AzTrials
AzTrials

Lupus Erythematosus, SystemicPhase 2NCT02070978

Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Atacicept (Long-term Follow-Up of Participant Who Participated in ADDRESS II)

A Phase 2 study testing Atacicept 75 mg and Atacicept 150 mg in people with Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, run by EMD Serono at 84 sites in 17 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a multicenter, double-blind, Phase 2b, long-term extension (LTE) to the ADDRESS II core trial (EMR 700461-023) (NCT01972568), to evaluate long-term safety and tolerability of atacicept in participants with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
What is being tested?
Atacicept 75 mg and Atacicept 150 mg
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
253 participants
Where
84 sitesin 17 countries
Study dates
29 Jul 2014to 9 Feb 2018
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants who had completed the 24-week treatment period of study EMR-700461-023 (ADDRESS II core trial)
  • Women of childbearing potential who had a negative pregnancy test
  • Other protocol defined inclusion criteria were applied

Who cannot join

  • Active neurological symptoms of SLE that were deemed severe or progressive
  • Diagnosis of any demyelinating disease, such as, but not restricted to, multiple sclerosis (MS) or optic neuritis
  • Pregnancy
  • Active clinically significant viral, bacterial, or fungal infection, or any major episode of infection that in the investigator's opinion makes the participants unsuitable to continued participation in the study
  • Other protocol defined exclusion criteria were applied

Trial locations and contacts

84 sites in 17 countries.

84 sites in 17 countries

United States23 sites
  • Pinnacle Research Group LLC

    Anniston, Alabama, 36207

  • Austin Regional Clinic, P.A.

    Austin, Texas, 78731

  • Wallace Rheumatic Study Center

    Beverly Hills, California, 90211

  • University of Alabama at Birmingham - (UAB)

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35294

  • Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC)

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29425

  • DJL Clinical Research, PLLC

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210

  • Clinical Research of West Florida - Corporate

    Clearwater, Florida, 33765

  • MetroHealth System

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44109

  • Southern California Permenent Medical Group

    Fontana, California, 92335

  • AA MRC LLC Ahmed Arif Medical Research Center

    Grand Blanc, Michigan, 48439

  • The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research

    Manhasset, New York, 11031

  • Hospital for Special Surgery

    New York, New York, 10021

  • Rutgers New Jersey Medical School

    Newark, New Jersey, 07103

  • Arthritis & Rheumatology Center of Oklahoma

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103

  • OMRF

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104

  • Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

  • East Bay Rheumatology Medical Group, Inc.

    San Leandro, California, 94578

  • Washington University

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • Clayton Medical Associates, P.C.

    St Louis, Missouri, 63117

  • Clinical Research of West Florida, Inc.

    Tampa, Florida, 33603

  • McIlwain Medical Group, PA

    Tampa, Florida, 33613

  • Little River Arthritis & Osteoporosis Clinic

    Waco, Texas, 76708

  • Clinical Research Center of Reading LLC

    Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, 19610

Other trials in United States

Argentina10 sites
  • Organizacion Medica de Investigacion (OMI)

    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1015ABO

  • APRILLUS

    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1046AAQ

  • Atencion Integral en Reumatologia (AIR)

    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1426AAL

  • Hospital Privado Centro Medico de Cordoba

    Córdoba, X5016KEH

  • Instituto CAICI

    Rosario, Santa Fe Province, S2000PBJ

  • Cordis S.A.

    Salta, A4400ANW

  • Centro Polivalente de Asistencia e Inv. Clinica CER

    San Juan, 5400

  • Centro Medico Privado de Reumatologia

    San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province, T4000AXL

  • Centro Integral de Reumatologia

    San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province, T4000DVB

  • Investigaciones Clinicas Tucuman

    San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province, T4000ICL

Other trials in Argentina

Mexico9 sites
  • Investigacion y Biomedicina de Chihuahua, S.C.

    Chihuahua City, 31000

  • Icle S.C.

    Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44600

  • Unidad de Investigacion en Enfermedades Cronico Degenerativas SC

    Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44620

  • Morales Vargas Centro de Investigacion, S.C.

    León, Guanajuato, 37000

  • Centro Multidisciplinario para el desarrollo Especializado de la Investigacion Clinica en Yucatan

    Mérida, Yucatán, 97130

  • Clinstile, S.A. de C.V.

    Mexico City, Mexico City, 06700

  • Accelerium S. de R.L. de C.V.

    Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64000

  • Clinica de Enfermedades Cronicas y de Procedimientos Especiales, S.C.

    Morelia, Michoacán, 58249

  • Hospital Universitario de Saltillo "Dr. Gonzalo Valdés Valdés"

    Saltillo, Coahuila, 25000

Other trials in Mexico

Bulgaria7 sites
  • MHAT "Eurohospital" - Plovdiv, OOD

    Plovdiv, 4002

  • Medical Center "Teodora", EOOD

    Rousse, 7000

  • MHAT - Ruse, AD

    Rousse, 7002

  • UMHAT "Sv. Ivan Rilski", EAD

    Sofia, 1431

  • DCC "Sveta Anna", EOOD

    Sofia, 1750

  • Medical Center "Nov Rehabilitatsionen Tsentar", EOOD

    Stara Zagora, 6000

  • MHAT-Targovishte, AD

    Targovishte, 7700

Other trials in Bulgaria

Chile6 sites
  • Corporacion de Beneficencia Osorno

    Osorno, 5290000

  • Quantum Research Santiago

    Puerto Varas, 5550170

  • Centro Medico Prosalud

    Santiago, 7500000

  • Biomedica

    Santiago, 7500710

  • Centro de Estudios Reumatologicos

    Santiago, 7501126

  • CINVEC - Centro de Investigacion Clinica V Region

    Viña del Mar

Other trials in Chile

Russia6 sites
  • FSBEI HE " First Moscow State Medical University n.a. I.M. Sechenov" of the MoH of the RF

    Moscow, 119992

  • SBIH of Republic Kareliya "Republican Hospital n.a. V.A. Baranov"

    Petrozavodsk, 185019

  • SPb SBIH "Clinical Rheumatological Hospital # 25"

    Saint Petersburg, 190068

  • SIH "Saratov City Clinical Hospital # 12"

    Saratov, 410039

  • SBIH of Vladimir region "Regional Clinical Hospital"

    Vladimir, 600023

  • SBHI of Yaroslavl Region "Clinical Hospital # 8"

    Yaroslavl, 150003

Other trials in Russia

Philippines4 sites
  • Angeles University Foundation Medical Center

    Angeles City, Pampanga, 2009

  • Mary Mediatrix Medical Center

    Batangas, 4127

  • Davao Doctors Hospital

    Davao City, 8000

  • Iloilo Doctors Hospital

    Iloilo City, 5000

Other trials in Philippines

Peru3 sites
  • Hogar Clínica San Juan de Dios - Arequipa

    Arequipa, 00000

  • Clinica Medica Cayetano Heredia

    Lima, Lima 31

  • Invest Clinicas Sac Inst de Ginecologia y Reproduccion

    Lima, Lima 33

Other trials in Peru

South Korea3 sites
  • Seoul National University Hospital

    Seoul, Gyeonggi-do, 110744

  • Konkuk University Medical Center

    Seoul, 05030

  • Ajou University Hospital

    Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, 16499

Other trials in South Korea

United Kingdom3 sites
  • University College London Hospitals

    London, Greater London, NW1 2PG

  • Guy's Hospital

    London, Greater London, SE1 7EH

  • Queen's Hospital

    Romford, Essex, RM7 0AG

Other trials in United Kingdom

Czechia2 sites
  • Revmatologicky Ustav

    Prague, 128 50

  • Revmatologicka ambulance

    Uherské Hradiště, 686 01

Other trials in Czechia

Germany2 sites
  • Charite Universitaetsmedizin Berlin - Campus Charite Mitte

    Berlin, 13353

  • Universitaetsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz

    Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, 55131

Other trials in Germany

South Africa2 sites
  • Naidoo, A

    Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, 4319

  • Winelands Medical Research Centre

    Stellenbosch, Western Cape, 7600

Other trials in South Africa

Brazil1 site
  • Centro de Pesquisas em Diabetes Ltda.

    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-170

Other trials in Brazil

Italy1 site
  • Fondazione IRCCS CA' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico

    Milan, 20122

Other trials in Italy

Poland1 site
  • Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 2 im.dr J. Biziela

    Bydgoszcz, 85-168

Other trials in Poland

Spain1 site
  • Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valladolid

    Valladolid, 47005

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: A Phase IIb, Multi-Center, Long-Term Extension Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Atacicept in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Who Completed Protocol EMR-700461-023 (ADDRESS II)

This is a multicenter, double-blind, Phase 2b, long-term extension (LTE) to the ADDRESS II core trial (EMR 700461-023) (NCT01972568), to evaluate long-term safety and tolerability of atacicept in participants with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Participants who completed the 24-week core study ADDRESS II core study (NCT01972568) and thus not met any of the discontinuation criteria were invited to enter this long-term extension (LTE) study NCT02070978.

Being tested
Atacicept 75 mg, Atacicept 150 mg
Keywords
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Atacicept 75 and 150 mg, LTE
Medical subject headings
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Atacicept 75 mgDrug

    Participants who received atacicept 75 milligram (mg) as once-weekly subcutaneous injection in the core study ADDRESS II continued to receive this dose during this LTE study. Participants in this reporting arm received the medication up to a maximum of 143.7 weeks.

  • Atacicept 150 mgDrug

    Participants who received placebo in the core study ADDRESS II switched to receive atacicept 150 mg as once-weekly subcutaneous injection for up to a maximum of 97.7 weeks during this LTE study.

  • Atacicept 150 mgDrug

    Participants who received atacicept 150 mg in core study ADDRESS II continued to receive atacicept 150 mg as once-weekly subcutaneous injection during this LTE study up to a maximum of 97.9 weeks.

Study groups in NCT02070978
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Atacicept 75 mgExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Atacicept 75 mg
Atacicept 150 mgExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Atacicept 150 mg
Placebo/Atacicept 150 mgExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Atacicept 150 mg

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During the Treatment Period

    An Adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug or worsening of pre-existing medical condition, whether or not related to study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. An AE was considered as 'treatment emergent' if it occurred after the first drug administration of each period or if it was present prior to drug administration but exacerbated after the drug administration. Treatment- Emergent adverse events (TEAEs) during the treatment period exclude those ongoing at the time of study entry into 024 LTE Day 1 and exclude the safety follow-up period.

    Measured: Baseline (LTE Day 1) up to maximum treatment duration of 143.7 weeks

  2. Number of Participants Who Prematurely Discontinued the Treatment Due to Adverse Event (AE)

    An Adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug or worsening of pre-existing medical condition, whether or not related to study drug. TEAEs were defined as events with an onset date on or after the date of first dose of study treatment in the core study and ongoing at the 024 LTE study entry, occurring during the 024 LTE study and the Safety follow-up Period.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1 of Core study) up to maximum duration of 167.7 weeks

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Change From Baseline in Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology (SLICC/ACR) Damage Index Organ Damage Scores

    SLICC/ACR score or damage index evaluates cumulative damage in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). These changes may or may not be related to SLE. Most items are scored only if they have been present for at least 6 months. Scores range from 0 to 47 points, with higher scores indicating greater cumulative damage. Baseline was defined as Day 1 of Core study.

    Measured: Baseline: Day 1 (Core Study), Day 1 (LTE Study), Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96

  2. Change From Baseline in Disease Activity as Measured by British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) 2004 Score

    BILAG Disease Activity Index evaluates systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) activity in 8 organ system domains: General, mucocutaneous, neurological, musculoskeletal, cardiorespiratory, vasculitis, renal, and hematologic using a separate alphabetic score (A to E) assigned to each organ system defined as follows. BILAG A: Severe disease activity; BILAG B: moderate disease activity; BILAG C: mild disease; BILAG D: system previously affected but now inactive; BILAG E: system never involved. BILAG evaluated by scoring each of a list of signs and symptoms as: improving (1); same (2); worse (3); new (4); not present (0); not done (ND). The total BILAG score is the sum of the scores of the 8 domains where A=9, B=3, C=1, D=0, and E=0. The total score ranges from 0 to 72 with a higher score indicating greater lupus activity.

    Measured: Baseline: Core study Screening, LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96

  3. Change From Baseline in Disease Activity as Measured by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) Score

    SLEDAI-2K is an activity index that measures disease activity and records feature of active lupus as present or not present. SLEDAI-2K uses a weighted checklist to assign a numerical score based on the presence or absence of 24 symptoms. Each symptom present is assigned between 1 and 8 points based on its usual clinical importance, yielding a total score that ranges from 0 points (no symptoms) to 105 points (presence of all defined symptoms). Baseline was defined as core study screening visit.

    Measured: Baseline: Screening Visit (Core Study); LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96

  4. Change From Baseline in Disease Activity as Measured by SLEDAI-2K Responder Index-50 (SRI-50) Score

    SRI-50 index was derived from SLEDAI-2K and could capture 50% or better improvement in each descriptor between any 2 visits in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) participants when there was incomplete resolution. The new assigned scores for the descriptors of SRI-50 were derived by dividing the score of each SLEDAI-2K descriptor by 2. SLEDAI-2K was an activity index that measured disease activity and records feature of active lupus as present or not present. SLEDAI-2K used a weighted checklist to assign a numerical score based on the presence or absence of 24 symptoms. Each symptom present was assigned between 1 and 8 points based on its usual clinical importance, yielding a total score that ranged from 0 points (no symptoms) to 105 points (presence of all defined symptoms).

    Measured: Baseline: Screening Visit (Core Study); LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96

  5. Change From Baseline in Disease Activity as Measured by Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score

    The PGA was used to quantify disease activity and was measured using an anchored visual analog scale (VAS). The participant's current disease activity assessed by investigator in the score range of 0 to 3. Where 0=none; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. The assessment made relative not to the participant's most severe state, but the most severe state of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) per the investigator's assessment. Baseline was defined as core study screening visit.

    Measured: Baseline: Screening Visit (Core Study); LTE Day1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96

  6. Number of Participants Who Achieved SLE Responder Index (SRI-4) Response (a Disease Activity Composite Index)

    SRI-4 response was defined as greater than or equal to 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score and no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA). SLEDAI-2K is an activity index that measures disease activity and records feature of active lupus as present or not present. SLEDAI-2K uses a weighted checklist to assign a numerical score based on the presence or absence of 24 symptoms. Each symptom present is assigned between 1 and 8 points based on its usual clinical importance, yielding a total score that ranges from 0 points (no symptoms) to 105 points (presence of all defined symptoms).

    Measured: Baseline: Core study Screening; LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96

  7. Number of Participants Who Achieved BILAG-based Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response (a Disease Activity Composite Index)

    The BICLA response was defined as BILAG-2004 improvement (all screening visit BILAG A improving to B/C/D, all screening visit BILAG B to C/D, and less than or equal to (<=1) new BILAG B and no new BILAG A); no deterioration in SLEDAI total score; PGA increase by less than (<) 0 percentage (%) (defined as less then (<)0.3 point increase for the statistical analyses) and no non-permitted medication/treatment. Baseline was defined as core study screening visit.

    Measured: Baseline: Core study Screening; LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96

  8. Percent Change From Baseline in Prednisone-equivalent Corticosteroid Dose

    Measured: Baseline: Screening Visit (Core Study); LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96

  9. Change From Baseline in the Short-Form (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Component Score and Mental Component Score

    The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being. These eight subscales were summarized as relating to either physical health or mental health. Physical component summary (PCS) is based primarily on physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health scales and mental component summary (MCS) encompasses vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health scales. Score from mental health, role emotional, social functioning, and vitality domains were averaged to calculate MCS. Total score range for MCS was 0-100 (100=highest level of mental functioning). Score from physical function, role physical, bodily pain, and general health domains were averaged to calculate PCS. Total score range for PCS was 0-100 (100=highest level of physical functioning).

    Measured: Baseline (Core Study Day 1); LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96

  10. Change From Baseline in Lupus Quality of Life (LupusQoL) Questionnaire Score

    The LupusQoL was a lupus-specific health related QoL (HRQoL) questionnaire consisting of 34 items grouped in 8 domains: physical health, pain, planning, intimate relationships, burden to others, emotional health, body image, and fatigue. Participants indicate their responses on a 5-point Likert response format, where 4 = never, 3 = occasionally, 2 = a good bit of the time, 1 = most of the time, and 0 = all of the time. Summary scores can be calculated for all 8 domains. A LupusQoL score for each domain was reported on a 0 to 100 scale, with greater values indicating better HRQoL. Baseline was defined as Day 1 of core study.

    Measured: Baseline (Core Study Day 1); LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, and Week 96

  11. Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

    The PGIC is self-rated scale that asks the participant to describe the change in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions, and overall Quality of life (QoL) related to the participant's painful condition on the following scale: 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (much worse) and 7 (very much worse). Number of participants in the PGIC categories of very much improved (1) and much improved (2) are reported.

    Measured: Baseline (Core Study Day 1); LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96

  12. Change From Baseline in EuroQoL 5 Dimension Instrument (EQ-5D) Score

    EQ-5D questionnaire comprised of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression measured on 3 levels; 1=no problem, 2=moderate problems, 3=extreme problems. This part, called the EQ-5D descriptive system, provides a 5-dimensional description of health status. 5 dimensional 3-level system was converted into single index utility score. Possible values for single index utility score ranged from -0.594 (severe problems in all dimensions) to 1.0 (no problem in all dimensions) on scale where 1 represented best possible health state. Baseline was defined as Day 1 of Core study.

    Measured: Baseline: Day 1 (Core Study), LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96

  13. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores

    EQ-5D is a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 millimeters (mm) (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state. Baseline defined as Day 1 of core study.

    Measured: Baseline: Day 1 (Core Study), LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96

  14. Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Score

    The FACIT-Fatigue score was calculated according to a 13-item questionnaire that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function. It uses a 5-point Likert-type scale (0 = not at all; 1 = a little bit; 2 = somewhat; 3 = quite a bit; 4 = very much). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse possible score) to 52 (best score). A higher score reflected an improvement in the participant's health status.

    Measured: Baseline: Day 1 (Core study); LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96

  15. Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event

    An Adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug or worsening of pre-existing medical condition, whether or not related to study drug. Treatment-Emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are defined as events with an onset date on or after the date of first dose of study treatment in the core study and ongoing at LTE study entry, or occurring during LTE study.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1 of Core study) up to maximum duration of 167.7 weeks

  16. Number of Participants With Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score

    The C-SSRS assesses the suicidal behavior and suicidal ideation in participants. Occurrence of suicidal behavior after study entry is defined as having answered "yes" to a least 1 of the 4 suicidal behavior subcategories (actual attempt, interrupted attempt, aborted attempt, and preparatory acts or behavior). Occurrence of suicidal ideation is defined as having answered "yes" to at least 1 of the suicidal ideation sub-categories (1) wish to be dead, (2) nonspecific active suicidal thoughts, (3) active suicidal ideation with any methods (no plan) without intent to act, (4) active suicidal ideation with some intent to act (without specific plan), and (5) active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent).

    Measured: LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 98

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Feb 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start29 Jul 2014
  3. Primary completion5 Apr 2016
  4. Study completion9 Feb 2018

Why it stopped: The study was terminated early due to shortage of drug supply.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
253 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02070978
Sponsor's protocol ID
700461-024
Other IDs
2013-002758-62
Status last verified
Mar 2019
First submitted
21 Feb 2014
Last updated
21 Mar 2019
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Wallace DJ, Isenberg DA, Morand EF, Vazquez-Mateo C, Kao AH, Aydemir A, Pudota K, Ona V, Aranow C, Merrill JT. Safety and clinical activity of atacicept in the long-term extension of the phase 2b ADDRESS II study in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Nov 3;60(11):5379-5389. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab115.

    PubMed 33547784

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Atacicept 75 mg and Atacicept 150 mg in people with Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, run by EMD Serono at 84 sites in 17 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 84 sites in United States, Argentina, Mexico, Bulgaria, Chile and 12 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Mar 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During the Treatment Period (time frame: Baseline (LTE Day 1) up to maximum treatment duration of 143.7 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02070978, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Mar 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in