AzTrials
AzTrials

Barrett's EsophagusNCT02066233

Prospective Study to Compare the Efficacy of E.G.Scan to Detect Barrett's Esophagus Compared With Standard Endoscopy

A study testing EG Scan II (transnasal endoscopy) and Standard Endoscopy in people with Barrett's Esophagus, run by Mayo Clinic at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a disposable nasal endoscope called "E.G. Scan II" will visualize the esophagus as well as the standard test, sedated endoscopy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Barrett's Esophagus
What is being tested?
EG Scan II (transnasal endoscopy) and Standard Endoscopy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Mar 2014to Mar 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult participants aged 18 years or above who are scheduled for routine upper GI endoscopy for Barrett's Esophagus surveillance, varices surveillance and dyspepsia.
  • Able and willing to give informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Patients known to be intolerant to endoscopy.
  • Patients with frequent epistaxis.
  • Patients not clinically fit for endoscopy as judged by their care team.
  • Pregnant women.
  • Patients with allergy/sensitivity to Simethicone (Mylicon), Phenylephrine, Lidocaine nasal spray, Benzocaine spray (Topex)
  • Use of anticoagulants or antiplatelets.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a disposable nasal endoscope called "E.G. Scan II" will visualize the esophagus as well as the standard test, sedated endoscopy.

Read the detailed description

All subjects underwent two procedures: the E.G.Scan II followed by standard endoscopy in a tandem design. The E.G. Scan II is a transnasal endoscope system to capture and transmit images of the esophagus. Captured images can be reviewed via the E.G. View for diagnosis of diseases related to the esophagus. Generally, the commercial esophagoscope system has reusable probes, but E.G. Scan™ II has a single use probe because reusable probes have the risk of infection and pollution.

Prior to the E.G.Scan, subjects received a standard prep for the procedure. The two procedures were performed by two different experienced endoscopists who were blinded to the indication of the procedure. At both procedures a note was made of any abnormality of the esophagus. Every subject with an endoscopic diagnosis of Barrett's Esophagus had clinical biopsies taken to confirm diagnosis. Subject tolerability was measured with a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 represented the "worst experience" and 10 the "best experience."

Being tested
EG Scan II (transnasal endoscopy), Standard Endoscopy
Keywords
Barrett's, esophagus, reflux, heartburn, screening
Medical subject headings
Barrett Esophagus, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Heartburn

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EG Scan II (transnasal endoscopy)Device

  • Standard EndoscopyProcedure or surgery

Study groups in NCT02066233
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Subjects with Barrett's EsophagusActive comparatorAll subjects will receive transnasal endoscopy (EG Scan II) followed by standard endoscopy.
Receives: Device: EG Scan II (transnasal endoscopy); Procedure: Standard Endoscopy
Subjects with Reflux and/or HeartburnActive comparatorAll subjects will receive EG Scan II (transnasal endoscopy) followed by standard endoscopy.
Receives: Device: EG Scan II (transnasal endoscopy); Procedure: Standard Endoscopy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Median Tolerability Score on 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    On the 10-point VAS, 0 represented the "worst experience" and 10 the "best experience."

    Measured: Within 48 hours

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Preference for Either of the Two Procedures, EG II Scan Versus Standard Endoscopy

    Subjects were asked the following question: "Based on the overall experience (including need for sedation, ability to drive, time off work, procedure comfort, procedure time, etc.). Which procedure would you prefer to have in the future?" Possible answers were: Nasal camera test (EG), oral camera test (Gastroscopy), or either test.

    Measured: Two weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Feb 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2014
  3. Primary completionOct 2015
  4. Study completionMar 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02066233
Sponsor's protocol ID
13-008214
Status last verified
Jun 2017
First submitted
3 Feb 2014
Last updated
6 Jul 2017
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Sami SS, Iyer PG, Pophali P, Halland M, di Pietro M, Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo J, White JR, Johnson M, Guha IN, Fitzgerald RC, Ragunath K. Acceptability, Accuracy, and Safety of Disposable Transnasal Capsule Endoscopy for Barrett's Esophagus Screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Mar;17(4):638-646.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.07.019. Epub 2018 Aug 3.

    PubMed 30081223

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing EG Scan II (transnasal endoscopy) and Standard Endoscopy in people with Barrett's Esophagus, run by Mayo Clinic at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Jul 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Median Tolerability Score on 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (time frame: Within 48 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02066233, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jul 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in