" and "ON stim On drug" conditions
Measured: 4 and 6 months after surgery
Change of gait physiological parameters between "No Stim On drug" and "Off stim On drug" conditions
Measured: 1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of gait physiological parameters between "No Stim Off drug" and "On stim off drug" conditions
Measured: 1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of gait physiological parameters between "No Stim Off drug" and "Off stim off drug" conditions
Measured: 1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2009
- Primary completionMay 2012
- Study completionMay 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Parkinson's DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 6 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, David Grabli, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02055261
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RBM C08-07
- Status last verified
- Feb 2014
- First submitted
- 16 Jan 2014
- Last updated
- 5 Feb 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Feb 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Low Frequency Deep Brain Stimulation of the Pedunculopontine Nucleus on Gait and Balance Disorders of Parkinson's Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02055261
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RBM C08-07
- Conditions
- Parkinson's Disease
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 6 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Pitié-Salpêtrière HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2009
- Primary completion
- May 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The appearance of postural instability and gait disorders is a major turning point in the evolution of Parkinson's disease (PD). These axial symptoms are usually unresponsive to L-Dopa and represent a severe impairment for the patients due to frequent falls and reduced outside mobility. There is no effective pharmacological treatment available for these symptoms, and their pathophysiology is not well known : it is currently assumed that non-dopaminergic brainstem lesions participate to axial symptoms in PD. Surgically, these patients cannot benefit from high frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) since this operation tends to even aggravate axial symptoms unresponsive to L-Dopa in some patients. A dysfunction of the pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) might be at the origin of these axial symptoms, since the PPN participates in the maintenance of posture and motion in primates. In PD patients, recent reports have suggested that low frequency stimulation of the PPN may equally improve gait and posture. However, these results are debatable due to methodological limitations, insufficient clinical evaluation and uncertain anatomical targeting. Thus, our aim is to propose a low frequency PPN stimulation to six advanced PD patients according to the usual criteria for STN DBS who are, however, unsuitable for this operation due to gait and posture disorders. We will perform a randomized, double-blind and cross over design (two months periods with and without DBS randomly assigned to each patient). The targeting will be allowed by a a three-dimensional and deformable atlas of the basal ganglia fusioned with the stereotaxic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of each patient. Evaluations will comprise 1 month before surgery and in "Off" and "On" stimulation condition:
- clinical motor assessment in both "Off" and "On" drug state, including cardinal parkinsonian signs, gait and balance
- gait initiation physiological evaluation
- cognitive and behavioral testing If our hypothesis is confirmed, low frequency PPN stimulation may well represent a substantial improvement of our therapeutic options for advanced PD patients suffering from debilitating gait and posture disorders unresponsive to L-Dopa.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| OFF PPN DBS-ON PPN DBS | Other | Device: Low frequency DBS of the pedunculopontine nucleusPatients randomly allocated to the order OFF Low frequency DBS of the pedunculopontine nucleus then ON Low frequency DBS of the pedunculopontine nucleus |
| ON PPN DBS - OFF PPN DBS | Other | Device: Low frequency DBS of the pedunculopontine nucleusPatients randomly allocated to the order ON Low frequency DBS of the pedunculopontine nucleus then OFF Low frequency DBS of the pedunculopontine nucleus |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Parkinson's disease
- Age < 70 and > = 18 years
- Improvement > or = 50 % during acute levodopa test
- Score > or = 2 on item 29 of UPDRS part 3 score obtained in "off" drug state
- No previous DBS
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Contra indication to surgery
- Contra indication to MRI
- Severe life threatening comorbidity
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Low frequency DBS of the pedunculopontine nucleus | Device | OFF PPN DBS-ON PPN DBS, ON PPN DBS - OFF PPN DBS |
Primary outcome
Change of Rating scale for gait evaluation between 'Off stim off drug" and "On stim off drug" conditions
Time frame: 4 months and 6 months after surgery
The primary outcome criteria will be the comparison between RSGE total score in obtained 'Off' and 'On' stimulation conditions either at 4 or 6 months after surgery according to the randomized order of the cross-over
15 secondary outcomes
Adverse events records
Time frame: 1 month before surgery, 1-2-3-4-5-6 months after surgery
Change of UPDRS part 3 score between "Off Stim Off drug" and "ON stim Off drug" conditions
Time frame: 4 and 6 months after surgery
Change of Rating scale for gait evaluation between 'Off stim on drug" and "On stim on drug" conditions
Time frame: 4 and 6 months after surgery
Change of UPDRS part 3 score between "Off Stim On drug" and "ON stim On drug" conditions
Time frame: 4 and 6 months after surgery
Change of UPDRS part 3 score between "Off Stim Off drug" and "No stim Off drug" conditions
Time frame: 1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of UPDRS part 3 score between "Off Stim On drug" and "No stim On drug" conditions
Time frame: 1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of Rating scale for gait evaluation between 'Off stim Off drug" and "No stim off drug" conditions
Time frame: 1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of Rating scale for gait evaluation between 'Off stim On drug" and "No stim on drug" conditions
Time frame: 1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of Rating scale for gait evaluation between 'On stim Off drug" and "No stim off drug" conditions
Time frame: 1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of Rating scale for gait evaluation between 'On stim On drug" and "No stim On drug" conditions
Time frame: 1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of gait physiological parameters between "Off Stim Off drug" and "ON stim Off drug" conditions
Time frame: 4 and 6 months after surgery
Change of gait physiological parameters between "Off Stim On drug" and "ON stim On drug" conditions
Time frame: 4 and 6 months after surgery
Change of gait physiological parameters between "No Stim On drug" and "Off stim On drug" conditions
Time frame: 1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of gait physiological parameters between "No Stim Off drug" and "On stim off drug" conditions
Time frame: 1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of gait physiological parameters between "No Stim Off drug" and "Off stim off drug" conditions
Time frame: 1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Feb 2014.
Related trials for Parkinson's Disease
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Early Molecular Biomarkers for Differentiating Parkinsonian Syndromes
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Atypical Parkinsonism
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stromal Cells-derived Exosomes in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson Disease (PD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Adaptive DBS to Offset STN Dysregulation During Exercise in PD
Parkinson Disease
Not yet recruiting
Compulsive Eating and Brain's Reward System in Different Pathologies
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Bipolar 1 Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Effect of the Zeen Mobility Device on Clinical Practicality, Safety, and Impact (Via Assessments of Walking, Standing Tolerance, Balance, Endurance, Effort, and Participation in Daily Tasks) in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting for Individuals With Mobility Impairments.
Stroke, Parkinson's Disease (PD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Low frequency DBS of the pedunculopontine nucleus in people with Parkinson's Disease, run by Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Feb 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change of Rating scale for gait evaluation between 'Off stim off drug" and "On stim off drug" conditions (time frame: 4 months and 6 months after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Feb 2014.