Conductive Hearing LossNCT02064478
Clinical Survey of Oticon Medical Ponto Implants and a Surgical Technique With Tissue Preservation
An observational study of Conductive Hearing Loss and Mixed Hearing Loss, run by Oticon Medical at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
A bone anchored hearing system is used to improve hearing for patients with e.g. conductive/mixed hearing loss or single sided deafness. With this type of system, a titanium implant is installed in the temporal bone, where it osseointegrates, i.e. integrates with the bone. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Conductive Hearing Loss, Mixed Hearing Loss, Single Sided Deafness
- How many people
- 25 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- Feb 2014to Sep 2017
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All patients to be included are already planned for treatment with a bone anchored hearing aid at Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre (Nijmegen, The Netherlands).
Who may be able to join
- 18 years or older
- Patient indicated for an ear level bone anchored sound processor
- Bone thickness at the implant site of at least 4 mm
Who cannot join
- Inability to participate in follow-up
- Psychiatric disease in the medical history
- Mental disability
- Presumed doubt, for any reason, that the patient will be able to show up on all follow ups
- Diseases or treatments known to compromise the bone quality at the implant site, e.g. radiotherapy, osteoporosis, diabetes mellitus.
- Patients with natural skin height of >10 mm
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
A bone anchored hearing system is used to improve hearing for patients with e.g. conductive/mixed hearing loss or single sided deafness.
With this type of system, a titanium implant is installed in the temporal bone, where it osseointegrates, i.e. integrates with the bone. An abutment (also in titanium) is attached to the implants and penetrates the skin. The sound processor (hearing aid) is then connected to the abutment, and can be attached and removed by the patient via a snap-coupling. This type of system has been successfully implanted in more than 100.000 patients. Recently, a simplified surgical procedure, where no skin thinning around the abutment is made, was approved. The results after using this installation technique, here called soft tissue preservation, are the focus of this study.
The objective of the study is to compare the outcomes after a surgical procedure with soft tissue preservation (test) and a surgery with soft tissue reduction (control) for placing Oticon Medical Ponto implants and abutments. The main hypothesis is that patient numbness around the implant is less in the test group compared to the control group.
- Keywords
- Bone anchored hearing implant, Bone anchored hearing device
- Medical subject headings
- Hearing Loss, Conductive, Hearing Loss, Mixed Conductive-Sensorineural
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tissue preservation | Ponto implant installed using a tissue preservation surgical technique | |
| Tissue reduction | Ponto implant installed using a classical technique with skin thinning |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Numbness around implant, specifically mean Total sensibility
Measured: 36 months after surgery
Secondary outcomes (48)
Length of surgery
Measured: At surgery
Sum of number of unplanned visits, revision surgeries, medications related to implant, and other treatments requiring medical staff per patient
Measured: 0-6 months
Mild/Adverse skin reaction
Adverse skin reaction is defined as a Holgers score ≥ 2 at least one follow-up visit, including unplanned visits, during the analysis period Holgers score is a standardized score of skin reactions around a bone anchored hearing implant.
Measured: 0-6 months
Skin condition according to Holgers
Holgers score is a standardized score of skin reactions around a bone anchored hearing implant.
Measured: 7 days after surgery
Postoperative complications
Including
- Bleeding or hematoma
- Flap necrosis
- Wound dehiscence
- Other (description)
Measured: 7 days to 6 months
Proportion of patients with complete wound healing at first surgical visit
Measured: 7 days
Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) scores
Measured: 3 months
Glasgow Health Status Inventory (GHSI) scores
Measured: Baseline (before surgery)
Abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit (APHAB) scores
Measured: Baseline (before surgery)
Mean hours of use of the sound processor
Measured: 0-6 months
Sum of number of unplanned visits, revision surgeries, medications related to implant, and other treatments requiring medical staff per patient
Measured: 0-12 months
Sum of number of unplanned visits, revision surgeries, medications related to implant, and other treatments requiring medical staff per patient
Measured: 0-36 months
Bone conduction (BC) in-situ audiometric thresholds
Measured: 6 months
Bone conduction (BC) audiometric threshold
Measured with B-71
Measured: 6 months
Mean total sensibility around implant
Measured: Baseline (before surgery)
Implant stability quotient (ISQ)
Measured: At surgery
Time to implant loss
Measured: 0-36 months
Patient and Observer scar assessment score
Measured: 21 days post surgery
Mild/Adverse skin reaction
Adverse skin reaction is defined as a Holgers score ≥ 2 at least one follow-up visit, including unplanned visits, during the analysis period
Measured: 0-12 months
Mild/Adverse skin reaction
Adverse skin reaction is defined as a Holgers score ≥ 2 at least one follow-up visit, including unplanned visits, during the analysis period
Measured: 0-36 months
Skin condition according to Holgers
Measured: 21 days
Skin condition according to Holgers
Measured: 12 weeks
Skin condition according to Holgers
Measured: 6 months
Skin condition according to Holgers
Measured: 1 year
Skin condition according to Holgers
Measured: 2 years
Skin condition according to Holgers
Measured: 3 years after surgery
Postoperative complications
Including
- Bleeding or hematoma
- Flap necrosis
- Wound dehiscence
- Other (description)
Measured: 7 days to 12 months
Postoperative complications
Including
- Bleeding or hematoma
- Flap necrosis
- Wound dehiscence
- Other (description)
Measured: 7 days to 36 months
Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) scores
Measured: 12 months
Glasgow Health Status Inventory (GHSI) scores
Measured: 6 months
Glasgow Health Status Inventory (GHSI) scores
Measured: 36 months
Abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit (APHAB) scores
Measured: 6 months
Abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit (APHAB) scores
Measured: 36 months
Mean hours of use of the sound processor
Measured: 0-36 months
Mean total sensibility around implant
Measured: 21 days
Mean total sensibility around implant
Measured: 6 months
Mean total sensibility around implant
Measured: 12 months
Mean total sensibility around implant
Measured: 36 months
Implant stability quotient (ISQ)
Measured: 7 days post surgery
Implant stability quotient (ISQ)
Measured: 21 days post surgery
Implant stability quotient (ISQ)
Measured: 12 weeks post surgery
Implant stability quotient (ISQ)
Measured: 6 months post surgery
Implant stability quotient (ISQ)
Measured: 12 months post surgery
Implant stability quotient (ISQ)
Measured: 24 months post surgery
Implant stability quotient (ISQ)
Measured: 36 months post surgery
Patient and Observer scar assessment score
Measured: 6 months
Patient and Observer scar assessment score
Measured: 12 months
Patient and Observer scar assessment score
Measured: 36 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2014
- Primary completionApr 2015
- Study completionSep 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Conductive Hearing LossStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Oticon Medical
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Statistiska Konsultgruppen
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Myrthe KS Hol, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Radboud University Medical CenterEmmanuel AM Mylanus, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Radboud University Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02064478
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- C47
- Status last verified
- Feb 2018
- First submitted
- 14 Feb 2014
- Last updated
- 22 Feb 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
den Besten CA, Bosman AJ, Nelissen RC, Mylanus EA, Hol MK. Controlled Clinical Trial on Bone-anchored Hearing Implants and a Surgical Technique With Soft-tissue Preservation. Otol Neurotol. 2016 Jun;37(5):504-12. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000994.
PubMed 26945315
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Feb 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Survey of Oticon Medical Ponto Implants and a Surgical Technique With Tissue Preservation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02064478
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- C47
- Keywords
- Bone anchored hearing implant, Bone anchored hearing device
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Oticon MedicalIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Statistiska Konsultgruppen
- Study start
- Feb 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A bone anchored hearing system is used to improve hearing for patients with e.g. conductive/mixed hearing loss or single sided deafness.
With this type of system, a titanium implant is installed in the temporal bone, where it osseointegrates, i.e. integrates with the bone. An abutment (also in titanium) is attached to the implants and penetrates the skin. The sound processor (hearing aid) is then connected to the abutment, and can be attached and removed by the patient via a snap-coupling. This type of system has been successfully implanted in more than 100.000 patients. Recently, a simplified surgical procedure, where no skin thinning around the abutment is made, was approved. The results after using this installation technique, here called soft tissue preservation, are the focus of this study.
The objective of the study is to compare the outcomes after a surgical procedure with soft tissue preservation (test) and a surgery with soft tissue reduction (control) for placing Oticon Medical Ponto implants and abutments. The main hypothesis is that patient numbness around the implant is less in the test group compared to the control group.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tissue preservation | – | –Ponto implant installed using a tissue preservation surgical technique |
| Tissue reduction | – | –Ponto implant installed using a classical technique with skin thinning |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All patients to be included are already planned for treatment with a bone anchored hearing aid at Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre (Nijmegen, The Netherlands).
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- 18 years or older
- Patient indicated for an ear level bone anchored sound processor
- Bone thickness at the implant site of at least 4 mm
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Inability to participate in follow-up
- Psychiatric disease in the medical history
- Mental disability
- Presumed doubt, for any reason, that the patient will be able to show up on all follow ups
- Diseases or treatments known to compromise the bone quality at the implant site, e.g. radiotherapy, osteoporosis, diabetes mellitus.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Numbness around implant, specifically mean Total sensibility
Time frame: 36 months after surgery
48 secondary outcomes
Length of surgery
Time frame: At surgery
Sum of number of unplanned visits, revision surgeries, medications related to implant, and other treatments requiring medical staff per patient
Time frame: 0-6 months
Mild/Adverse skin reaction
Time frame: 0-6 months
Skin condition according to Holgers
Time frame: 7 days after surgery
Postoperative complications
Time frame: 7 days to 6 months
Proportion of patients with complete wound healing at first surgical visit
Time frame: 7 days
Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) scores
Time frame: 3 months
Glasgow Health Status Inventory (GHSI) scores
Time frame: Baseline (before surgery)
Abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit (APHAB) scores
Time frame: Baseline (before surgery)
Mean hours of use of the sound processor
Time frame: 0-6 months
Sum of number of unplanned visits, revision surgeries, medications related to implant, and other treatments requiring medical staff per patient
Time frame: 0-12 months
Sum of number of unplanned visits, revision surgeries, medications related to implant, and other treatments requiring medical staff per patient
Time frame: 0-36 months
Bone conduction (BC) in-situ audiometric thresholds
Time frame: 6 months
Bone conduction (BC) audiometric threshold
Time frame: 6 months
Mean total sensibility around implant
Time frame: Baseline (before surgery)
Implant stability quotient (ISQ)
Time frame: At surgery
Time to implant loss
Time frame: 0-36 months
Patient and Observer scar assessment score
Time frame: 21 days post surgery
Mild/Adverse skin reaction
Time frame: 0-12 months
Mild/Adverse skin reaction
Time frame: 0-36 months
Skin condition according to Holgers
Time frame: 21 days
Skin condition according to Holgers
Time frame: 12 weeks
Skin condition according to Holgers
Time frame: 6 months
Skin condition according to Holgers
Time frame: 1 year
Skin condition according to Holgers
Time frame: 2 years
Skin condition according to Holgers
Time frame: 3 years after surgery
Postoperative complications
Time frame: 7 days to 12 months
Postoperative complications
Time frame: 7 days to 36 months
Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) scores
Time frame: 12 months
Glasgow Health Status Inventory (GHSI) scores
Time frame: 6 months
Glasgow Health Status Inventory (GHSI) scores
Time frame: 36 months
Abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit (APHAB) scores
Time frame: 6 months
Abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit (APHAB) scores
Time frame: 36 months
Mean hours of use of the sound processor
Time frame: 0-36 months
Mean total sensibility around implant
Time frame: 21 days
Mean total sensibility around implant
Time frame: 6 months
Mean total sensibility around implant
Time frame: 12 months
Mean total sensibility around implant
Time frame: 36 months
Implant stability quotient (ISQ)
Time frame: 7 days post surgery
Implant stability quotient (ISQ)
Time frame: 21 days post surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Feb 2018.
- Background: PubMed 26945315den Besten CA, Bosman AJ, Nelissen RC, Mylanus EA, Hol MK. Controlled Clinical Trial on Bone-anchored Hearing Implants and a Surgical Technique With Soft-tissue Preservation. Otol Neurotol. 2016 Jun;37(5):504-12. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000994.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Conductive Hearing Loss
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Post-Market Registry Study for Vibrant Hearing Solutions
Conductive Hearing Loss, Mixed Hearing Loss
Not yet recruiting
Outcomes of Cartilage Tympanoplasty in Children
Tympanic Membrane Perforation, Conductive Hearing Loss
Recruiting
Evaluation of Flexible Conductive Hearing Aids
Conductive Hearing Loss
RecruitingObservational study
Pilot Study to Evaluate the Long-term Chronic Care of Patients Who Could or do Utilize an Osseointegrated Device (OID)
Hearing Loss, Conductive, Hearing Loss, Mixed
Recruiting
Post-market Evaluation of the Transition From the Baha Connect System to the Osia System in Adult Bone Conduction Implant Recipients
Bone Conduction, Hearing Loss, Conductive
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Myrthe KS Hol, MD, PhD principal investigator
Radboud University Medical Center
Emmanuel AM Mylanus, MD, PhD principal investigator
Radboud University Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Conductive Hearing Loss and Mixed Hearing Loss, run by Oticon Medical at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Numbness around implant, specifically mean Total sensibility (time frame: 36 months after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02064478, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Feb 2018.